The Telehealth Tradeoff: A Multimethod Study of the Benefits and Challenges Associated With Maintaining Treatment Outcomes Using a Hybrid Model of Pediatric Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic required intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) programs to shift to virtual models of care. This study used a multimethod approach to examine outcomes of a pediatric hybrid IIPT program (50% in-person treatment and 50% synchronous video-based telehealth) and assessed staff experiences while treating within this model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (M=14.73, SD=2.04; 79% female) reported pain intensity, functional disability, and psychological factors (anxiety, depressive symptoms, fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, social functioning) at admission, discharge, and short-term follow-up. Differences in treatment outcomes at discharge and short-term follow-up between patients who participated in the hybrid IIPT model (n=42) during the pandemic and those who participated in the traditional in-person model before the pandemic (n=42) were examined. Quantitative assessments of staff burnout and perceived effort and qualitative assessments exploring staff perspectives about the challenges and advantages of the hybrid IIPT model were gathered.

RESULTS

Youth in both groups made significant improvements across the majority of treatment outcomes; however, the hybrid group reported higher levels of pain at discharge and anxiety at follow-up. The majority of IIPT staff reported moderate to high levels of overall burnout, and almost half reported high levels of emotional exhaustion. Staff highlighted various challenges and benefits associated with treating within the hybrid model.

DISCUSSION

When considering telehealth as a treatment tool for youth with complex chronic pain, it is crucial to leverage its benefits while addressing its challenges for patients and providers.

Development and Validation of the Scale for Pain Self-Efficacy (SPaSE) in German and English Languages for Children and Adolescents

No validated measure for pain self-efficacy in children and adolescents is currently available in the German language, and existing English versions have limitations. This study used a thorough development process to create the Scale for Pain Self-Efficacy (SPaSE) in both German and English languages. Scale development was based on self-efficacy theory, adapting items from existing self-efficacy measures, and review of patients' perspectives. The final version of the 11-item SPaSE was created with expert discussions and testing of content validity, comprehensibility, and construct validity. The validation process consisted of exploratory factor analysis, testing of item characteristics, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change in 2 German samples of children and adolescents with chronic pain (study 1: outpatient sample N = 150, inpatient sample N = 31). Cross-validation in a U.S. sample (study 2: N = 98) confirmed the 1-factor structure, the sound psychometric properties and reliability of the SPaSE. Sum scores of the SPaSE were negatively correlated with pain-related disability, pain intensity, passive pain coping strategies, and emotional distress, in line with previous research. The valid and reliable SPaSE can be used in clinical practice to monitor pain treatment progress, advances the field of pain self-efficacy research in Germany, and opens the door to comparative research in German and English samples. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents psychometric properties of a newly developed measure of pain self-efficacy in children and adolescents that is available in both German and English language. This measure could be used in both research and clinical practice to measure treatment progress and outcome.

Clinical Assessment of Mechanical Allodynia in Youth With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Development and Preliminary Validation of the Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense)

Youth with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) commonly experience mechanical allodynia and disability. Assessment of mechanical allodynia is typically binary (present or absent), making it difficult to assess the quality and degree of mechanical allodynia before and after treatment. This study developed and validated the Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense) to provide an easy way for rehabilitation clinicians to evaluate mechanical allodynia before and after intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment. The 6 Pedi-Sense items demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (CR) at admission (CR = .956) and discharge (CR = .973), reasonably fit the hypothesized linear model of stimulus intensity (P < .0001), and significantly loaded onto a single latent factor, mechanical allodynia (P < .0001), at admission and discharge. Pedi-Sense scores significantly correlated with disability (r_s = .40; P = .004) and pain catastrophizing (r_s = .33; P = .017) at admission. The Pedi-Sense appeared responsive to intervention as participants' total scores improved by 1.44 points (95% CI: .72, 2.15) after IIPT interventions that included daily tactile desensitization. However, test-retest and interrater reliability and the specific contribution of desensitization treatment to the overall success of multi-modal pain rehabilitation still needs to be evaluated. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of a novel clinical assessment of static and dynamic mechanical allodynia. The Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense) allows rehabilitation clinicians to easily evaluate mechanical allodynia at the bedside with minimal training and simple equipment to guide desensitization treatment in clinical settings.

Will This Treatment Help My Child?: How Parent/Caregiver Treatment Expectations Relate to Intensive Pain Rehabilitation Outcomes for Youth With Chronic Pain

OBJECTIVE

An extensive body of research has highlighted the impact that parent/caregiver factors have on functioning and treatment outcomes among youth with chronic pain. However, parent/caregiver expectations in pain treatment have been largely understudied, despite strong evidence that treatment expectations are associated with treatment engagement and overall outcomes in nonpain populations. Accordingly, the primary aim of this investigation was to preliminarily examine the manifestation and measurement of parent/caregiver treatment expectations in an intensive interdisciplinary pediatric pain treatment (IIPT) setting.

METHODS

Participants in this study (N=328) included children and adolescents who attended an IIPT program for chronic pain between August 2013 and March 2020 and their parent/caregiver(s). Outcomes examined include parent/caregiver self-report of treatment expectations for their child upon admission to the IIPT in addition to pain-related and psychosocial factors at admission and discharge.

RESULTS

Findings revealed a high level of expectations (ie, belief that the treatment will be helpful) on average, with higher parent/caregiver expectations associated with poorer functioning at admission to and discharge from the IIPT program.

CONCLUSION

Extremely high treatment expectations among parents of more disabled youth may be indicative of unrealistic hopes or the "need" for IIPT to help their child; tempering parental expectations with psychoeducation about IIPT goals and realistic outcomes may indirectly improve treatment outcomes for their children. Future research should examine the potentially unique and important role that treatment expectations, of both parent/caregivers and their children, may have in overall IIPT outcomes.

Perfectly Tired: Perfectionism and Sleep in Adolescents With Chronic Pain

OBJECTIVE

Conceptual links between perfectionism and chronic pain have been proposed yet minimal empirical data exists. Poor sleep is associated with high levels of perfectionism and is common among youth with chronic pain. This study explores associations between perfectionism and sleep quality in adolescents with chronic pain while considering levels of functional disability.

METHODS

Adolescents (ages 12-18) with chronic pain (N = 423) completed baseline measures of self-oriented perfectionism (SOP), socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP), sleep quality, and functional disability as part of routine clinical care at an outpatient chronic pain clinic and a pain rehabilitation day treatment program. Multivariate multiple regression assessed associations between perfectionism (SOP and SPP) and sleep (falling asleep/reinitiating sleep, returning to wakefulness, and going to bed). Two moderation models explored how relations between perfectionism (SOP and SPP) and sleep quality (total score) varied depending on level of functional disability. All analyses controlled for clinic setting.

RESULTS

Results indicated SPP was associated with more difficulties across all sleep subdomains in adolescents with chronic pain, while SOP was unrelated to sleep quality. Associations between perfectionism and sleep quality were dependent on functional disability; perfectionism was most strongly associated with worse sleep quality for adolescents with less functional disability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the relationship between perfectionism and sleep quality in adolescents with chronic pain and suggests that perfectionistic youth with less disability are at the greatest risk for sleep problems. Longitudinal research is needed to understand how perfectionism, sleep, and disability interact over time in youth with chronic pain.

Offset analgesia identifies impaired endogenous pain modulation in pediatric chronic pain disorders

Offset analgesia (OA), a psychophysical test of endogenous pain inhibition, is diminished in many adult chronic pain disorders but OA has not been investigated in youth with chronic pain disorders. This study assessed OA responses in 30 youth with chronic primary and secondary pain disorders and 32 healthy controls. The OA, control, and constant thermal tests were evoked with an individualized noxious heat stimulus of approximately 50/100 mm on a visual analogue scale followed by 1°C offset temperature. This study also examined the association of OA responses with 2 self-report measures of pain sensitivity, the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire. Patients exhibited diminished capacity to activate OA with a reduction in ΔeVASc of 53 ± 29% vs controls 74 ± 24% (P = 0.003) even after multivariate regression adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Patients also showed decreased ability to habituate to a constant noxious heat stimulus compared to controls (P = 0.021). Central Sensitization Inventory scores showed excellent predictive accuracy in differentiating patients from controls (area under the curve = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99) and CSI score ≥30 was identified as an optimal cutoff value. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores did not differentiate patients from controls nor correlate with OA. In this study, 60% of youth with chronic pain showed reduced capacity for endogenous pain inhibition.

Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment improve pediatric headache-related disability?

Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for improving disability in children with chronic headache using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model as a conceptual framework for disability assessment.Materials and methods: Children with chronic headache (n = 50; ages 10-19 years; 62% female) attended an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment program 8 h/day, 5 times/week for 2-7 weeks. Disability measures were administered at admission, discharge, and 6-8 week follow-up. Disability outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Friedman's analyses of variance were used to compare scores across two and three longitudinal time points, respectively.Results: After rehabilitation, disability reduced on the Headache Impact Test-6 from severe impact at admission to some impact at follow-up (p < 0.001). Median time on the modified Bruce protocol increased from 13.1 min (interquartile range = 12.6-14.1) to 14.4 min (interquartile range = 12.9-16.3), p < 0.001, with gains maintained at follow-up. Improvements in pain and disability were associated with improvements in school participation.Conclusions: Findings of this study support the effectiveness of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for improving disability in children with chronic headache.Implication for rehabilitationIntensive interdisciplinary pain treatment is effective for improving pain and disability in children with chronic headaches.Application of the ICF model to disability assessment suggests that children with chronic headaches may experience significant disability, even when standardized assessments of physical capacity are normal.The modified Bruce protocol, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computerized Adaptive Tests, and Headache Impact Test-6 appear particularly valuable in understanding the nature of disability in children with chronic headaches.