Clinical utility of the academic research consortium new proposed criteria for high bleeding risk definition in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Background

The Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria have been proposed to stratify the bleeding risk of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While most criteria were established, 4 criteria have been proposed on a de novo basis.

Purpose

We assessed the prevalence and prognosis of new ARC-HBR criteria in a contemporary, prospective, multicenter, quality-improvement registry of all-comers patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2020, consecutive subjects were enrolled; baseline characteristics and medications were prospectively collected, and patients were followed-up at 1 year. All clinical events (including bleeding) were adjudicated by an independent committee. All 17 ARC-HBR criteria were individually evaluated by reviewing patients' charts.

Results

Of the 2804 patients enrolled, 782 (28.0%) met the ARC-HBR definition and 47 (6%) of them experienced a major BARC 3 or 5) bleeding at 1-year. HBR patients had a significantly higher risk of BARC 3–5 bleedings (HR for: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.02–4.67; p<0.0001; Fig. 1A), BARC 2–5 (HR: 1.845; 95% CI: 1.4–2.42; p<0.0001). Fig. 1B indicates the proportion of patients meeting each criterion. Age, (moderate or severe) chronic kidney disease, (moderate or severe) anemia and oral anticoagulant therapy included 88% of HBR patients.

The 4 new ARC-HBR criteria, all together, were present in only 1.7% of our population: 1.0% was planned for major surgery while on dual antiplatelet therapy, 0.5% had a recent intracranial hemorrhage/ictus or brain arteriovenous malformations, 0.1% had hepatic cirrhosis with portal hypertension and 0.1% had a recent surgery or trauma. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis including individual ARC-HBR criteria, only CKD (major and minor criteria), anemia (major and minor criteria) and cancer were the independent predictors of BARC 3–5 events with a concordance-index for this model of 0.698 (p<0.001). In a second model including only CKD (major criterion), anemia (major criterion), age and oral anticoagulation therapy, all these criteria were independent predictors of BARC 3–5 events with a concordance index of 0.674 (pmodel<0.001 for the model) (Fig. 2).

Conclusion

Almost one third of contemporary ACS patients was at HBR according to the ARC-HBR definition and these patients presented a significantly higher risk of bleedings at 1-year. The most common 4 criteria (age, CKD, anemia, and oral anticoagulant therapy) allowed the identification of 88% of HBR patients. The newly proposed HBR criteria were extremely rare and therefore challenging to validate and of uncertain clinical utility. These data may inform and simplify clinical decision making and provide priority for future directions of HBR definitions.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Barriers associated with emergency medical service activation in Italian patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Background

Many ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) patients fail to activate the Emergency Medical System (EMS), with possible dramatic consequences. Prior studies focusing on barriers to EMS activation include patients with any acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without representation of southern European populations. However, barriers are influenced by the ACS type and by socio-demographic and racial factors.

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the barriers to EMS call for patients diagnosed for STEACS in Italy.

Methods

A prospective, single-center, survey-based study, including all the patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEACS in a tertiary hospital in northern Italy from 1st June 2018 to 31st May 2020.

Results

The questionnaire was filled out by 293 patients. The majority of the participants were males (74%), married (70.4%), with a high-school degree (38.4%) and with a median age of 62 years. Chest pain as a possible symptom related to a cardiovascular attack is known by most of the respondents (89%), and left arm pain/shake by 53.7% of them, whilst the other possible signs and symptoms (i.e. dyspnea, asthenia, sweating, nausea, vomiting, dizziness) were unknown to the majority of the participants. Only 191 (65.2%) of the participants activated the EMS after symptoms onset. The main reasons for not calling EMS were the perception that symptoms were not related to an important health problem (45.5%) and that a private vehicle is faster than EMS to reach the hospital (34.7%). The median time to first medical contact was 60 minutes, and it was significantly higher in the patients who did not called EMS compared to those who did (180 [60–420] mins vs 35 [15–120] mins, p<0.001). The patients who called a private doctor after symptoms onset did not called EMS more frequently than those who did not (5.9% vs 8.2%, p=0.3). Moreover, 30% of the patients who did not call the EMS would still act in the same way if a new episode occurred and the main reasons for this were that they think to be faster than EMS (57.1%) and to live close to the hospital (17.9%). Analyzing predictors of EMS activation, only prior history of cardiovascular disease has been demonstrated to be a predictor of calling the EMS in case of symptoms suspected for STEACS.

Conclusions

Our study, from the southern Europe, showed that a substantial percentage of patients with symptoms suspected for STEACS preferred private vehicle rather than activating the EMS. Our results highlight the need for information campaigns targeted to both the general population and medical doctors, stressing that the EMS is faster than a private vehicle to direct the patient to the right hospital and increasing the awareness of the people on the type of possible heart attack symptoms, which seem to be the most neglected issues by patients who did not call the EMS.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Prognosis and prescriptions of glifozines in candidates patients in a prospective, multicenter, quality-improvement study of patients with acute coronary syndrome

Background

Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) have demonstrated substantial improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without diabetes mellitus (DM). Prescription patterns and outcome of SGLT2-i candidates in patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are less well established.

Purpose

We aimed to assess the proportion of candidates to SGLT2-i and to characterize their clinical outcome in a contemporary, prospective, multicenter, quality-improvement study of all-comers patients with ACS. We also aimed to ascertain prescriptions of SGLT2-i at discharge.

Methods

Between 2018 and 2020, subjects were enrolled in the study; baseline characteristics and medications were prospectively collected, and patients were followed-up at 1 year. Subjects were considered candidates to SGLT2-i if any of the following were: (i) known (medically treated) or new (HbA1c >6.5%) diagnosis of type 2 DM; (ii) left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD; new or known left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) or clinical HF; (iii) CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate 25–74 mL/min/m2, according to DAPA-CKD trial eligibility).

Results

Of the 2804 consecutive ACS patients enrolled, 798 (28.5%) had new or known DM and only 10 were already on SGLT2-I at baseline. Additionally, 1,098 (39.2%) patients qualified for SGLT2-i prescription as having known or new LVSD or HF, and 803 (28.6%) as having CKD. (Fig. 1A) Overall, these 1,767 (63.1%) SGLT2-i candidates had substantially higher hazard of death as compared to no candidate (Hazard Ratio [HR] at 1-year: 6.82; 95% Confidence Interval: 4.32–10.8; p<0.001; Fig. 1B) and each indication to SGLT2-i independently predicted death at 1 year (HR: 2.30/2.11/3.06; 95% CI: 1.78–2.97/1.62–2.74/2.35–3.97; all p<0.0001; for DM, HF, CKD, respectively; Fig. 2). At discharge, only 18 (1.0% of the candidates) were prescribed with SGLT2-i and, of those with DM, having a diabetological consultation before discharged modestly but significantly increased the likelihood of being discharged with SGLT2-i (4.3% vs. 6.6%; p=0.0015).

Conclusion

Most (two out of three) contemporary ACS patients are candidates to SGLT2-i therapy, and they have a significant and substantial higher risk of mortality at 1-year as compared to no candidates. Current prescription rates are still extremely low (1%) and highlight opportunity for quality improvement and multidisciplinary decision-making.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Long-term follow-up of heart transplant patients treated with permanent pacemaker: a monocentric study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background and purpose

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMi) is needed in about 5% of patients following heart transplant (HTx) primarily due to sinus node dysfunction (SND), which commonly occurs in an early phase, or to atrio-ventricular block (ABV), which is common later on. Currently, data on rate of ventricular pacing (VP) is lacking and little is known on long-term outcomes after PPMi.

Methods

This was a retrospective, monocentric study. Among 1123 patients treated with HTx, all with biatrial technique, from november 1985 to march 2019 at our institution, 61 (5.4%) patients needed PPMi. PM parameters, clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at 1 month and at 1-3-5-10 years follow-up. The primary aim was to analyse the percentage of right ventricular pacing in the overall population and in subgroups stratified by the timing of PPMi and by pacing indication. Secondary endpoints were to analyze long-term outcomes according to the percentage of ventricular pacing and to the type of implanted PM (single vs. dual chamber). 

Results

Among patients treated with PPMi (68.9% single-chamber), 62.2% were implanted for SND and 36% for AVB. Early PPMi (< 3 months after HTx), occurred in 34.4% of patients, mainly due to SND, while late PPMi (> 3 months after HTx) occurred in 65,6% with an equal distribution between SND and AVB. Median follow-up time from HTx was 140 months and 82 months from PPMi. Overall mean rate of VP was 21%. Rate of VP was higher in patients implanted early rather than late after HTx, both at 1 month (91% vs 2%, P = 0,002) and at 1 year after the procedure (43 vs 1, P = 0,037). Patients with AVB had a greater rate of VP compared to those implanted for SND, irrespective of timing of implantation and these findings were still present at 3 and 5 years follow-up (62 vs 1%, P = 0,011 at 3 years and 80 vs 6%, P = 0,002 at 5 years). VP declined progressively after PPM implantation. No differences were observed in terms of 10-years mortality between early vs late PPMi, dual vs single-chamber and mean VP > 21% vs ≤ 21%.

Conclusions

Patients treated with PPMi after HTx show on average low percentage of VP over long-term follow-up. AV block indication and early implantation are associated with a higher percentage of VP. The rate of VP, the timing of PPMi and the use of single vs dual chamber PM do not affect overall prognosis or left ventricular systolic function. Our data may justify implantation of a single-chamber PPM, which bears less complications and procedural time, in the majority of HTx patients needing PPMi.