1
|
Kokorelias KM, Lee TSJ, Bayley M, Seto E, Toulany A, Nelson MLA, Dimitropoulos G, Penner M, Simpson R, Munce SEP. A Web-Based Peer-Patient Navigation Program (Compassionate Online Navigation to Enhance Care Transitions) for Youth Living With Childhood-Acquired Disabilities Transitioning From Pediatric to Adult Care: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024; 7:e47545. [PMID: 38324351 PMCID: PMC10882481 DOI: 10.2196/47545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have highlighted significant challenges associated with the transition from pediatric to adult health and social care services for youth living with childhood-acquired disabilities and their caregivers. Patient navigation has been proposed as an effective transitional care intervention. Better understanding of how patient navigation may support youth and their families during pediatric to adult care transitions is warranted. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the preferred adaptations of an existing web-based platform from the perspectives of youth with childhood-onset disabilities and their family caregivers to develop a web-based peer-patient navigation program, Compassionate Online Navigation to Enhance Care Transitions (CONNECT). METHODS A qualitative descriptive design was used. Participants included youth living with childhood-acquired disabilities (16/23, 70%) and their caregivers (7/23, 30%). Semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted, digitally recorded, and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and was facilitated through NVivo software (Lumivero). RESULTS Participants desired a program that incorporated (1) self-directed learning, (2) a library of reliable health and community resources, and (3) emotional and social supports. On the basis of participants' feedback, CONNECT was deemed satisfactory, as it was believed that the program would help support appropriate transition care through the provision of trusted health-related information. Participants highlighted the need for options to optimize confidentiality in their health and social care and the choice to remain anonymous to other participants. CONCLUSIONS Web-based patient navigation programs such as CONNECT may deliver peer support that can improve the quality and experience of care for youth, and their caregivers, transitioning from pediatric to adult care through personalized support, health care monitoring, and health and social care resources. Future studies are needed to test the feasibility, acceptability, usability, use, and effectiveness of CONNECT among youth with childhood-onset disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tin-Suet Joan Lee
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Seto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Digital Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alene Toulany
- Department of Adolescent Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Melanie Penner
- Department of Pediatrics, Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Simpson
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah E P Munce
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temetry Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kokorelias KM, Grosse A, Zhabokritsky A, Walmsley SL, Sirisegaram L. Exploring implementation considerations for geriatric-HIV clinics: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on HIV models of geriatric care. HIV Med 2024; 25:38-59. [PMID: 37794607 DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review aimed to map the current state of knowledge regarding the implementation considerations of existing geriatric-HIV models of care, to identify areas of further research and to inform the implementation of future geriatric-HIV interventions that support older adults living with HIV. METHODS We conducted a scoping review that was methodologically informed by the Arskey and O'Malley's 5 step framework and theoretically informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A systematic search of six databases was conducted for peer-reviewed literature. The grey literature was also searched. Article screening was performed in duplicate. Data was extracted for the purpose of this secondary analysis using a data extraction template informed by the CFIR. Data was inductively and deductively analyzed. RESULTS In total, 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. The models of care described varied in terms of their location and setting, the number and type of care providers involved, the mechanism of patient referral, the type of assessments and interventions performed and the methods of longitudinal patient follow-up. Four key categories emerged to describe factors that influenced their implementation: care provider buy-in, patient engagement, mechanisms of communication and collaboration, and available resources. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this scoping review provide an initial understanding of the key factors to consider when implementing geriatric-HIV models of care. We recommend health system planners consider mechanisms of communication and collaboration, opportunities for care provider buy-in, patient engagement and available resources. Future research should explore implementation in more diverse settings to understand the nuances that influence implementation and care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Grosse
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice Zhabokritsky
- Department of Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- CIHR Canadian HIV Trails Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sharon L Walmsley
- Department of Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- CIHR Canadian HIV Trails Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Luxey Sirisegaram
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aggarwal M, Katz A, Kokorelias KM, Wong ST, Aghajafari F, Ivers NM, Martin-Misener R, Aubrey-Bassler K, Breton M, Upshur REG, Kwong JC. What are effective vaccine distribution approaches for equity-deserving and high-risk populations during COVID-19? Exploring best practices and recommendations in Canada: protocol for a mixed-methods multiple case codesign study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072238. [PMID: 37940159 PMCID: PMC10632871 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The WHO has stated that vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to overcoming COVID-19. Vaccine hesitancy among underserved and at-risk communities is an ongoing challenge in Canada. Public confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and the principles of equity need to be considered in vaccine distribution. In Canada, governments of each province or territory manage their own healthcare system, providing an opportunity to compare and contrast distribution strategies. The overarching objective of this study is to identify effective vaccine distribution approaches and advance knowledge on how to design and implement various strategies to meet the different needs of underserved communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Multiple case studies in seven Canadian provinces will be conducted using a mixed-methods design. The study will be informed by Experience-Based CoDesign techniques and theoretically guided by the Socio-Ecological Model and the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix frameworks. Phase 1 will involve a policy document review to systematically explore the vaccine distribution strategy over time in each jurisdiction. This will inform the second phase, which will involve (2a) semistructured, in-depth interviews with policymakers, public health officials, researchers, providers, groups representing patients, researchers and stakeholders and (2b) an analysis of population-based administrative health data of vaccine administration. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data will inform the identification of effective vaccine distribution approaches for various populations. Informed by this evidence, phase 3 of the study will involve conducting focus groups with multiple stakeholders to codesign recommendations for the design and implementation of effective vaccine delivery strategies for equity-deserving and at-risk populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by the University of Toronto's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (#42643), University of British Columbia Behavioural Research Ethics Board (#H22-01750-A002), Research Ethics Board of the Nova Scotia Health Authority (#48272), Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board (#2022.126), Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary (REB22-0207), and University of Manitoba Health Research Board (H2022-239). The outcome of this study will be to produce a series of recommendations for implementing future vaccine distribution approaches from the perspective of various stakeholders, including equity-deserving and at-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Katz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Rehabiliation Sciences Institute, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabiliation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sabrina T Wong
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Noah M Ivers
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Mylaine Breton
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Munce SE, Steele Gray C, Pomeroy BC, Bayley M, Kokorelias KM, Luong D, Biddiss E, Cave T, Bragge P, Chew-Graham CA, Colquhoun H, Dadich A, Dainty KN, Elliott M, Feng P, Goldhar J, Hamilton CB, Harvey G, Kastner M, Kothari A, Langley J, Jeffs L, Masterson D, Nelson MLA, Perrier L, Riley J, Sellen K, Seto E, Simpson R, Staniszewska S, Srinivasan V, Straus SE, Tricco AC, Kuluski K. Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e50463. [PMID: 37902812 PMCID: PMC10644195 DOI: 10.2196/50463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions. OBJECTIVE The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions. METHODS The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline. RESULTS The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CONCLUSIONS The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/50463.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ep Munce
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mark Bayley
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sinai Health and University Health Network, Geriatrics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elaine Biddiss
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Peter Bragge
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carolyn A Chew-Graham
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ann Dadich
- School of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katie N Dainty
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patrick Feng
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario College of Art & Design University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jodeme Goldhar
- International Foundation for Integrated Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clayon B Hamilton
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Design Studies, Department of Art & Design, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Kothari
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joe Langley
- Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Lianne Jeffs
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Masterson
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare Sweden, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Michelle LA Nelson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Riley
- Ontario Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research SUPPORT Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Sellen
- Ontario College of Art & Design University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Seto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Digital Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Simpson
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Staniszewska
- Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Vasanthi Srinivasan
- Ontario Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research SUPPORT Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kokorelias KM, Grigorovich A, Harris MT, Rehman U, Ritchie L, Levy A, Denecke K, McMurray J. Coadaptation Between Smart Technologies and Older Adults Over Time: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e51129. [PMID: 37812466 PMCID: PMC10594133 DOI: 10.2196/51129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Internet of Things (IoT) has gained significant attention due to advancements in technology and has potential applications in meeting the needs of an aging population. Smart technologies, a subset of IoT, can support older adults in aging in place, promoting independent living and improving their quality of life. However, there is a lack of research on how older adults and smart technologies coadapt over time to maximize their benefits and sustain adoption. OBJECTIVE We will aim to comprehensively review and analyze the existing scientific literature pertaining to the coadaptation between smart technologies and older adults. The primary focus will be to investigate the extent and nature of this coadaptation process and explore how older adults and technology coevolve over time to enhance older adults' experience with technology. METHODS This scoping review will follow the methodology outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed articles will be searched in databases like Ovid MEDLINE, OVID Embase, PEDro, OVID PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus. The research team will create a data extraction form covering study characteristics, participant characteristics, underlying models and frameworks, research findings, implications for technology coadaptation, and any identified study limitations. A directed content analysis approach will be used, incorporating the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation framework and Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Plus theoretical framework. RESULTS The results of this study are expected in January 2024. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review endeavors to present a thorough overview of the available evidence concerning how smart technologies interact with older adults over an extended period. The insights gained from this review will lay the groundwork for a research program that explores how older adults adapt to and use smart technologies throughout their lives, ultimately leading to improved user satisfaction and experience and facilitating aging in place with tailored support and user-centered design principles. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/51129.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- National Institute on Ageing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alisa Grigorovich
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Recreation and Leisure Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada
| | - Maurita T Harris
- User Experience Design, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Umair Rehman
- Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Louise Ritchie
- Alzheimer Scotland Centre for Policy and Practice, University of West Scotland, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - AnneMarie Levy
- Lazaridis School of Business & Economics/Community Health, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Kerstin Denecke
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Josephine McMurray
- Lazaridis School of Business & Economics/Community Health, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aggarwal M, Scott G, Kokorelias KM, Kulasegaram K, Katz A, Upshur REG. Defining the capabilities and competencies of high-performing family physicians: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072266. [PMID: 37591643 PMCID: PMC10441087 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-performing primary care is recognised as the foundation of an effective and efficient healthcare system. Many medical graduates report they are not prepared for independent practice. To date, no research has been conducted to identify the key capabilities and competencies of high-performing family medicine graduates in Canada. This pilot project aims to identify the capabilities and competencies of high-performing early-career family physicians in Ontario, Canada, and explore opportunities for enhancing learning, teaching and assessment within family medicine residency programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Employing a mixed-methods explanatory sequential study design, this research will use a theory-driven Professional Capability Framework, previously validated in studies across nine professions, to guide the investigation. The first (quantitative) phase involves surveying ~50 high-performing early-career family physicians identified as high performing by educators, colleagues and leaders. The objective of the survey is to identify the key competencies and personal, interpersonal and cognitive capabilities of high-performing family physicians. The second (qualitative) phase involves conducting workshops with stakeholders, including educators, professional associations, regulators and colleges, to test the veracity of the results. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. The first and second phases will identify the key capabilities and competencies required to confidently adapt to the independent practice of comprehensive family medicine and inform fit-for-purpose educational strategies for teaching, learning and assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the University of Toronto's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (#41799). Research findings will be discussed with professional bodies, educators responsible for family medicine curricula and universities. Study findings will also be disseminated through academic conferences and academic publications in peer-reviewed journals. Project summaries and infographics will be developed and disseminated to key stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Scott
- Learning Futures, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sinai Health and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabiliation Sciences Institute and Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kulamakan Kulasegaram
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Katz
- Department of Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kokorelias KM, Grosse A, Zhabokritsky A, Sirisegaram L. Understanding geriatric models of care for older adults living with HIV: a scoping review and qualitative analysis. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:417. [PMID: 37422631 PMCID: PMC10329351 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04114-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) treatment have reduced mortality rates and consequently increased the number of individuals with HIV living into older age. Despite this, people aged 50 years and older have been left behind in recent HIV treatment and prevention campaigns, and a gold-standard model of care for this population has not yet been defined. Developing evidence-based geriatric HIV models of care can support an accessible, equitable, and sustainable HIV health care system that ensures older adults have access to care that meets their needs now and in the future. METHODS Guided by Arksey & O'Malley (2005)'s methodological framework, a scoping review was conducted to determine the key components of, identify gaps in the literature about, and provide recommendations for future research into geriatric models of care for individuals with HIV. Five databases and the grey literature were systematically searched. The titles, abstracts and full texts of the search results were screened independently in duplicate. Data were analyzed using a qualitative case study and key component analysis approach to identify necessary model components. RESULTS 5702 studies underwent title and abstract screening, with 154 entering full-text review. 13 peer-reviewed and 0 grey literature sources were included. Most articles were from North America. We identified three primary model of care components that may improve the successful delivery of geriatric care to people living with HIV: Collaboration and Integration; Organization of Geriatric Care; and Support for Holistic Care. Most articles included some aspects of all three components. CONCLUSION To provide effective geriatric care to older persons living with HIV, health services and systems are encouraged to use an evidence-based framework and should consider incorporating the distinct model of care characteristics that we have identified in the literature. However, there is limited data about models in developing countries and long-term care settings, and limited knowledge of the role of family, friends and peers in supporting the geriatric care of individuals living with HIV. Future evaluative research is encouraged to determine the impact of optimal components of geriatric models of care on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160 - 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Grosse
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Alice Zhabokritsky
- Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, The University of Toronto, King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- CIHR Canadian HIV Trails Network, 570-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Luxey Sirisegaram
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aggarwal M, Hutchison B, Kokorelias KM, Mehta K, Greenberg L, Moran K, Barber D, Samson K. Impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: protocol for a rapid scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072076. [PMID: 37336539 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Interprofessional teams and funding and payment provider arrangements are key attributes of high-performing primary care. Several Canadian jurisdictions have introduced team-based models with different payment models. Despite these investments, the evidence of impact is mixed. This has raised questions about whether team-based primary care models are being implemented to facilitate team collaboration and effectiveness. Thus, we present a protocol for a rapid scoping review to systematically map, synthesise and summarise the existing literature on the impact of provider remuneration mechanisms and extrinsic and intrinsic incentives in team-based primary care. This review will answer three research questions: (1) What is the impact of provider remuneration models on team, patient, provider and system outcomes in primary care?; (2) What extrinsic and intrinsic incentives have been used in interprofessional primary care teams?; and (3) What is the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic team-based incentives on team, patient, provider and system outcomes? METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a rapid scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit) and grey literature sources (Google Scholar, Google). This review will consider all empirical studies and full-text English-language articles published between 2000 and 2022. Reviewers will independently perform the literature search, data extraction and synthesis of included studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to appraise the quality of evidence. The literature will be synthesised, summarised and mapped to themes that answer the research question of this review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required. Findings from this study will be written for publication in an open-access peer-review journal and presented at national and international conferences. Knowledge users are part of the research team and will assist with disseminating findings to the public, clinicians, funders and professional associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutchison
- Department of Family Medicine, Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sinai Health and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabiliation Sciences Institute and Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Sciences, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kavita Mehta
- Association of Family Health Teams of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kimberly Moran
- Ontario College of Family Physicians, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Barber
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Samson
- East Wellington Family Health Team, Erin/Rockwood, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aggarwal M, Kokorelias KM, Glazier RH, Katz A, Shiers-Hanley JE, Upshur REG. What is the role of primary care in the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out and the barriers and facilitators to an equitable vaccine roll-out? A rapid scoping review of nine jurisdictions. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065306. [PMID: 37076148 PMCID: PMC10123853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to: (1) examine the experience of nine global jurisdictions that engaged primary care providers (PCPs) to administer COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic; (2) describe how vaccine hesitancy and principles of equity were incorporated in the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out strategies and (3) identify the barriers and facilitators to the vaccine roll-out. DESIGN Rapid scoping review. DATA SOURCES Searches took place in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and PsycINFO, Google, and the websites of national health departments. Searches and analyses took place from May 2021 to July 2021. RESULTS Sixty-two documents met the inclusion criteria (35=grey literature; 56% and 27=peer reviewed; 44%). This review found that the vaccine distribution approach started at hospitals in almost all jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, PCPs were engaged at the beginning, and the majority included PCPs over time. In many jurisdictions, equity was considered in the prioritisation policies for various marginalised communities. However, vaccine hesitancy was not explicitly considered in the design of vaccine distribution approaches. The barriers to the roll-out of vaccines included personal, organisational and contextual factors. The vaccine roll-out strategy was facilitated by establishing policies and processes for pandemic preparedness, well-established and coordinated information systems, primary care interventions, adequate supply of providers, education and training of providers, and effective communications strategy. CONCLUSIONS Empirical evidence is lacking on the impact of a primary care-led vaccine distribution approach on vaccine hesitancy, adoption and equity. Future vaccine distribution approaches need to be informed by further research evaluating vaccine distribution approaches and their impact on patient and population outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Katz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Ross E G Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kokorelias KM, Leung G, Jamshed N, Grosse A, Sinha SK. Identifying the areas of low self-reported confidence of internal medicine residents in geriatrics: a descriptive study of findings from a structured geriatrics skills assessment survey. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22:870. [PMID: 36522619 PMCID: PMC9756669 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03934-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, no standardized methods exist to assess the geriatric skills and training needs of internal medicine trainees to enable them to become confident in caring for older patients. This study aimed to describe the self-reported confidence and training requirements in core geriatric skills amongst internal medicine residents in Toronto, Ontario using a standardized assessment tool. METHODS This study used a novel self-rating instrument, known as the Geriatric Skills Assessment Tool (GSAT), among incoming and current internal medicine residents at the University of Toronto, to describe self-reported confidence in performing, teaching and interest in further training with regard to 15 core geriatric skills previously identified by the American Board of Internal Medicine. RESULTS 190 (75.1%) out of 253 eligible incoming (Year 0) and current internal medicine residents (Years 1-3) completed the GSAT. Year 1-3 internal medicine residents who had completed a geriatric rotation reported being significantly more confident in performing 13/15 (P < 0.001 to P = 0.04) and in teaching 9/15 GSAT skills (P < 0.001 to P = 0.04). Overall, the residents surveyed identified their highest confidence in administering the Mini-Mental Status Examination and lowest confidence in assessing fall risk using a gait and balance tool, and in evaluating and managing chronic pain. CONCLUSION A structured needs assessment like the GSAT can be valuable in identifying the geriatric training needs of internal medicine trainees based on their reported levels of self-confidence. Residents in internal medicine could further benefit from completing a mandatory geriatric rotation early in their training, since this may improve their overall confidence in providing care for the mostly older patients they will work with during their residency and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Grace Leung
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Namirah Jamshed
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anna Grosse
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Samir K Sinha
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Suite 475 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Singh H, Nelson MLA, Martyniuk J, Colquhoun H, Munce S, Cameron JI, Kokorelias KM, Pakkal O, Kuluski K. Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065150. [PMID: 36410803 PMCID: PMC9680189 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Codesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health studies as it may produce more relevant and effective findings. The stroke population commonly exhibits challenges such as aphasia and cognitive changes that may limit their participation in codesign. However, the use of codesign within the stroke literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. This scoping review will determine: (1) what is the extent, range and nature of stroke research that has used codesign methods? (2) What codesign methods have been used to develop stroke interventions? (3) What considerations for codesigning interventions with people who have stroke are not captured in the findings? METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a protocol for a scoping review to identify the literature relating to stroke, and codesign will be conducted on OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsychINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro-Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Global Index Medicus. Studies of any design and publication date will be included. Title and abstract and full-text review will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted, collated and then summarised descriptively using quantitative (eg, numerical descriptions) and qualitative (eg, textual descriptions) methods. Numerical summaries will map the extent (eg, number of studies), range (eg, types of studies) and nature (eg, types of interventions developed) of the literature on this topic. A thematic analysis will provide insights into the codesign methods (eg, activities, non-researchers), including heterogeneity across and within studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This review protocol does not require ethics approval as data has not been collected/analysed. The findings will highlight opportunities and recommendations to inform future codesign research in stroke and other populations who exhibit similar challenges/disabilities, and they will be disseminated via publications, presentations and stakeholder meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERREGISTRATION Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NSD2W.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle LA Nelson
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Martyniuk
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Munce
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jill I Cameron
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System/University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Oya Pakkal
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singh H, Sangrar R, Wijekoon S, Nekolaichuk E, Kokorelias KM, Nelson MLA, Mirzazada S, Nguyen T, Assaf H, Colquhoun H. Applying 'cultural humility' to occupational therapy practice: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063655. [PMID: 35906054 PMCID: PMC9345050 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cultural humility is becoming increasingly important in healthcare delivery. Recognition of power imbalances between clients and healthcare providers is critical to enhancing cross-cultural interactions in healthcare delivery. While cultural humility has been broadly examined in healthcare, knowledge gaps exist regarding its application in occupational therapy (OT) practice. This scoping review protocol aims to: (1) describe the extent and nature of the published health literature on cultural humility, including concepts, descriptions and definitions and practice recommendations, (2) map the findings from objective one to OT practice using the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF), and (3) conduct a consultation exercise to confirm the CPPF mapping and generate recommendations for the practice of cultural humility in OT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, Ebsco CINAHL Plus, ProQuest ASSIA, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts, ProQuest ERIC, WHO Global Index Medicus, and Web of Science databases. Published health-related literature on cultural humility will be included. There will be no restrictions on population or article type. Following deduplication on Endnote, the search results will undergo title, abstract, and full-text review by two reviewers working independently on Covidence. Extracted data will include descriptors of the article, context, population, and cultural humility. After descriptive extraction, data describing cultural humility-related content will be descriptively and interpretively analysed using an inductive thematic synthesis approach. The data will also be mapped to OT practice through deductive coding using the CPPF. Occupational therapists and clients will be consulted to further critique, interpret and validate the mapping and generate practice recommendations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was not required for this scoping review protocol. We will disseminate the findings, which can enhance understanding of cultural humility in OT, facilitate cross-cultural encounters between occupational therapists and clients and improve care outcomes through publications and presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardeep Singh
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruheena Sangrar
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sachindri Wijekoon
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erica Nekolaichuk
- Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Program, Sinai Health and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle L A Nelson
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sofia Mirzazada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tram Nguyen
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Holly Assaf
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise the existing literature on care transition planning from the perspectives of older adults, caregivers and health professionals and to identify the factors that may influence these stakeholders' transition decision-making processes. DESIGN A scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework. A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on 7 January 2021 to identify articles in five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and AgeLine). Records were included when they described care transition planning in an institutional setting from the perspectives of the care triad (older adults, caregivers and health professionals). No date or study design restrictions were imposed. SETTING This review explored care transitions involving older adults from an institutional care setting to any other institutional or non-institutional care setting. Institutional care settings include communal facilities where individuals dwell for short or extended periods of time and have access to healthcare services. PARTICIPANTS Older adults (aged 65 or older), caregivers and health professionals. RESULTS 39 records were included. Stakeholder involvement in transition planning varied across the studies. Transition decisions were largely made by health professionals, with limited or unclear involvement from older adults and caregivers. Seven factors appeared to guide transition planning across the stakeholder groups: (a) institutional priorities and requirements; (b) resources; (c) knowledge; (d) risk; (e) group structure and dynamic; (f) health and support needs; and (g) personality preferences and beliefs. Factors were described at microlevels, mesolevels and macrolevels. CONCLUSIONS This review explored stakeholder involvement in transition planning and identified seven factors that appear to influence transition decision-making. These factors may be useful in advancing the delivery of person and family-centred care by determining how individual-level, group-level and system-level values guide decision-making. Further research is needed to understand how various stakeholder groups balance these factors during transition planning in different health contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Carbone
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- St John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Law
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kokorelias KM, Nelson MLA, Tang T, Steele Gray C, Ellen M, Plett D, Jarach CM, Xin Nie J, Thavorn K, Singh H. Who is Included in Digital Health Technologies to Support Hospital to Home Transitions for Older Adults?: Secondary analysis of a rapid review and equity-informed recommendations (Preprint). JMIR Aging 2021; 5:e35925. [PMID: 35475971 PMCID: PMC9096639 DOI: 10.2196/35925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- St John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System/University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle LA Nelson
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Terence Tang
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Moriah Ellen
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Eilat, Israel
- Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Eilat, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Eilat, Israel
| | - Donna Plett
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carlotta Micaela Jarach
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jason Xin Nie
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hardeep Singh
- March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge initiatives entailed and identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future work. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS Electronic databases and websites of government and healthcare organisations were searched for eligible articles. Articles were required to include an initiative that focused on delayed discharge, involve a hospital setting and be published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Following extraction, a policy framework by Doern and Phidd was adapted to organise the included initiatives into categories: (1) information sharing; (2) tools and guidelines; (3) practice changes; (4) infrastructure and finance and (5) other. RESULTS Sixty-six articles were included in this review. The majority of initiatives were categorised as practice change (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19) and tools and guidelines (n=19). Numerous initiatives incorporated multiple categories. The majority of initiatives were implemented by multidisciplinary teams and resulted in improved outcomes such as reduced length of stay and discharge delays. However, the experiences of patients and families were rarely reported. Included initiatives also lacked important contextual information, which is essential for replicating best practices and scaling up. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review identified a number of initiatives that have been implemented to target delayed discharges. While the majority of initiatives resulted in positive outcomes, delayed discharges remain an international problem. There are significant gaps and limitations in evidence and thus, future work is warranted to develop solutions that have a sustainable impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Cadel
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara J T Guilcher
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabiliation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Quality Division, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jason Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jon Glasby
- School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tara Kiran
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Quality Division, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kokorelias KM, Gignac MAM, Naglie G, Rittenberg N, Cameron JI. A qualitative study of the experiences of male and female spousal and adult children caregivers across the caregiving trajectory. Alzheimers Dement 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.047478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
17
|
Kokorelias KM, D'Souza SJ, Au J, Gignac MA, Naglie G, Rittenberg N, Cameron JI. P2-508: CAREGIVER-IDENTIFIED PHASES OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CAREGIVING. Alzheimers Dement 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.2916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jennifer Au
- The University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Monique A.M. Gignac
- The University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Work and Health; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Gary Naglie
- Baycrest Health Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
- University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Toronto ON Canada
- Rotman Research Institute; Toronto ON Canada
| | | | - Jill I. Cameron
- The University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|