4 Return to golf post arthroplasty

Aim

To determine the impact of arthroplasty on player handicap, frequency of golf played, return to club competitions and overall mental and physical health using the SF-12.

Method

A three page, 30 item, open access survey was sent to a community of over 500,000 golfers via the newsletter for the HowDidIDo® app between 18/04/2019–30/04/2019, inviting users who had undergone a joint replacement to complete. Responses were analysed using Microsoft excel and StatsDirect.

Results

A total of 3043 valid responses were received, the majority were male (n=2392). Mean age was 70 years (25–92). Most respondents had only a single joint replacement (n=1977). Within the cohort, there were mostly hips (n=2092) and knees (n=2069) replaced with far fewer shoulders (n=101), although this concurred with NJR population data. Across the whole cohort, most respondents were playing more (40%) or the same (44%) amount of golf following arthroplasty. Across the cohort only 4% were assumed unable to return to club competitions, while 76% of respondents returned to competitions within six months. Mean handicap prior to arthroplasty was increased (17.6 to 18.9) with no significant difference between hips, knees and shoulders. The SF-12 results were completed for 1094 respondents which when matched for age, demonstrated higher physical (48.59 vs. 43.65) and mental health (55.59 vs.52.10) scores.

Conclusions

Joint replacement enables the vast majority of patients to continue or increase the amount of golf played with most returning to club competitions within six months. A slight increase in handicap is demonstrated following surgery in this cohort, with stabilisation after this initial increase. Patients playing golf following arthroplasty demonstrate better physical and mental health than their age matched counterparts.

688 Rapid Implementation of Virtual Fracture Clinic During COVID 19 Reduces Both Face-To-Face Appointments and Facilitates Rapid Feedback and Education to Be Delivered to The Emergency Department

Introduction

COVID-19 has dictated a shift towards virtual clinics. Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust serves over a million patients with a significant number of face-to-face fracture clinics. Introduction of a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) reduces hospital return rates and improves patient experience. The referral data can be used to give immediate monthly feedback to the referring department to further improving patient flow.

Method

Prospective data was collected for all referrals to VFC during March 2020. Data included referral diagnosis, actual diagnosis, referrers grade, and final outcome.

Results

630 referrals were made to VFC. 347 (55%) of those referrals were directly discharged without the need for physical consultation. Of these 114 (32%) were injuries which can be discharged by the Emergency Department with an advice leaflet using existing pathways. Of the remaining discharges 102 (29%) were query fractures or sprains; and 135 (39%) were minor fractures; which needed only advice via a letter and no face to face follow up.

Conclusions

Implementation of VFC leads to a decrease in physical appointments by 55% saving 347 face to face appointments. The new system has also facilitated effective audit of referrals in order to further improve patient flow from the Emergency Department via feedback mechanisms and education.

P22: CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF NECK OF FEMUR FRACTURES

Introduction

According to NICE CG124, the gold standard of treatment for neck of femur (NOF) fractures is operative management on the day or day after admission. In practice, this is not always achievable depending on various factors, e.g. patient preference, clinical condition and theatre availability, with a further subset of patients undergoing conservative management.

Method

A retrospective analysis was performed on all NOF fractures managed non-operatively at a single centre from January 2017 to August 2019 by case notes analysis and review of radiographical images. Demographics, fracture type, pre-fracture mobility status, co-morbidities, mortality and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) are reported. Where applicable, our dataset is correlated with the National Hip Fracture Database for comparison.

Result

24 patients were included in the study period, with a mean age of 79.9 years (range 54-99 years) and male:female ratio of 0.85:1. The mean NHFS (n=18) was 5.7 (range 3-8) and at least 62.5% (n=15) were deemed unfit for surgery or arrested pre-operatively. Conservatively managed NOF fractures are associated with a 30-day mortality of 41.7% compared to the centre average of 8.2% and national average of 6.9% for all NOF fractures. Overall mortality within 1 year is 95.5% (n=22).

Conclusion

Our study confirms that the conservative management of NOF fractures is associated with high mortality, however it may be the only treatment option acceptable in patients who are limited by unfavourable clinical conditions. Therefore, the decision for conservative management in NOF fractures requires careful consideration with the need for an established decision-making pathway.

Take-home message

The conservative management of neck of femur fractures is associated with high mortality, therefore requires careful consideration with the need for an established decision-making pathway.

30-day complication rates and patient-reported outcomes following day case primary lumbar microdiscectomy in a regional NHS spinal centre

INTRODUCTION

Advances in surgical and anaesthesia technique have reduced length of stay for lumbar discectomy. Current evidence suggests that daycase surgery is associated with improved patient satisfaction, faster recovery, reduced infection rates and financial savings. We present our microdiscectomy daycase protocol, together with 30-day postoperative complication rates and patient reported outcomes in an NHS setting.

METHODS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied all patients that met a locally agreed daycase protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy and were operated upon and discharged on the same calendar day between 1 March 2013 and 31 December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients underwent primary daycase microdiscectomy (70 males, 64 females). The cohort had a mean age of 41 years (range 16-82 years). Some 96% (n = 129) were single-level procedures, 93% were unilateral (n = 125) and 81% (n = 109) took place at either L4/L5 or L5/S1. All patients were discharged on the same day as admission and operation. Four patients re-presented to hospital within 30 days and three were discharged from the emergency department within four hours following a clinical review. One patient required an inpatient stay for a washout of a superficial postoperative infection. Significant improvements (P < 0.05) were found postoperatively for back pain and leg pain on self-reported visual analogue scores and Oswestry Disability Index.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we present a safe and effective protocol for day case lumbar microdiscectomy. Our 30-day postoperative complication rate of under 1% is comparable to that of traditional inpatient primary lumbar microdiscectomy. Patient-reported outcome measures revealed significant improvement in both pain and functional scores.