The horizon of pediatric cardiac critical care

Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care (PCCC) is a challenging discipline where decisions require a high degree of preparation and clinical expertise. In the modern era, outcomes of neonates and children with congenital heart defects have dramatically improved, largely by transformative technologies and an expanding collection of pharmacotherapies. Exponential advances in science and technology are occurring at a breathtaking rate, and applying these advances to the PCCC patient is essential to further advancing the science and practice of the field. In this article, we identified and elaborate on seven key elements within the PCCC that will pave the way for the future.

Effect of Cognitive Aids on Adherence to Best Practice in the Treatment of Deteriorating Surgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Simulation Setting

Importance

Failure to rescue causes significant morbidity and mortality in the surgical population. Human error is often the underlying cause of failure to rescue. Human error can be reduced by the use of cognitive aids.

Objectives

To test the effectiveness of cognitive aids on adherence to best practice in the management of deteriorating postoperative surgical ward patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial in a simulation setting. Surgical teams consisted of 1 surgeon and 2 nurses from a surgical ward from 4 different hospitals in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Data were analyzed between February 2, 2017, and December 18, 2018.

Interventions

The teams were randomized to manage 3 simulated deteriorating patient scenarios with or without the use of cognitive aids.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome of the study was failure to adhere to best practice, expressed as the percentage of omitted critical management steps. The secondary outcome of the study was the perceived usability of the cognitive aids.

Results

Of the total participants, 93 were women and 51 were men. Twenty-five surgical teams performed 75 patient scenarios with cognitive aids, and 25 teams performed 75 patient scenarios without cognitive aids. Using the cognitive aids resulted in a reduction of omitted critical management steps from 33% to 10%, which is a 70% (P < .001) reduction. This effect remained significant (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, -0.228 to -0.061; P = .001) in a multivariate analysis. Overall usability (scale of 0-10) of the cognitive aids was scored at a median of 8.7 (interquartile range, 8-9).

Conclusions and Relevance

Failure to comply with best practice management of postoperative complications is associated with worse outcomes. In this simulation study, adherence to best practice in the management of postoperative complications improves significantly by the use of cognitive aids. Cognitive aids for deteriorating surgical patients therefore have the potential to reduce failure to rescue and improve patient outcome.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03812861.

Cognitive aids: 'a must' for procedures performed by multidisciplinary sedation teams outside the operation room?

The human brain might not perform optimally during stressful situations. Cognitive aids can help in such situations to carry out all necessary treatment steps in a correct order. We present the case of a severe anaphylactic reaction during a percutaneous radiological intervention to drain an echinococcosis cyst on the radiology suite outside the operation room (OR), in which cognitive aids were successfully used to optimise patient care by a multidisciplinary team. Cognitive aids do not replace experience and skills of the individual caregivers, but can be invaluable tools for multidisciplinary teams dealing with crisis situations outside the OR.

[Resuscitation after trauma: better survival chances thanks to goal-oriented treatment]

- Recent literature shows increased survival for patients with traumatic cardiac arrest.- An early and aggressive approach to underlying causes and good integrated trauma care are probably responsible for this.- The new resuscitation guideline of the European Resuscitation Council emphasises that treatment of the underlying cause deserves more priority than performing chest compressions.- In addition to a structured approach with interventions focused on the causes of the arrest, standard operating procedures and protocols, regular scenario training and clinical governance are vital to improve survival chances for these patients.

European implementation of the "2014 ESC/ESA guideline on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management"

BACKGROUND

Substandard implementation of a guideline is a major factor contributing to poor guideline adherence and has the potential to result in preventable patient harm. This study aims to quantify the uptake of the European guideline on non-cardiac surgery by European anesthetists.

METHODS

This is a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Data was collected during Euroanaesthesia, the annual congresses of the Dutch Society of Anaesthesiology, European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists and European Society for Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy in 2015. Primary endpoints were the implementation and knowledge scores derived from the questionnaires.

RESULTS

The implementation score from 488 questionnaires was excellent in 4%, good in 14%, average in 22%, poor in 32% and very poor in 28% of the cases. The knowledge score was excellent in 1%, good in 27%, moderate in 49%, poor in 18% and very poor in 5% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Current implementation and knowledge of the guideline on non-cardiac surgery in Europe needs to be improved.

[Cognitive aid for emergencies in the OR--AMC bundle helps ensure that no steps are left out]

Crucial management steps in unexpected perioperative emergencies are frequently omitted by OR teams because of the suboptimal performance of the brain under stress.A cognitive aid is a tool that will help care providers to perform and speed up all the necessary management steps of a critical event. We have created a Dutch adaption of the Stanford Emergency Manual, a bundle of cognitive aids to manage a number of life threatening emergencies in the operating theatre. The effectiveness of these cognitive aids has been demonstrated in simulated emergencies. Their use has furthermore, been standard practice in other high-risk industries for many years. Further research should therefore mainly focus on the implementation and optimisation of these tools.

Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture

We describe the impact of a targeted performance improvement programme and the associated performance improvement interventions, on mortality rates, error rates and process of care for haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Clinical care and performance improvement data for 185 adult patients with exsanguinating pelvic trauma presenting to a United Kingdom Major Trauma Centre between January 2007 and January 2011 were analysed with univariate and multivariate regression and compared with National data. In total 62 patients (34%) died from their injuries and opportunities for improved care were identified in one third of deaths.

Three major interventions were introduced during the study period in response to the findings. These were a massive haemorrhage protocol, a decision-making algorithm and employment of specialist pelvic orthopaedic surgeons. Interventions which improved performance were associated with an annual reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.93), p = 0.02), a reduction in error rates (p = 0.024) and significant improvements in the targeted processes of care. Exsanguinating patients with pelvic trauma are complex to manage and are associated with high mortality rates; implementation of a targeted performance improvement programme achieved sustained improvements in mortality, error rates and trauma care in this group of severely injured patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1090–7.

Establishing a regional enterocutaneous fistula service: the Royal London hospital experience

BACKGROUND

The development of enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) is one of the most challenging complications encountered in colorectal surgery. Currently, only two supra-regional centres are nationally designated in the United Kingdom to treat ECF patients. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome measures following the implementation of an ECF service at The Royal London Hospital.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with enterocutaneous fistula between December 2005 and November 2011 were recruited to the study. Clinical outcomes analysed included successful ECF closure, number of surgical procedures required for successful ECF closure, re-fistulation rates and morbidity/mortality data.

RESULTS

41 patients (20 M:21 F) of median age 54 years (range, 16-81) were studied. Patients had undergone a median of 4 (range, 1-18) operations prior to referral. Eleven fistulas (27%) healed spontaneously. Of the remaining 30 patients, 5 (17%) died before surgery due to uncontrollable sepsis and 6 (20%) refused surgical intervention and were managed conservatively. Nineteen patients (63%) underwent definitive surgical repair requiring a median of 1 (range, 1-2) operations, with recurrent fistulation reported in 4 patients (21%). No intra-operative mortality was encountered. Two (11%) patients died postoperatively due to cardio-respiratory complications.

CONCLUSIONS

These data compare favourably with outcome measures reported by designated national centres, suggesting ECF patients can be safely managed closer to home in regional units that have the appropriate expertise. Nevertheless, management of this condition remains critically dependent upon a dedicated multidisciplinary team approach.