1
|
Appropriate admission to rehabilitation: definition of a set of criteria through the Delphi Method. Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Controlling inappropriateness of care, a widespread phenomenon, should be a global target in order to improve the quality of care, save money and ensure system sustainability. Inappropriateness is a relevant issue in public health and in rehabilitation medicine specifically. In fact, admitting a patient to a rehabilitation hospital or unit is a complex decision also due to the absence of shared and objective admission criteria. Aim of this study is to define clinical admission criteria and rules in rehabilitation medicine.
Methods
A three-round Delphi survey was conducted on a sample of rehabilitation medicine experts skilled in both rehabilitation and healthcare organization. The two initial rounds consisted of an electronic online questionnaire concerning appropriateness of admission to intensive rehabilitation while in the third one a report of the results was provided to the participants. The experts had to score their agreement with each item in the questionnaires, based on either a Likert scale or a dichotomous statement. Consensus between the experts was assessed.
Results
A total of 53 health professionals completed the Delphi survey. 19 out of 20 Italian regions were represented. The first round consisted of 8 multiple-choice questions questionnaire. The second round was designed thanks to the suggestions provided by the panelists in the previous one and consisted of a twelve items questionnaire. At the end of the survey, eight criteria of appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation were identified and five rules defining an appropriate admission to a rehabilitation facility were elaborated.
Conclusions
This study represents an attempt to create a worthwhile and reliable tool for a more conscious clinical practice in admission to rehabilitation, based on a set of shared criteria and rules.
Key messages
Improving appropriateness in healthcare delivery must be a primary goal in public health and in rehabilitation medicine specifically. Delphi method was applied to define shared clinical admission criteria and rules in rehabilitation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Vaccine-preventable diseases screening and vaccination programs for healthcare professions students. Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Students in Healthcare Professions (SHPs) present an increased risk of contracting and transmitting Vaccine-Preventable Diseases (VPDs). Our study aimed to investigate the organizational strategies (screening and immunization for VPDs and vaccination promotion among SHPs) implemented by the healthcare facilities accredited with the University of Milan.
Methods
we sent an e-survey by e-mail to medical residents and first- and last-year students in nursing, midwifery and healthcare assistance.
Results
among 3397 invited SHPs, 645 participated. We included in the analysis 522 SHPs, distributed in 24 facilities across the Lombardy region (mean age 27,4 years; 69,5% female; 69% medical residents, 28% nursing, 2% healthcare assistance, and 1% midwifery students). Although most participants underwent occupational health visit before the traineeship start (47,5%) or within 6 months (29,5%), others hadn't undergone yet (15,1%). The visits included the collection of vaccination history (72,6%; 64,6% from written documentation), serological tests for VPDs (hepatitis B 76,1%, measles and rubella 58,4%, varicella 54,4%), and screening for latent TB (69,7%). Vaccinations were recommended to 226 participants, but only 173 fully (76,5%) or partially (8%) complied. Full compliance was associated with nudges like in-hospital (Chisq. 18,7; p = 0.00) and free vaccinations (Chisq. 31; p = 0.00). Reported facility vaccination policies included campaigns (posters 37,4%, intranet 39,5%, social media 11,5%, general/personalized letters 30,3%/11,5%), time-off incentives (7,7%), on-site (30,5%) and opinion leaders' vaccinations (9,8%). However, SHPs were often unaware of those strategies (mean 48,6%), and intra-facility answers were sometimes discordant (agreement <70% for facilities with >30 respondents).
Conclusions
SHPs are often unaware or discordant regarding vaccination policies carried out by traineeship facilities, suggesting the need of inclusive communication strategies.
Key messages
About half of students in healthcare professions are screened for VPDs after the start of the traineeship. Students in healthcare professions are often unaware of vaccination promotion strategies.
Collapse
|