State-of-the-art management of the acutely unwell child

Children make up around one-fifth of all emergency department visits in the USA and UK, with an increasing trend of emergency admissions requiring intensive care. Anaesthetists play a vital role in the management of paediatric emergencies contributing to stabilisation, emergency anaesthesia, transfers and non-technical skills that optimise team performance. From neonates to adolescents, paediatric patients have diverse physiology and present with a range of congenital and acquired pathologies that often differ from the adult population. With increasing centralisation of paediatric services, staff outside these centres have less exposure to caring for children, yet are often the first responders in managing these high stakes situations. Staying abreast of the latest evidence for managing complex low frequency emergencies is a challenge. This review focuses on recent evidence and pertinent clinical updates within the field. The challenges of maintaining skills and training are explored as well as novel advancements in care.

Recommendations on the Management of Interhospital Transport of Pediatric Patients With Mediastinal Mass

PURPOSE

Children with mediastinal masses often present with insidious symptoms to nonspecialist centers and require interhospital transport to oncology centers for definitive care. We evaluated clinical characteristics and patient outcomes and proposed a management protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all children with mediastinal mass at the pediatric intensive care unit of the Hong Kong Children's Hospital between April 2019 and March 2020.

RESULTS

Ten children with a median age of 14.5 years (interquartile range, 9.3-17.0 years) were included. Leukemia and lymphoma accounted for the majority of cases (n = 6, 60%). Nearly all patients (n = 9, 90%) required interhospital transport before definitive treatment could be instituted. There were no deaths, but 2 patients were transported with significant respiratory compromise. Among patients requiring more than 1 interhospital transport, there was a higher incidence of shortness of breath (100% vs 40%; odds ratio, 33; P = 0.048) and orthopnea (80% vs 0%; odds ratio, 33; P = 0.048), whereas none had a neck mass (0% vs 80%; odds ratio, 0.03; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with mediastinal mass are at risk of life-threatening cardiorespiratory compromise. Pretransport assessment, planning, and stabilization along with clear management plans for deterioration during transport are crucial especially for patients who are symptomatic at time of presentation, to reduce risks associated with delays in arriving at the specialist point of care for definitive treatment.

Making the invisible visible: New perspectives on the intersection of human-environment interactions of clinical teams in intensive care

Understanding human behaviour is essential to the successful adoption of new technologies, and for the promotion of safer care. This requires capturing the detail of clinical workflows to inform the design of new human-technology interactions. We are interested particularly in the possibilities for touchless technologies that can decipher human speech, gesture and motion and allow for interactions that are free of contact. Here, we employ a new approach by installing a single 360° camera into a clinical environment to analyse touch patterns and human-environment interactions across a clinical team to recommend design considerations for new technologies with the potential to reduce avoidable touch.

175 Embracing a System-Based Approach to Simulation – The Experience of a Paediatric Hospital During a Global Pandemic

The GOSH Clinical Simulation Centre (CSC) delivers an established paediatric

The aim of the study was to expand the applications of our pan-trust

Over the course of 18 months, simulation exercises were designed to focus on rehearsal and refinement of processes and systems, towards uncovering latent safety threats or gaps in practice. A reporting tool was developed; to capture risks and identify mitigating actions. In addition to this, an established reporting structure enabled faculty to share findings and escalate risks to the local patient safety team. The COVID-19 pandemic presented healthcare workers with many new or unfamiliar working practices. This context further shifted our focus towards systems safety simulations (SSS) with the aim of enabling teams to focus on rehearsing and preparing for new ways of working.

Ten different exercises were delivered with clinical teams across the trust: successfully informing the development of five new clinical guidelines relating to COVID-19-specific practices. In one exercise alone, 11 latent safety threats (LSTs) were captured and managed with the appropriate teams (

Themes from LSTs captured during COVID-19 CT transfer simulation

SSS fire evacuation exercise in the IMRI suite

SSS fire evacuation exercise in the new sight and sound building

These exercises demonstrate the potential applications of simulation to support process and system improvement. Beyond the pandemic, we aim to continue to deliver SSS exercises to help make clinical systems and spaces safer for patients and teams. Following in the footsteps of successful simulation teams in the USA, we aim to advance this work to deliver SSS at the preconstruction level in future to inform the design of new clinical spaces.

Early morbidities following paediatric cardiac surgery: a mixed-methods study

Background

Over 5000 paediatric cardiac surgeries are performed in the UK each year and early survival has improved to > 98%.

Objectives

We aimed to identify the surgical morbidities that present the greatest burden for patients and health services and to develop and pilot routine monitoring and feedback.

Design and setting

Our multidisciplinary mixed-methods study took place over 52 months across five UK paediatric cardiac surgery centres.

Participants

The participants were children aged < 17 years.

Methods

We reviewed existing literature, ran three focus groups and undertook a family online discussion forum moderated by the Children’s Heart Federation. A multidisciplinary group, with patient and carer involvement, then ranked and selected nine key morbidities informed by clinical views on definitions and feasibility of routine monitoring. We validated a new, nurse-administered early warning tool for assessing preoperative and postoperative child development, called the brief developmental assessment, by testing this among 1200 children. We measured morbidity incidence in 3090 consecutive surgical admissions over 21 months and explored risk factors for morbidity. We measured the impact of morbidities on quality of life, clinical burden and costs to the NHS and families over 6 months in 666 children, 340 (51%) of whom had at least one morbidity. We developed and piloted methods suitable for routine monitoring of morbidity by centres and co-developed new patient information about morbidities with parents and user groups.

Results

Families and clinicians prioritised overlapping but also different morbidities, leading to a final list of acute neurological event, unplanned reoperation, feeding problems, renal replacement therapy, major adverse events, extracorporeal life support, necrotising enterocolitis, surgical infection and prolonged pleural effusion. The brief developmental assessment was valid in children aged between 4 months and 5 years, but not in the youngest babies or 5- to 17-year-olds. A total of 2415 (78.2%) procedures had no measured morbidity. There was a higher risk of morbidity in neonates, complex congenital heart disease, increased preoperative severity of illness and with prolonged bypass. Patients with any morbidity had a 6-month survival of 81.5% compared with 99.1% with no morbidity. Patients with any morbidity scored 5.2 points lower on their total quality of life score at 6 weeks, but this difference had narrowed by 6 months. Morbidity led to fewer days at home by 6 months and higher costs. Extracorporeal life support patients had the lowest days at home (median: 43 days out of 183 days) and highest costs (£71,051 higher than no morbidity).

Limitations

Monitoring of morbidity is more complex than mortality, and hence this requires resources and clinician buy-in.

Conclusions

Evaluation of postoperative morbidity provides important information over and above 30-day survival and should become the focus of audit and quality improvement.

Future work

National audit of morbidities has been initiated. Further research is needed to understand the implications of feeding problems and renal failure and to evaluate the brief developmental assessment.

Funding

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 30. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ and GlideScope® videolaryngoscopes for difficult pediatric intubation in a Pierre Robin manikin

Airway management in children is associated with anatomical and physiological challenges compared with adults. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate and related to a difficult airway. Both the Airtraq™ and GlideScope® have never been previously directly compared in PRS. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of these two airway devices in a PRS manikin for ethical and practical reasons. Between April and July 2017, 26, pediatric intensive care clinical fellows or trainees from a tertiary pediatric center were recruited to participate. In this prospective and randomized crossover trial, all participants first set up the Airtraq™ and the GlideScope® and then used these videolaryngoscopes to intubate an AirSim® PRS manikin. Our primary outcome measure was the duration of the successful intubation attempt. Duration of the successful intubation attempt was 18.1 (14.2-34.9 [10.2-51.3]) s for the Airtraq™ compared to 31.1 (18.7-55.6 [6.2-119]) s for the GlideScope® (p = 0.045). Setup time was 50.0 ± 6.9 s for the Airtraq™ and 27.8 ± 8.6 s for the GlideScope® (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Even though setup time was longer, the characteristics of intubation performance were superior with the Airtraq™ relative to the GlideScope® in an AirSim® PRS manikin. What is Known: • Several case reports have described the successful use of Airtraq™ to intubate children with Pierre Robin sequence. • The GlideScope® has demonstrated similar rates of first-attempt successful intubation to flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. What is New: • In the hands of pediatric non-airway specialists, the characteristics of intubation performance, including the duration of the successful intubation attempt, are superior with the Airtraq™ compared with the GlideScope® in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. • Setup time for the Airtraq™ is, however, longer relative to that for the GlideScope®.

Selection by a panel of clinicians and family representatives of important early morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery suitable for routine monitoring using the nominal group technique and a robust voting process

OBJECTIVE

With survival following paediatric cardiac surgery improving, the attention of quality assurance and improvement initiatives is shifting to long-term outcomes and early surgical morbidities. We wanted to involve family representatives and a range of clinicians in selecting the morbidities to be measured in a major UK study.

SETTING

Paediatric cardiac surgery services in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

We convened a panel comprising family representatives, paediatricians from referring centres, and surgeons and other clinicians from surgical centres.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Using the nominal group technique augmented by a robust voting process to identify group preferences, suggestions for candidate morbidities were elicited, discussed, ranked and then shortlisted. The shortlist was passed to a clinical group that provided a view on the feasibility of monitoring each shortlisted morbidity in routine practice. The panel then met again to select a prioritised list of morbidities for further study, with the list finalised by the clinical group and chief investigators.

RESULTS

At the first panel meeting, 66 initial suggestions were made, with this reduced to a shortlist of 24 after two rounds of discussion, consolidation and voting. At the second meeting, this shortlist was reduced to 10 candidate morbidities. Two were dropped on grounds of feasibility and replaced by another the panel considered important. The final list of nine morbidities included indicators of organ damage, acute events and feeding problems. Family representatives and clinicians from outside tertiary centres brought some issues to greater prominence than if the panel had consisted solely of tertiary clinicians or study investigators.

CONCLUSION

The inclusion of patient and family perspectives in identifying metrics for use in monitoring a specialised clinical service is challenging but feasible and can broaden notions of quality and how to measure it.