Breakthrough Infections Following mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The clinical effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is lower than in the general population.

METHODS

From April to October 2021, 481 KT recipients with COVID-19, included in the Spanish Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Registry, were analyzed. Data regarding vaccination status and vaccine type were collected, and outcomes of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (n = 130) were compared with fully vaccinated patients (n = 351).

RESULTS

Clinical picture was similar and survival analysis showed no differences between groups: 21.7% of fully vaccinated patients and 20.8% of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated died (P = 0.776). In multivariable analysis, age and pneumonia were independent risk factors for death, whereas vaccination status was not related to mortality. These results remained similar when we excluded patients with partial vaccination, as well as when we analyzed exclusively hospitalized patients. Patients vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (n = 213) showed a significantly lower mortality than those who received the BNT162b2 vaccine (n = 121) (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.85; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 severity in KT patients has remained high and has not improved despite receiving 2 doses of the mRNA vaccine. The mRNA-1273 vaccine shows higher clinical effectiveness than BNT162b2 in KT recipients with breakthrough infections. Confirmation of these data will require further research taking into account the new variants and the administration of successive vaccine doses.

Use of tocilizumab in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19

Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus infection is related to a cytokine storm with large interleukin-6 (IL-6) release. The IL-6-receptor blocker tocilizumab may control the aberrant host immune response in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . In this pandemic, kidney transplant (KT) recipients are a high-risk population for severe infection and showed poor outcomes. We present a multicenter cohort study of 80 KT patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab during hospital admission. High mortality rate was identified (32.5%), related with older age (hazard ratio [HR] 3.12 for those older than 60 years, P = .039). IL-6 and other inflammatory markers, including lactic acid dehydrogenase, ferritin, and D-dimer increased early after tocilizumab administration and their values were higher in nonsurvivors. Instead, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased after tocilizumab, and this decrease positively correlated with survival (mean 12.3 mg/L in survivors vs. 33 mg/L in nonsurvivors). Each mg/L of CRP soon after tocilizumab increased the risk of death by 1% (HR 1.01 [confidence interval 1.004-1.024], P = .003). Although patients who died presented with worse respiratory situation at admission, this was not significantly different at tocilizumab administration and did not have an impact on outcome in the multivariate analysis. Tocilizumab may be effective in controlling cytokine storm in COVID-19 but randomized trials are needed.

Impact of errors of creatinine and cystatin C equations in the selection of living kidney donors

Background

Reliable determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the evaluation of living kidney donors. Although some guidelines recommend the use of measured GFR (mGFR), many centres still rely on estimated GFR (eGFR) obtained through equations or 24-h creatinine clearance. However, eGFR is neither accurate nor precise in reflecting real renal function. We analysed the impact of eGFR errors on evaluation and decision making regarding potential donors.

Methods

We evaluated 103 consecutive living donors who underwent mGFR via iohexol plasma clearance and eGFR by 51 creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations. The cut-off for living donation in our centre is GFR > 80 mL/min for donors >35 years of age or 90 mL/min for those <35 years of age. We analysed the misclassification of donors based on the cut-off for donation-based eGFR.

Results

Ninety-three subjects (90.3%) had mGFR values above (donors) and 10 [9.7% (95% confidence interval 5.4-17)] below (non-donors) the cut-off. In non-donors, most of the equations gave eGFR values above the cut-off, so donation would have been allowed based on eGFR. All non-donors were female with reduced weight, height and body surface. In donors, up to 32 cases showed eGFR below the cut-off, while mGFR was actually higher. Therefore an important number of donors would not have donated based on eGFR alone.

Conclusion

The misclassification of donors around the cut-off for donation is very common with eGFR, making eGFR unreliable for the evaluation of living kidney donors. Whenever possible, mGFR should be implemented in this setting.

Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine on the Incidence of Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Despite the high incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among high-risk recipients, no studies have investigated its prevention by immunosuppression optimization.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial testing whether a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and rapid steroid withdrawal (SW) within 1 week (Tac-SW) or cyclosporine A (CsA) with steroid minimization (SM) (CsA-SM), decreased the incidence of PTDM compared with tacrolimus with SM (Tac-SM). All arms received basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil. High risk was defined by age >60 or >45 years plus metabolic criteria based on body mass index, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PTDM after 12 months.

RESULTS

The study comprised 128 de novo renal transplant recipients without pretransplant diabetes (Tac-SW: 44, Tac-SM: 42, CsA-SM: 42). The 1-year incidence of PTDM in each arm was 37.8% for Tac-SW, 25.7% for Tac-SM, and 9.7% for CsA-SM (relative risk [RR] Tac-SW vs. CsA-SM 3.9 [1.2-12.4; P = 0.01]; RR Tac-SM vs. CsA-SM 2.7 [0.8-8.9; P = 0.1]). Antidiabetic therapy was required less commonly in the CsA-SM arm (P = 0.06); however, acute rejection rate was higher in CsA-SM arm (Tac-SW 11.4%, Tac-SM 4.8%, and CsA-SM 21.4% of patients; cumulative incidence P = 0.04). Graft and patient survival, and graft function were similar among arms.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk patients, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with SM provides the best balance between PTDM and acute rejection incidence.

Influence of genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 on sirolimus pharmacokinetics, patient and graft survival and other clinical outcomes in renal transplant

BACKGROUND

In transplant patients receiving de novo anticalcineurin-free sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression, we determined the influence of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) and ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP), member (ABCB1) genotypes on SRL blood levels and medium-term relevant clinical outcomes, in order to improve effectiveness of immunosuppression strategies when anti-mammalian target of rapamycin (anti-mTOR) inhibitor is indicated for clinical reasons.

METHODS

Forty-eight renal transplant recipients (suffered 48% diabetes mellitus, 91% hypertension, and 47% dyslipidemia) were genotyped for CYP3A5 (6986A>G) and ABCB1 (3435C>T) polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Sirolimus blood levels were determined using microparticle enzyme immunoassay technique. Relationships between genotypes and pharmacokinetics, graft function, and patient-graft survival were determined by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

CYP3A5*1/*3 showed lower SRL levels than CYP3A5*3/*3 (4.13±1.54 vs. 8.49±4.18 ng/mL; p=0.003) and level/dose ratio (LDR) (92.74±37.47 vs. 178.62±116.45; p=0.019) in early post-transplant period. In ABCB1 polymorphisms, CT genotypes showed higher SRL levels than CC and TT (8.93±2.22 vs. 7.28±2.47 vs. 7.35±1.15 ng/mL; p=0.038) in the late period; LDR in CC and CT were 171.29±36.24 vs. 335.66±138.71 (p=0.003), despite receiving lower doses (p=0.018). Acute rejection rate was 14% vs. 42% for *3/*3 and 14% (TT), 48% (CT), and 31% (CC). Median patient survival was 45 months, significantly lower than that of *3/*3 patients (69 months). Death-censored graft survival during 5-year follow-up was similar for both CYP3A5 genotypes and significantly lower in TT than CT and CC groups, without survival differences.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms influenced SRL levels; preliminary data suggest this may affect patient and graft survival. Genotyping renal transplant patients could help select candidates for SRL (genotype*3/*3 for CYP3A5 and CT for ABCB1), when anti-mTOR immunosuppression is indicated.

[A successful pregnancy in female after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation]

The effects of pregnancy on kidney transplant recipients have been widely described, although its impact on the mother, the fetus and the graft is still debated. Experience in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation is limited, with few reported cases, which increases uncertainty about guidelines to follow in this situation. We describe a case of successful pregnancy in a 35 year-old patient who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation 34 months before delivery. After modifications in immunosuppressive therapy (with tacrolimus and mycophenolate, the latter being switched to azathioprine), pregnancy evolved favourably. Delivery was by caesarean section due to fetal distress at 38 weeks of gestational age. Five months after delivery the child shows normal development while both pancreas and kidney grafts show normal function.

Surgical complications and renal function after kidney alone or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a matched comparative study

BACKGROUND

In selected type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) offers higher long-term graft and patient survival, but also higher initial morbidity and mortality than cadaveric kidney transplantation alone (CKTA). The development of new immunosuppressive regimens and surgical approach has improved this initial outcome, but little is known about their effect on short-term renal function and surgical complications related to the renal graft.

METHODS

We analysed retrospectively the short-term follow-up of 45 T1DM patients consecutively transplanted during 42 months (20 SPKT and 25 CKTA) in order to compare short-term (6 months) renal allograft function and surgical complications related to the renal allograft in both groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in donor characteristics. SPKT recipients had a significantly shorter time on dialysis and cold ischaemia time, with a higher number of HLA mismatches. There was no difference in acute rejection incidence, but delayed kidney graft function was less frequent in SPKT (5% vs 32%; P<0.05). Plasma creatinine level at discharge and 6 months was significantly lower in SPKT (1.1+/-0.3 vs 1.6+/-0.7; P<0.005 and 1.1+/-0.3 vs 1.5+/-0.6; P<0.05, respectively). There were no differences in surgical renal complications (haemorrhage, thrombosis or arterial stenosis, ureter leaks or stricture, lymphoceles or dehiscences). Two SPKT patients needed reintervention on the renal allograft and only one CKTA patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern transplant era, SPKT in ESRD diabetic patients, offers a slightly better short-term kidney allograft function without significant increase in surgical morbidity, compared with CKTA.

Successful therapeutic use of rituximab in refractory membranous glomerulonephritis

We present the case of a 57-year-old man with nephrotic syndrome secondary to idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis unsuccessfully treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARA), prednisone and chlorambucil. After treatment with rituximab, we observed a progressive decrease of proteinuria and normalization of serum albumin. 18 months after treatment, he remained in remission. No adverse reactions to rituximab were noted throughout follow-up.