Metabolically active tumour volume segmentation from dynamic [(18)F]FLT PET studies in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) with (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) can be used to assess tumour proliferation. A kinetic-filtering (KF) classification algorithm has been suggested for segmentation of tumours in dynamic [(18)F]FLT PET data. The aim of the present study was to evaluate KF segmentation and its test-retest performance in [(18)F]FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Nine NSCLC patients underwent two 60-min dynamic [(18)F]FLT PET scans within 7 days prior to treatment. Dynamic scans were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) as well as with ordered subsets expectation maximisation (OSEM). Twenty-eight lesions were identified by an experienced physician. Segmentation was performed using KF applied to the dynamic data set and a source-to-background corrected 50% threshold (A50%) was applied to the sum image of the last three frames (45- to 60-min p.i.). Furthermore, several adaptations of KF were tested. Both for KF and A50% test-retest (TRT) variability of metabolically active tumour volume and standard uptake value (SUV) were evaluated.

RESULTS

KF performed better on OSEM- than on FBP-reconstructed PET images. The original KF implementation segmented 15 out of 28 lesions, whereas A50% segmented each lesion. Adapted KF versions, however, were able to segment 26 out of 28 lesions. In the best performing adapted versions, metabolically active tumour volume and SUV TRT variability was similar to those of A50%. KF misclassified certain tumour areas as vertebrae or liver tissue, which was shown to be related to heterogeneous [(18)F]FLT uptake areas within the tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

For [(18)F]FLT PET studies in NSCLC patients, KF and A50% show comparable tumour volume segmentation performance. The KF method needs, however, a site-specific optimisation. The A50% is therefore a good alternative for tumour segmentation in NSCLC [(18)F]FLT PET studies in multicentre studies. Yet, it was observed that KF has the potential to subsegment lesions in high and low proliferative areas.

Assessment of simplified methods to measure 18F-FLT uptake changes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) PET/CT provides a noninvasive assessment of proliferation and, as such, could be a valuable imaging biomarker in oncology. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of simplified quantitative parameters of (18)F-FLT uptake in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and after the start of treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

Ten patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring an activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation were included in this prospective observational study. Patients underwent (15)O-H2O and (18)F-FLT PET/CT scanning on 3 separate occasions: within 7 d before treatment, and 7 and 28 d after the first therapeutic dose of a TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib). Dynamic scans were acquired and venous blood samples were collected during the (18)F-FLT scan to measure parent fraction and plasma and whole-blood radioactivity concentrations. Simplified measures (standardized uptake value [SUV] and tumor-to-blood ratio [TBR]) were correlated with fully quantitative measures derived from kinetic modeling.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of thirty (18)F-FLT PET/CT scans were evaluable. According to the Akaike criterion, a reversible 2-tissue model with 4 rate constants and blood volume parameter was preferred in 84% of cases. Relative therapy-induced changes in SUV and TBR correlated with those derived from kinetic analyses (r(2) = 0.83-0.97, P < 0.001, slope = 0.72-1.12). (18)F-FLT uptake significantly decreased at 7 and 28 d after the start of treatment compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Changes in (18)F-FLT uptake were not correlated with changes in perfusion, as measured using (15)O-H2O.

CONCLUSION

SUV and TBR could both be used as surrogate simplified measures to assess changes in (18)F-FLT uptake in NSCLC patients treated with a TKI, at the cost of a small underestimation in uptake changes or the need for a blood sample and metabolite measurement, respectively.