A134 THE PEDIATRIC ENDOSCOPY POCKET GUIDE – DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL “IN-THE-MOMENT” ELECTRONIC RESOURCE FOR PEDIATRIC ENDOSCOPY

Background

Endoscopy is vital to pediatric gastroenterology. Performing endoscopic procedures safely, effectively and with age-specific considerations requires integration of technical and cognitive competencies. There are many guidelines for endoscopic diagnosis, classification, and management of pediatric gastrointestinal conditions. To date, there are few collated resources for pediatric endoscopists.

Subspecialty trainee feedback at McMaster University identified the need for an accessible, consolidated resource to improve knowledge and competence. The literature shows a lack of exposure in subspeciality training to uncommon yet high acuity procedures such as gastrointestinal bleeding. In an apprenticeship-based learning model, this poses a challenge for both trainees and trainers. Evidence suggests use of multimedia tools is more effective for learning procedural skills than text alone, which guided the creation of this resource.

Purpose

To develop an “in-the-moment” electronic resource to supplement training of pediatric endoscopic procedures.

Method

A subspeciality trainee and two pediatric gastroenterologists with expertise in medical education and program development identified existing knowledge gaps. An electronic pocket guide with links to relevant guidelines and instructional resources was developed. The guide underwent six rounds of revision to ensure it contained relevant and updated guidelines. A copyright and e-learning expert reviewed the content to certify it complied with copyright laws and McMaster University’s accessibility guidelines. The guide will be uploaded to Pressbooks © which allows for export to multiple formats for distribution.

Result(s)

Based on knowledge gaps identified by local experts, the following six domains were incorporated into the pocket guide:

1. Logistics: safety procedures, colonoscopy preparation regimens, equipment specifications, considerations for urgent endoscopy and reporting guidelines

2. Troubleshooting: patient positioning, loop recognition/management strategies

3. Special tests: method of collection, collection media and lab protocols

4. Scoring systems: validated scoring tools for eosinophilic esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal varices, caustic esophageal injury, bleeding ulcers, and inflammatory bowel disease

5. Endoscopic emergencies: guidelines for esophageal burns, foreign body ingestions and upper gastrointestinal bleeds

6. Endoscopic tools: instructions for tools used in the categories of hemostasis, polypectomy, foreign body removal, esophageal varices, and strictures

Conclusion(s)

This novel teaching tool provides an electronic guide that can be used at all levels of pediatric gastroenterology training to gain familiarity and/or rapidly access resources for complex or infrequently encountered endoscopy techniques. Future studies will aim to evaluate the pocket guide from two aspects – ease of use/accessibility and whether implementation of this guide leads to increased competence with various endoscopic tools and techniques.

Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below

None

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Clinical decision support system RHINA in the diagnosis and treatment of acute or chronic rhinosinusitis

Background

Rhinosinusitis is an inflammation of the sinonasal cavity which affects roughly one in seven people per year. Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is mostly, apart from allergic etiology, caused by a viral infection and, in some cases (30–50%), by a bacterial superinfection. Antibiotics, indicated only in rare cases according to EPOS guidelines, are nevertheless prescribed in more than 80% of ARS cases, which increases the resistant bacterial strains in the population.

Methods

We have designed a clinical decision support system (CDSS), RHINA, based on a web application created in HTML 5, using JavaScript, jQuery, CCS3 and PHP scripting language. The presented CDSS RHINA helps general physicians to decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics in patients with rhinosinusitis.

Results

In a retrospective study of a total of 1465 patients with rhinosinusitis, the CDSS RHINA presented a 90.2% consistency with the diagnosis and treatment made by the ENT specialist.

Conclusion

Patients assessed with the assistance of our CDSS RHINA would decrease the over-prescription of antibiotics, which in turn would help to reduce the bacterial resistance to the most commonly prescribed antibiotics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01599-3.

A qualitative study of fourteen African countries' nursing workforce and labour market

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe factors affecting nursing education and labour markets in countries in East, Central, and Southern Africa, and critical areas for investment.

BACKGROUND

An understanding about the relationship between the supply of nurses (determined by types of educational programmes, and the quantity and quality of nurse graduates), and workforce demand is critical to health policy development.

METHODS

Six focus groups and 14 key informant interviews with nursing leaders and experts were conducted. Participants included government chief nursing officers, registrars of regulatory bodies, association leaders and heads of nursing education. The data were transcribed, coded and analysed using inductive techniques.

FINDINGS

Participants discussed challenges and strengths of nursing education, school and regulatory infrastructure, financing mechanisms for the nursing workforce, the state of nursing jobs and scope of nursing practice.

CONCLUSION

Strengthened regulations and leadership are needed to improve investment in nursing, the quality of nursing education, and working conditions and to promote the achievement of better health outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY

Clarifying scope of practice for nurses in the health sector and creating competency-based requirements is important. Governments should establish positions that align with updated competencies and provide fair and safe working conditions. The current and ongoing investment case for nursing requires improved data systems and a commitment to use labour market data for decision-making.

Abstract P6-18-06: Ribociclib treatment benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer with ≥1 dose reduction: Data from the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials

Background: In the MONALEESA (ML) trials, addition of ribociclib (RIB; cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) to endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC). RIB was generally well tolerated, with adverse events (AEs) managed effectively by dose modifications. Here we present efficacy data for RIB-based regimens of interest for the proposed indication (i.e. with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor [NSAI] or fulvestrant [FUL]) from ML-2, -3, and -7 in pts who received no prior ET for ABC and who had ≥1 RIB dose reduction, to explore the efficacy of RIB in pts who need to dose reduce.

Methods: Pts included in this analysis were: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC and no prior ET for ABC who received RIB (600 mg; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) with letrozole (2.5 mg/day; ML-2 [NCT01958021]), or FUL (500 mg per label; ML-3 [NCT02422615]); and premenopausal women with no prior ET and ≤1 line of chemotherapy for ABC who received RIB with an NSAI (anastrozole: 1 mg/day; letrozole: 2.5 mg/day; ML-7 [NCT02278120]) plus goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days). Dose reductions for RIB (600 to 400 to 200 mg) were permitted. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety.

Results: In ML-2, -3, and -7, ≥1 RIB dose reduction occurred (n/N) in 169/334 (51%), 92/238 (39%), and 91/246 (37%) pts assigned to RIB, respectively. AEs were the main reason for dose reduction, with all-grade neutropenia the most common AE leading to dose reduction (ML-2 69%, ML-3 80%, ML-7 82%). Median PFS (months) was prolonged with RIB vs placebo in pts without a RIB dose reduction (ML-2: 27.7 vs 16.0; ML-3: not reached [NR] vs 18.3; ML-7: 23.8 vs 13.8); median PFS in pts with ≥1 RIB dose reduction was: ML-2 25.3, ML-3 NR, and ML-7 27.5 months. In pts with measurable disease and without a RIB dose reduction, ORR was 46% (ML-2), 43% (ML-3), and 48% (ML-7); CBR was 70%, 68%, and 79%, respectively. In pts with measurable disease and ≥1 RIB dose reduction, ORR was 62% (ML-2), 57% (ML-3), and 55% (ML-7); CBR was 88%, 85%, and 88%, respectively. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs in the RIB vs placebo groups (≥5% of pts in either ML trial, irrespective of causality or dose reduction) were neutropenia (ML-2: 62% vs 1%; ML-3: 55% vs 0; ML-7: 65% vs 4%), leukopenia (ML-2: 21% vs 1%; ML-3: 12% vs 0; ML-7: 16% vs 1%), hypertension (ML-2: 13% vs 13%; ML-3: 5% vs 5%; ML-7: 2% vs 3%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ML-2: 10% vs 1%; ML-3: 10% vs 0; ML-7: 5% vs 1%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (ML-2: 6% vs 1%; ML-3: 6% vs 0; ML-7: 4% vs 1%).

Conclusions: Results from the ML-2, -3, and -7 trials suggest that pts who start on 600 mg of RIB and require dose reduction for the management of their AEs, or for other reasons, continue to derive clinical benefit.

Citation Format: Beck JT, Neven P, Sohn J, Chan A, Sonke GS, Bachelot T, Campos-Gomez S, Martin M, Bardia A, Alam J, Miller M, Diaz-Padilla I, Kong O, Hart L. Ribociclib treatment benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer with ≥1 dose reduction: Data from the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-06.

Partial maxillectomy for ameloblastoma of the maxilla with infratemporal fossa involvement: A combined endoscopic endonasal and transoral approach

Ameloblastoma represents the most common epithelial odontogenic tumor. Because of the proximity of the maxillary tumors to the orbit and skull base, it should be managed as radically as possible. Maxillectomy, mainly via the transfacial or transoral approach, represents the most common type of surgical procedure. Drawback of these approaches is limited control of the superiomedial extent of the tumour in the paranasal area. We report the use of a combined endoscopic endonasal and transoral approach to manage maxillary plexiform ameloblastoma in a 48-year-old male patient. A combined endoscopic endonasal and transoral approach enabled the radical removal of tumour with a 1.5cm margin of radiographically intact bone with good control from both intrasinusal and intraoral aspects. Adequate visualization of the extent of the lesion (e.g. orbit, infratemporal fossa, anterior cranial base) had been achieved. Non-complicated healing was achieved. This technique of partial maxillectomy led to very good aesthetic and functional results. No recurrence had been noted during review appointments. The combination of endoscopic endonasal and transoral approach for a partial maxillectomy allows sufficient reduction of the defect, thus eliminating the necessity for reconstruction and reducing the morbidity associated with it.

Abstract PD5-11: Not presented

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

P544The importance of contractile reserve when assessing asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis

Asymptomatic patients may exhibit symptoms during objective exercise testing, but whether symptoms are due to the obstructively of the valve (typified by the mean gradient) or underlying ventricular function remains unknown. While the mean gradient is an easy parameter to measure no consensus about the measurement of contractile reserve exists. Longitudinal abnormalities may occur in the presence of a normal ejection fraction and the augmentation of these parameters is poorly described. To obtain an objective regarding patients exercise ability is best determined using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. We therefore examined echocardiographic predictors of exercise ability during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.24 asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe or severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction underwent stress echocardiography with simultaneous cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The primary assessment of exercise ability was the VO2peak and OUES. Echocardiography was measured at rest and during maximal exercise (defined as RER > 1)OUES and VO2peak showed a poor relationship with conventional parameters of severity including peak and mean gradients, AVA and dimensionless index, resting systolic function (by EF and TDI). During exercise systolic augmentation had a good relationship with exercise ability but the exercise mean gradient and exercise LVEF did not.Longitudinal systolic function and particularly systolic augmentation is the strongest predictor of exercise ability when compared to conventional measures of severity.VO2peakOUESS' exerciseRho=0.69 (p=0.001)R= 0.71 (p=0.001)S' restRho=0.52 (p=0.01)R= 0.44 (p=ns)Rest AV max VRho= 0.09 (p=ns)R= -0.08 (p=ns)Rest AV mean PGRho= 0.34 (p=ns)R=-0.10 (p=ns)Exercise AV max VRho=0.43 (p=0.05)R=0.23 (p=ns)Exercise AVmean PGRho= 0.51 (p=0.001)R=0.26 (p=ns)Rest AVARho=0.40 (p=ns)Rho=0.46 (p=0.04)Dimensionless indexRho=0.15 (p=ns)R=0.13 (p=ns)LVEF restRho=-0.18 (p=ns)R=-0.32 (p=ns)LVEF exerciseRho=0.18 (p=ns)R=0.17 (p=ns)S' - systolic velocity; V - velocity; AV - aortic valve; AVA- aortic valve area; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction.

TAK-228 (formerly MLN0128), an investigational dual TORC1/2 inhibitor plus paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

This phase I trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of investigational oral TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 plus paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients received TAK-228 6-40 mg via three dosing schedules; once daily for 3 days (QDx3d QW) or 5 days per week (QDx5d QW), and once weekly (QW) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m² (dose-escalation phase, n = 47) and with/without trastuzumab 2 mg/kg (expansion phase, n = 20). Doses were escalated using a modified 3 + 3 design, based upon dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1.

RESULTS

TAK-228 pharmacokinetics exhibited dose-dependent increase in exposure when dosed with paclitaxel and no apparent differences when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue, rash, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and nausea. The maximum tolerated dose of TAK-228 was determined as 10-mg QDx3d QW; the expansion phase proceeded with 8-mg QDx3d QW. Overall, the most common grade ≥3 drug-related toxicities were neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (12%), and hyperglycemia (12%). Of 54 response-evaluable patients, eight achieved partial response and six had stable disease lasting ≥6 months.

CONCLUSION

TAK-228 demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other TORC inhibitors and promising preliminary antitumor activity in a range of tumor types; no meaningful difference was noted in the pharmacokinetics of TAK-228 when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. These findings support further investigation of TAK-228 in combination with other agents including paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01351350.

Abstract P2-08-01: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial evaluating exemestane ± enzalutamide in patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P1-14-06: A phase II randomized study with eribulin/cyclophosphamide (ErC) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) as neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer- Final analysis of primary endpoint and correlative analysis results

Background: Eribulin mesylate (Er) is a non-taxane inhibitor of microtubule growth that results in G2-M cell cycle arrest, disruption of normal mitotic spindles and apoptosis. Er demonstrated an overall survival (OS) but not progression free survival (PFS) advantage in anthracycline and taxane refractory breast cancer pts. This OS rather than PFS benefit has been attributed to Er's potential to suppress new metastases through its effects on the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway, even in the absence of an effect on the primary tumor or established metastases. In this study ErC was compared to TC, a standard regimen for (neo) adjuvant treatment. A companion exploratory analysis examined the EMT markers E-cadherin and vimentin, as well as the endothelial marker CD-31 assessing tumor vasculature. Final assessments of the primary endpoint of pathological complete response (pCR) and results of the correlative studies will be presented.

Methods: Women with histologically confirmed invasive HER2-negative (IHC 0-1+ or FISH/SISH negative), cT1-3, cN0-2, M0 (pN3a disease allowed) adenocarcinoma of the breast were eligible. Following a 10 pt lead-in to confirm the safety/feasibility of ErC, pts were randomized 2:1. Arm 1, Er 1.4 mg/m2 IV (Days 1 & 8) and C 600 mg/m2 IV (Day 1); Arm 2, T 75 mg/m2 IV and C 600 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, both regimens administered q 21 days x 6 cycles followed by surgery. Tumor samples were collected at baseline and from residual breast cancer at the time of surgery. Samples were assayed for E-cadherin, vimentin, and CD-31 expression by immunohistochemistry.

Results: Enrollment was completed 4/2014 (76 pts); 10 pts in lead-in phase, 66 pts were randomized (Arm 1, 44; Arm 2, 22). In the randomized population, 77% had invasive ductal adenocarcinoma; median tumor size 3.1 cm (range, 0.4-10cm; 29.5% were T3); axillary nodes clinically positive in 52%. 34% of pts were triple negative (TN). 59 pts (89%) underwent surgery after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on study. pCR rates were 9% and 18% on the TC and ErC arms respectively. 4/7 pts with pCR on the ErC arm were TN. tumor samples were analyzed from 69 pts (including lead-in pts) for expression of the EMT biomarkers. Of these, 40 pts had paired pre- and post-treatment samples, and 29 pts had either a pre- or post-treatment sample (including 8 pre-treatment samples from pts who achieved pCR). In pre-treatment tumor specimens (61 samples), E-cadherin levels were modest-high in 80%, vimentin expression was seen in 39%, and CD-31 expression observed in 21% of the samples. Analysis of pre- and post-treatment paired specimens and differential effects according to treatment regimen will be presented.

Conclusion: The observed pCR rate of 18% with ErC in this HER2- pt population was comparable with other NAC regimens. Correlative evaluation of EMT markers and tumor vascular density with response is ongoing and will be presented.

Citation Format: Yardley DA, Chandra P, Hart L, Wright GS, Ward P, Mani A, Shastry M, Finney L, Guo S, DeBusk LM, Hainsworth JD, Burris III HA. A phase II randomized study with eribulin/cyclophosphamide (ErC) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) as neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer- Final analysis of primary endpoint and correlative analysis results. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-06.

A randomized phase II study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Continuation or 'switch' maintenance therapy is commonly used in patients with advancd non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat, as switch maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary end point of this open-label, randomized phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with non-progressive, advanced NSCLC after platinum-based doublet (first-line) chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab), any histology, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were eligible. Randomization was 2 : 1 in favor of imetelstat, administered at 9.4 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, or observation. Telomere length (TL) biomarker exploratory analysis was carried out in tumor tissue by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and telomerase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients enrolled, 114 were evaluable. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more frequent with imetelstat. Median PFS was 2.8 and 2.6 months for imetelstat-treated versus control [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844; 95% CI 0.54-1.31; P = 0.446]. Median survival time favored imetelstat (14.3 versus 11.5 months), although not significantly (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.41-1.12; P = 0.129). Exploratory analysis demonstrated a trend toward longer median PFS (HR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.14-1.3; P = 0.124) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.11-1.46; P = 0.155) in imetelstat-treated patients with short TL, but no improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with long TL (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.39-1.88; and HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.2-1.28; P = 0.145).

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance imetelstat failed to improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients responding to first-line therapy. There was a trend toward a improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with short TL. Short TL as a predictive biomarker will require further investigation for the clinical development of imetelstat.

Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is an integral component of colorectal cancer treatment, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity. The Combined Oxaliplatin Neurotoxicity Prevention Trial (CONcePT) tested intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) administration and the use of concurrent calcium and magnesium salts (Ca/Mg), two modifications intended to reduce neurotoxicity and extend the duration of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this trial involving double randomization, 140 patients were randomized to receive modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab with IO (eight-cycle blocks of oxaliplatin treatment) versus continuous oxaliplatin (CO); and Ca/Mg versus placebo (pre- and postoxaliplatin infusion). The primary end point was time-to-treatment failure (TTF).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients were entered and treated up to the point of early study termination due to concerns by the data-monitoring committee (DMC) that Ca/Mg adversely affected tumor response. Tumor response was not a study end point. Given DMC concerns, an additional independent, blinded radiology review of all images showed no adverse effect of treatment schedule or Ca/Mg on response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The IO schedule was superior to CO [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.581, P = 0.0026] for both TTF and time-to-tumor progression (TTP) (HR = 0.533, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample. There was no effect of Ca/Mg on response.

Abstract P2-16-17: Characterization of response to everolimus (EVE) in BOLERO-2: A phase 3 trial of EVE plus exemestane (EXE) in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer

Introduction: The BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated that combining the oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, EVE, with the steroidal aromatase inhibitor, EXE, more than doubled median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (PBO) plus EXE in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC) who relapsed or progressed following a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Patients also achieved responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) during treatment with EVE+EXE.

Methods: The phase 3, double-blind, BOLERO-2 trial randomized postmenopausal women with HR+ BC progressing or recurring after NSAIs in a 2:1 manner to EVE 10 mg once daily plus EXE 25 mg once daily (EVE+EXE; n = 485) or placebo (PBO) plus EXE (PBO+EXE; n = 239). The primary endpoint was PFS by local assessment. Overall response rate (ORR; complete + partial response per investigator assessment based on RECIST 1.0) and duration of overall response were secondary endpoints. In addition, best percentage change from baseline in sum of longest diameters of target lesions was assessed.

Results: At the time of final PFS analyses at 18 months’ median follow-up, ORR was significantly higher in the EVE+EXE arm compared with the PBO+EXE arm (12.6% vs 1.7%, respectively, by local assessment; P<.0001). Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, 71% in the EVE+EXE arm had a decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared with baseline vs 30% in the PBO+EXE arm. Median duration of overall response was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.2, 21.9 months) for EVE+EXE and 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.2, 6.9 months) for PBO+EXE. Of note, only 4 patients in the PBO+EXE arm had an objective response to treatment.

Conclusions: In addition to PFS, the combination of EVE plus EXE significantly improved ORR vs PBO+EXE in patients with HR+, HER2− advanced BC progressing during or after NSAI therapy. Furthermore, greater than two-thirds of patients treated with EVE+EXE experienced tumor shrinkage during treatment. These results further support the rationale for combining EVE with EXE to improve clinical outcomes in HR+, HER2− advanced BC progressing after NSAI therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-17.

P1-12-10: Phase II Study Evaluating Lapatinib (L) in Combination with Albumin Bound Paclitaxel (ab-Pac) in Women Who Have Received 0–1 Chemotherapy Regimen for HER2 Overexpressing (HER2+) Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Background: L, a dual kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), approved for the treatment of HER2+ MBC in combination with capecitabine following progression after trastuzumab, anthracycline, and taxane. L in combination with chemotherapy has significantly improved progression free survival in patients (pts) with HER2+ MBC. Ab-Pac is a cremophor free, albumin-bound paclitaxel approved for use in pts with MBC demonstrating superior efficacy and safety when compared to other taxanes.

Methods: Phase II study (LPT111111) evaluated the efficacy and safety of L in combination with ab-Pac in 60 pts with histologically confirmed stage IV HER2+ (IHC 3+/FISH+) invasive MBC. Pts received 0–1 prior chemotherapeutic regimen in the metastatic setting and no prior treatment with L. Prior taxane therapy permitted provided this was > 12 months prior to study entry, LVEF>50%, peripheral neuropathy < 2, prior CNS mets permitted, and prior endocrine therapy permitted. Pts received ab-Pac (125 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 8, 15, q28 days) plus L (1250 mg daily). Planned safety analysis of the first 5 pts prompted a protocol amendment with a 20% dose reduction for both agents due to Grade (G) 3 neutropenia and diarrhea. Subsequent pts received ab-Pac (100 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8, 15, q28 days) in combination with L (1000 mg daily). Pts with SD or a response continued L alone until progression. Response assessments performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), time to response, duration of response and overall survival (OS).

Results: Here we present the final analysis of all subjects receiving at least 6 months of protocol therapy. Median age is 56 years; 45 pts (75%) received treatment as 1st line therapy and 15 (25%) as 2nd line; 57% hormone receptor positive and 43% negative; 42% received trastuzumab and 40% received a taxane in either (neo) adjuvant or metastatic setting. After a median of 5.6 months, 7% pts had a complete response, 47% a partial response and 17% had stable disease, the ORR was 53% [95% CI: 41% to 66%]. The median time to response was 7.8 wks [95% CI: 7.4 to 8.1] with a median duration of response of 48.7 wks [95% CI: 31.7 to 57.1]. The median PFS was 39.7 wks [95% CI: 34.1 to 63.9]. Duration of exposure to ab-Pac; 48% received less than 6 cycles, 30% received 6 cycles and 22% received greater than 6 cycles. Table 1 shows the most common G ≥2 treatment-related toxicities.

P1-17-09: A Phase 1/2 Dose-Escalation Study of SAR245408 (S08) or SAR245409 (S09) in Combination with Letrozole (L) in Subjects with Hormone Receptor-Positive and HER2−Negative (HR+/HER2−) Breast Cancer (BC) Refractory to a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor (AI)

Background: Upregulation of PI3K activity is a common molecular mechanism involved in resistance to AIs. S08 is a potent, orally bioavailable, pan-PI3K inhibitor. S09 is a potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of PI3K which also possesses mTOR inhibitory activity. Both compounds exhibit robust PI3K and ERK pathway inhibition in paired human tumor biopsy samples from phase 1 studies (Edelman G, et al. ASCO 2010; Brana I, et al. ASCO 2010).

Methods: This ongoing, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 study (NCT01082068) was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of L in combination with either S08 (Arm 1) or S09 (Arm 2). Eligible female patients (pts) were ≥18 yrs, ECOG PS 0–1, with advanced or recurrent HR+/HER2− BC whose disease is refractory to nonsteroidal AIs. Phase 1 used an ascending 3+3 dose-escalation design and pts were accrued to each arm until no more than 1/3 pts or ≥33% of 3–6 pts at a given dose level experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 28-day cycle. Pts were alternately assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 and received 2.5 mg L PO (qd) in combination with different dose levels of either S08 (Arm 1; starting dose 200 mg tablets, PO, qd) or S09 (Arm 2; starting dose of 30 mg capsules, PO, bid). After reaching a preliminary maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each combination, pts will accrue to the phase 2 portion of the study. A two-stage design will be used evaluate the phase 2 co-primary endpoints of ORR and PFS. Each arm will be evaluated independently and no formal comparisons between arms are planned.

Results: As of June 1st 2011, 17 pts were enrolled to Arm 1 (8 pts) or Arm 2 (9 pts). Median age was 54 yrs. Based on preliminary data, the adverse event profile in both arms were similar to those reported in the single agent phase I studies for S08 and S09 respectively. SAEs reported in Arm 1 (2 subjects) included 2 cases of Gr1 pneumothorax and 1 Gr4 pneumonitis; in Arm 2 (2 subjects) included Gr4 lumbar pain and Gr4 elevation of ALT and AST. No DLTs were reported in Arm 1 while one DLT (Gr3 skin rash) was reported in Arm 2 at a dose level of S09 50 mg bid (table 1). Arm 1 dosing data from S08 400 mg qd + L 2.5 mg qd dose level (maximum dose level allowed per protocol) will be completed by August 2011. For Arm 2, the MTD was S09 50 mg bid + L 2.5 mg, qd.

Experience with academic detailing services for quality improvement in primary care practice

BACKGROUND

Despite longstanding experimental evidence about effectiveness of academic detailing, transitioning this research-based concept into acceptable primary care quality improvement services has been slow in the USA. The purpose of this study was to describe primary care uptake, retention and response to an academic-detailing-led service in the USA. Exploration of accessible performance indicators of service acceptance, and feasibility of use of an Australian academic detailing service model were secondary objectives.

METHODS

Over a 29-month period, an academic-detailing-led drug and therapeutics information service was offered to all primary care physicians providing ongoing patient care in Fayette County, Kentucky. Two programmes (on type 2 diabetes management and chronic pain management) incorporating up to four office visits were offered.

RESULTS

102 of 130 (78%) eligible primary care physicians participated in the service, 72% receiving visits for the type 2 diabetes management programme, and 58% the chronic non-malignant pain programme. At all successive encounters, participants expressed a willingness to continue to receive visits. Difficulties were experienced in obtaining appointments for subsequent visits, although on direct enquiry, only one participant explicitly declined further visits. No notable differences existed between physicians accepting visits and those who did not. Across successive visits, passive indicators of satisfaction with the service included: duration of visits, office waiting times, retention of printed materials from one visit to the next, whether physicians wished their extender colleagues to also receive visits, and observed levels of interest and participation within encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing primary care quality improvement services spearheaded by academic detailing can be acceptable to US primary care physicians in practice.

Efficacy results from a multicenter phase II noncomparative two-arm pilot trial of bevacizumab with anastrozole or fulvestrant as first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer

1091

Background: Estrogen modulates angiogenesis via effects on endothelial cells with subsequent induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF promotes tumor growth and is associated with poor response to antiestrogen therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of bevacizumab (B) in combination with anastrozole (A) or fulvestrant (F) as first-line endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Eligibility criteria: no prior hormonal or chemotherapy for MBC, measurable or evaluable disease, normal LVEF, post-menopausal. Treatment: Arm A: anastrozole 1 mg po QD in pts who were a) ET naïve, b) ≥ 12 months from adjuvant ET, and c) intolerant of or progressed on prior tamoxifen. Arm B: fulvestrant 500 mg D1 and 250 mg D15 IM loading dose followed by 250 mg q28 days in pts who were a) < 12 months from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs), b) intolerant of or progressed on AIs, and c) MD's discretion. Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV D1 q2 weeks was given in both arms. Trastuzumab permitted in HER-2+ pts only. Response assessments were q8 weeks; pts were treated until disease progression or toxicity. Results: 79 pts were enrolled fromNovember 2006 to November 2008. 42 pts are evaluable for response and toxicity, Arm A - 25 pts and Arm B - 17 pts. Median age was 64, ECOG PS 0 - 55%, 1- 43 %, adjuvant chemo 27%, adjuvant hormonal -38%, hormone receptor status: ER+/PR+ 80%, ER+/PR- 14%, ER-/PR+ 2 %. HER-2+ 5 pts, 31% had ≥ 2 metastatic disease sites predominately lung and bone only disease - 40%. Median # cycles - 4. 24% achieved a partial response and 57% stable disease; 7 pts progressed. G3 hypertension (12%) was the most common toxicity. Median PFS for Arm A was 16.3 months and has not yet been reached for Arm B. Conclusions: Bevacizumab in combination with anastrozole or fulvestrant is feasible and well tolerated with no unanticipated toxicities. The addition of bevacizumab resulted in prolongation of the median PFS to16.3 months with anastrozole as compared to the 7–9 month historical control PFS reported for first-line AI monotherapy in MBC. Further evaluation of bevacizumab endocrine combinations is warranted.

[Table: see text]

Phase II trial of irinotecan, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer

18133

Background: In a previously reported phase II trial bevacizumab (B) was used as maintenance therapy following induction with irinotecan (I), carboplatin (C) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients (pts) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). 1-year progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 53% and 70%, respectively. In the present multicenter community-based trial B is given with induction chemoradiotherapy and as maintenance therapy. Methods: The primary endpoint is to assess the median PFS. Eligibility criteria: newly diagnosed LS-SCLC, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–1, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria: hemoptysis and therapeutic anticoagulation. Treatment: I 60mg/m2 IV D1, 8, 15, C AUC=4 IV D1, and B 10 mg/kg IV D1 and 15 every 28D. Pts received concurrent RT to 61.2 Gy starting with the 3rd cycle, and were restaged every 8 weeks. If no progressive disease (PD) or excessive toxicity after 4 cycles, pts received B x 6 months. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was used at M.D. discretion. This 2-stage trial was designed to achieve a 40% improvement in historical median PFS of 12–14 months. Results: 20 pts were enrolled from 4/06 to 12/06 (trial ongoing, n=50 planned). Data are available for 14 pts in this analysis. Baseline features: median age 64 years; male/female, 21%/79%; and ECOG PS 0/1, 64%/36%. The objective response rate was 78% (95% CI 45%-94%) - all partial responses. No pt had PD. 7 pts were not evaluable: too early, 5 pts; off study (toxic megacolon, 1 pt; intercurrent illness, 1 pt). With a median follow-up of 5 months, the median PFS has not been reached. Grade (G) 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity with induction occurring in more than 2 pts: diarrhea (29%) and esophagitis, fatigue, pain (21% each). G3/4 hematologic toxicity: leukopenia (21%), neutropenia (14%), and thrombocytopenia (43%). There have been 2 G3/4 bleeding events with induction: suspected tracheoesophageal fistula with death (possibly treatment-related), 1 pt; and hematochezia, unrelated, 1 pt. Conclusions: This trial continues to be closely monitored for safety. Further accrual and longer follow-up are necessary to assess if B can be safely combined with chemoradiotherapy and improve efficacy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Results of a randomized phase II study of irofulven in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients that have failed first-line docetaxel treatment

5068

Background: Currently, no available treatments demonstrate an increase in survival for patients (pts) with hormone- refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) who have failed treatment with docetaxel-based regimens. Previous monotherapy and combination Phase I/II trials with irofulven (IROF) have shown antitumor effects in pts with HRPC, including those with resistance to docetaxel. A randomized phase II study was undertaken in HRPC pts with documented resistance to docetaxel to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IROF regimens compared to mitoxantrone (MITOX). Methods: Pts with metastatic HRPC with documented progression by RECIST or PSA Working Group criteria during or within 3 months of prior docetaxel were randomized to 1 of 3 arms in a 2:2:1 ratio: Arm A: IROF (0.45 mg/kg, Day [D]1, 8 every [q] 3 weeks [w]) and prednisone (PRED; 10 mg qd); Arm B: IROF (0.4 mg/kg D1, 15), capecitabine (CAPE; 2,000 mg/m2 D1–15 q4w) and PRED; Arm C: MITOX (12 mg/m2 q3w) and PRED. Pts were stratified by baseline pain status. Efficacy endpoints included time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and response. Results: Enrollment of 134 treated pts was completed as of Jan 2006 (Arm A/B/C: 53/54/27). Median age: 64/66/63 years, median KPS: 80/90/80, median baseline PSA (ng/mL): 144/136/243, disease-related pain at baseline: 65%/57%/59%, and median number of metastatic sites: 1/1/2. Median pre-study PSA doubling time (days) was 42/44/50. Efficacy: As of Jan 2007, median OS (mos) was 10.1/9.5/7.4 in Arms A/B/C (based on 73% of pt deaths). Preliminary median TTP (mos) was 2.2/3.8/1.8, based mainly on PSA progression. PSA and RECIST responses were 10%/22%/0% and 10%/10%/13%, respectively. Safety: Treatment was well tolerated in all arms. The most frequent Grade 3–4 toxicities (% pts) were asthenia (8%/15%/0%), and vomiting (4%/11%/0%). Grade 3–4 hematological events included neutropenia (22%/15%/61%) and thrombocytopenia (23%/21%/4%). Conclusions: Results to date indicate longer survival, longer TTP, and greater PSA response for IROF/PRED and IROF/CAPE/PRED compared to MITOX/PRED. Based on these data, a larger randomized trial of irofulven in docetaxel resistant HRPC patients is warranted.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II trial of irofulven (IROF)/prednisone (P), IROF/capecitabine (C)/P or mitoxantrone (M)/P in docetaxel-pretreated hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients (pts)

14513

Background: IROF, a semisynthetic derivative of the natural product illudin S, is a novel DNA binding agent. IROF alone or in combination has shown activity in phase I-II trials in HRPC, notably with IROF/C (Cvitkovic et al, ASCO 2004). Methods: Pts with histologically-proven metastatic HRPC who progressed (RECIST or PSA) during prior docetaxel or within 3 months of discontinuing treatment, with adequate hematologic and organ functions and KPS ≥70% were stratified by pain and randomized to one of three treatments: Arm A: IROF (0.45 mg/kg, day 1 and 8 q3weeks [w]) and P (10 mg po daily); Arm B: IROF (0.4 mg/kg day 1 and 15), C(2000 mg/m2 day 1–15 q4w) and P; or Arm C: M (12 mg/m2 q3w) and P. Primary endpoint was TTP (RECIST, PSA or clinical progression); secondary endpoints included PSA response (≥50% decrease for ≥4 w), pain response, and toxicity; 135 pts are planned in a 2:2:1 ratio. The study was powered to detect a difference in TTP of 1.5 vs 3 months. Results: As of Dec 2005, 78 pts were randomized and treated with ≥ 5 months follow-up (A/B/C: 31/31/16). Median age (A/B/C) 69/70/61, KPS ≥80% 24/28/9, median baseline PSA ng/mL 90/147/235, disease related pain at baseline 61%/58%/63%; other characteristics, including metastatic site distribution, were similar between arms. Safety: 65 pts were evaluated for safety. Median cycles/Pt (A, B, C) 3/2/2; grade 3/4 toxicities (% pts A, B, C): asthenia (4%, 16%, 0%), vomiting (0%, 12%, 0%) and diarrhea (4%, 8%, 0%). The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were neutropenia (10%, 6%, 31%) and thrombocytopenia (15%, 12%, 0%). Conclusion: IROF in combination with P and, in particular, C/P shows improved activity and acceptable tolerance compared to M/P in docetaxel-resistant HRPC. Patient accrual is complete as of Jan 2006, and final results will be presented. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Bevacizumab, erlotinib, and imatinib in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Update of a multicenter phase II trial

4594

Background: Most patients with clear cell RCC have loss of von-Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene function, ultimately leading to overexpression of VEGF, transforming growth factor (TGF-α), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). In this phase II trial, we evaluate the combination blockade of VEGF, and the EGF and PDGF receptors as treatment for metastatic RCC. Methods: Eligibility: metastatic clear cell RCC; 0–2 previous systemic regimens; ECOG PS 0–1; no previous anti-angiogenesis or EGF receptor inhibitor therapy; no active CNS metastases; adequate organ function; no history of thromboembolic disease; informed consent. All patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV q 2 wks, erlotinib 150 mg PO daily, and imatinib 400 mg PO daily. Patients were evaluated for response after 8 weeks; treatment continued until tumor progression. Results: 92 patients entered this trial between 6/04 and 4/05. Pertinent clinical characteristics: no previous systemic treatment, 71%; Motzer prognostic category low/intermediate/high 47%/50%/3%. 84 patients (91%) received at least 8 weeks of therapy. Objective responses were seen in 11 patients (12%); an additional 52 patients (57%) had stable disease/minor response at first reevaluation. After a median follow-up of 11 months, projected median and 1-year progression-free survivals are 9 months and 40%, respectively. One-year overall survival is 62%. The addition of imatinib to bevacizumab/erlotinib added substantial toxicity. Grade 3/4 toxicity included: diarrhea, 48%; skin rash, 27%; fatigue, 23%; nausea/vomiting, 20%. 2 patients discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity; all patients who received treatment for > 8 weeks required dose reductions of imatinib and/or erlotinib. Conclusions: The addition of imatinib, a PDGF receptor inhibitor, to bevacizumab/erlotinib does not appear to substantially improve the efficacy of the 2-drug combination. This 3-drug combination produced moderate to severe toxicity in the majority of patients, primarily exacerbations of diarrhea, fatigue, and skin rash. Further development of this 3-drug regimen is not recommended.

[Table: see text]

A phase II, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with either chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) or erlotinib hydrochloride compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non-small cell lung cancer

7062

Background: Bevacizumab is a recombinant, humanized anti-VEGF MAb. Erlotinib is a potent, reversible, highly selective and orally available EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. Both compounds have demonstrated a survival benefit in the treatment of NSCLC: bevacizumab when added to chemotherapy in the first line setting, and erlotinib when given alone in the 2nd/3rd line. In addition, a single arm phase I/II study of the combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib has shown encouraging survival and response rate data, with a favorable safety profile (Sandler et al, PASCO 2004). Methods: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety of combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed), or with erlotinib; and to make a preliminary assessment of the efficacy of combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy or erlotinib relative to chemotherapy alone, as measured by progression-free survival. All patients had histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC and had experienced disease progression (clinical or radiological) during or following one platinum-based regimen for advanced stage disease. Randomization was on a 1:1:1 basis to docetaxel or pemetrexed plus placebo (arm 1) v docetaxel or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab (arm 2) v bevacizumab plus erlotinib (arm 3). Patients remained in the treatment phase of the study until documented radiographic or clinical disease progression or through 52 weeks of study treatment. Results: Between August 2004 and November 2005, 120 patients were randomized and treated. To date, there have been 68/85 required PFS events; arms 1 and 2 therefore remain blinded. Demographics from the first 85 patients for arms 1 & 2 v 3 are as follows: median age 65 v 68;% male/female 64/36 v 44/56; ethnicity % white/black/asian/other 83/12/2/3 v 74/15/4/7; % ECOG PS 0/1/2 46/52/2 v 50/50/0; % adenocarcinoma/BAC&BAC-like/Other 67/7/26 v 69/8/23; % current/previous/never-smoker 15/71/14 v 11/74/15. Conclusions: Efficacy and safety results will be presented at the meeting.

[Table: see text]

The chronobiology of the Natal mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus natalensis

The Natal mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus natalensis, rarely, if ever, is exposed to external light cues because it occurs in completely sealed tunnel systems. As a result, their classical visual system is regressed, and therefore, their circadian system is expected proportionally to be expanded. Locomotor activity was investigated under a number of different photic regimes. Nine of the 12 mole-rats exhibited endogenous circadian rhythms of locomotor activity under constant darkness, with a mean free run period of 24.13 h (range 23.93-24.13 h), with these animals entrained to a light-dark cycle (12 L:12 D). Because C. hottentotus natalensis are able to entrain their locomotor activity to an external light source, light must reach the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), suggesting a functional circadian clock. A clear day-night rhythm of melatonin secretion in animals housed under a neutral photoperiod (12 L:12 D) was observed, with higher melatonin concentrations in the dark compared with the light phase. The rhythm was maintained after the animals were transferred to either continuous light (LL) or dark (DD), suggesting that the endogenous rhythm was maintained under acute exposure to light and dark. However, under DD, the rhythm appeared to shift slightly, potentially as a result of the rhythm free running. These results show that C. hottentotus natalensis has endogenous rhythms of both locomotor activity and melatonin secretion, which are modulated by light.

Strategies for teaching nursing research online

BACKGROUND

Nursing, like many disciplines in university settings, is experiencing increasing demand for online courses. Development and implementation of online courses with the quality of education nursing students experience in traditional classroom settings, is essential to maintaining integrity of the educational process. Nursing research has been offered in the online format in the RN-BSN programme for 2 years. This course has an average enrolment of 80 to 90 students each semester.

PURPOSE

This article presents strategies used in teaching an RN-BSN nursing research course online.

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback from faculty and students indicates that these strategies have been successful in facilitating this writing intensive course through distance learning.