Functional outcome and athletic level after arthroscopic repair followed by triple pelvic osteotomy in patients with labral tears resulting from acetabular dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Patients with acetabular dysplasia are at a higher risk of developing symptomatic labral tears. Isolated treatments that address these pathologies are well established. Combined treatment with hip reorientation osteotomy using Bernese periacetabular osteotomy in addition to arthroscopic labral repair show good results. Studies that report the outcome in patients who received both arthroscopic labral repair and a triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) are lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the short to midterm functional outcome and activity level in these patients.

METHODS

This case series retrospectively included 8 patients (2 male, 6 female) with acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≤ 25°) and a labral tear on magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). All patients underwent arthroscopic labral repair followed by TPO after an average period of 3 months (range 2-6). Average age at the time of surgery was 25 years (range 15-37). Patients were followed up and the following main parameters were assessed: LCEA, modified Harris hip score (mHSS), Tegner score, UCLA score, patient satisfaction on a scale of 1-4.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 19 months (range 15-25). The mean LCEA increased from 18° to 37° (p < 0.0001). The mHSS improved from a mean of 79 to 94 on final follow-up (p = 0.00123). The Tegner and UCLA scores had a median of 4 and 5, respectively. The mean LCEA increased from 18° to 37° (p < 0.0001). The mean patient satisfaction was 3.6.

CONCLUSION

Patients with evidence of a labral tear resulting from acetabular dysplasia benefit from arthroscopic repair followed by a TPO. The literature still lacks evidence that labral repair and reorientation osteotomy produce superior outcome compared to osteotomy alone. Treatment should consider clinical presentation in addition to radiological findings with emphasis on MRA.

Quantitative sensory testing in physically active individuals and patients who underwent multidisciplinary pain therapy in the longitudinal course

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences of quantitative sensory testing (QST) results in healthy individuals (group control, n=20), physically active individuals (group sport, n=30) and in patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain (group pain, n=30).

Methods

Thermal detection thresholds, thermal pain thresholds and blunt pressure pain thresholds were measured at various sites (T0). Additionally, group pain was treated in multidisciplinary pain therapy for 4 weeks. All groups were retested after 4 weeks to evaluate the reliability of QST measurements and to investigate possible early changes following treatment (T1).

Results

Importantly, QST-measurements showed stable test results for group sport and group control at both time points. Athletes demonstrated the highest pain thresholds in general (cold pain threshold mean in degree Celsius for the hand: 5.76, lower back right: 7.25, lower back left: 7.53; heat pain threshold mean in degree Celsius for the hand: 46.08, lower back right: 45.77, lower back left: 45.70; and blunt pressure pain mean in kilograms for the hand: 3.54, lower back right: 5.26, lower back left: 5.46). Patients who underwent therapy demonstrated significant differences at T1 (cold pain threshold hand mean in degree Celsius for the hand: 11.12 [T0], 15.12 [T1]; and blunt pressure pain mean in kilograms for the lower back right: 2.87 [T0], 3.56 [T1]). They were capable of enduring higher blunt pressure, but on the other hand cold pain tolerance had decreased (P=0.045 and P=0.019, respectively).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate significant differences of QST results among the three groups and we detected early changes following multidisciplinary pain therapy, which will be discussed.