Serologic response to COVID-19 infection and/or vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment

BACKGROUND

It was shown that immunocompromised patients have significantly reduced immunologic responses to COVID-19 vaccines. The immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine/infection in patients with solid tumors is reduced. We evaluated the immunologic response to COVID-19 and/or the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among cancer patients on active treatments and reviewed previous literature to identify subgroups that may require third vaccination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies were measured in a cohort of 202 cancer patients on active treatment with chemotherapy (96), immunologic (52), biologic (46), and hormonal (12) treatments for early (n = 66, 32.7%) or metastatic disease (n = 136, 67.3%). Of those, 172 had received two vaccine doses, and 30 had COVID-19 infection (20/30 also received one dose of vaccine). Specific anti-S receptor-binding domain antibodies were further measured in patients with equivocal anti-S1/S2 results.

RESULTS

Among cancer patients, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response rate was 89.1% (180/202) after COVID-19 vaccination or infection and 87.2% (150/172) in patients after vaccination without a history of COVID-19, compared with 100% positive serologic tests in a control group of 30 health care workers (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy treatment was independently associated with significantly reduced humoral response to infection or vaccination, with an 81.3% response rate, compared with 96.2% in patients on other treatments (P = 0.001). In vaccinated patients on chemotherapy, the positive response rate was 77.5%. In a multiple regression model, a neutralizing antibody titer (>60 AU/ml) was more likely with immunotherapy (odds ratio 2.44) and less likely with chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both COVID-19 vaccine and natural infection are highly immunogenic among cancer patients. Our study, however, identifies those under chemotherapy as significantly less responsive, and with lower antibody levels. These findings justify close virological and serological surveillance along with consideration of these patients for booster (third dose) vaccine prioritization, as new highly spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge.

Glutathione-S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 polymorphisms, and breast cancer risk, in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

Variation in penetrance estimates for BRCA1/2 carriers suggests that other environmental and genetic factors may modify cancer risk in carriers. The GSTM1, T1 and P1 isoenzymes are involved in metabolism of environmental carcinogens. The GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene is absent in a substantial proportion of the population. In GSTP1, a single-nucleotide polymorphism that translates to Ile112Val was associated with lower activity. We studied the effect of these polymorphisms on breast cancer (BC) risk in BRCA1/2 carriers. A population of 320 BRCA1/2 carriers were genotyped; of them 262 were carriers of one of the three Ashkenazi founder mutations. Two hundred and eleven were affected with BC (20 also with ovarian cancer (OC)) and 109 were unaffected with BC (39 of them had OC). Risk analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for origin (Ashkenazi vs non-Ashkenazi). We found an estimated BC HR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.65-1.12, P=0.25) and 1.11 (95% CI 0.81-1.52, P=0.53) for the null alleles of GSTM1 and GSTT1, respectively. For GSTP1, HR for BC was 1.36 (95% CI 1.02-1.81, P=0.04) for individuals with Ile/Val, and 2.00 (95% CI 1.18-3.38) for carriers of the Val/Val genotype (P=0.01). An HR of 3.20 (95% CI 1.26-8.09, P=0.01), and younger age at BC onset (P=0.2), were found among Val/Val, BRCA2 carriers, but not among BRCA1 carriers. In conclusion, our results indicate significantly elevated risk for BC in carriers of BRCA2 mutations with GSTP1-Val allele with dosage effect, as implicated by higher risk in homozygous Val carriers. The GSTM1- and GSTT1-null allele did not seem to have a major effect.

Superior survival of breast cancer BRCA1 /2 mutation carriers harboringG/G at the -309 position at the MDM2 promoter compared to those harboring T/T or G/T at this SNP

10600

Background: A germ line single polymorphism in the promoter of the gene encoding the important modulator of P53, MDM2 has been described. The findings of G/G nucleotides at this position in contrast to G/Tor T/T were demonstrated to increase MDM2 transcriptional levels and were correlated with younger onset of cancers in patients with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Furhtermore gastric cancer patients harboring T/T at this position and treated with chemotherapy were found to have decresed survival compared to the other SNP carriers. P53 mutations appear in high frequency in tumors associated with BRCA1/2 mutations. Indeed it has been suggested that mutations in the p53 gene are a necessary step in tumorigenesis in BRCA tumors. Methods: Here we investigate the effect of the MDM2 SNP309 on overall survival and age of onset in breast cancer patients. MDM2 SNP309 was evaluated in Breast cancer Ashkenazy patients analyzed for the three common mutations in BRCA1/2- 180 patients who are positive for either of these mutation and 272 negative ones. 194 negative, Disease onset age and survival were analyzed for the different subgroups Results: Around a quarter of the whole population analyzed were identified as carriers of G/G at the -309 MDM2. There was no correlation between age of disease onset in either BRCA1/2mutation carriers and the specific genotype. In the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers we found a survival advantage in patients harboring the SNP309 G/G genotype(p-0.001 log rank test). Such an effect was not demonstrated in patients tested negative for the known Ashkenazy mutations Conclusions: In specific subgroups of breast cancer patients SNP309 G/G is associated with improved patient survival. A possible explanation for this finding could be the presence of a P53 which can be reactivated in the MDM2 SNP309 G/G carriers.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA2 carriers, but not in BRCA1 carriers or noncarriers

Variation in the penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers suggests that other genetic polymorphisms may modify the cancer risk in carriers. The RAD51 gene, which participates in homologous recombination double-strand breaks (DSB) repair in the same pathway as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene products, is a candidate for such an effect. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), RAD51-135g → c, in the 5′ untranslated region of the gene has been found to elevate breast cancer (BC) risk among BRCA2 carriers. We genotyped 309 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, of which 280 were of Ashkenazi origin, 166 noncarrier BC patients and 152 women unaffected with BC (a control group), for the RAD51-135g → c SNP. Risk analyses were conducted using COX proportional hazard models for the BRCA1/2 carriers and simple logistic regression analysis for the noncarrier case–control population. BRCA2 carriers were also studied using logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. The estimated BC hazard ratio (HR) for RAD51-135c carriers adjusted for origin (Ashkenazi vs non-Ashkenazi) was 1.28 (95% CI 0.85–1.90, P=0.23) for BRCA1/2 carriers, and 2.09 (95% CI 1.04–4.18, P=0.04) when the analysis was restricted to BRCA2 carriers. The median BC age was younger in BCRA2-RAD51-135c carriers (45 (95% CI 36–54) vs 52 years (95% CI 48–56), P=0.05). In a logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) was 5.49 (95% CI 0.5–58.8, P=0.163). In noncarrier BC cases, carrying RAD51-135c was not associated with BC risk (0.97; 95% CI 0.47–2.00). These results indicate significantly elevated risk for BC in carriers of BRCA2 mutations who also carry a RAD51-135c allele. In BRCA1 carriers and noncarriers, no effect for this SNP was found.

CAG and GGC repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene and breast cancer susceptibility in BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers

Variation in the penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers suggests that other genetic polymorphisms may modify the cancer risk in carriers. A previous study has suggested that BRCA1 carriers with longer lengths of the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor (AR) gene are at increased risk of breast cancer (BC). We genotyped 188 BRCA1/2 carriers (122 affected and 66 unaffected with breast cancer), 158 of them of Ashkenazi origin, 166 BC cases without BRCA1/2 mutations and 156 Ashkenazi control individuals aged over 56 for the AR CAG and GGC repeats. In carriers, risk analyses were conducted using a variant of the log-rank test, assuming two sets of risk estimates in carriers: penetrance estimates based on the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (BCLC) studies of multiple case families, and lower estimates as suggested by population-based studies. We found no association of the CAG and GGC repeats with BC risk in either BRCA1/2 carriers or in the general population. Assuming BRCA1/2 penetrance estimates appropriate to the Ashkenazi population, the estimated RR per repeat adjusted for ethnic group (Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi) was 1.05 (95%CI 0.97-1.17) for BC and 1.00 (95%CI 0.83-1.20) for ovarian cancer (OC) for CAG repeats and 0.96 (95%CI 0.80-1.15) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.60-1.22) respectively for GGC repeats. The corresponding RR estimates for the unselected case-control series were 1.00 (95%CI 0.91-1.10) for the CAG and 1.05 (95%CI 0.90-1.22) for the GGC repeats. The estimated relative risk of BC in carriers associated with > or =28 CAG repeats was 1.08 (95%CI 0.45-2.61). Furthermore, no significant association was found if attention was restricted to the Ashkenazi carriers, or only to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. We conclude that, in contrast to previous observations, if there is any effect of the AR repeat length on BRCA1 penetrance, it is likely to be weak.

A deletion/insertion mutation in the BRCA2 gene in a breast cancer family: a possible role of the Alu-polyA tail in the evolution of the deletion

Patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer were screened for gross rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene by Southern hybridization, with exon 10 and a fragment of exon 11 used as probes. One breast cancer patient with a positive family history had a 6.2-kb deletion including exons 12 and 13. The deletion breakpoint in intron 11 was in the 3' polyA tail of an Alu element, where a track of approximately 60 adenine nucleotide residues was inserted. Expansion of the Alu-polyA tail may have resulted from polymerase slippage during replication, representing a novel mechanism in which Alu elements mediate deletion/insertion mutations.

[Genetic counseling for families at high cancer risk]

About 5-10% of the most common cancers, such as breast, colon and melanoma, result from mutations in inherited predisposition genes. Recently some of these genes have been mapped or even cloned. These advances in cancer genetics have made more precise genetic counseling possible for cancer patients and their families. In our clinic for specific genetic counseling 180 families with a history of cancer were seen during a 10-month period. In counseling sessions, the family history was confirmed and interpreted, personal risk was estimated and the availability of molecular genetic testing was presented. Blood samples for DNA testing were drawn from those with certain criteria who wished to be tested. Instructions for early detection were also given, depending on the personal risk of cancer as compared to that of the general population.