Long-Term Neurological Safety in B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Treated With Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy

Background and Objectives:

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is a promising treatment in relapsing B-cell lymphoma, but is frequently associated with acute neurotoxicity. Neurological long-term safety has not been thoroughly assessed.

Methods:

All consecutive refractory lymphoma patients admitted in our center for CAR T-cell therapy underwent neurological examination, extensive neuropsychological assessment, brain MRI (except one patient) and completed self-administrated questionnaires at baseline. The patients who remained disease-free at 2 years were re-evaluated similarly. All neurological assessments were conducted by senior neurologists.

Results:

None of the 19 disease-free patients developed new neurological deficits or MRI changes when compared to baseline. There was no difference in cognitive performances before and two years after, even for the 11 patients who had developed acute neurotoxicity after CAR T-cells.

In self-questionnaire assessments, cognitive complaint was stable, reported by 32% of patients at 2 years. We observed a reduction in HADS anxiety scores two years after treatment when compared to baseline (median score: 7/21 vs 4/21, p=0.01).

Discussion:

In conclusion, no significant neurocognitive or neurological disorders were observed in this cohort of patients, two years after treatment with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients may be at higher risk for severe coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19); however, the outcome of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been described yet.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study within the Lymphomes Oculo-Cérébraux national network (LOC) to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCNSL patients (positive real-time polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swab or evocative lung computed tomography scan). We compared clinical characteristics between patients with severe (death and/or intensive care unit admission) and mild disease.

RESULTS

Between March and May 2020, 13 PCNSL patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 11 (85%) of whom were undergoing chemotherapy at the time of infection. The mortality rate was 23% (3/13), and two additional patients (15%) required mechanical ventilation. Two patients (15%) had no COVID-19 symptoms. History of diabetes mellitus was more common in severe patients (3/5 vs 0/8, p = 0.03). Two patients recovered from COVID-19 after mechanical ventilation during more than two weeks and resumed chemotherapy. In all, chemotherapy was resumed after COVID-19 recovery in nine patients (69%) after a median delay of 16 days (range 3-32), none of whom developed unusual chemotherapy complication nor SARS-Cov2 reactivation.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary analysis suggests that, while being at higher risk be for severe illness, PCNSL patients with COVID-19 might be treated maximally especially if they achieved oncological response at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chemotherapy might be resumed without prolonged delay in PCNSL patients with COVID-19.

Evaluation of mid-term (6-12 months) neurotoxicity in B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CAR T-cells: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

CAR T-cells are profoundly changing the standard of care in B-cell malignancies. This new therapeutic class induces a significant number of acute neurotoxicity, but data regarding mid and long-term neurological safety are scarce. We evaluated mid-term neurological safety, with special emphasis on cognitive functions, in a series of adults treated with CAR T-cells.

METHODS

Patients treated in a single centre with CD19-targeted CAR T-cells for a relapsing B-cell lymphoma were prospectively followed-up by neurologists. Before CAR T-cells infusion, all patients underwent neurological examinations with neuropsychological testing, and filled out questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression and cognitive complains. Patients surviving without tumour progression were re-evaluated similarly, six to 12 months later.

RESULTS

In this prospective cohort of 56 consecutive adult patients treated with CAR T-cells, 27 were eligible for mid-term evaluation (median time 7.6 months). Twelve patients developed an acute and reversible neurotoxicity with median duration time of 5.5 days. In all patients, neurological examination on mid-term evaluation was similar to baseline. In self-assessment questionnaires, 63% of patients reported clinically meaningful anxiety, depression or cognitive difficulties at baseline, a number reduced to 44% at time of mid-term evaluation. On cognitive assessments, no significant deterioration was found when compared to baseline, in any cognitive functions assessed (verbal and visual memory, executive functions, language and praxis), even in patients who developed acute neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients treated with CD19-targeted CAR-T cells , we found no evidence for neurological or cognitive toxicity, 6 and 12 months after treatment.

Description of neurotoxicity in a series of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR T) cell therapy is a highly promising treatment for haematological malignancies but is frequently associated with cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Between July 2018 and July 2019, all patients treated with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for relapsing lymphoma were followed-up longitudinally to describe neurological symptoms and their evolution over time. Four different French centres participated and 84 patients (median age 59 years, 31% females) were included. Neurotoxicity, defined as the presence of at least one neurological symptom appearing after treatment infusion, was reported in 43% of the patients. The median time to onset was 7 days after infusion with a median duration of 6 days. More than half of the patients (64%) had grade 1–2 severity and 34% had grade 3–4. CRS was observed in 80% of all patients. The most frequent neurological symptoms were cognitive signs, being severe in 36%, and were equally distributed between language disorders and cognitive disorders without language impairment. Non-pyramidal motor disorders, severe in 11%, were reported in 42% of the patients. Elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP) within 4 days after treatment was significantly correlated with the occurrence of grade 3–4 neurotoxicity. Although sometimes severe, neurotoxicity was almost always reversible. The efficacy of steroids and antiepileptic drugs remains unproven in the management of neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapies occurs in more than 40% of patients. The clinical pattern is heterogeneous but cognitive disorders (not limited to language disorders) and, to a minor degree, non-pyramidal motor disorders, appeared as a signature of severe neurotoxicity.

Impact of New Systemic Treatment and Radiotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases

Simple Summary

Although the recent years have seen incredible progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma including brain metastases, the survival of melanoma patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) is still poor. There are currently only a handful of reports suggesting that BRAF and MEK inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors, may induce survival benefit in advanced melanoma patients with LM. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutics interventions in LM melanoma patients in the era of new systemic treatment and radiosurgery. This study demonstrated that new treatment modalities appear to be promising new treatment options for melanoma LM, and need to be tested in larger prospective studies. A subset of patients are long-term survivors, and factors associated with improved survival such as low serum LDH level may be identified.

Abstract

Importance: Few data are available on patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) from melanoma treated with new systemic therapies. Objective: To gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutic interventions in melanoma patients with LM in the era of new systemic treatment. Design: Clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival of melanoma patients diagnosed with LM, isolated or associated with brain metastases, were collected. The Cox regression model assessed the influence of patient and melanoma characteristics on survival. Setting: Monocentric, retrospective, real-life cohort of patients with LM from melanoma. Participants: All patients followed up at Saint-Louis University Hospital and diagnosed with LM between December 2013 and February 2020 were included. For each patient identified, a central review by dermato-oncologist and neuro-oncologist experts was performed to confirm the diagnosis of LM. Exposure: Impact of new systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Results: Among the 452 advanced melanoma patients followed at St Louis Hospital between 2013 and 2020, 41 patients with LM from melanoma were identified. Among them, 29 patients with a diagnosis of LM “confirmed” or “probable” after central neuro-oncologists reviewing were included. Nineteen patients had known melanoma brain metastases at LM diagnosis. Among the 27 patients treated with systemic therapy, 17 patients were treated with immunotherapy, 5 patients received targeted therapy, 1 was treated with chemotherapy, and 4 patients were treated with anti-PD-1 in combination with BRAF inhibitor. The median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 5.1 months. Median OS was 7.1 months for the 9 patients receiving systemic therapy combined with radiotherapy, and 3.2 months for the 20 patients not receiving combined radiotherapy. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09–1.90, p < 0.01) and presence of neurological symptoms at LM diagnosis (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.25–6.99, p = 0.01) were associated with poor survival. At the time of data analysis, five patients were still alive with a median follow-up of 47.4 months and had persistent complete response. Conclusion: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising new treatment options in LM from melanoma that can increase overall survival, and may induce long lasting remission in some patients.

P14.31 CMV reactivation in a cohort of newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy. A single center analysis

BACKGROUND

The Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous herpes virus which infects 60–80 % of the population in Europe. Although the CMV usually remains latent, reactivation can occur in the context of an immunodepression, such as low CD4-lymphocyte levels in HIV patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) patients frequently show lymphopenia, which is related to both the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor and to the treatment with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT). Surprisingly, the incidence of CMV reactivation in GBM patients has not been clearly studied so far. We report here our experience on CMV reactivation in a cohort of newly-diagnosed GBM patients, treated with RT and TMZ. We assessed the incidence of CMV reactivation in these patients and tried to identify risk factors for such reactivation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients with histologically confirmed malignant GBM recommended for temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in our institution from October 2013 to December 2015 were reviewed. In all patients, sex, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), lymphocyte level, serological CMV status and steroid dosages were recorded at the onset, and one month after completion of the concomitant radio-chemotherapy regimen. A CMV reactivation was defined by a detection of CMV DNA > 1000 copies/ml in the patient’s serum.

RESULTS

103 patients meeting the analysis criteria were reviewed. Within these 103 patients, 34 patients (33%) had initial negative serology for CMV, and none of them developed a seroconversion after treatment with concomitant RT + TMZ. Among patients with positive IgG (n=69), 16 patients (23%) developed a positive viremia at one point during treatment with concomitant RT + TMZ. Age (>60 years), lymphocyte count before RT (<1500/mm3) and use of steroids were correlated with CMV reactivation (p<0.05 in univariate analysis). A positive CMV viremia during RT+TMZ did not impact the progression free survival (PFS) but was associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) when compared to the others patients (median: 12 months vs 15 months; p=0.04). No clinical symptoms suggestive of CMV infection were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this single center series, we showed that CMV reactivation occurs in 23% of the GBM patients having a positive serology for CMV. Reactivation was more frequent in older patients, with low lymphocyte counts and treated with steroids. A positive viremia was not associated with poor PFS, a fact that does not support a promoting role of CMV in glioma oncogenesis, which has been sometimes suggested. Yet, the group of patients with CMV reactivation showed a shorter OS, which might be related to an older age and /or poorer clinical conditions in this group.