Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, "B"; no brace, "NB"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all p > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], p = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], p = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], p = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, p = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, p = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

Buffering Mitigates Chondrocyte Oxidative Stress, Metabolic Dysfunction, and Death Induced by Normal Saline: Formulation of a Novel Arthroscopic Irrigant

For decades, surgeons have utilized 0.9% normal saline (NS) for joint irrigation to improve visualization during arthroscopic procedures. This continues despite mounting evidence that NS exposure impairs chondrocyte metabolism and compromises articular cartilage function. We hypothesized that chondrocyte oxidative stress induced by low pH is the dominant factor driving NS toxicity, and that buffering NS to increase its pH would mitigate these effects. Effects on chondrocyte viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and overall metabolic function were assessed. Even brief exposure to NS caused cell death, ROS overproduction, and disruption of glycolysis, pentose phosphate, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pathways. NS also stimulated ROS overproduction in synovial cells that could adversely alter the synovial function and subsequently the entire joint health. Buffering NS with 25 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) significantly increased chondrocyte viability, reduced ROS production, and returned metabolite levels to near control levels while also reducing ROS production in synovial cells. These results confirm that chondrocytes and synoviocytes are vulnerable to insult from the acidic pH of NS and demonstrate that adding a buffering agent to NS averts many of its most harmful effects.

Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?

Background:

Patients undergoing elective procedures often utilize online educational materials to familiarize themselves with the surgical procedure and expected postoperative recovery. While the Internet is easily accessible and ubiquitous today, the ability of patients to read, understand, and act on these materials is unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate online resources about anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery utilizing measures of readability, understandability, and actionability.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Using the term “ACL surgery,” 2 independent searches were performed utilizing a public search engine (Google.com). Patient education materials were identified from the top 50 results. Audiovisual materials, news articles, materials intended for advertising or medical professionals, and materials unrelated to ACL surgery were excluded. Readability was quantified using the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, and Gunning Fog Index. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) was utilized to assess the actionability and understandability of materials. For each online source, the relationship between its Google search rank (from first to last) and its readability, understandability, and actionability was calculated utilizing the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ_S).

Results:

Overall, we identified 68 unique websites, of which 39 met inclusion criteria. The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 10.08 ± 2.34, with no website scoring at or below the 6th-grade level. Mean understandability and actionability scores were 59.18 ± 10.86 (range, 33.64-79.17) and 34.41 ± 22.31 (range, 0.00-81.67), respectively. Only 5 (12.82%) and 1 (2.56%) resource scored above the 70% adequate PEMAT-P threshold mark for understandability and actionability, respectively. Readability (lowest P value = .103), understandability (ρ_S = –0.13; P = .441), and actionability (ρ_S = 0.28; P = .096) scores were not associated with Google rank.

Conclusion:

Patient education materials on ACL surgery scored poorly with respect to readability, understandability, and actionability. No online resource scored at the recommended reading level of the American Medical Association or National Institutes of Health. Only 5 resources scored above the proven threshold for understandability, and only 1 resource scored above it for actionability.

Outcomes Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Partial Transphyseal (Over-the-Top) Technique in Skeletally Immature Patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in skeletally immature patients is increasing, with ACL reconstruction preferred in this population due to reported chondroprotective benefits. Due to concerns with growth disturbance following ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients, various physealsparing and partial transphyseal techniques have been developed. Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective ACL reconstruction technique in skeletally immature patients. The purpose of the current study was to report the outcomes of a partial-transphyseal over-the-top (OTT) ACL reconstruction in a cohort of skeletally immature patients.

METHODS

All patients with radiographic evidence of open tibial and femoral physes that underwent primary ACL reconstruction using a partial-transphyseal OTT technique between 2009-2018 at a single tertiary-care institution with at least twelve months of clinical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, physical examination findings, graft ruptures, return to sport, and Tegner activity levels were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 males and 1 female (12 knees) with a mean age of 12.8±1.8 (range: 10-16) years were included in the study. The mean postoperative follow-up of the cohort was 2.3±1.2 (range: 1.1-5.2) years. All ACLs were reconstructed with hamstring autograft with allograft augmentation utilized in a single patient. There were two cases of ACL graft rupture (16.7%). All patients were able to return to the same or higher level of sporting activity at an average of 7.4+2.7 months. There were no cases of clinically significant longitudinal or angular growth disturbance.

CONCLUSION

Partial transphyseal ACL reconstruction using a transphyseal tibial tunnel and an extra-articular OTT technique on the femur in skeletally immature patients affords minimal risk of growth disturbance with a graft rupture rate consistent with what has been reported in this high-risk population. All patients were able to return to sport at the same or higher level. Level of Evidence: IV.

Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database

BACKGROUND

Rotational ankle fractures are common injuries associated with high rates of intra-articular injury. Traditional ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques provide limited capacity for evaluation of intra-articular pathology. Ankle arthroscopy represents a minimally invasive technique to directly visualize the articular cartilage and syndesmosis while aiding with reduction and allowing joint debridement, loose body removal, and treatment of chondral injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture ORIF surgery amongst early-career orthopaedic surgeons while examining the influence of subspecialty fellowship training on utilization.

METHODS

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination database was queried to identify all candidates performing at least one ankle fracture ORIF from examination years 2010 to 2019. All ORIF cases were examined to identify those that carried a concomitant CPT code for ankle arthroscopy. Concomitant ankle arthroscopy cases were categorized by candidates self-reported fellowship training status and examination year. Descriptive statistics were performed to report relevant data and linear regression analyses were utilized to assess temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy with ORIF for ankle fractures. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 36,113 cases of ankle fracture ORIF performed of which 388 cases (1.1%) were performed with concomitant ankle arthroscopy. Ankle fracture ORIF was most frequently performed by trauma fellowship trained ABOS Part II candidates (n=8,888; 24.6%), followed by sports medicine (n=7,493; 20.8%) and foot and ankle (n=6,563; 18.2%). Arthroscopy was most frequently utilized by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons (293/6,270 cases; 4.5%) followed by sports medicine (29/7,464 cases; 0.4%) and trauma (4/8,884 cases; 0.1%). With respect to arthroscopic cases, 293 cases (75.5%) were performed by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons, 29 (7.5%) sports medicine, and 4 (1.0%) trauma. Ankle arthroscopy utilization significantly increased from 3.65 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2010 to 13.91 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2019 (p=0.010). Specifically, foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons demonstrated a significant increase in arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF over time (p<0.001; OR: 1.101; CI: 1.054-1.151).

CONCLUSION

Ankle arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF has increased over the past decade. Foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons contribute most significantly to this trend. Level of Evidence: IV.

Editorial Commentary: The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Is Not Isometric and Anatomic Reconstruction Is Important, But Just a Small Piece of the Patellar Instability Puzzle

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has proven to be a reliable procedure to reduce patellar instability events in patients with recurrent patellar instability. As our reconstruction techniques have evolved to address pathology in a diverse patient population, there continues to be an obsessive focus on the precise anatomy of the MPFL origin on the medial knee, due in large part to concerns that improper femoral tunnel position may result in excessive graft anisometry and failure. However, recurrent patellar instability involves many complexities and should not be simply reduced to a single point on the medial knee.

Periarticular Local Infiltrative Anesthesia and Regional Adductor Canal Block Provide Equivalent Pain Relief After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative pain and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients who received an adductor canal block (ACB) or periarticular local infiltrative anesthesia (LIA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected ACL registry was performed. Patients underwent ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and September 2020 and received long-acting local anesthesia with a preoperative ultrasound-guided ACB or periarticular LIA after surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) consumed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and total hospital recovery time were compared. Univariate analysis was used to compare VAS pain and MME totals between overall groups and groups propensity score matched for age, sex, body mass index, graft type, and meniscal treatment. Results are presented as mean (95%CI) unless otherwise indicated.

RESULTS

There were 265 knees (253 patients) included (LIA, 157 knees; ACB, 108 knees). Overall, VAS pain scores before hospital discharge (LIA: 2.6 [2.4-2.8] vs ACB: 2.4 [2.1-2.7]; P = .334) and total MMEs were similar (LIA: 17.6 [16.4-18.8] vs ACB: 18.5 [17.2-19.8] (MME); P =.134). Median time to discharge also did not significantly differ (LIA: 137.5 [IQR: 116-178] vs. ACB: 147 [IQR: 123-183] (min); P = .118). Matched subanalysis (LIA and ACB; n = 94) did not reveal significant differences in VAS pain before discharge (LIA: 2.4 [2.1-2.7] vs ACB: 2.7 [2.4-3.0]; P = .134) or total MMEs (LIA: 18.6 (17.2-20.0) vs ACB: 17.9 (16.4-19.4); P = .520).

CONCLUSION

The use of ACB or LIA resulted in similar early pain levels, opioid consumption, and hospital recovery times after ACLR surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparison study.

Cartilage and Meniscus Injuries Are More Common in Patients Undergoing Delayed Multiligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of meniscus and cartilage pathology in multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) and determine the relationship between surgical timing and injury mechanism with degree of intra-articular injury. Patients with surgically treated MLKIs over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed and grouped based on surgical intervention, time to intervention, and injury mechanism. The presence or absence of meniscus and chondral injury were recorded at the time of surgery. Surgical intervention within 6 weeks of injury was deemed acute, while surgery occurring more than 6 weeks from injury was classified as delayed. Over the 15-year study period, 207 patients with MLKIs were identified. Compared with acutely managed patients, the delayed intervention group had significantly more meniscus (p = 0.03) and cartilage (p < 0.01) pathology. Meniscus injury rates in MLKIs sustained during sporting activity did not differ from nonsporting injuries (p = 0.63). However, the nonsporting group had significantly more chondral injuries (p < 0.01). High-energy injury mechanism was associated with increased cartilage (p = 0.02), but not meniscus (p = 0.61) injury rates. In conclusion, surgical reconstruction of MLKIs delayed for more than 6 weeks was associated with increased meniscus and cartilage pathology.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Utilization among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part-II Database

An updated understanding of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) utilization is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in volume and utilization of UKA among early-career surgeons and to examine the influence of fellowship training status on utilization of UKA. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part-II database was queried from 2010 to 2019 to identify candidates who reported ≥1 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or UKA. Self-reported history of fellowship training experiences was recorded. "High-volume" surgeons were defined as performing ≥7 UKA over the ABOS Part-II collection period. Trends were evaluated with the Cochrane-Armitage test and generalized linear models. From 2010 to 2019, a total of 2,045 candidates (28.1%) reported ≥1 TKA, while 585 candidates (8.0%) reported ≥1 UKA. The number of candidates reporting ≥1 UKA significantly increased (p = 0.001). An increase in UKA volume was observed over the study period (p < 0.001). Rates of utilization of UKA relative to TKA did not change significantly over the study period (p = 0.11). Sixty-three (2.4%) candidates met the study definition for high-volume UKA utilization. UKA procedure volume increased among ABOS Part-II candidates over the study period; however, rates of UKA utilization relative to TKA volume remained unchanged. Increasing volume of UKA performed by early-career surgeons is likely secondary to an increased number of surgeons trained in adult reconstruction. Only 2.4% of candidates who reported performing at least one knee arthroplasty procedure met the threshold for a high-volume UKA practice. Early-career surgeons should remain conscientious of UKA volume in their practice.

Assessment of Femoral Version Should be Assessed Independently of Conventional Measures in Patellofemoral Instability

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study is to determine the association between femoral version and traditional pathologic bony factors commonly used to measure and define patellofemoral alignment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients treated for patellofemoral instability (PFI) at a single institution. Patients included underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lower extremity using a rotational protocol prior to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy. Those with a history of ipsilateral lower extremity surgery were excluded. Two independent reviewers measured femoral version, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, and tibial torsion (TT). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to describe the relationships between all radiographic measures.

RESULTS

A total of 51 knees (43 patients) were included. The average age and body mass index were 23.7 ± 9.33 years and 29.23 ± 8.04 kg/ m2, respectively. The mean femoral version was 15.61 ± 11.57°. The degree of femoral version did not significantly correlate with TT-TG (r=0.103, p=0.474), TT-PCL (-0.086, p=0.550), or TT (r=0.111, p=0.438). Increased TT-TG distance was strongly associated with increased TT-PCL (r=0.470, p=0.001). In females, increased femoral version significantly correlated with increased TT (r=0.381, p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Neither increased nor decreased amounts of femoral anteversion significantly correlated with TT-TG, TT-PCL, or TT. Therefore, assessment of femoral version should be measured independently of conventional measures when considering osteotomies to correct PFI.Level of Evidence: IV.

PROMIS Versus Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sports Medicine Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee, Shoulder, and Hip Interventions: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) was designed to monitor the global wellbeing of patients, with the Physical Function Computer-Adaptive Test (PF-CAT) component focused specifically on functional outcome. PROMIS aims for increased item-bank accuracy, lower administrative burden, and decreased floor and ceiling effects compared to legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Our primary research outcomes focused on sports medicine surgical populations, which may skew younger or have wide-ranging functional statuses. Specifically, for this population, we questioned if PROMIS PF-CAT was equal to legacy PROMs in (1) construct validity and (2) convergent/divergent validities; and superior to legacy PROMs with respect to (3) survey burden and (4) floor and ceiling effects.

METHODS

Searches were performed in April 2019 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase databases for Level I-III evidence. This resulted in 541 records, yielding 12 studies for inclusion. PROM data was available for patients undergoing arthroscopic orthopaedic procedures of the knee, shoulder, and hip. Measures of construct validity, convergent/divergent validity, survey burden, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated for PROMIS PF-CAT versus legacy PROMs.

RESULTS

PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated excellent or excellent-good correlation with legacy PROMS for physical function and quality of life for patients undergoing arthroscopic interventions of the knee, shoulder, and hip. Compared to legacy PROM instruments, PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated the lowest overall survey burden and had the lowest overall number of floor or ceiling effects across participants.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF-CAT is an accurate, efficient evaluation tool for sports medicine surgical patients. PROMIS PF-CAT strongly correlates with legacy physical function PROMs while having a lower test burden and less incidence of floor and ceiling effects. PROMIS PF-CAT may be an optimal alternative for traditional physical function PROMs in sports medicine patients undergoing arthroscopic procedures. Further studies are required to extend the generalizability of these findings to patients during postoperative timepoints after shoulder and hip interventionsLevel of Evidence: III.

Beach Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: Differences in Suture Anchor Position and Number During Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic shoulder capsulolabral repair using glenoid-based suture anchor fixation provides consistently favorable outcomes for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. To optimize outcomes, inferior anchor position, especially at the 6-o'clock position, has been emphasized. Proponents of both the beach-chair (BC) and lateral decubitus (LD) positions advocate that this anchor location can be consistently achieved in both positions.

HYPOTHESIS

Patient positioning would be associated with the surgeon-reported labral tear length, total number of anchors used, number of anchors in the inferior glenoid, and placement of an anchor at the 6-o'clock position.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort of patients undergoing primary arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair. Patient positioning in the BC versus LD position was determined by the operating surgeon and was not randomized. At the time of operative intervention, surgeon-reported labral tear length, total anchor number, anchor number in the inferior glenoid, and anchor placement at the 6-o'clock position were evaluated between BC and LD cohorts. Descriptive statistics and between-group differences (continuous: t test [normal distributions], Wilcoxon rank sum test [nonnormal distributions], and chi-square test [categorical]) were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 714 patients underwent arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair (BC vs LD, 406 [56.9%] vs 308 [43.1%]). The surgeon-reported labral tear length was greater for patients having surgery in the LD position (BC vs LD [mean ± SD], 123.5°± 49° vs 132.3°± 44°; P = .012). The LD position was associated with more anchors placed in the inferior glenoid and more frequent placement of anchors at the 6-o'clock (BC vs LD, 22.4% vs 51.6%; P < .001). The LD position was more frequently associated with utilization of ≥4 total anchors (BC vs LD, 33.5% vs 46.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons utilizing the LD position for arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in patients with anterior shoulder instability more frequently placed anchors in the inferior glenoid and at the 6-o'clock position. Additionally, surgeon-reported labral tear length was longer when utilizing the LD position. These results suggest that patient positioning may influence the total number of anchors used, the number of anchors used in the inferior glenoid, and the frequency of anchor placement at the 6 o'clock position during arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for anterior shoulder instability. How these findings affect clinical outcomes warrants further study.

REGISTRATION

NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Increased Prevalence and Associated Costs of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Patients Undergoing Sports Medicine Operative Procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of preoperatively diagnosed psychiatric comorbidities and the impact of these comorbidities on the healthcare costs of ten common orthopaedic sports medicine procedures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing 10 common sports medicine procedures from 2007 to 2017q1 were identified using the Humana claims database. These procedures included anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; medial collateral ligament repair/reconstruction; Achilles repair/reconstruction; Rotator cuff repair; meniscectomy/meniscus repair; hip arthroscopy; arthroscopic shoulder labral repair; patellofemoral instability procedures; and shoulder instability repair. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnoses of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Cohorts included patients with ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity (psychiatric) versus those without psychiatric comorbidities (no psychiatric). Differences in costs across groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests, with significance defined as P < .05. Linear regression analysis was used to assess rates of procedures per year from 2006 to 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 226,402 patients (57.7% male) from 2007 to 2017q1 were assessed. The prevalence of ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity within the entire database was 10.31% (reference) versus 21.21% in those patients undergoing the 10 investigated procedures. Patients with psychiatric comorbidity most frequently underwent rotator cuff repair (28%), hip labral repair (26.3%) and meniscectomy/meniscus repair (25.0%%) had ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity. Compared with the no psychiatric cohort, diagnosis of ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity was associated with increased health care costs for all 10 sports medicine procedures ($9678.81 vs $6436.20, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of preoperatively diagnosed psychiatric comorbidities among patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine procedures is high. The presence of psychiatric comorbidities preoperatively was associated with increased postoperative costs following all investigated orthopaedic sports medicine procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective comparative study.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Ankle Arthrodesis Use: An American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Database Study

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) use has increased during the past 20 years, whereas ankle arthrodesis (AAD) use has remained constant. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in TAA and AAD use in American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part II candidates while considering the influence of fellowship training status on treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part II database was queried to identify all candidates who performed ≥1 TAA or AAD from examination years 2009 through 2018. Candidates were categorized by examination year and by self-reported fellowship training status. Descriptive statistical methods were used to report procedure volumes. Trends in use of TAA and AAD were examined by using log-modified regression analyses. From 2009through 2018, there was no significant change in TAA or AAD use among all candidates (p = .92, p = .20). Candidates reporting a foot and ankle fellowship trended toward increased use of TAA relative to AAD compared with non-foot and ankle fellowship candidates, but this failed to reach statistical significance (p = .06). The use of arthroscopic AAD increased over time (p < .01) among all candidates. TAA and AAD use did not change over the study period. Volume of TAA and AAD performed by early-career surgeons remains low. The findings in this study should serve as an important reference for orthopedic trainees, early-career surgeons, and orthopedic educators interested in optimizing training curriculum for surgical management of end-stage ankle arthritis.

Trends and Complications of Arthroscopic-Assisted Tibial Plateau Fracture Fixation: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Purpose

To determine trends in arthroscopic-assisted tibial plateau fracture fixation (AATPFF), to evaluate trends in the overall rate of tibial plateau fracture fixation, and to compare postoperative complications between AATPFF and traditional tibial plateau fixation.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing AATPFF and traditional tibial plateau fixation was conducted using the Humana Inc. administrative database from 2007 to 2016. A 1:1 propensity match was utilized to match patients in the 2 study groups based on age, sex, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression or anxiety, and smoking history. Postoperative complications were grouped as minor medical complications, major medical complications, surgical complications, emergency department visits, and reoperation. Linear regression analysis was used to assess trends and Pearson's χ² test was used to compare postoperative complications with statistical significance defined as P < .05.

Results

In total, 522 patients underwent AATPFF and 3920 patients underwent traditional tibial plateau fracture fixation. There was a 4-fold increase in the use of AATPFF over the study period (P = .0173). Similarly, there was an increase in the utilization of traditional tibial plateau fracture fixation, although to a lesser extent (1.33-fold). After propensity matching, the traditional fixation group demonstrated significantly higher rates of minor medical complications (8.2% vs 2.7%, P = .0002), major medical complications (9.9% vs 4.6%, P = .0018), surgical complications (13.2% vs 2.7%, P < .0001), and emergency department visits (21.4% vs 13.5%, P < .0001) within 90 days of surgery compared with the AATPFF group. There was no difference in reoperation rates within 90 days between the 2 groups (2.9% vs 3.6%, P = .85).

Conclusions

The incidence of tibial plateau fracture fixation is increasing, however, use of AATPFF is increasing at a faster rate compared to traditional techniques. Furthermore, the addition of knee arthroscopy to fracture fixation does not increase the risk of complication, reoperation, or emergency department visit within 90 days.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective matched cohort.

Do Patient Positioning and Portal Placement for Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis Matter?

Background

Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis was first described over 2 decades ago and originally performed in the lateral decubitus or supine position using anterolateral and posterolateral portals situated about the fibula. More recently, several authors have advocated for prone positioning utilizing posteromedial and posterolateral portals with an optional accessory lateral portal. To date, a comparison of these techniques has been limited.

Purpose

To determine the effect of patient positioning and portal placement on complication rates after arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Patients were placed into 1 of 3 groups: the lateral group if they were positioned lateral or supine with lateral-based portals; the 2-portal prone group if they were positioned prone with posteromedial and posterolateral portals; or the 3-portal prone group if posteromedial, posterolateral, and accessory lateral portals were utilized in the prone position. Inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects models were used to evaluate pooled estimates.

Results

A total of 20 studies examining 484 feet in 468 patients with a mean follow-up of 36.1 months were included for analysis. Overall, 8 studies examined patients in the prone position with 2 posterior portals (n = 111; 22.9%), 7 articles evaluated lateral portals (n = 182; 37.6%), and 5 studies examined patients in the prone position with 3 portals (n = 191; 39.5%). The total complication rate was similar (P = .620) between the 2-portal prone (18.9%), 3-portal prone (17.8%), and lateral (17.6%) groups. There was no difference observed in the rate of complications secondary to portal placement (P ≥ .334), rate of painful hardware (P ≥ .497), and rate of repeat surgery (P ≥ .304). The 2-portal prone group had a significantly higher rate of nonunion than the lateral group (8.1% vs 1.1%, respectively; P = .020) but not the 3-portal prone group (5.8%; P = .198).

Conclusion

The current study demonstrated a higher rate of nonunion following arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis with prone patient positioning using posteromedial and posterolateral portals without an accessory lateral portal.

Perioperative and Postoperative Factors Influence Quadriceps Atrophy and Strength After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background:

Quadriceps dysfunction after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is common and may affect return to sport due to resulting muscle atrophy and muscle weakness.

Purpose:

To systematically review the available literature regarding the impact of perioperative and postoperative interventions on quadriceps atrophy and loss of strength after ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2009 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Embase. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score to determine consensus scores. Eligible level 1 or level 2 studies included interventions of perioperative nerve block, intraoperative tourniquet use, postoperative nutritional supplementation, and postoperative blood flow restriction training. Additionally, the included studies quantified postoperative quadriceps measurements such as thigh circumference, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), isokinetic quadriceps strength, and/or quadriceps electromyographic (EMG) testing.

Results:

In total, 15 studies met stated inclusion and exclusion criteria with the following intervention types: perioperative nerve block (n = 4), intraoperative tourniquet use (n = 5), postoperative nutritional supplementation (n = 3), and postoperative blood flow restriction (n = 3). Intraoperative tourniquet use resulted in decreased thigh circumference and detrimental EMG changes in quadriceps function in 3 of the 5 included studies. Perioperative femoral nerve blocks were associated with transient decreases in postoperative quadriceps strength, persisting up to 6 weeks after surgery, in 2 of the 4 studies. Postoperative blood flow restriction training augmented quadriceps size and function after ACL reconstruction in 2 of 3 studies. Postoperative nutritional supplementation was associated with increased quadriceps volume and strength in 1 of the 3 studies examined.

Conclusion:

The peri- and postoperative factors reviewed here may influence quadriceps atrophy and strength after ACL reconstruction. Our results tentatively indicated that blood flow restriction training may be beneficial to the quadriceps after ACL reconstruction and that intraoperative tourniquet use and nerve block administration may be detrimental; however, the strongest finding was that all of these interventions would benefit from further level 1 and 2 evidence studies, including multicenter, randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up, to definitively determine their impact on return to activity.

Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability

Background:

The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to improve patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and administration through a computer adaptive test (CAT). The PROMIS physical function-CAT (PF-CAT) has not been investigated in patients with patellofemoral instability (PFI).

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of the PROMIS PF-CAT with previously validated tools for measuring PROMs in patients with a diagnosis of PFI. We hypothesized that the PF-CAT will have the strongest correlations with other PROMs that evaluated PF as well as moderate correlations with PROMs that measured other health domains.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

Patients enrolled in this study who underwent operative intervention for PFI completed the following evaluations preoperatively: PROMIS PF-CAT, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS). Correlation coefficients and the percentage of patients achieving the highest and lowest possible outcome score of each instrument were calculated to assess floor and ceiling effects. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

Results:

In total, 91 participants (63.7% females; mean age, 20.1 ± 7.2 years) completed the questionnaires. PF-CAT had the lowest number of questions (4.3 ± 1.1). The strongest correlations were between the PF-CAT and SF-36 PF subscale (r = 0.78; P < .01), AKPS (r = 0.68; P < .01), and KOOS Activities of Daily Living subscale (r = 0.68; P < .01). Correlation was moderate between the PF-CAT and the KOOS subscales of Sports/Recreation (r = 0.58; P < .01), Quality of Life (r = 0.53; P < .01), and Symptoms (r = 0.47; P < .01). The PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated no floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion:

In patients with PFI, construct validity of the PROMIS PF-CAT was supported by strong correlations demonstrated between the PF-CAT and PROMs evaluating PF and moderate correlations with those assessing other health domains. Our results demonstrated a low respondent burden and no floor or ceiling effects associated with the PROMIS PF-CAT. The PROMIS PF-CAT may be considered a beneficial alternative to previously established PF PROMs for preoperative evaluation of patients with PFI.

Arthroscopy Versus Open Arthrotomy for Treatment of Native Hip Septic Arthritis: An Analysis of 30-Day Complications

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in short-term complications in patients treated with open arthrotomy or arthroscopy for septic arthritis (SA) of the native hip and identify risk factors associated with return to the operating room (ROR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent hip arthrotomy or arthroscopy for native hip SA between 2007 and 2017 were queried in the Humana database via the PearlDiver research tool. Patients with a previous history of total hip arthroplasty were excluded from this study. Basic demographics and various 30-day perioperative complications, including ROR, were compared between the 2 cohorts. Multivariate analysis was performed for ROR within 30 days following arthroscopy and arthrotomy.

RESULTS

We identified 421 patients with SA of the native hip, of whom 387 (91.9%) and 34 (8.1%) were treated with open arthrotomy and arthroscopy, respectively. There were no significant differences in demographic variables between groups. On univariate analysis, the incidence of total adverse events (arthrotomy: 75.7% vs arthroscopy: 52.9%, P = .0038) was significantly greater in the open arthrotomy cohort. However, there was little difference in ROR between both cohorts (arthrotomy: 45.9% vs arthroscopy: 38.2%, P = .3836). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative septicemia or septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.89, P = .0026) as a significant risk factor for ROR within 30 days after surgery. Neither arthrotomy (OR 4.93, 95% CI 0.42-115.2, P = .2174) nor arthroscopy (OR 3.55, 95% CI 0.33-78.01, P = .3077) were significant risk factors to ROR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SA of the hip had similar short-term complication rates and ROR regardless of open arthrotomy or arthroscopic management. This suggests that arthroscopic management may be a safe option for the treatment of SA of the hip with potentially limited morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (treatment harms investigation).

Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While the indications for primary hip arthroscopic surgery in treating femoroacetabular abnormalities continue to be defined, the indications and outcomes for revision hip arthroscopic surgery remain ambiguous. However, revision hip arthroscopic surgery is performed in 5% to 14% of patients after their index procedure. While patient-reported outcomes (PROs) generally improve after revision procedures, the extent of their improvement is not well defined.

PURPOSE

To determine the outcomes and efficacy of revision hip arthroscopic surgery in patients who remain symptomatic after their index procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis and systematic review.

METHODS

The terms "hip arthroscopy,""revisions,""outcomes," and "femoroacetabular impingement" were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. After screening, 15 studies were included for review. In addition to hip-specific metrics, functional outcome measures were included. Pooled estimates and 95% CIs were calculated using inverse variance methods.

RESULTS

A total of 4765 hips in 4316 patients were identified. The most common indication for revision surgery was inadequate bony resection during the index procedure. Meta-analysis showed that all PROs improved significantly from baseline to final follow-up after revision hip arthroscopic surgery. Notably, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) increased a mean of 17.20 points after revision hip arthroscopic surgery, the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) improved by 13.98, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain decreased by 3.16. However, when compared with primary hip arthroscopic surgery, the mean PRO scores after revision hip arthroscopic surgery were lower. After revision hip arthroscopic surgery, the rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 0% to 14.3%, and the rates of further arthroscopic revision ranged from 2% to 14%.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate bony resection represents the most common indication for revision hip arthroscopic surgery. PROs improve significantly after revision hip arthroscopic surgery but remain lower than those of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopic surgery.

Preoperative opioid use is associated with inferior outcomes after patellofemoral stabilization surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between preoperative opioid use and persistent postoperative use, and determine the impact of preoperative opioid use on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing patellofemoral stabilization surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 60 patients after patellofemoral stabilization surgery with a minimum of 2-year follow-up was performed using a prospectively collected patellar instability registry. Patients were categorized as opioid naïve (n = 48) or preoperative opioid users (n = 12). Postoperative opioid use was assessed for all patients at 2 and 6 weeks. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Kujala questionnaires were administered at baseline, and 6 months and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative opioid use was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative opioid use at 2- and 6-weeks following surgery (p = 0.0023 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Preoperative opioid use was associated with significantly lower KOOS and Kujala scores at baseline, 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. Both groups significantly improved from baseline KOOS and Kujala scores at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. Regardless of preoperative opioid use, opioid use at 6 weeks after surgery was associated with worse KOOS scores at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing patellofemoral stabilization surgery, preoperative opioid use was predictive of postoperative use. Additionally, preoperative opioid use was associated with worse PROs at 6 months and 2 years following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Patients With Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee

PURPOSE

To validate the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT) with current patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in patients with cartilage injuries of the knee.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for osteochondral autograft or allograft transplant, microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, allograft cartilage resurfacing, and chondroplasty were prospectively enrolled in the study and completed PROMIS PF CAT, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS activities of daily living, pain, symptoms, sport, and quality of life), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36 physical function [PF] and Physical Component Summary), and EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaires. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to compare instruments. Instrument correlations were defined as excellent (>0.7), excellent to good (0.61-0.69), good (0.4 to 0.6), and poor (<0.39), with significance defined as P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 293 knees in 275 patients (54.5% male) undergoing 319 cartilage procedures were analyzed. The most commonly performed cartilage procedure was chondroplasty (n = 118; 37.0%), followed by microfracture (n = 100; 31.3%). The mean age was 34.0 ± 14.7 and the mean body mass index was 30.0 ± 6.9. The PROMIS PF CAT had an excellent correlation with the SF-36 PF (r = 0.819; P < .001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (r = 0.766; P < .001), KOOS activities of daily living (r = 0.733; P < .001), KOOS Sport (r = 0.709; P < .001), and EuroQol-5 Dimension (r = 0.752; P < .001) instruments; an excellent-good correlation with the KOOS pain (r = 0.662; P < .001), and KOOS quality of life (r = 0.640; P < .001) scores; and a good correlation with the KOOS symptoms (r = 0.519; P < .001) scale. The PROMIS PF CAT had no floor or ceiling effects and the smallest question burden (mean 4.17 ± 0.93 questions). Dimensionality analyses demonstrated that the smallest amount of unexplained variance was present in the PROMIS PF CAT (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS PF CAT is an effective tool for preoperative outcome assessment in patients with cartilage defects of the knee. It correlates strongly with legacy PRO measures of physical function with no ceiling and floor effects and a minimal time burden for completion. Further study is warranted to determine postoperative performance and to evaluate the responsiveness of PROMIS to change within a patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Prognostic retrospective comparative study.

Association of Preoperative Opioid Use and Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background:

Perioperative opioid consumption has received a great deal of recent attention. However, perioperative opioid utilization in the total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) population has not been well studied. We sought to identify factors associated with postoperative opioid use following TAA.

Methods:

The PearlDiver Research Program was used to query the Humana, Inc, administrative claims database from 2007 to 2017 for patients undergoing TAA. Additional variables of interest were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Preoperative opioid use was defined as having filled an opioid prescription in the 3 months before TAA. Prescription opioid claims data were tracked for 12 months postoperatively. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and multivariate analysis was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results:

A total of 544 patients who underwent TAA were identified, with 180 (33.1%) filling an opioid prescription preoperatively. Those filling prescriptions preoperatively had a significantly greater risk for postoperative opioid use compared to those not taking opioids (RR: 4.36 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.80-6.80] at 12 months). Anxiety or depression (RR: 2.27 [1.44-3.59]), low back pain (LBP) (RR: 2.27 [1.50-3.42]), and fibromyalgia (RR: 2.15 [1.42-3.28]) were also found to increase the risk of taking opioids at 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis found preoperative opioid use to be the strongest predictor of postoperative opioid use.

Conclusions:

Nearly one-third of patients filled an opioid prescription within 3 months of TAA, and filling a prescription preoperatively was the strongest factor associated with postoperative opioid use. Fibromyalgia, depression or anxiety, and LBP were also associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative opioid use.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Risk Factors for Opioid Use After Patellofemoral Stabilization Surgery: A Population-Based Study of 1,316 Cases

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgeons remain the third-highest group of opioid prescribers among physicians in the United States, accounting for 8% of all opioid prescriptions. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for opioid consumption and opioid prescription refills after patellofemoral stabilization surgery. We hypothesized that preoperative opioid use and younger age would be independent risk factors for postoperative opioid use.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary patellar stabilization surgery between 2007-2017 in the Humana Inc. administrative claims database were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patellofemoral stabilization procedures (CPT-27420, 27422, 27427,27418). Patients were categorized into opioid naive (N-OU) and those who filled opioid prescriptions within 3 months prior to surgery (OU). Patients in the OU cohort were further categorized into those who filled prescriptions at 1-3 months before surgery (C-OU) and those who filled opioid prescriptions only in the month preceding surgery (A-OU). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative opioid use at 3 and 12 months using the open-source R software (www.r-project.org) housed within PearlDiver.

RESULTS

A total of 1,316 eligible patients were included. One year postoperatively, there was a greater risk of opioid consumption in the OU cohort (OU vs N-OU: 22.2% vs 4.1%; Relative Risk [RR]: 1.233; 95% CI: 1.172- 1.298; P< 0.0001). C-OU (OR: 5.74; 95% CI: 3.75- 8.9; P< 0.0001), obesity (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14- 2.69; P = 0.0099), and preoperative diagnosis of depression or anxiety (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.01- 3.25; P = 0.0435) were independent risk factors for opioid use at 12 months postoperatively. Younger age (age <30) was associated witha lower risk of opioid use at 3 months (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.21- 0.44; P< 0.0001) and 12 months (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17- 0.46; P< 0.0001) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative opioid utilization significantly increased opioid prescription filling following patellofemoral stabilization surgery. Patient-specific variables including obesity and preoperatively diagnosed depression or anxiety also increased the risk of postoperative opioid utilization. Given the relatively young age and high activity level of patients undergoing patellofemoral stabilization surgery, heightened awareness of patient-specific factors must be considered when selecting appropriate pain management regimens postoperatively.Level of Evidence: III.

Is the Actual Failure Rate of Hip Arthroscopy Higher Than Most Published Series? An Analysis of a Private Insurance Database

BACKGROUND

The use of hip arthroscopy (HA) for the management of intra-articular hip pathology has increased greatly, with a 600% increase in utilization from 2006-2010. Studies have demonstrated good to excellent outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. However, some patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy will require revision hip arthroscopy (revision HA) or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association between hip arthroscopy failure and (1) osteoarthritis, (2) age > 40 years, and (3) psychiatric comorbidities.

METHODS

The Humana Inc. insurance claims database was used to identify patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2007 and 2015, with query by CPT (current procedural terminology code) of more than 25 million deidentified insurance and Medicare beneficiary claims. Following primary hip arthroscopy, patients were longitudinally tracked for subsequent ipsilateral hip arthroscopy (revision HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum of 1-year clinical follow-up from the primary HA procedure. Hip arthroscopy failure (HA failure) was defined specifically as patients who underwent a revision HA or THA with a minimum of 1-year of clinical follow-up from the primary HA procedure. Variables assessed included presence of pre-existing osteoarthritis, age < 40 years or age > 40 years, and presence of preoperatively diagnosed psychiatric comorbidities including depression or anxiety. The relationships between revision HA, THA, or HA failure and these variables were assessed utilizing univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. Independent predictors of revision ipsilateral hip arthroscopy and subsequent hip arthroplasty were identified using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 785 patients (64.1% female) underwent primary hip arthroscopy. The overall failure rate with a minimum of 1-year clinical follow-up from the index HA procedure was 18%[140/785; 8% (63/785) revision hip arthroscopy, 10% (82/785) THA]. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified psychiatric comorbidities (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.2-6.2, p<0.01) as the only independent predictor of hip arthroscopy failure (revision HA or THA). Independent predictors of revision HA included both psychiatric comorbidity (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.2, p<0.01) and age < 40 years (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-5.0, p<0.01), while age > 40 years (OR 3.09, 1.47-7.25, p<0.005), smoking (OR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.68-1.88, p=0.02), and osteoarthritis (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.98-5.43, p<0.001) predicted conversion to THA.

CONCLUSION

The hip arthroscopy failure rate of 18% in the present study is alarmingly high, a figure much higher than reported in previously published series. Patient factors associated with conversion to THA included age > 40 years, smoking, and preexisting osteoarthritis. The presence of psychiatric comorbidities, specifically depression and anxiety, was independently associated with revision HA and overall HA failure.Level of Evidence: III.

Graft Preparation with Intraoperative Vancomycin Decreases Infection After ACL Reconstruction: A Review of 1,640 Cases

BACKGROUND

Reported infection rates following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are low, but infections are associated with high morbidity including reoperations and inferior clinical outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the rate of infection after ACL reconstruction with and without graft preparation with a vancomycin irrigant.

METHODS

All ACL reconstructions performed between May 2009 and August 2018 at a single academic institution were reviewed and categorized based on vancomycin use. Patients with <90-day follow-up, intraoperative graft preparation with an antibiotic other than vancomycin, or previous ipsilateral knee infection were excluded. Infection was defined as a return to the operating room for irrigation and debridement within 90 days after ACL reconstruction. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis using t tests and Poisson regression were performed, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 1,640 patients (952 males; 58.0%) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 27.7 ± 11.4 years underwent ACL reconstruction (1,379 primary procedures; 84.1%) and were included for analysis. Intraoperative vancomycin was used in 798 cases (48.7%), whereas 842 ACL reconstructions (51.3%) were performed without intraoperative vancomycin. In total, 11 reconstructions (0.7%) were followed by infection, which occurred in 10 (1.2%) of the patients in whom the graft was not soaked in vancomycin and in 1 (0.1%) of the patients in whom the graft was soaked in vancomycin (p = 0.032). Age (p = 0.571), sex (p = 0.707), smoking (p = 0.407), surgeon (p = 0.124), and insurance type (p = 0.616) were not associated with postoperative infection risk. Autograft use was associated with decreased infections (p = 0.045). There was an 89.4% relative risk reduction with the use of intraoperative vancomycin. An increased body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.029), increased operative time (p = 0.001), and the absence of ACL graft preparation with vancomycin (p = 0.032) independently predicted postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vancomycin-soaked grafts was associated with a 10-fold reduction in infection after ACL reconstruction (0.1% versus 1.2%; p = 0.032). Other risk factors for infection after ACL reconstruction included increased BMI and increased operative time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opioid use following shoulder stabilization surgery: risk factors for prolonged use

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of opioid use before and after shoulder stabilization surgery for instability due to recurrent dislocation and assess patient factors associated with prolonged opioid use postoperatively.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary shoulder stabilization procedures for shoulder instability due to recurrent dislocation were accessed from the Humana administrative claims database. Patients were categorized as those who filled 1 or more opioid prescriptions within 1 month, those who filled opioid prescriptions between 1 and 3 months, and those who never filled opioid prescriptions before surgery. Rates of opioid use were evaluated preoperatively and longitudinally tracked for each group. Multiple binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with opioid use at 3 months and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 4802 patients (45.9% opioid naive) underwent shoulder stabilization surgery for shoulder instability during the study period. Rates of opioid use significantly declined after the first postoperative month; however, at 1 year, the rate of opioid use was significantly greater in patients who filled opioid prescriptions preoperatively (13.4% vs. 1.9%, P < .0001). Filling opioid prescriptions 1 to 3 months prior to surgery was the strongest risk factor for opioid use at 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were prescribed opioids 1 to 3 months before surgery had the highest risk of prolonged opioid use following surgery. Obesity, tobacco use, and a preoperative diagnosis of fibromyalgia were independently associated with prolonged opioid use following surgery.

Preoperative Performance of PROMIS in Patients With Patellofemoral Malalignment and Chondral Disease

BACKGROUND

Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument has not yet been validated in patients undergoing operative treatment for patellofemoral malalignment and chondral disease.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing (PF CAT) instrument in a population of patients with patellofemoral malalignment and chondral disease relative to established patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled at the time of indication for surgery and completed 5 PRO instruments preoperatively: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); Marx activity rating scale (Marx); EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L); and PROMIS PF CAT. Convergent and discriminant validity was assessed by measuring correlations between PROMIS PF CAT and other PRO instruments, including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Strength of correlation was measured by use of Spearman correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients (40 knees) were enrolled in the study. All knees underwent Fulkerson osteotomy and concomitant cartilage procedure (29 chondroplasty, 6 allograft, 5 microfracture). Mean patient age was 33.4 years, and 73% of knees were in female patients. Correlations (r) between PROMIS PF CAT and knee PRO instruments were as follows: SF-36 PF (r = 0.80; P < .01); KOOS Pain (r = 0.74; P < .01); KOOS Symptoms (r = 0.47; P < .01); KOOS Quality of Life (r = 0.68; P < .01); KOOS Sports and Recreation (r = 0.72; P < .01); KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (r = 0.80; P < .01); WOMAC Function (r = 0.80; P < .01); WOMAC Pain (r = 0.72; P < .01); WOMAC Stiffness (r = 0.38; P = .02); Marx (r = 0.22; P = .31); and EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.72; P < .01). Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed in PROMIS PF CAT or KOOS ADL. Mean (±SD) question burden with PROMIS PF CAT was 5.6 ± 0.6 questions.

CONCLUSION

In patients with patellofemoral malalignment and chondral disease, PROMIS PF CAT is an efficient and reliable PRO instrument to preoperatively assess patients across a spectrum of knee function without floor or ceiling effects.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the proximity of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) femoral insertion to the distal femoral physis in skeletally immature patients, multiple techniques for femoral graft fixation have been described.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature and evaluate outcomes and complications following MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines through use of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. All original, English-language studies reporting outcomes or complications following MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients were included. Skeletally mature patients were excluded. Data regarding demographics, surgical technique, graft type, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Study quality was assessed by use of the modified Coleman methodology score. Statistical analysis was performed through use of chi-square and weighted mean pooled cohort statistics, where appropriate, with significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

7 studies that entailed 132 MPFL reconstructions (126 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Females comprised 57.9% of the cohort (73 females), and the mean age was 13.2 years (range, 6-17 years). Mean postoperative follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 1.4-10 years). All of the grafts used were autograft, with gracilis tendon (n = 80; 60.6%) being the most common. Methods of femoral fixation included interference screw (n = 52; 39.4%), suture anchor (n = 51; 38.6%), and soft tissue pulley around the medial collateral ligament or adductor tendon (n = 29; 21.9%). Pooled Kujala scores improved from 59.1 to 84.6 after MPFL reconstruction. The total reported complication rate was 25.0% (n = 33) and included 5 redislocations (3.8%) and 15 subluxation events (11.4%). No cases of premature physeal closure were noted, and there were 3 reports of donor site pain (2.3%). Neither autograft choice (P > .804) nor method of femoral fixation (P > .416) influenced recurrent instability or overall complication rates.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients is a viable treatment option, with significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and redislocation event rates of less than 5% at nearly 5-year follow-up. Further high-quality research is needed to determine optimal graft options and surgical technique while considering recurrent instability, donor site morbidity, and potential injury to the adjacent physis.

Trends in Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair: An American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the trends in labral repair in American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II candidates performing hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

Candidates who performed arthroscopic hip surgery between 2011 and 2015 during their American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II board collection period were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes (29860, 29861, 29862, 29863, 29914, 29915, 29916). The proportion of hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair (Current Procedural Terminology code 29916) were calculated for each year and analyzed by fellowship training experience. Trends in labral repair utilization were calculated using univariate and regression analyses, with significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,606 hip labral repair cases were performed, with a 35% increase in utilization between 2011 and 2015. Overall, labral repair was performed in 64.8% (1,606/2,480) of hip arthroscopy cases, with a significant increase between 2011 and 2015 (47.4% vs 79.2%; P < .001). Of the hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair, 80.4% (1,291/1,606) were performed by candidates with sports medicine fellowship training. The proportion of hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair was highest for surgeons with sports medicine fellowship training compared with those without sports medicine fellowship training (66.1% vs 59.8%; P = .007). Candidates with sports medicine training performing at least 1 labral repair each year increased from 68% to 89% over the study period (P = .0007). The average number of labral repairs per candidate increased significantly over the duration of the study period (P = .0072).

CONCLUSIONS

Labral repair utilization during hip arthroscopy procedures nearly doubled from 2011 to 2015 for American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II candidates, reflecting a significant change in practice. Current data suggest that nearly 80% of hip arthroscopy procedures include labral repair. These trends may reflect the current practice patterns at academic institutions with sports medicine fellowships.

Prescription Opioid Use Before and After Hip Arthroscopy: A Caution to Prescribers

PURPOSE

To determine pre- and postoperative opioid utilization while identifying risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use following hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2007 and the second quarter of 2016 were identified within the Humana Inc. administrative claims database. Chronic preoperative opioid utilization was defined as filling of any opioid prescription 1 to 3 months before surgery, whereas acute preoperative opioid utilization was defined as filling any opioid prescription within 1 month of surgery. Rates of pre- and postoperative opioid utilization were calculated, and patient demographic characteristics and medical conditions associated with pre- and postoperative opioid utilization were identified.

RESULTS

Of the 1,208 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, chronic and acute preoperative opioid utilization was observed in 24.9% and 17.3% of patients, respectively. Chronic preoperative opioid utilization was more frequently observed in obese (P < .001) patients, those ≥50 years of age (P = .002), and those with preexisting anxiety and/or depression (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, chronic preoperative opioid utilization was the strongest predictor of opioid prescription filling at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively (odds ratio at 3 months, 18.60, 95% confidence interval, 12.41 to 28.55), whereas preexisting anxiety and/or depression and obesity were additionally identified as predictors of prolonged postoperative opioid utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic preoperative opioid utilization before hip arthroscopy is common at 24.9%. The high rate of chronic preoperative opioid utilization is particularly important considering that chronic preoperative opioid utilization is the strongest predictor of continued postoperative opioid prescription filling out to 12 months postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Trends in Knee Articular Cartilage Treatments: An American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database Study

This study aims to evaluate the trends in treatment of knee articular cartilage lesions over the past decade using data obtained from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II database. The ABOS Part II database was queried from 2004 to 2013 for chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral grafting procedures. All cases were analyzed for patient age and operating surgeon's fellowship training status. Univariate analysis including chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables was performed to determine if any significant changes in practice patterns were present. Linear regression analyses were utilized to examine temporal trends in procedures performed and fellowship training status. From 2004 to 2013, 25,938 procedures addressing articular cartilage lesions from 3,586 surgeons were identified in the ABOS database. 46.8% of these orthopaedic surgeons had completed a 1-year sports medicine fellowship. Sixty-six percent of cartilage surgeries were performed by sports medicine-trained surgeons. The articular cartilage surgical volume decreased from 3,126 cases in 2004 to 1,690 cases in 2013. The most common procedure coded overall was chondroplasty (80.23%) followed by microfracture (21.37%) and osteochondral grafting (2.1%). The mean age of patients undergoing chondroplasty was 46.9 years; this was significantly higher than microfracture (mean age 40.5 years) or osteochondral grafting procedures (mean age 31.6 years), p < 0.0005. The age of all patients undergoing cartilage surgery significantly decreased between 2004 and 2013, p < 0.001. A dramatic decrease in reported chondroplasty volume was observed between 2011 and 2012. Concurrent osteotomies were used in <1% of procedures addressing cartilage injuries, while 65% of patients underwent concurrent meniscectomy. These described trends are most pronounced in surgeons with sports medicine fellowship training. In conclusion, knee articular cartilage surgical volume and patient age have both sharply declined since 2011, a trend driven by sports medicine-trained Part II examinees. This trend correlates with changes in billing and coding practices, as well as improved education from high-level studies.

Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Hip Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Revision hip arthroscopy often serves as a measure for a failed primary hip arthroscopy procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate, timing, and risk factors for revision hip arthroscopy using a large national database.

METHODS

The Humana administrative claims dataset was reviewed from 2007 through the second quarter of 2015 to identify patients undergoing hip arthroscopy using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and laterality modifiers. Patients with subsequent ipsilateral revision hip arthroscopy were identified and the rate and timing of these revisions determined. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine effects of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), osteoarthritis diagnosis, and specific hip arthroscopy procedure on revision rates.

RESULTS

There were 1807 hip arthroscopy procedures identified with a revision rate of 4% (total of 72 procedures). Of the revision procedures, 43% occurred within 6 months after the index procedure, and 86% occurred within 18 months. Age < 50 years was the only significant predictor of revision hip arthroscopy (OR 2.03, CI 1.173.53) with an even distribution across younger age groups. An osteoarthritis diagnosis, gender, and BMI did not represent significant risk factors for revision (OR 0.87, 0.98, 0.9 and CI 0.5-1.51, CI 0.6-1.59, CI 0.37-2.12, respectively). Chondroplasty was the most common procedure leading to revision (46%) followed by labral repair (37%). The most common revision procedures were chondroplasty (44%) followed by femoroplasty (38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 4% of hip arthroscopy procedures underwent revision arthroscopy over the 8-year period. Revision was associated with age < 50, and revisions were most frequently performed for femoroacetabular impingement. The majority of revisions occurred within 18 months after the index procedure.Level of Evidence: IV.

The Effect of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Tendon-to-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review with Subgroup Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is some concern that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may impair the healing of certain musculoskeletal tissues. However, the effect of NSAIDs on the specialized fibrocartilaginous transition at the tendon-to-bone interface remains largely unknown. Thus, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of NSAIDs on tendon-to-bone healing following acute injury or surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and SportDiscus databases were searched from the time of database inception to May 14, 2018 to identify all clinical and basic science studies investigating the effect of NSAIDs on tendon-to-bone healing. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Research (SYRCLE) risk of bias assessment tools for clinical and basic science studies, respectively. A qualitative synthesis of the literature was performed with a subgroup meta-analysis of homogeneous basic science studies.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies, including three clinical and 10 basic science studies, were included. The overall methodological quality of the included clinical studies was poor, while assessment of the basic science studies revealed consistent areas at high or unclear risk of bias. Of the included clinical studies, a single study reported a higher rate of rotator cuff repair failure with selective (COX-2) NSAID use compared with non-selective NSAID use, while no clinical failures were noted with NSAID use following distal biceps tendon repair. Basic science studies had heterogeneous outcome reporting. A subgroup analysis of homogeneous animal studies revealed no significant effect of all NSAIDs (Standard Mean Difference [SMD] -1.05, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -2.39-0.30, p=0.13) or non-selective NSAIDs on load to failure (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -1.26-0.02, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature does not provide sufficient evidence for or against the use of NSAIDs following acute injury or surgical repair of the tendon-bone interface.Level of Evidence: IV.

Editorial Commentary: Trends in Cartilage Surgery-Who Is Steering the Ship?

With myriad cartilage surgery techniques available, including marrow stimulation, autologous osteochondral transfer, osteochondral allograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation, treatment of knee articular cartilage injuries has become increasingly complex. Recent evidence suggests that advanced cartilage restoration procedures may provide improved outcomes and durability when compared with marrow stimulation techniques. When investigating orthopaedic surgeons early in practice, it appears that utilization of marrow stimulation techniques has decreased, an encouraging trend that is in line with recent evidence. However, it is important to consider how other factors not investigated, including insurance approval and payor reimbursement, may influence these trends moving forward.

Graft use in the treatment of large and massive rotator cuff tears: an overview of techniques and modes of failure with MRI correlation

Despite technical advances, repair of large or massive rotator cuff tears continues to demonstrate a relatively high rate of failure. Rotator cuff repair or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a variety of commercially available grafts provides a promising option in patients with tears that may be at high risk for failure or otherwise considered irreparable. There are three major graft constructs that exist when utilizing graft in rotator cuff repair or reconstruction: augmentation at the rotator cuff footprint, bridging, and SCR. Each construct has a unique appearance when evaluated using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and each construct has unique sites that are predisposed to failure. Understanding the basic principles of these constructs can help the radiologist better evaluate the postoperative MRI appearance of these increasingly utilized procedures.

The Incidence of Glenohumeral Bone and Cartilage Lesions at the Time of Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Surgery: A Comparison of Patients Undergoing Primary and Revision Surgery

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular glenohumeral joint changes frequently occur after shoulder instability events.

PURPOSE

(1) To compare demographic characteristics, baseline patient-reported outcomes, and intraoperative findings for patients undergoing primary or revision shoulder stabilization surgery and (2) to determine the incidence of glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions in this population while identifying factors independently associated with these lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group shoulder instability database was used to identify all prospectively enrolled patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery for anterior instability between October 2012 and September 2016. Any patient who underwent surgery for posterior or multidirectional shoulder instability or concomitant rotator cuff repair surgery was excluded. Patient demographic characteristics, preoperative patient-reported outcomes, and intraoperative findings, including glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions, were compared for patients undergoing primary and revision shoulder stabilization surgery. Additionally, patients with and without glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions were compared and independent associations determined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 545 patients available for analysis (461/545 [84.6%] primary; 84/545 [15.4%] revision). Patients undergoing revision surgery were older ( P = .001), were more frequently smokers ( P = .022), had a greater number of instability events before surgery ( P = .047), more frequently required reduction assistance ( P < .001), and had lower Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary ( P = .020) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) ( P = .026) scores preoperatively. Additionally, patients undergoing revision surgery had a higher frequency of bone and cartilage lesions than those undergoing primary surgery (47.6% vs 18.4%, respectively; P < .001). Male sex, revision surgery, black race, increasing body mass index, increasing patient age, and lower preoperative SF-36 Physical Component Summary score were independently associated with the presence of glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions at the time of shoulder stabilization surgery. Revision surgery was strongly associated with the presence of glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions (odds ratio [OR], 4.381 [95% CI, 2.591-7.406]) and glenoid bone loss greater than 10% (OR, 9.643 [95% CI, 5.128-18.134]) or 20% (OR, 13.076 [95% CI, 5.113-33.438]) of the glenoid width.

CONCLUSION

Glenohumeral bone and cartilage lesions are common at the time of shoulder stabilization surgery, occurring more frequently in patients undergoing revision surgery as compared with primary surgery. On the basis of these findings, future prospective studies should aim to compare the clinical outcomes in these 2 groups.

What is the Impact of Smoking on Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of smoking on revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of smoking on complications after revision THA.

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent revision THA between 2006 and 2014. Patients were divided into current smokers and nonsmokers. Each cohort was compared in terms of demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and operative time. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the outcomes of any wound complication, deep infection, and reoperation within 30 days of revision THA were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 8237 patients had undergone a revision THA. Of these patients, 14.7% were current smokers and 85.3% were nonsmokers. Univariate analyses demonstrated that smokers had a higher rate of any wound complication (4.1% vs 3.0%, P = .04), deep infection (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = .003), and reoperation (6.8% vs 4.8%, P = .003). Multivariate analysis controlling for confounding demographic, comorbidity, and operative variables identified current smokers as having a significantly increased risk of deep infection (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38) and reoperation (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.85).

CONCLUSION

Smoking significantly increases the risk of infection and reoperation after revision THA. The results are even more magnified for revision procedures compared to published effects of smoking on primary THA complications. Further research is needed regarding the impact of smoking cessation on mitigation of these observed risks.

Editorial Commentary: When Is Too Small, Too Small? Allograft Augmentation of Autologous Hamstring Grafts During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Soft tissue allograft augmentation of small hamstring autografts, so-called hybrid grafts, has been proposed as an option during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). However, notable concerns exist with both small autograft use and allograft use during ACL-R, particularly in young, active patients. We currently choose to augment hamstring autografts with diameters <8.0 mm, adding only enough allograft to create a hybrid graft with an overall diameter no larger than 8.5 mm. Based on the available evidence, surgeons continue to seek the tipping point where the benefit of additional allograft tissue exceeds the consequence of its use.

Traumatic Obturator Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Managed with Closed Reduction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

CASE

A 30-year-old man sustained an obturator dislocation of a left total hip prosthesis with a concomitant ipsilateral fracture of the greater trochanter following a high-energy motor-vehicle accident. With the patient under general anesthesia, the hip was successfully treated with closed reduction, as confirmed with intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs. Postreduction, the patient was able to mobilize with abduction restrictions and had no additional instability. Short-term follow-up showed evidence of healing of the greater trochanter.

CONCLUSION

Obturator dislocation of a total hip prosthesis is an exceedingly rare injury. Closed reduction can be considered as a treatment option in the appropriate patient, with a satisfactory short-term outcome.

Who Is Performing Hip Arthroscopy?: An Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part-II Database

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy utilization has increased dramatically over the last decade. However, the lack of a formal training curriculum raises concern that inconsistent technical performance may be an issue for early-career hip arthroscopists. The purpose of the present study was to investigate hip arthroscopy utilization by early-career orthopaedic surgeons while focusing on fellowship training status to better guide future development of a hip arthroscopy training curriculum.

METHODS

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part-II database was used to identify candidates who had performed ≥1 hip arthroscopy procedures between 2006 and 2015. Procedures were categorized using Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and candidates were categorized by fellowship training experience. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization were evaluated using univariate and regression analyses while stratifying by fellowship training experience.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.2% (643) of 6,987 ABOS candidates had performed ≥1 hip arthroscopy procedures. Over the study period, both the proportion of candidates performing hip arthroscopy and the proportion of hip arthroscopy procedures performed (relative to all procedures performed, of any type) increased (p < 0.001). Candidates performing hip arthroscopy most frequently reported sports medicine fellowship training (74.5%; 479 of 643). Also, among the candidates who performed hip arthroscopy, the proportion who had sports medicine fellowship training increased over the study period (p = 0.001). The majority of candidates performing hip arthroscopy (67.2%; 432 of 643) performed ≤5 hip arthroscopy procedures, while a small number of high-volume hip arthroscopists (6.5%; 42 of 643) performed 34.6% (1,403 of 4,054) of all hip arthroscopy procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in hip arthroscopy utilization in this cohort appears to have been driven primarily by the increased number of candidates performing hip arthroscopy and less by an increasing number of hip arthroscopy procedures being performed by individual candidates. The majority of candidates performing hip arthroscopy were sports-medicine-fellowship trained. This information is valuable for both trainees and educators interested in improving education and defining a curriculum for future hip arthroscopy training.

Opioid Use Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Trends and Risk Factors for Prolonged Use

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: (1) What is the prevalence of opioid use prior to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)? (2) What is the typical trend in opioid use following THA over the first post-operative year? (3) What are the risk factors for prolonged opioid use following primary THA?

METHODS

Primary THA patients were identified in the Humana database from 2007 to 2015. Pre-operative and post-operative opioid use was measured by monthly prescription refill rates. Rates of opioid use were trended monthly for 1 year post-operatively and compared based on pre-operative opioid user (OU) status as well as other patient demographics and co-morbidities.

RESULTS

In total, 37,393 THA patients were analyzed and 14,309 patients (38.2%) were pre-operative opioid users (OUs). Pre-operative opioid use was the strongest predictor for prolonged opioid use following THA, with non-opioid users filling significantly less opioid prescriptions than OUs at every time point analyzed. Younger age, female sex, and all other diagnoses analyzed were found to significantly increase the rate of opioid refilling following THA throughout the entire post-operative year.

CONCLUSION

Over one-third of THA patients use opioids within 3 months prior to THA and this percentage has increased 6% during the years included in this study. Pre-operative opioid use was most predictive of increased refills of opioids following THA. These data provide an important baseline for opioid use trends following THA that can be used for future comparison while identifying risk factors for prolonged use that will be helpful to prescribers as we all work to decrease opioid use, misuse, and abuse.

Hip Fractures: Appropriate Timing to Operative Intervention

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to (1) identify the incidence of surgical delay in hip fractures, (2) evaluate the time point surgical delay puts patients at increased risk for complications, and (3) identify risk factors for surgical delay in the setting of surgical management of hip fractures.

METHODS

A multi-center database was queried for patients of 60 years of age or older undergoing surgical treatment of a hip fracture. Surgical delay was defined by days from admission until surgical intervention. Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses were performed on all groups.

RESULTS

A total of 4215 patients underwent surgery for their hip fracture. Of those experiencing surgical delay, 3304 (78%) patients experienced surgical delay of ≥1 day, 1314 (31%) had delay of ≥2 days, and 480 (11%) experienced delay of ≥3 days. There was a significant difference in complications if patients experienced surgical delay of ≥2 days (P ≤ .01). Multivariate analyses identified multiple risk factors for delay of ≥2 days including congestive heart failure (odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 2.04-4.66) and body mass index ≥40 (odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.31-4.08). Subgroup analysis identified that patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were not at risk for complications with surgical delay of ≥2 days.

CONCLUSION

Surgical delay of ≥2 days in the setting of hip fractures is common and confers an increased risk of complications in those undergoing non-total hip arthroplasty procedures. We recommend surgical intervention prior to 48 hours from hospital admission when possible. Healthcare systems can utilize our non-modifiable risk factors when performing quality assessment and cost accounting.

Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Trends and Risk Factors for Prolonged Use

BACKGROUND

The United States is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. Little is known about perioperative opioid use for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to identify rates of preoperative opioid use, evaluate postoperative trends and identify risk factors for prolonged use after TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA from 2007-2014 were identified within the Humana database. Postoperative opioid use was measured by monthly prescription refill rates. A preoperative opioid user (OU) was defined by history of opioid prescription within 3 months prior to TKA and a non-opioid user (NOU) was defined by no history of prior opioid use. Rates of opioid use were trended monthly for one year postoperatively for all cohorts.

RESULTS

73,959 TKA patients were analyzed and 23,532 patients (31.2%) were OU. OU increased from 30.1% in 2007 to 39.3% in 2014 (P < .001). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest predictor for prolonged opioid use following TKA, with OU filling significantly more opioid prescriptions than NOU at every time point analyzed. Younger age, female sex and other intrinsic factors were found to significantly increase the rate of opioid refilling following TKA throughout the postoperative year.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of TKA patients use opioids within 3 months prior to surgery and this percentage has increased over 9% during the years included in this study. Preoperative opioid use was most predictive of increased refills of opioids following TKA. However, other intrinsic patient characteristics were also predictive of prolonged opioid use.

Infection following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 6,389 Cases

Infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is rare. Previous authors have concluded that diabetes, tobacco use, and previous knee surgery may influence infection rates following ACLR. The purpose of this study was to identify a cohort of patients undergoing ACLR and define (1) the incidence of infection after ACLR from a large multicenter database and (2) the risk factors for infection after ACLR. We identified patients undergoing elective ACLRs in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome was any surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses comparing infected and noninfected cases to identify risk factors for infection. In total, 6,398 ACLRs were available for analysis of which 39 (0.61%) were diagnosed with a postoperative infection. Univariate analysis identified preoperative dyspnea, low hematocrit, operative time > 1 hour, and hospital admission following surgery as predictors of postoperative infection. Diabetes, tobacco use, age, and body mass index (BMI) were not associated with infection (p > 0.05). After multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of postoperative infection was hospital admission following surgery (odds ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.96; p = 0.04). Hospital admission following surgery was associated with an increased incidence of infection in this large, multicenter cohort. Smoking, elevated BMI, and diabetes did not increase the risk infection in the present study. Surgeons should optimize outpatient operating systems and practices to aid in same-day discharges following ACLR.

Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rates of Adoption and Early Complications

BACKGROUND

When new technologies are introduced, it is important to evaluate the rate of adoption and outcomes compared with preexisting technology. The purpose of this study was to determine the adoption rate of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to determine if the short-term complication rate changed over time with navigation, and to compare short-term complication rates of navigated and traditional TKA.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify 108,277 patients undergoing primary TKA between 2010 and 2014, of which 3573 cases (3.30%) were navigated. Rates of adoption of navigated TKA were determined. Differences in short-term complications by year were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Navigation utilization decreased from 4.96% in 2010 to 3.06% in 2014. Blood transfusion rates for the entire cohort decreased from 19% in 2011 to 6% in 2014, and was not decreased with navigation compared with traditional TKA in 2014 (P = .1309). Operative time was not increased by navigation, and average 94.2 minutes. There were no significant differences in all-cause complications, reoperation rate, unplanned readmission, or length of stay for any year.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 38.3% decrease in TKA navigation utilization from 2010-2014. Blood transfusion rates decreased 68% over the 5-year study, and were not decreased with navigation in 2014. Navigation was not found to increase operative time. There were no significant differences in short-term complications, readmission rate, or length of stay between navigated and traditional TKA.