Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1096 patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of MT, with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), in acute BAO through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

METHODS

Systematic searches of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were undertaken on August 1, 2022. Good functional outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were 90-day mortality, successful post-thrombectomy recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

RESULTS

Three studies reporting 1096 patients with BAO AIS were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in good functional outcome were detected between the two groups (RR=1.28 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.92); p=0.117). However, specifically patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) benefited from bridging IVT (OR=2.52 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.22); p<0.001) with better functional outcomes. There was a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate for patients who underwent bridging IVT compared with MT alone (RR=0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.80); p=0.008). No significant differences were detected in rates of post-treatment recanalization (RR=1.01 (95% CI 0.35 to 2.91); p=0.954), sICH (RR=0.96 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.42); p=0.724), and SAH (RR=0.93 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.83); p=0.563).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AIS due to BAO, bridging IVT was associated with lower mortality rates at 90 days, compared with direct MT. There were no improved functional outcomes or increased sICH or SAH between both arms, However, patients with LAA benefited from bridging IVT, with better functional outcomes.

Etiologies, mechanisms, and risk factors of ischemic stroke in a young Asian adult cohort

OBJECTIVES

Risk factors and causes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are more diverse in young adults, and traditional stroke classifications may be inadequate. Precise characterisation of AIS is important for guiding management and prognostication. We describe stroke subtypes, risk factors and etiologies for AIS in a young Asian adult population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Young AIS patients aged 18-50 years admitted to two comprehensive stroke centres from 2020-2022 were included. Stroke etiologies and risk factors were adjudicated using Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and International Pediatric Stroke Study (IPSS) risk factors. Potential embolic sources (PES) were identified in a subgroup with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). These were compared across sex, ethnicities and age groups (18-39 years versus 40-50 years).

RESULTS

A total of 276 AIS patients were included, with mean age 43±5.7 years and 70.3% male. Median duration of follow-up was 5 months (IQR: 3-10). The most common TOAST subtypes were small-vessel disease (32.6%) and undetermined etiology (24.6%). IPSS risk factors were identified in 95% of all patients and 90% with undetermined etiology. IPSS risk factors included atherosclerosis (59.5%), cardiac disorders (18.7%), prothrombotic states (12.4%) and arteriopathy (7.7%). In this cohort, 20.3% had ESUS, of which 73.2% had at least one PES, which increased to 84.2% in those <40 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Young adults have diverse risk factors and causes of AIS. IPSS risk factors and ESUS-PES construct are comprehensive classification systems that may better reflect heterogeneous risk factors and etiologies in young stroke patients.

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation After Ischemic Stroke with an Insertable Cardiac Monitor: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

In ischemic stroke patients, we compared the use of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) versus non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and other clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the routine use of 12-lead electrocardiography or Holter monitoring for AF detection after ischemic stroke. Recent randomised controlled trials have investigated the impact of ICM versus non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring for AF detection in this population. However, precise recommendations for monitoring post-stroke AF are lacking; including the optimal timing, duration, and method of electrocardiography monitoring.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on Embase and PubMed from database inception until 27 October 2022 to include randomised controlled trials that compared ICM with non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring for post-stroke AF detection. This yielded 3 randomised controlled trials with a combined cohort of 1231 patients with a recent ischemic stroke. Individual patient data (IPD) was then reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves and analysed using the shared-frailty Cox model. An aggregate data meta-analysis was conducted for 1231 patients across all 3 studies for outcomes that could not be reconstructed using IPD.

RESULTS

One-stage meta-analysis demonstrated an increase in the hazard ratio (HR 6.01, 95% CI 3.40-10.60; p<0.001) of AF detection in patients undergoing monitoring via ICM compared to standard care. Aggregate data meta analysis revealed a significant increase in initiation of anticoagulation (OR 3.09, 95% CI 2.05 - 4.66; p<0.00001) in the ICM group. However, no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or death were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we found that the use of ICM increased the detection rate of post-stroke AF and the rate of anticoagulation initiation. However, this did not translate into a reduced incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke.