POS0902 RISK FACTORS FOR LUNG FUNCTION DECLINE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN A LARGE SINGLE-CENTER COHORT

Background

Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is the leading cause of scleroderma-related mortality.

Objectives

This work identifies factors associated with SSc-ILD decline on pulmonary function testing (PFT).

Methods

This single center cohort identified 312 patients with ILD as determined by high resolution chest. 184 patients (59% of 312) completed baseline and serial PFTs (with at least two follow-up PFTs) and were included in this analysis. Mixed linear models were fit to assess the decline in the percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) over time. Demographics, disease factors, autoantibodies, and ILD features were included in the univariate mixed linear model; those achieving a p-value <0.20 were included in the multivariable mixed linear model. Patients were followed longitudinally, with survival as an endpoint identified using the National Death Registry Index, reviewing death certificates, and hospital records.

Results

The 184 patients were an average of 53.2 [12.1] years old; the median [IQR] disease duration from the first non-Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom was 1.8 [0.7, 4.8] years. SSc subtype was diffuse in 55.4% (n=102), limited in 32.6% (n=60), overlap syndrome in 8.2% (n=15), and SSc sine scleroderma in 3.87% (n=7). Serologies were positive for anti-topoisomerase I (ATA), anti-centromere and anti-RNA polymerase III in 31.4% (n=53/169), 10.4% (16/154) and 22.9% (25/109) respectively. Mean ppFVC was 70.8 (18.9) and ppDLco 57.2 (20.8). Whole lung involvement (WLI%) of ≥20% on visual read was found in 49.3% of subjects (74/150 (49.3%)) where quantification was available. Over a median of 4.9 (2.4, 6.8) years, 21 patients (11.4%) died. The ppFVC declined a mean of 0.28/year in the overall group. There were differences in terms of ppFVC decline/year between patients who died in the first 2 years (n=10, -8.28%), 2-8 years (n=5, -3.89%), after 8 years (n=6, -1.00%), or who were still alive (n=163, -0.13%). The primary cause of death was ILD (6/21, 28.6%); those who died in the first 2 years most often died from progressive ILD (4/6, 67%). Factors significantly associated with decline in ppFVC on univariate analyses, included longer disease duration (ref. < median, P=0.0048), ATA positivity (ref. negative, P=0.0081), and WLI ≥20% (ref. 0-20%, P=0.0484). In multivariate analysis the only statistically significant variable associated with decline in ppFVC/ year was ATA positivity.

Conclusion

In a large single center cohort of SSc-ILD, ATA positivity is a risk factor for developing progressive SSc-ILD, consistent with other SSc-ILD cohorts. Stratifying patients by survival demonstrates that lung function declines dramatically in those who died within 2 years, whose main cause of death was progressive ILD. These data support the growing need to identify risk factors for disease severity and risk for progression, and to target intervention in patients most likely to develop progressive SSc-ILD1,2.

References

[1]Roofeh D, Lin CJF, Goldin JG, et al. Tocilizumab Prevents Progression of Early Systemic Sclerosis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2021

[2]Roofeh D, Lescoat A, Khanna D. Treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Effects of Cilostazol and Isosorbide Mononitrate on Cerebral Hemodynamics in the LACI-1 Randomized Controlled Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Cerebral small vessel disease—a major cause of stroke and dementia—is associated with cerebrovascular dysfunction. We investigated whether short-term isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) and cilostazol, alone or in combination, improved magnetic resonance imaging–measured cerebrovascular function in patients with lacunar ischemic stroke.

Tranexamic Acid for Prevention of Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients With or Without Spot Sign

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The computed tomography angiography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography based spot sign has been proposed as a biomarker for identifying on-going hematoma expansion in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. We investigated, if spot-sign positive participants benefit more from tranexamic acid versus placebo as compared to spot-sign negative participants.

METHODS

TICH-2 trial (Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage) was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruiting acutely hospitalized participants with intracerebral hemorrhage within 8 hours after symptom onset. Local investigators randomized participants to 2 grams of intravenous tranexamic acid or matching placebo (1:1). All participants underwent computed tomography scan on admission and on day 2 (24±12 hours) after randomization. In this sub group analysis, we included all participants from the main trial population with imaging allowing adjudication of spot sign status.

RESULTS

Of the 2325 TICH-2 participants, 254 (10.9%) had imaging allowing for spot-sign adjudication. Of these participants, 64 (25.2%) were spot-sign positive. Median (interquartile range) time from symptom onset to administration of the intervention was 225.0 (169.0 to 310.0) minutes. The adjusted percent difference in absolute day-2 hematoma volume between participants allocated to tranexamic versus placebo was 3.7% (95% CI, -12.8% to 23.4%) for spot-sign positive and 1.7% (95% CI, -8.4% to 12.8%) for spot-sign negative participants (P_heterogenity=0.85). No difference was observed in significant hematoma progression (dichotomous composite outcome) between participants allocated to tranexamic versus placebo among spot-sign positive (odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.29 to 2.46]) and negative (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.45]) participants (P_heterogenity=0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the TICH-2 trial do not support that admission spot sign status modifies the treatment effect of tranexamic acid versus placebo in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. The results might have been affected by low statistical power as well as treatment delay. Registration: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN93732214.

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that the combination of MEK inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents may result in improved efficacy in melanoma. We evaluated whether combining MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition was more efficacious than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IMspire170 was an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive cobimetinib (60 mg, days 1-21) plus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks) in 28-day cycles or anti-programmed death-1 pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) alone until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 11 December 2017, and 29 January 2019, 446 patients were randomized to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (n = 222) or pembrolizumab (n = 224). Median follow-up was 7.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-9.9] for cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 7.2 months (IQR 4.9-10.1) for pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2] with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7-9.6) with pembrolizumab [stratified hazard ratio 1.15 (95% CI 0.88-1.50); P = 0.30]. Hazard ratios for PFS were consistent across prespecified subgroups. In exploratory biomarker analyses, higher tumor mutational burden was associated with improved clinical outcomes in both treatment arms. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10.0% with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 0.9% with pembrolizumab), diarrhea (7.7% versus 1.9%), rash (6.8% versus 0.9%), hypertension (6.4% versus 3.7%), and dermatitis acneiform (5.0% versus 0). Serious AEs occurred in 44.1% of patients with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 20.8% with pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSION

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab did not improve PFS compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

Tranexamic acid to improve functional status in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: the TICH-2 RCT

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid reduces death due to bleeding after trauma and postpartum haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess if tranexamic acid is safe, reduces haematoma expansion and improves outcomes in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).

DESIGN

The TICH-2 (Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage) study was a pragmatic, Phase III, prospective, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Acute stroke services at 124 hospitals in 12 countries (Denmark, Georgia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK).

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with ICH within 8 hours of onset.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Exclusion criteria were ICH secondary to anticoagulation, thrombolysis, trauma or a known underlying structural abnormality; patients for whom tranexamic acid was thought to be contraindicated; prestroke dependence (i.e. patients with a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 4); life expectancy < 3 months; and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of < 5.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants, allocated by randomisation, received 1 g of an intravenous tranexamic acid bolus followed by an 8-hour 1-g infusion or matching placebo (i.e. 0.9% saline).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was functional status (death or dependency) at day 90, which was measured by the shift in the mRS score, using ordinal logistic regression, with adjustment for stratification and minimisation criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 2325 participants (tranexamic acid, n = 1161; placebo, n = 1164) were recruited from 124 hospitals in 12 countries between 2013 and 2017. Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline. The primary outcome was determined for 2307 participants (tranexamic acid, n = 1152; placebo, n = 1155). There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for the primary outcome of functional status at day 90 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.03; p = 0.11]. Although there were fewer deaths by day 7 in the tranexamic acid group (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99; p = 0.041), there was no difference in case fatality at 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; p = 0.37). Fewer patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) after treatment with tranexamic acid than with placebo by days 2 (p = 0.027), 7 (p = 0.020) and 90 (p = 0.039). There was no increase in thromboembolic events or seizures.

LIMITATIONS

Despite attempts to enrol patients rapidly, the majority of participants were enrolled and treated > 4.5 hours after stroke onset. Pragmatic inclusion criteria led to a heterogeneous population of participants, some of whom had very large strokes. Although 12 countries enrolled participants, the majority (82.1%) were from the UK.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid did not affect a patient's functional status at 90 days after ICH, despite there being significant modest reductions in early death (by 7 days), haematoma expansion and SAEs, which is consistent with an antifibrinolytic effect. Tranexamic acid was safe, with no increase in thromboembolic events.

FUTURE WORK

Future work should focus on enrolling and treating patients early after stroke and identify which participants are most likely to benefit from haemostatic therapy. Large randomised trials are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN93732214.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 35. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The project was also funded by the Pragmatic Trials, UK, funding call and the Swiss Heart Foundation in Switzerland.

Effects of Isosorbide Mononitrate and/or Cilostazol on Hematological Markers, Platelet Function, and Hemodynamics in Patients With Lacunar Ischaemic Stroke: Safety Data From the Lacunar Intervention-1 (LACI-1) Trial

Background: Cilostazol and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) are candidate treatments for cerebral small vessel disease and lacunar ischaemic stroke. As both drugs may influence hemoglobin and platelet count, and hemodynamics, we sought to assess their effects in the lacunar intervention-1 (LACI-1) trial. Methods: Fifty-seven lacunar ischaemic stroke patients were randomized to immediate ISMN, cilostazol, or their combination for 9 weeks in addition to guideline stroke prevention. A fourth group received both drugs with a delayed start. Full blood count, platelet function, peripheral blood pressure (BP), heart rate and central hemodynamics (Augmentation index, Buckberg index) were measured at baseline, and weeks 3 and 8. Differences were assessed by multiple linear regression adjusted for baseline and key prognostic variables. Registration ISRCTN 12580546. Results: At week 8, platelet count was higher with cilostazol vs. no cilostazol (mean difference, MD 35.73, 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI 2.81-68.66, p = 0.033), but no significant differences were noted for hemoglobin levels or platelet function. At week 8, BP did not differ between the treatment groups, whilst heart rate was higher in those taking cilostazol vs. no cilostazol (MD 6.42, 95% CI 1.17-11.68, p = 0.017). Buckberg index (subendocardial perfusion) was lower in those randomized to cilostazol vs. no cilostazol and in those randomized to both drugs vs. either drug. Whilst ISMN significantly increased unadjusted augmentation index (arterial stiffness, MD 21.19, 95% CI 9.08-33.31, p = 0.001), in isolation both drugs non-significantly reduced augmentation index adjusted for heart rate. Conclusions: Cilostazol increased heart rate and platelet count, and reduced Buckberg index, whilst both drugs may individually reduce arterial stiffness adjusted for heart rate. Neither drug had clinically significant effects on hemoglobin or platelet function over 8 weeks. Further assessment of the safety and efficacy of these medications following lacunar ischaemic stroke is warranted.

The effectiveness and safety of anti-fibrinolytics in patients with acute intracranial haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for an individual patient data meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction: The Anti-fibrinolytics Trialists Collaboration aims to increase knowledge about the effectiveness and safety of anti-fibrinolytic treatment by conducting individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses of randomised trials. This article presents the statistical analysis plan for an IPD meta-analysis of the effects of anti-fibrinolytics for acute intracranial haemorrhage.

Methods: The protocol for the IPD meta-analysis has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019128260). We will conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with 500 patients or more assessing the effects of anti-fibrinolytics in acute intracranial haemorrhage. The primary outcomes will be 1) death from stroke or head injury within 30 days of randomisation, and 2) death from stroke or head injury, or dependency within 90 days of randomisation. The primary outcomes will be limited to patients treated within three hours of injury or stroke onset. We will report treatment effects using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We use logistic regression models to examine how the effect of anti-fibrinolytics vary by time to treatment, severity of intracranial bleeding, and age. We will also examine the effect of anti-fibrinolytics on secondary outcomes including death, dependency, vascular occlusive events, seizures, and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes will be assessed in all patients irrespective of time of treatment. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.

Conclusions: This IPD meta-analysis will examine important clinical questions about the effects of anti-fibrinolytic treatment in patients with intracranial haemorrhage that cannot be answered using aggregate data. With IPD we can examine how effects vary by time to treatment, bleeding severity, and age, to gain better understanding of the balance of benefit and harms on which to base recommendations for practice.

The effectiveness and safety of anti-fibrinolytics in patients with acute intracranial haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for an individual patient data meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Anti-fibrinolytics Trialists Collaboration aims to increase knowledge about the effectiveness and safety of anti-fibrinolytic treatment by conducting individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses of randomised trials. This article presents the statistical analysis plan for an IPD meta-analysis of the effects of anti-fibrinolytics for acute intracranial haemorrhage.

METHODS

The protocol for the IPD meta-analysis has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019128260). We will conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with 500 patients or more assessing the effects of anti-fibrinolytics in acute intracranial haemorrhage. The primary outcomes will be 1) death from stroke or head injury within 30 days of randomisation, and 2) death from stroke or head injury, or dependency within 90 days of randomisation. The primary outcomes will be limited to patients treated within three hours of injury or stroke onset. We will report treatment effects using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We use logistic regression models to examine how the effect of anti-fibrinolytics vary by time to treatment, severity of intracranial bleeding, and age. We will also examine the effect of anti-fibrinolytics on secondary outcomes including death, dependency, vascular occlusive events, seizures, and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes will be assessed in all patients irrespective of time of treatment. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.

CONCLUSIONS

This IPD meta-analysis will examine important clinical questions about the effects of anti-fibrinolytic treatment in patients with intracranial haemorrhage that cannot be answered using aggregate data. With IPD we can examine how effects vary by time to treatment, bleeding severity, and age, to gain better understanding of the balance of benefit and harms on which to base recommendations for practice.

Tolerability, safety and intermediary pharmacological effects of cilostazol and isosorbide mononitrate, alone and combined, in patients with lacunar ischaemic stroke: The LACunar Intervention-1 (LACI-1) trial, a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Lacunar stroke, a frequent clinical manifestation of small vessel disease (SVD), differs pathologically from other ischaemic stroke subtypes and has no specific long-term secondary prevention. Licenced drugs, isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) and cilostazol, have relevant actions to prevent SVD progression.

METHODS

We recruited independent patients with clinically confirmed lacunar ischaemic stroke without cognitive impairment to a prospective randomised clinical trial, LACunar Intervention-1 (LACI-1). We randomised patients using a central web-based system, 1:1:1:1 with minimisation, to masked ISMN 25 mg bd, cilostazol 100 mg bd, both ISMN and cilostazol started immediately, or both with start delayed. We escalated doses to target over two weeks, sustained for eight weeks. Primary outcome was the proportion achieving target dose. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, safety (haemorrhage, recurrent vascular events), cognition, haematology, vascular function, and neuroimaging. LACI-1 was powered (80%, alpha 0.05) to detect 35% (90% versus 55%) difference between the proportion reaching target dose on one versus both drugs at 55 patients. Registration ISRCTN12580546.

FINDINGS

LACI-1 enrolled 57 participants between March 2016 and August 2017: 18 (32%) females, mean age 66 (SD 11, range 40-85) years, onset-randomisation 203 (range 6-920) days. Most achieved full (64%) or over half (87%) dose, with no difference between cilostazol vs ISMN, single vs dual drugs. Headache and palpitations increased initially then declined similarly with dual versus single drugs. There was no between-group difference in BP, pulse-wave velocity, haemoglobin or platelet function, but pulse rate was higher (mean difference, MD, 6.4, 95%CI 1.2-11.7, p = 0.02), platelet count higher (MD 35.7, 95%CI 2.8, 68.7, p = 0.03) and white matter hyperintensities reduced more (Chi-square p = 0.007) with cilostazol versus no cilostazol.

INTERPRETATION

Cilostazol and ISMN are well tolerated when the dose is escalated, without safety concerns, in patients with lacunar stroke. Larger trials with longer term follow-up are justified.

FUNDING

Alzheimer's Society (AS-PG-14-033).

Triple versus guideline antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrence after acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: the TARDIS RCT

BACKGROUND

Two antiplatelet agents are better than one for preventing recurrent stroke after acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Therefore, intensive treatment with three agents might be better still, providing it does not cause undue bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of intensive therapy with guideline antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke and TIA.

DESIGN

International prospective randomised open-label blinded end-point parallel-group superiority clinical trial.

SETTING

Acute hospitals at 106 sites in four countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients > 50 years of age with acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA within 48 hours of ictus (stroke).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were allocated at random by computer to 1 month of intensive (combined aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) or guideline (combined aspirin and dipyridamole, or clopidogrel alone) antiplatelet agents, and followed for 90 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of any recurrent stroke (ischaemic, haemorrhagic; assessed using the modified Rankin Scale) or TIA within 90 days by blinded telephone follow-up. Analysis using ordinal logistic regression was by intention to treat. Other outcomes included bleeding and its severity, death, myocardial infarction (MI), disability, mood, cognition and quality of life.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee after recruitment of 3096 participants (intensive, n = 1556; guideline, n = 1540) from 106 hospitals in four countries between April 2009 and March 2016. The incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA did not differ between intensive and guideline therapy in 3070 (99.2%) participants with data [93 vs. 105 stroke/TIA events; adjusted common odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.20; p = 0.47]. Major (encompassing fatal) bleeding was increased with intensive as compared with guideline therapy [39 vs. 17 participants; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.23, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.96; p = 0.006]. There were no differences between the treatment groups in all-cause mortality, or the composite of death, stroke, MI and major bleeding (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.35; p = 0.88).

LIMITATIONS

Patients and investigators were not blinded to treatment. The comparator group comprised two guideline strategies because of changes in national guidelines during the trial. The trial was stopped early, thereby reducing its statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of three antiplatelet agents is associated with increased bleeding without any significant reduction in recurrence of stroke or TIA.

FUTURE WORK

The safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin and clopidogrel) versus aspirin remains to be defined. Further research is required on identifying individual patient response to antiplatelets, and the relationship between response and the subsequent risks of vascular recurrent events and bleeding complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47823388.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 48. See the NIHR Journal Library website for further project information. The Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) vanguard phase was funded by the British Heart Foundation (grant PG/08/083/25779, from 1 April 2009 to 30 September 2012) and indirect funding was provided by the Stroke Association through its funding of the Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. There was no commercial support for the trial and antiplatelet drugs were sourced locally at each site. The trial was sponsored by the University of Nottingham.

Prevention of haematoma progression by tranexamic acid in intracerebral haemorrhage patients with and without spot sign on admission scan: a statistical analysis plan of a pre-specified sub-study of the TICH-2 trial

OBJECTIVE

We present the statistical analysis plan of a prespecified Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage (TICH)-2 sub-study aiming to investigate, if tranexamic acid has a different effect in intracerebral haemorrhage patients with the spot sign on admission compared to spot sign negative patients. The TICH-2 trial recruited above 2000 participants with intracerebral haemorrhage arriving in hospital within 8 h after symptom onset. They were included irrespective of radiological signs of on-going haematoma expansion. Participants were randomised to tranexamic acid versus matching placebo. In this subgroup analysis, we will include all participants in TICH-2 with a computed tomography angiography on admission allowing adjudication of the participants' spot sign status.

RESULTS

Primary outcome will be the ability of tranexamic acid to limit absolute haematoma volume on computed tomography at 24 h (± 12 h) after randomisation among spot sign positive and spot sign negative participants, respectively. Within all outcome measures, the effect of tranexamic acid in spot sign positive/negative participants will be compared using tests of interaction. This sub-study will investigate the important clinical hypothesis that spot sign positive patients might benefit more from administration of tranexamic acid compared to spot sign negative patients. Trial registration ISRCTN93732214 ( http://www.isrctn.com ).

Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage (TICH-2): an international randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid can prevent death due to bleeding after trauma and post-partum haemorrhage. We aimed to assess whether tranexamic acid reduces haematoma expansion and improves outcome in adults with stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage.

METHODS

We did an international, randomised placebo-controlled trial in adults with intracerebral haemorrhage from acute stroke units at 124 hospital sites in 12 countries. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 1 g intravenous tranexamic acid bolus followed by an 8 h infusion of 1 g tranexamic acid or a matching placebo, within 8 h of symptom onset. Randomisation was done centrally in real time via a secure website, with stratification by country and minimisation on key prognostic factors. Treatment allocation was concealed from patients, outcome assessors, and all other health-care workers involved in the trial. The primary outcome was functional status at day 90, measured by shift in the modified Rankin Scale, using ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for stratification and minimisation criteria. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN93732214.

FINDINGS

We recruited 2325 participants between March 1, 2013, and Sept 30, 2017. 1161 patients received tranexamic acid and 1164 received placebo; the treatment groups were well balanced at baseline. The primary outcome was assessed for 2307 (99%) participants. The primary outcome, functional status at day 90, did not differ significantly between the groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·88, 95% CI 0·76-1·03, p=0·11). Although there were fewer deaths by day 7 in the tranexamic acid group (101 [9%] deaths in the tranexamic acid group vs 123 [11%] deaths in the placebo group; aOR 0·73, 0·53-0·99, p=0·0406), there was no difference in case fatality at 90 days (250 [22%] vs 249 [21%]; adjusted hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·77-1·10, p=0·37). Fewer patients had serious adverse events after tranexamic acid than after placebo by days 2 (379 [33%] patients vs 417 [36%] patients), 7 (456 [39%] vs 497 [43%]), and 90 (521 [45%] vs 556 [48%]).

INTERPRETATION

Functional status 90 days after intracerebral haemorrhage did not differ significantly between patients who received tranexamic acid and those who received placebo, despite a reduction in early deaths and serious adverse events. Larger randomised trials are needed to confirm or refute a clinically significant treatment effect.

FUNDING

National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and Swiss Heart Foundation.

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole versus clopidogrel alone or aspirin and dipyridamole in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia (TARDIS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Intensive antiplatelet therapy with three agents might be more effective than guideline treatment for preventing recurrent events in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole) with that of guideline-based antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

We did an international, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial in adult participants with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 48 h of onset. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer randomisation to receive loading doses and then 30 days of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin 75 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily) or guideline-based therapy (comprising either clopidogrel alone or combined aspirin and dipyridamole). Randomisation was stratified by country and index event, and minimised with prognostic baseline factors, medication use, time to randomisation, stroke-related factors, and thrombolysis. The ordinal primary outcome was the combined incidence and severity of any recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic; assessed using the modified Rankin Scale) or TIA within 90 days, as assessed by central telephone follow-up with masking to treatment assignment, and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN47823388.

FINDINGS

3096 participants (1556 in the intensive antiplatelet therapy group, 1540 in the guideline antiplatelet therapy group) were recruited from 106 hospitals in four countries between April 7, 2009, and March 18, 2016. The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee. The incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA did not differ between intensive and guideline therapy (93 [6%] participants vs 105 [7%]; adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·67-1·20, p=0·47). By contrast, intensive antiplatelet therapy was associated with more, and more severe, bleeding (adjusted cOR 2·54, 95% CI 2·05-3·16, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with recent cerebral ischaemia, intensive antiplatelet therapy did not reduce the incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA, but did significantly increase the risk of major bleeding. Triple antiplatelet therapy should not be used in routine clinical practice.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, British Heart Foundation.

The effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in patients with acute intracranial haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for an individual patient data meta-analysis

Introduction: The Antifibrinolytic Trialists Collaboration aims to increase knowledge about the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytic treatment by conducting individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses of randomised trials. This article presents the statistical analysis plan for an IPD meta-analysis of the effects of antifibrinolytics for acute intracranial haemorrhage. Methods: The protocol for the IPD meta-analysis has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016052155). We will conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with 1000 patients or more assessing the effects of antifibrinolytics in acute intracranial haemorrhage. We will assess the effect on two co-primary outcomes: 1) Death in hospital within 30 days of randomisation, and 2) Death  or dependency at final follow-up within 90 days of randomisation. The co-primary outcomes will be limited to patients treated within three hours of injury or stroke onset. We will report treatment effects using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We use logistic regression models to examine how the effect of antifibrinolytics vary by time to treatment, severity of intracranial bleeding, and age. We will also examine the effect of antifibrinolytics on secondary outcomes including death, dependency, vascular occlusive events, seizures, and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes will be assessed in all patients irrespective of time of treatment. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Conclusions: This IPD meta-analysis will examine important clinical questions about the effects of antifibrinolytic treatment in patients with intracranial haemorrhage that cannot be answered using aggregate data. With IPD we can examine how effects vary by time to treatment, bleeding severity, and age, to gain better understanding of the balance of benefit and harms on which to base recommendations for practice.

Does tranexamic acid lead to changes in MRI measures of brain tissue health in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage? Protocol for a MRI substudy nested within the double-blind randomised controlled TICH-2 trial

OBJECTIVES

To test whether administration of the antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH) leads to increased prevalence of diffusion-weighted MRI-defined hyperintense ischaemic lesions (primary hypothesis) or reduced perihaematomal oedema volume, perihaematomal diffusion restriction and residual MRI-defined SICH-related tissue damage (secondary hypotheses).

DESIGN

MRI substudy nested within the double-blind randomised controlled Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage (TICH)-2 trial (ISRCTN93732214).

SETTING

International multicentre hospital-based study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible adults consented and randomised in the TICH-2 trial who were also able to undergo MRI scanning. To address the primary hypothesis, a sample size of n=280 will allow detection of a 10% relative increase in prevalence of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintense lesions in the TXA group with 5% significance, 80% power and 5% imaging data rejection.

INTERVENTIONS

TICH-2 MRI substudy participants will undergo MRI scanning using a standardised protocol at day ~5 and day ~90 after randomisation. Clinical assessments, randomisation to TXA or placebo and participant follow-up will be performed as per the TICH-2 trial protocol.

CONCLUSION

The TICH-2 MRI substudy will test whether TXA increases the incidence of new DWI-defined ischaemic lesions or reduces perihaematomal oedema or final ICH lesion volume in the context of SICH.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The TICH-2 trial obtained ethical approval from East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (12/EM/0369) and an amendment to allow the TICH-2 MRI sub study was approved in April 2015 (amendment number SA02/15). All findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. The primary outcome results will also be presented at a relevant scientific meeting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN93732214; Pre-results.

Abstract 103: Intensive versus Guideline Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Transient Ischaemic Attack: Data From the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency in Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) Trial

Background: The risk of recurrence following an ischaemic stroke (IS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is high, especially immediately after the event. Intensive treatment might be more effective in preventing recurrence than guideline therapy providing bleeding does not become excessive. We tested this in a subgroup of patients enrolled with TIA into the TARDIS trial.

Methods: TARDIS was an international multicentre prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint controlled trial. Patients with acute non-cardioembolic IS or TIA were randomised to intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) or guideline antiplatelets (clopidogrel alone, or combined aspirin and dipyridamole) given for one month. The primary outcome was recurrent cerebral events and their severity (using modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months. Data are number (%), mean (standard deviation, SD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Of 3,096 patients, 953 (30.8%; intensive 480, guideline 473) were enrolled with TIA. At baseline: mean age 70 (SD 10); male 62%; onset to randomisation <12 hours 17%, <24 hours 48%. By day 90, no differences were present between the two treatment groups for the primary outcome, death or other functional outcomes. However, patients in the intensive arm were less likely to suffer a recurrent TIA than those on guideline treatment (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.93).

Conclusion: Patients with a qualifying event of TIA were less likely to suffer a recurrent TIA if they received intensive treatment rather than guideline. However, no differences were present for recurrent stroke events.

Abstract TMP13: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Hypothermia for Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Background: It remains unclear whether inducing hypothermia is safe and effective for improving outcome after hyperacute ischaemic stroke. An individual patient data meta-analysis of completed trials was performed.

Methods: Following electronic searches for trials comparing hypothermia to control, Chief Investigators were approached to share individual patient data (IPD). Odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) were analysed with ordinal logistic regression and binary logistic regression with adjustment for trial, cooling method (endovascular, surface or unknown) and age.

Results: Data were obtained for 10 trials (320 participants): COAST-I, COAST-II, COOL AID pilot, COOL AID, COOLIST, HAIS-SE, ICTuS-L, ICTuS-2, MASCOT and MHAIS; IPD were not available for two studies. Trial designs varied and most had a small sample size, mean (SD) age 66 (11.5) years, female 42%, NIHSS 13.4 (5.3), time to treatment 4.5 (1.2) hours, thrombolysis 53%. In patients whose temperature was recorded (n=74), the lowest achieved temperature was in the hypothermia arm: 34.3 o C vs. 36.6 o C (p<0.001). Functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at day 90 did not differ between cooling vs. no cooling: n=297 OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.63-1.39, p=0.74). Serious adverse events (n=287) were increased in the cooling arm: 81.5% vs. 65.5% (p<0.001); pneumonia: 30.2% vs. 10.9% (p<0.001) and aspiration: 13.3% vs. 3.5% (p=0.004). There was no difference in death: 17.2% vs. 13.6% (p=0.21).

Conclusion: Hypothermia lowered temperature by 2.3 C, did not alter functional outcome or mortality, but was associated with more SAEs. Larger trials are needed to assess hypothermia in hyperacute stroke.

Abstract WP332: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients on Prior Antiplatelet Therapy in the Tranexamic Acid in Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage-2 (TICH-2) Trial

Background: Prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) may be associated with worse outcome in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). We explored the effects of APT on clinical outcomes in patients with ICH in the Tranexamic acid in primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage-2 (TICH-2) trial.

Methods: TICH-2 is an ongoing prospective randomised double-blind blinded-endpoint trial testing the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid in patients with spontaneous ICH presenting within 8 hours of onset. Data from 2255 patients recruited up to July 2017 were analysed blinded to treatment allocation. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior APT, with adjustment for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and presence of intraventricular haemorrhage. Haematoma expansion was defined as a relative increase in haematoma volume of > 33% or an absolute increase of > 6 mL from baseline.

Results: 593 patients (26.3%) had prior APT and these were older (mean age 75.7 vs 66.3 years) and more likely to have ischaemic heart disease (24.8%, 147 vs 2.8%, 46) and prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack (35.8%, 212 vs 6.4%, 106) than those with no APT. The APT group had larger baseline haematoma volume (27.9 mL vs 20.8 mL, table) and were more likely to have intraventricular haemorrhage (40.3% vs 29.1%). The rate of haematoma expansion was not significantly greater in the APT group. At day 90, the APT group had a worse functional outcome, mRS acOR 1.36 (95% CI 1.10-1.66, p=0.004) and higher mortality rate, hazard ratio 2.26 (95% CI 1.88-2.72, p<0.001).

Discussion & Conclusion: TICH-2 is the largest trial of a haemostatic agent in ICH to-date. Patients with prior APT had significantly greater baseline haematoma volume, worse functional outcome and higher mortality at day 90. Complete data will be presented in the conference. Therapies targeting enhancement of platelet function should be further researched.

Statistical analysis plan for the 'Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage' (TICH-2) trial

RATIONALE

Aside from blood pressure lowering, treatment options for intracerebral haemorrhage remain limited and a proportion of patients will undergo early haematoma expansion with resultant significant morbidity and mortality. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an anti-fibrinolytic drug, has been shown to significantly reduce mortality in patients, who are bleeding following trauma, when given rapidly. TICH-2 is testing whether TXA is effective at improving outcome in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH).

METHODS AND DESIGN

TICH-2 is a pragmatic, phase III, prospective, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Two thousand adult (aged ≥ 18 years) patients with an acute SICH, within 8 h of stroke onset, will be randomised to receive TXA or the placebo control. The primary outcome is ordinal shift of modified Rankin Scale score at day 90. Analyses will be performed using intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

This paper and its attached appendices describe the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the trial and were developed and published prior to database lock and unblinding to treatment allocation. The SAP includes details of analyses to be undertaken and unpopulated tables which will be reported in the primary and key secondary publications. The database will be locked in early 2018, ready for publication of the results later in the same year.

DISCUSSION

The SAP details the analyses that will be done to avoid bias arising from prior knowledge of the study findings. The trial will determine whether TXA can improve outcome after SICH, which currently has no definitive therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry, ID: ISRCTN93732214 . Registered on 17 January 2013.

Preventing cognitive decline and dementia from cerebral small vessel disease: The LACI-1 Trial. Protocol and statistical analysis plan of a phase IIa dose escalation trial testing tolerability, safety and effect on intermediary endpoints of isosorbide mononitrate and cilostazol, separately and in combination

Rationale

The pathophysiology of most lacunar stroke, a form of small vessel disease, is thought to differ from large artery atherothrombo- or cardio-embolic stroke. Licensed drugs, isosorbide mononitrate and cilostazol, have promising mechanisms of action to support their testing to prevent stroke recurrence, cognitive impairment, or radiological progression after lacunar stroke.

Aim

LACI-1 will assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy, by dose, of isosorbide mononitrate and cilostazol, alone and in combination, in patients with ischemic lacunar stroke.

Sample size

A sample of 60 provides 80+% power (significance 0.05) to detect a difference of 35% (90% versus 55%) between those reaching target dose on one versus both drugs.

Methods and design

LACI-1 is a phase IIa partial factorial, dose-escalation, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint trial. Participants are randomized to isosorbide mononitrate and/or cilostazol for 11 weeks with dose escalation to target as tolerated in two centers (Edinburgh, Nottingham). At three visits, tolerability, safety, blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and platelet function are assessed, plus magnetic resonance imaging to assess cerebrovascular reactivity in a subgroup.

Study outcomes

Primary: proportion of patients completing study achieving target maximum dose.

Secondary

symptoms whilst taking medications; safety (hemorrhage, recurrent vascular events, falls); blood pressure, platelet function, arterial stiffness, and cerebrovascular reactivity.

Discussion

This study will inform the design of a larger phase III trial of isosorbide mononitrate and cilostazol in lacunar stroke, whilst providing data on the drugs’ effects on vascular and platelet function.

Trial registration

ISRCTN (ISRCTN12580546) and EudraCT (2015-001953-33).

Remote Assessment of Platelet Function in Patients with Acute Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack

BACKGROUND

The TARDIS trial assessed the safety and efficacy of intensive versus guideline antiplatelet agents given for one month in patients with acute stroke or TIA. The aim of this substudy was to assess the effect of antiplatelet agents taken at baseline on platelet function reactivity and activation.

METHODS

Platelet function, assessed by remotely measured surface expression of P-selectin, was assessed in patients at their time of randomisation. Data are median fluorescence values.

RESULTS

The aspirin P-selectin test demonstrated that platelet expression was lower in 494 patients taking aspirin than in 162 patients not: mean 210 (SD 188) versus 570 (435), difference 360.3 (95% CI 312.2-408.4) (2p < 0.001). Aspirin did not suppress P-selectin levels below 500 units in 23 (4.7%) patients. The clopidogrel test showed that platelet reactivity was lower in 97 patients taking clopidogrel than in 585 patients not: 655 (296) versus 969 (315), difference 314.5 (95% CI 247.3-381.7) (2p < 0.001). Clopidogrel did not suppress P-selectin level below 860 units in 24 (24.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin and clopidogrel suppress stimulated platelet P-selectin, although one-quarter of patients on clopidogrel have high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Platelet function testing may be performed remotely in the context of a large multicentre trial. Trial registration ISRCTN47823388.

Abstract WP76: Baseline Characteristics of the 3,096 Patients Recruited Into the ‘Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency After Ischaemic Stroke’ (TARDIS) Trial

Background: The risk of recurrence following ischaemic stroke (IS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is highest immediately after the event. Antiplatelet agents are effective in reducing the risk of recurrence and two agents are superior to one in the early phase after ictus.

Design: The Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial was an international multicentre prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint trial that assessed the safety and efficacy of short-term intensive antiplatelet therapy with three agents (combined aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) as compared with guideline treatment in acute IS or TIA. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence and its severity, measured using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included recurrent vascular events, functional measures (cognition, disability, mood, quality of life) and safety (bleeding, death, serious adverse events). Data are number (%) or mean (standard deviation, SD).

Results: Recruitment ran from April 2009 to March 2016. 3,096 patients were recruited from 106 sites in 4 countries (Denmark 1.6%, Georgia 2.7%, New Zealand 0.2%, UK 95.4%). Randomisation characteristics included: age 69.0 (10.1) years; male 1945 (62.8%); time onset to randomisation 29.4 (11.9) hours; stroke severity (National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale) 2.8 (3.6); blood pressure 143.5 (18.2)/79.5 (11.4) mmHg; IS 2143 (69.2%), TIA 953 (30.8%).

Conclusion: TARDIS was a large international trial of intensive/triple antiplatelet therapy in acute IS and TIA, and included participants representative of patients in many western stroke services.

Funders: National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and British Heart Foundation. Trial registration: ISRCTN47823388

Abstract 189: Intensive Versus Guideline Antiplatelet Therapy For Preventing Recurrence In Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Or TIA: Results In Minor Stroke And TIA From The Triple Antiplatelets For Reducing Dependency In Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) Trial

Background: The risk of recurrence following an ischaemic stroke (IS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is high, especially immediately after the event. Since one antiplatelet agent is more effective than none, and two are are superior to one, even more intensive treatment might be more effective in preventing recurrence.

Methods: TARDIS was an international prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint controlled trial. Patients with acute (<48 hours) non-cardioembolic IS or TIA were randomised to intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) or guideline antiplatelets (clopidogrel alone, or combined aspirin and dipyridamole) given for one month. The primary outcome was stroke and TIA recurrence, and their severity (based on modified Rankin Scale), at 3 months. Patients or relatives gave written informed (proxy) consent and all sites had research ethics approval. The trial was funded by the British Heart Foundation and NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.

Results: The Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial in March 2016 since a definitive result had been reached. Of 3,096 patients, 2213 (71%) were enrolled with minor stroke (NIHSS <=3) or TIA. At baseline: mean age 69 (SD 10); male 62%; prior stroke 10%; diabetes 18%; index event IS 57%, TIA 43%; severity in IS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) 1.8 (1.0); ABCD2 in TIA 5.1 (0.9); onset to randomisation <12 hours 11%, <24 hours 35%.

Summary: The results will be available for presentation in quarter 4 2016. TARDIS is large enough to influence clinical practice.

Baseline characteristics of the 3096 patients recruited into the 'Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischemic Stroke' trial

Background The risk of recurrence following ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack is highest immediately after the event. Antiplatelet agents are effective in reducing the risk of recurrence and two agents are superior to one in the early phase after ictus. Design The triple antiplatelets for reducing dependency after ischemic stroke trial was an international multicenter prospective randomized open-label blinded-endpoint trial that assessed the safety and efficacy of short-term intensive antiplatelet therapy with three agents (combined aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) as compared with guideline treatment in acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence and its severity, measured using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included recurrent vascular events, functional measures (cognition, disability, mood, quality of life), and safety (bleeding, death, serious adverse events). Data are number (%) or mean (standard deviation, SD). Results Recruitment ran from April 2009 to March 2016; 3096 patients were recruited from 106 sites in four countries (Denmark 1.6%, Georgia 2.7%, New Zealand 0.2%, UK 95.4%). Randomization characteristics included: age 69.0 (10.1) years; male 1945 (62.8%); time onset to randomization 29.4 (11.9) h; stroke severity (National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale) 2.8 (3.6); blood pressure 143.5 (18.2)/79.5 (11.4) mmHg; IS 2143 (69.2%), transient ischemic attack 953 (30.8%). Conclusion Triple antiplatelets for reducing dependency after ischemic stroke was a large trial of intensive/triple antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, and included participants from four predominantly Caucasian countries who were representative of patients in many western stroke services.

Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pyrexia is a frequent adverse event with combined dabrafenib and trametinib therapy (CombiDT), but little is known of its clinical associations, etiology, or appropriate management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients on the BRF133220 phase I/II trial of CombiDT treated at the standard dose (150/2) were included for assessment of pyrexia (n = 201). BRAF and MEK inhibitor-naïve patients (n = 117) were included for efficacy analyses. Pyrexia was defined as temperature ≥38°C (≥100.4(°)F) or related symptoms.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine percent of patients developed pyrexia during treatment, 24% of which had pyrexia symptoms without a recorded elevation in body temperature. Pyrexia was grade 2+ in 60% of pyrexia patients. Median time to onset of first pyrexia was 19 days, with a median duration of 9 days. Pyrexia patients had a median of two pyrexia events, but 21% had three or more events. Various pyrexia management approaches were conducted in this study. A trend was observed between dabrafenib and hydroxy-dabrafenib exposure and pyrexia. No baseline clinical characteristics predicted pyrexia, and pyrexia was not statistically significantly associated with treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrexia is a frequent and recurrent toxicity with CombiDT treatment. No baseline features predict pyrexia, and it is not associated with clinical outcome. Dabrafenib and metabolite exposure may contribute to the etiology of pyrexia. The optimal secondary prophylaxis for pyrexia is best studied in a prospective trial.

MAP kinase signaling and inhibition in melanoma

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is critical to oncogenic signaling in the majority of patients with malignant melanoma. Driver mutations in both NRAS and BRAF have important implications for prognosis and treatment. The development of inhibitors to mediators of the MAPK pathway, including those to CRAF, BRAF, and MEK, has led to major advances in the treatment of patients with melanoma. In particular, the selective BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with tumors harboring BRAF mutations. However, the duration of benefit is limited in many patients and highlights the need for understanding the limitations of therapy in order to devise more effective strategies. MEK inhibitors have proven to particularly active in BRAF mutant melanomas also. Emerging knowledge about mechanisms of resistance as well as a more complete understanding of the biology of MAPK pathway signaling provides insight into rational combination regimens and sequences of molecularly targeted therapies.

Phase I study of PLX4032: Proof of concept for V600E BRAF mutation as a therapeutic target in human cancer

9000

Background: PLX4032 is an oral, selective inhibitor of the oncogenic V600E mutant BRAF kinase with preclinical activity. V600E BRAF is the most common kinase mutation in melanoma (60%), also found in colorectal carcinomas (10%), most anaplastic and papillary thyroid carcinomas, and low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Methods: Phase I, dose-escalation study designed to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) / pharmacodynamic (PD), and efficacy (RECIST evaluation every 8 wks) of PLX4032 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients (pts). Plasma PK samples were collected on days 1, 8 and 15. Results: 54 pts have been enrolled: metastatic melanoma (n=49), thyroid (n=3), rectal (n=1), or ovarian carcinoma (n=1). 26 pts received a crystalline formulation (CF) continuously at doses from 100 mg BID to 1600 mg BID with associated exposures below target plasma levels. 28 pts received an optimized formulation with increased bioavailability, predicted to have 10-fold greater bioavailability, at doses from 160 mg BID to 1120 mg BID. AUC was dose-proportional and above target levels at 240 mg BID and higher. There was 1 DLT at 720 mg BID (G4 pancytopenia); treatment was restarted at 360 mg BID without myelosuppression. At 1120 mg BID, 3 of 5 pts had DLT (rash and fatigue). One pt had grade 3 increased ALT at 360 mg BID. 13 melanoma pts (77 %M1C) treated at doses of 240 mg BID or higher of the increased bioavailability formulation have a minimum follow-up of 8 weeks. 5 of the 7 BRAF V600E+ pts treated at ≥ 240 mg BID had tumor regression, up to 83%, with 1 confirmed partial response (PR) and 1 unconfirmed PR (too early); 2 of 4 pts with unknown V600E status had tumor regression, up to 50%, with 1 confirmed PR; 2 BRAF wild-type pts had progressive disease. All 7 pts with tumor regression remain progression-free, ranging from 4 to 14 months. 3 thyroid cancer pts with V600E mutations have tumor regression (range 9–16%) and are progression-free (4–7 months). Conclusions: Dose escalation of PLX4032 reached DLTs at 1120 mg BID. 720 mg BID is the current MTD, but 960 mg BID may be explored. PLX4032 exhibits antitumor activity in V600E BRAF mutant tumors. These observations confirm that V600E BRAF is a valid therapeutic target in human cancer.

[Table: see text]

A three-part, phase I, dose-escalation study of GSK1120212, a potent MEK inhibitor, administered orally to subjects with solid tumors or lymphoma

e14584

Background: GSK1120212 is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1, a component of the MAP kinase pathway. GSK1120212 demonstrates efficient inhibition of p-ERK which correlates with inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. PO administration of GSK1120212 achieved tumor regression in multiple mouse xenograft models. The objectives of this study are to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of GSK1120212. Methods: In Part 1, patients (pts) with solid tumors or lymphoma are enrolled in successive cohorts and receive a single PO dose of GSK1120212 followed by QD doses on days 1 - 21 of each 28-day cycle. Tumor response is assessed Q 8 weeks. PK blood samples are collected from all pts. Ophthalmic exams are administered at baseline and as clinically warranted. Dose escalation occurs via an accelerated titration followed by a standard 3+3 escalation. In Part 2, pts with pancreatic or K-Ras mutant CRC will be enrolled at the MTD. In Part 3, pts with biopsiable tumors will enroll at MTD and sub-MTD doses. Tumor biopsies will be taken pre- and post-dose to measure pERK and other markers of cell proliferation. Results: Six pts with advanced malignancies (neuroendocrine, thyroid, colorectal (n=2), melanoma (n=2) have been treated with tablets at four dose levels: 0.125 (n=2), 0.25 (n=1), 0.5 (n=2), and 1.0 mg (n=1). No DLTs or grade 2 toxicities have been reported. One patient was on study for over 17 weeks. Based on mean AUC and Cmax, GSK1120212 exposures following 15 days of repeat-dose administration were approximately dose proportional across the dose range (0.125–0.5 mg) with a median Tmax of approximately 1.5 hours. Conclusions: GSK1120212 has been well tolerated to date. Dose escalation is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

Effect of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor lonafarnib on sensitivity of melanoma cells to the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib and on Rheb farnesylation and mTOR signaling

9077

Background: Farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTIs) inhibit the post-translational farnesylation of a number of target proteins, including Ras and Rheb, preventing their signaling function. Ras signals to the RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) and PI3K-AKT-mTOR (AKT) signaling pathways which are constitutively activated in melanoma and appear to play a major role in tumor progression and drug resistance. Rheb positively regulates mTOR signaling. Methods: Using a panel of melanoma cell lines we evaluated the effects of the FTI lonafarnib alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents (temozolomide, cisplatin) or pharmacological MAPK pathway inhibitors (sorafenib, U0126, PD98059) or AKT pathway inhibitors (LY294002, wortmannin, rapamycin) on proliferation, survival and invasive tumor growth of melanoma cells in monolayer and organotypic culture. Results: Lonafarnib did not significantly inhibit growth of metastatic melanoma cells. Also, lonafarnib did not sensitize melanoma cells to the chemotherapeutic agents tested. Most combinations of the FTI lonafarnib with MAPK or AKT pathway inhibitors lacked significant enhancement of growth inhibition compared to monotherapy. In contrast, lonafarnib significantly augmented the growth inhibitory effects of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in eight metastatic melanoma cell lines tested. These effects did not appear to depend on BRAF or NRAS mutation status. Moreover, lonafarnib combined with sorafenib induced marked apoptosis and abrogated invasive melanoma growth. Interestingly, the FTI lonafarnib did not inhibit phosphorylation of ERK or AKT but of p70S6K, a downstream target of Rheb and mTOR signaling. Conclusions: These data suggest that lonafarnib sensitizes melanoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting mTOR signaling via inhibition of Rheb farnesylation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I trial of RAD001 in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumors

14075

Background: Cetuximab is a selective epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitor approved for use in EGFR expressing advanced colorectal cancers. RAD001 inhibits mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), a downstream effector of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Preclinical studies suggest that RAD001 may restore sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in resistant cell lines, and that in combination it may augment anti-tumor activity. We assessed safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints for mTOR inhibition and tumor vascular permeability in a phase I combination study. Methods: Pts with EGFR-expressing advanced solid tumors were randomized to a 3 week run-in of single agent RAD001 or cetuximab Q wk, followed by RAD001 + cetuximab Qwk. RAD001 was dosed at 30–70 mg PO. Standard dosing of cetuximab was used (400 mg/m2 IV loading, followed by 250 mg/m2 IV Qwk). DLT was defined as any grade 4 hematologic or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity associated with treatment during cycle 1. In addition to plasma analysis for the PK of RAD001, we performed 18FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI before and during combination therapy, to assess for early changes in tumor metabolic activity and vascular permeability. Phosphorylation of p70S6K, a biomarker for RAD001 activity, was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Results: 12 pts (median age 56, 5 M/7F, median PS 0) were treated at dose levels 1–2 (RAD001 30–50mg/cetuximab 250 mg/m2), with 3 per dose order. Observed toxicities were all grade 1–2, and included mucositis (2/12), rash (8/12), fatigue (6/12), anorexia (4/12), nausea (5/12), and vomiting (5/12). 2 pts (parotid and ovarian CA) had SD (4+ mos) as best response, with decreased serum CA-125 in the ovarian CA pt. PET findings in pts with SD confirm decreased tumor metabolic activity. Conclusions: At these doses, neither drug appears to increase the toxicity of the other. Analysis of full dose RAD001 in the combination is nearing completion. Preliminary PET findings suggest biological activity of the combination.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I/II trial of sorafenib (S) with bevacizumab (B) in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients (Pts)

3031

Background: In an effort to enhance the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway blockade in mRCC we initiated a Phase I-II trial of combination S and B to block VEGFR signaling and VEGF binding, as well as, platelet derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFR) signaling. Methods: Pts with measurable (RECIST) mRCC, adequate organ function, and PS 0–1 were eligible for this trial. Cohorts of 6 pts were enrolled at 3 sites to define the MTD and DLT of the combination of S and B. The schedule was B IV q 14 days and S daily with cycles of 28 days. Response and toxicity were assessed at the end of 2 cycles. Dose levels began with S at 200mg BID and B at 5 mg/kg (level 1) with the hope to reach phase II doses of both agents (S at 400mg BID and B at 10mg/kg). The MTD or the phase II dose of each agent would then be administered to up to 45 pts with mRCC, clear cell histology, and prior nephrectomy. Results: A total of 18 patients have been enrolled to date, with 15 completing their first response evaluation. Pts were median age 61 years (46–74 range); M/F: 15/3; PS: 0/1= 12/6; 17 clear cell, 1 chromophobe, 11 prior nephrectomy; 4 with prior cytokine therapy. Two pts in level 1 experienced DLT with recurrent and intolerable (grade 3) hand-foot syndrome (HFS). An additional 6 patients were treated at dose level -1 (S at 200mmg QD and B at 3mg/kg) with no DLTs. Six more pts have been treated at dose level 1 with Vit B6 at 300mg/d in an attempt to minimize HFS. Toxicity data in this cohort is incomplete. Additional toxicities among the 18 pts included grade 3 hypertension (4), grade 3 proteinuria (2), and grade 2 stomatitis (3). Responses including 4 objective PRs, and 4 pts with 20–30% regression have been seen in the 14 evaluated pts. Only 2 patients have had disease progression. Conclusions: The phase II doses for this combination have not yet been established, but will likely be lower than the full phase II doses of the individual agents. The toxicities from HFS (primarily) and hypertension and stomatitis appear to be limiting. Even at the initial low doses of S and B, significant anti-tumor activity has been observed. The completion of this phase I trial will be reported. The phase II studies in mRCC are highly anticipated. Support by phase I contract UO-1 CA099177

[Table: see text]

Bevacizumab with or without erlotinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

4523

Background: Bevacizumab (B) has clinical efficacy in metastatic RCC following cytokine treatment. A single-arm Phase II trial suggested potential clinical benefit of adding erlotinib (E) to B. To further assess this combination in RCC, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase 2 trial comparing B+E vs B + placebo. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: previously untreated metastatic RCC with >50% clear cell histology; previous nephrectomy; ECOG PS 0 or 1; measurable disease; serum Ca++ ≤ 10 mg/dL; LDH ≤ 1.5 ULN; Hgb ≥ 9 g/dL; and standard exclusion criteria for B. All pts received B 10 mg/kg IV q 2 wk with either E 150 mg po daily or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumors were assessed using RECIST every 8 wks. A landmark analysis was performed 9 mo after accrual of the last pt. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included response duration, overall survival, and safety. Results: 104 pts (53 B, 51 B+E) were enrolled at 20 sites from Mar 2004–Oct 2004. 65 pts have discontinued therapy. 55 have progressed (PFS HR = 0.86, CI 0.5, 1.49). Median follow-up was 9.8 mo. Median survival duration was not reached. Only 1 treatment-related death due to GI perforation occurred (on B+E). Updated safety and survival data will be presented. Conclusions: B+E and B were well tolerated. Adding E does not appear to improve efficacy from B. PFS of 8.5 months with B compares favorably with the historical PFS of ∼ 4.7 mo with interferon alpha (IFN). Results of phase III trials comparing IFN ± B are pending.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Usual interstitial pneumonia

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a distinct histological lesion observed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but can be found in other etiologies. The diagnosis of UIP can be established by surgical lung biopsy or by high resolution thin section computed tomographic scans (provided the radiographic features are classical). Historically, patients labeled as "IPF'' encompassed a group of disorders including UIP as well as other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, which differ from UIP in prognosis and responsiveness to therapy. Current recommendations from international consensus statements restrict the term IPF to patients with idiopathic UIP. The inciting cause(s) and pathogenesis of UIP have not been elucidated, but alveolar epithelial cell injury and dysregulation or altered phenotypic expression of fibroblasts are key elements. Inflammatory cells may play minor roles in initiating or propagating the fibrotic process. The prognosis of UIP is poor. Mean survival following diagnosis approximates 3 years. Current therapies are of unproven value. Corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents have been most often used, but data affirming benefit are lacking. Single-lung transplantation is a viable option for patients failing medical therapy. Novel therapeutic strategies based upon inhibiting fibroproliferation or enhancing alveolar reepithelialization are desperately needed. In this article, we discuss diagnostic criteria for UIP (both histopathological and radiographic), natural history and clinical course, and therapeutic approaches (both current and future).