Perceived psychosocial stressors and coping resources in chronic low back pain patients as classified by the avoidance-endurance model

Objectives

The Avoidance-Endurance Model distinguishes between subgroups of low back pain (LBP) patients with three maladaptive styles of coping with pain: fear-avoidance (FAR), distress-endurance (DER), eustress-endurance (EER), and one adaptive coping style (AR). This study aimed to compare the quantity of patients' perceived psychosocial stressors and coping resources across these subgroups.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient rehabilitation center for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (69 women/68 men) with chronic LBP were assessed using the following: a demographic checklist, the visual analogue scale, Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and 36-Item Short Form. Subsequently, patients participated in semi-structured interviews led by clinical psychologists, which were intended to identify their perception of stressors and coping resources. The quantity of psychosocial stressors and coping resources were analyzed using deductive and inductive content analyses and then compared between subgroups using chi-square-tests.

Results

FARs experienced significantly higher levels of “mental suffering” (p = <0.001) and “other workplace problems” compared to ARs and EERs (p = <0.001). DERs reported significantly higher levels of “mental suffering” (p = <0.001), “job stress” (p = 0.022), and “familial losses” (p = 0.029) compared to ARs, whereas the AR group demonstrated significantly more “coping resources” (p = 0.001) compared to FARs.

Conclusion

AEM-subgroups differed in the quantity of perceived psychosocial stressors and coping resources with AR, who demonstrated a lower risk for pain chronicity and reported the highest quantity of resources. The variability across subgroups may imply differences in patientś needs regarding therapeutic interventions and suggests that a resource-centered approach to cope with stress and pain may be beneficial.

Changes in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Components "Activity/Participation" as Predicted Through Patient-Reported Outcomes Along With Comprehensive Back Pain Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVES

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) but its use in clinical practice is sparse. This study investigated the limitations and restrictions in the most relevant brief ICF core set categories for chronic low back pain (cLBP) as automatically predicted from routinely measured outcomes using a novel, validated mapping algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 2718 cLBP patients recruited, data from 1541 (64% females) were available from before and at the end of 6 months comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation. Assessments included the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Pain Disability Index (PDI) questionnaires, the percentage of patients with predicted limitations and restrictions in important activity and participation ICF categories, bodily functional measurements, pain intensity, and anxiety/depression (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

At baseline, both the RMDQ and the PDI measures were within the third of the lowest disability scores whilst 80% of the patients had limitations with "maintaining a body position" and 30% with "walking" ICF categories. Intervention-associated gains in the maximum isometric lumbar extension and flexion strength and the lumbar range of motion were significant overall, but improvements in patients' ICF limitations/restrictions varied. Anxiety/depression, lumbar range of motion, and extension strength all had a significant impact on the majority of the ICF categories, whereas flexion strength had none.

DISCUSSION

The rate of patients with predicted limitations/restrictions in activity/participation ICF core categories for cLBP partly mirrored disability levels and the impact of the body function scores on these limitations/restrictions in ICF categories was varied. Thus, assessing problems in the ICF activity/participation core categories is of relevance to clinical practice for both treatment goal setting and intervention planning. This may be achieved by computer-generated mapping without additional time burden.

In-depth analysis of life values and their corresponding inhibitors and facilitators in chronic low back pain patients: A mixed-method approach

BACKGROUND

The struggle with pain often interferes with the ability of chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients to pursue important life values due to psychological inflexibility.

OBJECTIVE

This research examined life values, related inhibitors and facilitators relevant to personalized therapy planning.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-four CLBP patients completed the Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI). Of these, 68 patients were interviewed to assess inhibitors and facilitators related to life values. Mixed-effects models quantitatively examined differences in the values, structuring content analysis served to qualitatively analyze the interviews.

RESULTS

Participants rated the value "family" as being of highest importance and success. The largest discrepancy between importance and success was found for "health". Content analyses revealed a broad range of inhibitors and facilitators related to the examined life values with the highest number of inhibitors related to "work". Facilitators were also found to be of relevance to all life values, but to a lower extent than inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived importance and success of life values and their related inhibitors and facilitators may differentially affect CLBP patients. Considering such individual aspects is therefore of utmost importance to improve patient care, as they enable treatment goals and the therapeutic strategies to be adapted accordingly.

Mapping patient reported outcome measures for low back pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health using random forests

BACKGROUND

There is need for feasible and efficient concepts to document patients functioning impairment according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) without imposing additional burden to clinical practice.

AIM

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an automatic linking approach that translates information derived from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the ICF.

DESIGN

Proof-of-concept study.

SETTING

Participants completed both the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Pain Disability Index and were interviewed using the activity and participation component of the ICF brief core set for low back pain.

POPULATION

A total of 244 patients with light to moderate chronic low back pain (cLBP); additionally, 19 patients with higher levels of pain were recruited and assessed for validation purposes.

METHODS

Based on information extracted from the PROMs and considering the factors age and gender, random forest models that predicted the presence or absence of an impairment at the specific ICF category were computed and validated.

RESULTS

Accuracy of the models was found to be acceptable for the most relevant ICF brief core set categories for low back pain if applied at the population level.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented approach can be assumed valid if applied at large on population level. The results are of relevance for the further development of automatic linking programs that would allow the ICF-based classification of functioning properties within the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) for any health condition.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The presented approach eases the documentation of patients' functioning impairment according to the standardized ICF.