Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The accurate assessment and grading of adverse events (AE) is essential to ensure comparisons between surgical procedures and outcomes. The current lack of a standardized severity grading system may limit our understanding of the true morbidity attributed to AEs in surgery. The aim of this study is to review the prevalence in which intraoperative adverse event (iAE) severity grading systems are used in the literature, evaluate the strengths and limitations of these systems, and appraise their applicability in clinical studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried to yield all clinical studies reporting the proposal and/or the validation of iAE severity grading systems. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched separately to identify the articles citing the systems to grade iAEs identified in the first search.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 2957 studies, with 7 studies considered for the qualitative synthesis. Five studies considered only surgical/interventional iAEs, while 2 considered both surgical/interventional and anesthesiologic iAEs. Two included studies validated the iAE severity grading system prospectively. A total of 357 citations were retrieved, with an overall self/nonself-citation ratio of 0.17 (53/304). The majority of citing articles were clinical studies (44.1%). The average number of citations per year was 6.7 citations for each classification/severity system, with only 2.05 citations/year for clinical studies. Of the 158 clinical studies citing the severity grading systems, only 90 (56.9%) used them to grade the iAEs. The appraisal of applicability (mean%/median%) was below the 70% threshold in 3 domains: stakeholder involvement (46/47), clarity of presentation (65/67), and applicability (57/56).

CONCLUSION

Seven severity grading systems for iAEs have been published in the last decade. Despite the importance of collecting and grading the iAEs, these systems are poorly adopted, with only a few studies per year using them. A uniform globally implemented severity grading system is needed to produce comparable data across studies and develop strategies to decrease iAEs, further improving patient safety.

Bibliometric analysis of academic journal recommendations and requirements for surgical and anesthesiologic adverse events reporting

BACKGROUND

Standards for reporting surgical adverse events (AEs) vary widely within the scientific literature. Failure to adequately capture AEs hinders efforts to measure the safety of healthcare delivery and improve the quality of care. The aim of the present study is to assess the prevalence and typology of perioperative AE reporting guidelines among surgery and anesthesiology journals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In November 2021, three independent reviewers queried journal lists from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) portal (www.scimagojr.com), a bibliometric indicator database for surgery and anesthesiology academic journals. Journal characteristics were summarized using SCImago, a bibliometric indicator database extracted from Scopus journal data. Quartile 1 (Q1) was considered the top quartile and Q4 bottom quartile based on the journal impact factor. Journal author guidelines were collected to determine whether AE reporting recommendations were included and, if so, the preferred reporting procedures.

RESULTS

Of 1409 journals queried, 655 (46.5%) recommended surgical AE reporting. Journals most likely to recommend AE reporting were: by category surgery (59.1%), urology (53.3%), and anesthesia (52.3%); in top SJR quartiles (i.e. more influential); by region, based in Western Europe (49.8%), North America (49.3%), and the Middle East (48.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and anesthesiology journals do not consistently require or provide recommendations on perioperative AE reporting. Journal guidelines regarding AE reporting should be standardized and are needed to improve the quality of surgical AE reporting with the ultimate goal of improving patient morbidity and mortality.

Obturator Nerve Injury in Robotic Pelvic Surgery: Scenarios and Management Strategies

BACKGROUND

Obturator nerve injury (ONI) is an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, usually reported in 0.2-5.7% of cases undergoing surgical treatment of urological and gynecological malignancies involving pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).

OBJECTIVE

To describe how an ONI may occur during robotic pelvic surgery and the corresponding management strategies.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively analyzed video content on intraoperative ONI provided by robotic surgeons from high-volume centers.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

ONI was identified during PLND and managed according to the type of nerve injury.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The management approach varies with the type of injury. Crush injury frequently occurs at an advanced stage of PLND. For a crush injury to the obturator nerve caused by a clip, management only requires its safe removal. Three situations can occur if the nerve is transected: (1) transection with feasible approximation and tension-free nerve anastomosis; (2) transection with challenging approximation requiring certain strategies for proper nerve anastomosis; and (3) transection with a hidden proximal nerve ending that may initially appear intact, but is clearly injured when revealed by further dissection. Each case has different management strategies with a common aim of prompt repair of the anatomic disruption to restore proper nerve conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

ONI is a preventable complication that requires proper identification of the anatomy and high-risk areas when performing pelvic lymph node dissection. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair using the management strategies described offer patients the best chance of recovery without sequelae.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We describe the different ways in which the obturator nerve in the pelvic area can be damaged during urological or gynecological surgeries. This is a preventable complication and we describe how it can be avoided and different management options, depending on the type of nerve injury.

Robotic Simultaneous Repair of Rectovesical Fistula With Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stricture after Radical Prostatectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience and outcomes using a novel robotic technique for the simultaneous repair of rectovesical fistula (RVF) with vesicourethral anastomotic stricture (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2021, four consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted simultaneous repair of RVF with concurrent VUAS after RP were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were examined and reported. Complications were graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system and the European Association of Urology Complications Panel Assessment and Recommendations.

RESULTS

Four cases with a median age of 68.5 (63.3-72.3) years were treated. Interposition omentum flaps were used in all our cases. One case had perineal urethral mobilization to reach healthy urethral margins and tension-free vesicourethral anastomosis. Surgeries were uneventful, with no intraoperative complications reported. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 370 (291.3-453) minutes, 255 (175-262.5) mL, and 2.5 (2-3) days, respectively. Median Jackson-Pratt drains, Double-J stents and Foley catheter removal days were 6 (6-10), 38 (32-43), and 30 (27-41) days, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up time was 16.25 (12-26) months, and no fistula recurrence was shown.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair could represent an effective approach for the simultaneous repair of RVF with concomitant VUAS. More studies and management standardization are needed to assess the role of the robotic platform in the simultaneous repair of RVF with VUAS after radical prostatectomy.

Minimally Invasive Management of Post-treatment Rectovesical Fistulae

Objective: The aim of this study is to report our experience in minimally invasive management of rectovesical fistulae (RVFs). Materials and Methods: Between 2004 and 2021, 24 patients who underwent minimally invasive RVF repair by a single surgeon at 3 international institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographic characteristics and perioperative and postoperative variables were collected. Complications were reported using the modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System and the European Association of Urology Complication Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations. Fistula repair was defined as confirmation of fistula closure by imaging and complete resolution of fistula-related symptoms at the 12-month follow-up. Continuous variables are reported as medians and quartiles, whereas categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. Results: Twenty-four patients with RVFs were treated: 22 males (91.7%) and 2 females with a median age of 66 (64.2-68) years. Twenty cases (83.3%) occurred postsurgery, three cases (12.5%) after surgery with combined radiotherapy, and one case (4.1%) after a combination of energy treatments. A robotic approach was performed in 19 patients (79%) and laparoscopic approach in 5 patients (21%). Ninety-six percent of patients had previous fecal diversions. No intraoperative complications were recorded. The median operative time was 180 (140-282) minutes, estimated blood loss was 50 (40-125) mL, and length of hospital stay was 2 (2-3) days. There were two Grade II complications and one Grade IIIb complication. All patients met criteria for repair. Conclusions: Minimally invasive management of RVFs is feasible. More studies are needed to assess the role of this approach among all RVF management options.

Superior Mesenteric Artery Injury during Robotic Radical Nephrectomy: Scenarios and Management Strategies

Injury to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a rare, underreported, and potentially devastating complication. This study aims to propose a systematic workup to describe how to prevent and manage SMA injury in a standardized stepwise manner. Three different instances of intraoperative injury to the SMA are described in an accompanying video. All three occurred when the SMA was misidentified as the left renal artery during left robotic radical nephrectomy. In the first case, the SMA was mistakenly identified as the renal artery, but after further dissection, the real renal artery was identified and SMA injury was prevented. In the second case, the SMA was clipped and the real left renal artery was subsequently identified, requiring clip removal. In the third case, the SMA was clipped and completely transected, requiring prompt repair by vascular surgery with a successful outcome. This study aims to propose a systematic workup to describe how to prevent and manage SMA injury in a standardized stepwise manner. The proper anatomic recognition of the SMA may prevent its injury. Intraoperative SMA injury should be promptly identified and repaired to avoid its devastating consequences.

Minimally Invasive Management of Rectourethral Fistulae

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience and outcomes in minimally invasive management of rectourethral fistula (RUF).

METHODS

From 2004 to 2021, 15 patients who underwent minimally invasive RUF repair by a single surgeon at 2 international institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographic characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. Complications were reported using the modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System and the European Association of Urology Complication Panel Assesment and Recommendations. Success was defined as complete resolution of fistula-related symptoms at 12-month follow-up along with confirmation of fistula closure by imaging or cystoscopy. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages whereas continuous variables were reported as median and quartiles.

RESULTS

Fifteen male patients with a median age of 71 (64-79.2) years were treated. Four cases (26.6%) occurred postsurgery, 8 cases (53.3%) occurred after energy treatments, and 3 cases (20%) after surgery combined with an energy treatment modality. A robotic and laparoscopic approach was performed in 9 (60%) and 6 (40%) patients, respectively. No intraoperative complications were reported. Median operative time was 264 (217.5-341) minutes, estimated blood loss was 175 (137.5-200) mL, and the length of hospital stay was 4 days. Nine postoperative complications were reported. All patients were followed-up for 12 months with no recurrence reported. All patients reached our criteria for successful RUF repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery could represent an efficient way to manage RUF in selected patients. More studies and treatment standardization are needed to assess the role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of RUF.

Effectiveness of a fluid immersion simulation system in the acute postoperative management of pressure ulcers: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

The Fluid Immersion Simulation system (FIS) has demonstrated good clinical applicability. This is the first study to compare surgical flap closure outcomes of FIS with an Air-Fluidized Bed (AFB), considered as standard of care. The success of closure after 14 days post-op was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were incidences of complications in the first two weeks after surgery and the rate of acceptability of the device. 38 subjects were in the FIS group while 42 subjects were placed in the AFB group. Flap failure rate was similar between groups (14% vs 12%; P= 0.84). Complications, notably dehiscence and maceration, were significantly higher in the FIS group (40% vs 17%; P=0.0296). The addition of a microclimate regulation device (ClimateCare®) to FIS for the last 43 patients showed a significant decrease in the rate of flap failure (71% vs 16%; P=0.001) and incidence of complications (33% vs 0%; P= 0.011). There was no statistically significant difference between the FIS and AFB in the rate of acceptability (nurse acceptance: 1.49 vs 1.72; P = 0.8; patient acceptance: 2.08 vs 2.06; P = 0.17), which further illustrates the potential implementation of this tool in a patient-care setting. Our results show that the use of ClimateCare® in combination with FIS can be a better alternative to the AFB in surgical closure of pressure ulcers.

Outcomes of Highest Grade (IV and V) Liver Injuries in Blunt and Penetrating Trauma

BACKGROUND

High-grade hepatic trauma can be devastating, with complications being common if patients survive. Studies comparing outcome differences between blunt and penetrating mechanism are lacking. This study aimed to describe and evaluate the association of traumatic mechanism with complications in patients sustaining grades IV and V liver injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all adults who suffered grades IV and V liver injury from 2015-2020 was performed at a level I trauma center in an urban area. Outcomes in patients with blunt and penetrating mechanisms were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included, of which 44 (43%) were penetrating and the remainder blunt. Patients with penetrating injuries were younger, more often male, and more likely to undergo initial operative management (82% vs 40%, P < .001). Regardless of mechanism, high grade liver injuries had similar rates of complications, including bile leak (17% vs 23%, P = .559) and intrabdominal abscess (7% vs 16%, P = .239), and similar need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (12% vs 19%, P = .379). Penetrating injuries required more re-interventions (42% vs 19%, P = .033), specifically more percutaneous drainage procedures (36% vs 12%, P = .016). Overall mortality was 29% and did not differ by mechanism.

DISCUSSION

Morbidity and mortality are high for grades IV and V liver injuries. Penetrating high-grade hepatic injuries are more likely to be managed operatively, but mortality and overall complications are similar to blunt mechanisms. This may allow for uniform algorithms to define management strategies regardless of mechanism.

Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis

Recent advances in ultrasonography (US) technology established modalities, such as Doppler-US, HistoScanning, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), elastography, and micro-ultrasound. The early results of these US modalities have been promising, although there are limitations including the need for specialized equipment, inconsistent results, lack of standardizations, and external validation. In this review, we identified studies evaluating multiparametric ultrasonography (mpUS), the combination of multiple US modalities, for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. In the past 5 years, a growing number of studies have shown that use of mpUS resulted in high PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) detection performance using radical prostatectomy histology as the reference standard. Recent studies have demonstrated the role mpUS in improving detection of CSPCa and guidance for prostate biopsy and therapy. Furthermore, some aspects including lower costs, real-time imaging, applicability for some patients who have contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and availability in the office setting are clear advantages of mpUS. Interobserver agreement of mpUS was overall low; however, this limitation can be improved using standardized and objective evaluation systems such as the machine learning model. Whether mpUS outperforms MRI is unclear. Multicenter randomized controlled trials directly comparing mpUS and multiparametric MRI are warranted.

The Relationship of Technical Skills and Cognitive Workload to Errors During Robotic Surgical Exercises

Purpose We attempt to understand the relationship between surgeon technical skills, cognitive workload and errors during a simulated robotic dissection task. Materials and Methods Participant surgeons performed a robotic surgery dissection exercise. Participants were grouped based on surgical experience. Technical skills were evaluated utilizing the validated Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) assessment tool. The dissection task was evaluated for errors during active dissection or passive retraction maneuvers. We quantified cognitive workload of surgeon participants as an Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA), derived from Task-Evoked-Pupillary-Response metrics; ICA ranged 0-1, with 1 representing maximum ICA. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used for all modellings to establish relationships between surgeon technical skills, cognitive workload and errors. Results We found a strong association between technical skills as measured by multiple GEARS domains (depth perception, force sensitivity and robotic control) and passive errors, with higher GEARS scores associated with a lower relative risk of errors (all p < 0.01). For novice surgeons, as average GEARS scores increased, the average estimated ICA decreased. In contrast, as average GEARS increased for expert surgeons, the average estimated ICA increased. When exhibiting optimal technical skill (maximal GEARS scores) novices and experts reached a similar range of ICA scores (ICA 0.47 and 0.42, respectively). Conclusions This study found that there is an optimal cognitive workload level for surgeons of all experience levels during our robotic surgical exercise. Select technical skill domains were strong predictors of errors. Future research will explore whether an ideal cognitive workload range truly optimizes surgical training and reduce surgical errors.

Virtual Residency Interviews: What Variables Can Applicants Control?

Due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, almost all residency programs have adopted virtual interviewing for the National Residency Matching Program® (NRMP) or The Match® 2021. Hence, applicants have had to adapt quickly to this process, since the interviewers and the applicants were mostly inexperienced regarding this process. To date, program directors have had a successful experience on this new modality, and since the pandemic continues to limit in-person meetings and given the benefits that virtual interviews provide in terms of transportation, booking, and cost, there is a high chance that interviews for The Match 2022 will also be conducted in the same, virtual way. In light of this, we performed a review of the literature by using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other online resources to analyze certain critical aspects and offer recommendations for residency and fellowship applicants to improve their performance in virtual interviews. Despite the current surge of virtual interviewing in today’s technology-driven era, virtual interviewing programs for residency and fellowship candidates selection are still in their infancy. We have learned that applicants can control certain aspects such as technology, settings, dress code, and behavior so that they can tailor their experience to make it more favorable and fulfilling. Ensuring proper preparation in terms of the variables that can influence the virtual experience is key for a successful interview.