Clinical Outcomes and Immunotoxicity in People with HIV (PWH) after Definitive Chemoradiation (CRT) for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Anal cancer disproportionately affects PWH despite antiretroviral therapy. Data on CRT outcomes are limited. Modern IMRT CRT decreases acute toxicity but may exacerbate immune dysregulation from chronic HIV. Although historical CRT has been associated with prolonged CD4 count suppression, little is known about late immunotoxicity in PWH after contemporary CRT. We report clinical outcomes and long term immunotoxicity.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Single-center retrospective review of all PWH confirmed on chart review with anal squamous cell carcinoma without prior pelvic irradiation treated with definitive IMRT CRT. Patient and CRT factors including HIV suppression (<200 copies/mL), mean CD4 count (cells/µL), and receipt of capecitabine (C) or 5-fluorouracil (F) +/- mitomycin (M) were summarized with n (%) or median (interquartile range). Progression-free and overall survival (PFS; OS) were estimated per Kaplan-Meier with 95% confidence intervals and compared with log-rank tests. Mean CD4 count and CD4:CD8 were compared by HIV suppression status (Welch's t-test); longitudinal changes in median CD4 count and CD4:CD8 were compared between baseline vs. nadir (within 6 months of CRT start) and 1-year follow-up for patients with complete data (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

RESULTS

A total of 23 PWH were treated between 2010-2022, median age 52, median 16 (13 - 19) years after HIV diagnosis; 4 had unsuppressed HIV; AJCC 8th stage I/II/III/IV 5/5/12/1. Radiation dose was median 54 Gy in 30 fractions over 42 (40 - 44) days. Most had C+M (57%); only 43% had 2×M with either C or F. One had neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel/pembrolizumab. With 2.9 (1.03 - 3.3) years follow-up, median OS was 6.6 (6.2 - unreached [UR]) years. With 2.2 (0.67 - 2.7) years follow-up, median PFS was UR. OS and PFS were similar regardless of HIV suppression status (both P ≥ 0.09). Overall baseline CD4 count was 458 (226 - 484), and CD4:CD8 was 0.54 (0.2 - 0.7). Nadir CD4 was 100 (59 - 126) and CD4:CD8 was 0.3 (0.2 - 0.4). Baseline and nadir CD4 count and CD4:CD8 were lower if HIV-unsuppressed (each P ≤ 0.04). One year after CRT, CD4 count was 252 (102 - 276), while CD4:CD8 was 0.5 (0.2 - 0.7). For 7 patients with repeated values the change in median from baseline to nadir, 6-, and 12-months post-CRT was -282, -549 (both P = 0.02), -480 (P = 0.9) for CD4 counts, and -0.7, -0.5, -0.4 (each P > 0.5) for CD4:CD8 ratios; none had unsuppressed HIV.

CONCLUSION

Definitive IMRT CRT with guideline-concordant doublet chemotherapy for anal cancer in PWH is effective despite unsuppressed HIV. Treatment leads to prolonged immunological changes that may increase the risk of HIV-related morbidity and mortality. Modifiable treatment-related causes of hematoimmunologic toxicity should be investigated further, and immune surveillance after CRT should be considered to better understand impact on quality of life.

A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users

AIMS

To examine the effect of two workstation and postural interventions on the incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trial of two distinct workstation and postural interventions (an alternate intervention and a conventional intervention) among 376 persons using computer keyboards for more than 15 hours per week. The incidence of neck/shoulder symptoms and hand/arm symptoms during six months of follow up among individuals in the intervention groups was compared to the incidence in computer users who did not receive an intervention (comparison group). For individuals in the intervention groups, study staff adjusted workstations, where possible, and trained individuals to assume the intervention postures. Individuals reported musculoskeletal symptoms in a weekly diary. Participants who reported discomfort intensity of 6 or greater on a 0-10 visual analogue scale or who reported musculoskeletal symptoms requiring use of analgesic medication were considered symptomatic.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms among the three intervention groups. Twenty two (18.5%) participants in the alternate intervention group, 25 (20.2%) in the conventional intervention group, and 25 (21.7%) in the comparison group developed incident arm or hand symptoms. Thirty eight (33.3%) participants in the alternate intervention group, 36 (31.0%) in the conventional intervention group, and 33 (30.3%) in the comparison group developed incident neck or shoulder symptoms. Compliance with all components of the intervention was attained for only 25-38% of individuals, due mainly to the inflexibility of workstation configurations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that two specific workplace postural interventions are unlikely to reduce the risk of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users.

The use of ultrasound for guiding needle placement for inferior alveolar nerve blocks

OBJECTIVE

The degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with an ultrasound-assisted inferior alveolar nerve block was compared to that obtained with a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular teeth to determine whether needle placement assisted by ultrasound results in more successful anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Through use of a repeated-measures design, each of 40 subjects randomly received an ultrasound-assisted inferior alveolar nerve block and a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block at 2 separate appointments. Mandibular anterior and posterior teeth were blindly tested by means of a pulp tester at 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes postinjection. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive readings of 80 were obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred percent of the subjects had profound lip numbness with both the ultrasound-assisted inferior alveolar nerve block and the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. For these 2 techniques, anesthetic success rates for individual teeth ranged from 38% to 92%. There were no significant differences (P > .05) between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that accurate needle placement with ultrasound for the inferior alveolar nerve block did not result in more successful pulpal anesthesia in the mandible. Therefore, accuracy of needle placement is not the primary reason for pulpal anesthetic failure with this block.