Prevalence and Survival of Prolonged Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

OBJECTIVES

To examine trends in utilization and outcomes among patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring prolonged venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Adult patients in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.

PATIENTS

Thirteen thousand six hundred eighty-one patients that required ECMO for the support of ARDS between January 2012 and December 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mortality while supported with VV ECMO and survival to hospital discharge based on ECMO duration were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. Among the 13,681 patients supported with VV ECMO, 4,040 (29.5%) were supported for greater than or equal to 21 days and 975 (7.1%) for greater than or equal to 50 days. Patients supported with prolonged VV ECMO were less likely to be discharged alive from the hospital compared with those with short duration of support (46.5% vs. 59.7%; p < 0.001). However, among patients supported with VV ECMO greater than or equal to 21 days, duration of extracorporeal life support was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; p = 0.87 and adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02; p = 0.48). Even in those supported with VV ECMO for at least 120 days (n = 113), 52 (46.0%) of these patients were ultimately discharged alive from the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged VV ECMO support of ARDS has increased and accounts for a substantial portion of cases. Among patients that survive for greater than or equal to 21 days while receiving VV ECMO support, duration is not predictive of survival to hospital discharge and clinical recovery may occur even after very prolonged VV ECMO support.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in younger patients with persistent dyspnea following acute, outpatient COVID-19 infection

Studies using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate persistent dyspnea following infection with COVID-19 have focused on older patients with co-morbid diseases who are post-hospitalization. Less attention has been given to younger patients with post-COVID-19 dyspnea treated as outpatients for their acute infection. We sought to determine causes of persistent dyspnea in younger patients recovering from acute COVID-19 infection that did not require hospitalization. We collected data on all post-COVID-19 patients who underwent CPET in our clinic in the calendar year 2021. Data on cardiac function and respiratory response were abstracted, and diagnoses were assigned using established criteria. CPET data on 45 patients (238.3 ± 124 days post-test positivity) with a median age of 27.0 (22.0-40.0) were available for analysis. All but two (95.6%) were active-duty service members. The group showed substantial loss of aerobic capacity-average VO2 peak (L/min) was 84.2 ± 23% predicted and 25 (55.2%) were below the threshold for normal. Spirometry, diffusion capacity, high-resolution computed tomography, and echocardiogram were largely normal and were not correlated with VO2 peak. The two most common contributors to dyspnea and exercise limitation following comprehensive evaluation were deconditioning and dysfunctional breathing (DB). Younger active-duty military patients with persistent dyspnea following outpatient COVID-19 infection show a substantial reduction in aerobic capacity that is not driven by structural cardiopulmonary disease. Deconditioning and DB breathing are common contributors to their exercise limitation. The chronicity and severity of symptoms accompanied by DB could be consistent with an underlying myopathy in some patients, a disorder that cannot be differentiated from deconditioning using non-invasive CPET.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Interstitial Lung Disease: Management Options to Move Beyond Supportive Care

Purpose of Review

This review delineates current diagnostic and management strategies for pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD).

Recent Findings

The INCREASE trial, a phase III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated both improved 6-min walk distance and decreased disease progression with inhaled treprostinil. This pivotal trial led to inhaled treprostinil becoming the first FDA approved medication for treatment of PH-ILD. The availability of this treatment has generated subsequent recommendations for the screening for PH in patients with ILD. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important for clinicians to gain awareness and familiarity with the evolving management options for PH-ILD.

Summary

The management of PH-ILD has its roots in goal-directed treatment of the underlying lung disease. However, recent medication advances and ongoing clinical studies are opening opportunities for more disease-specific treatment.