Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events.

BACKGROUND

PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA.

METHODS

In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).

Pivotal Study of a Novel Motor-Driven Endoscopic Ablation System

[Figure: see text].

P998Left atrial appendage closure device thrombosis is associated with systemic embolization

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation, in one of its forms, is the most frequent sustained tachyarrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke more than 5 times. Cardioembolic stroke and systemic embolism (CS/SE) represents the most severe complication of this arrhythmia. Approximately 92% of intracardiac thrombosis originates from the left atrial appendage (LAA) and, although its mechanical occlusion is proved method to prevent cardioembolism, thrombosis of all types of LAA occlusion devices and their associations with CS/SE were observed.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of LAA occlusion device thrombosis, its predictors and the risk for cardioembolism.

Methods

We analyzed a group of 359 patients (65% male, mean age 72 years) with high risk for thromboembolism (mean CHADSVASc = 4.0) after LAA catheter occlusion using any of 9 different occluder types since 2005. During clinical follow-up 819 patientyears were collected and an intracardiac thrombus was found on 22 devices. Total of 17 patients suffered CS/SE.

Results

Thrombosis was found in 11 men and 11 women, mean age 76 years, average CHADSVASc = 4.5 and HASBLED = 2.0. The thrombus was discovered on average 4.0 months after the LAA occlusion. In that time patients were receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (11x), acetysalicic acid (4x), or interrupted anticoagulation (6x). In 3 cases the thrombosis was associated with CS/SE which represented risk of 6.6% per year. In patients with no thrombosis annual risk of CS/SE was only 1.7% (P<0.001).

Figure 1

Conclusion

In our single center register thrombosis was found in total of 6.3% patients after LAA device implantation. In these patients, risk of CS/SE is 3.9-fold higher compared to patients without thrombus formation. Elderly patients and patients with more risk factors in general were affected more frequently.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Under Intracardiac Echocardiographic Guidance: Feasibility and Comparison With Transesophageal Echocardiography

Background

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure is an alternative therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients. These procedures are currently guided with transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy in most centers. As intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is commonly used in other catheter‐based procedures, we sought to determine the safety and effectiveness of intracardiac echocardiography–guided left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device.

Methods and Results

A total of 27 patients (11 males, 77.0±8.5 years) with atrial fibrillation receiving Watchman left atrial appendage closure under intracardiac echocardiography guidance at a single center were investigated. All patients were implanted successfully. There were no major procedural complications. The overall procedure‐related complication rate was 14.8%, mainly due to access site hematoma. Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated successful closure of the left atrial appendage in all patients at 45 days after device implant.

Conclusions

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure with intracardiac echocardiography guidance is safe and feasible.

Anatomical predictors for successful pulmonary vein isolation using balloon-based technologies in atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

We evaluated the correlation between pulmonary venous (PV) anatomy and acute and long-term success of PV isolation (PVI) with two balloon-based ablation catheter techniques.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients were analyzed in two equal groups treated with either the second-generation cryoballoon (CRYO) catheter or the visually guided laser ablation (VGLA) catheter. All patients underwent multi-detector computed tomography (CT) imaging. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the procedural achievement of proven electrical isolation of all veins and freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) within a 1-year follow-up period, respectively.

RESULTS

Variant PV anatomy was observed in 32% of patients in the CRYO group and in 40% of patients in the VGLA group. All PVs were targeted with either the CRYO catheter (n = 199) or the VGLA catheter (n = 206). One hundred ninety-three of 199 PVs (97%) were successfully isolated in the CRYO group and 194 of 206 PVs (94%) in the VGLA group (p = 0.83). Over a 12-month follow-up, AF recurrence was documented in 11/45 (24%) and 7/43 (16%) patients in the CRYO and the VGLA groups, respectively (p = 0.21). In the CRYO group, a larger left inferior PV size was associated with worse long-term outcome (p = 0.001). In the VGLA group, a larger left superior PV size (p = 0.003) and more oval right inferior PV were associated with worse acute success (p = 0.038). There was no absolute cutoff between PV anatomy and clinical success.

CONCLUSIONS

The variability of PV anatomy did not significantly compromise acute success of PVI or patient outcomes.

Chronic performance of a leadless cardiac pacemaker: 1-year follow-up of the LEADLESS trial

BACKGROUND

A leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) system was recently introduced to overcome lead-related complications of conventional pacing systems. To date, long-term results of an LCP system are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the complication incidence, electrical performance, and rate response characteristics within the first year of follow-up of patients implanted with an LCP.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed intermediate-term follow-up data for 31 of 33 patients from the LEADLESS trial cohort who had an indication for single-chamber pacing and received an LCP between December 2012 and April 2013.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 76 ± 8 years, and 65% were male. Between 3 and 12 months of follow-up, there were no pacemaker-related adverse events reported. The pacing performance results at 6- and 12-month follow-up were, respectively, as follows: mean pacing threshold (at a 0.4-ms pulse width), 0.40 ± 0.26 V and 0.43 ± 0.30 V; R-wave amplitude 10.6 ± 2.6 mV and 10.3 ± 2.2 mV; and impedance 625 ± 205 Ω and 627 ± 209 Ω. At the 12-month follow-up in 61% of the patients (n = 19 of 31), the rate response sensor was activated, and an adequate rate response was observed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCP demonstrates very stable performance and reassuring safety results during intermediate-term follow-up. These results support the use of the LCP as a promising alternative to conventional pacemaker systems. Continued evaluation is warranted to further characterize this system. (Evaluation of a New Cardiac Pacemaker; NCT01700244).

Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial

BACKGROUND

Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 77±8 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.

Renal sympathetic denervation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for the management of drug-resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess whether renal sympathetic denervation (RSDN) can be achieved using an off-the-shelf saline-irrigated radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter typically employed for cardiac tissue ablation.

BACKGROUND

RSDN using a specialized solid-tip RFA catheter has recently been demonstrated to safely reduce systemic blood pressure in patients with refractory hypertension. For cardiac tissue ablation, RFA technology has evolved from nonirrigated to saline-irrigated ablation electrodes to improve both safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

Ten patients with resistant hypertension underwent renal angiography, followed by bilateral RSDN with a saline-irrigated RFA catheter. Ambulatory blood pressure recordings (24 h) were obtained at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Repeat renal angiography was performed during follow-up to assess for arterial stenosis or aneurysm. In 5 patients, pre- and post-procedural serum measures of renal function and sympathetic activity were obtained: aldosterone; metanephrine; normetanephrine; plasma renin activity; and creatinine.

RESULTS

Over a 6-month period: 1) the systolic/diastolic blood pressure decreased by -21/-11 mm Hg; 2) all patients experienced a decrease in systolic blood pressure of at least 10 mm Hg (range 10 to 40 mm Hg); 3) there was no evidence of renal artery stenosis or aneurysm at repeat angiography; and 4) there was a significant decrease in metanephrine (-12 ± 4, p = 0.003), normetanephrine (-18 ± 4, p = 0.0008), and aldosterone levels (-60 ± 33 ng/l, p = 0.02) at 3 months. There was no significant change in plasma renin activity (-0.2 mg/l/hod, p = 0.4). There was no significant change in serum creatinine (-1 mmol/l, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide the proof-of-principle that RSDN can be performed using an off-the-shelf saline-irrigated RFA catheter.

Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy

BACKGROUND

For patients who have a ventricular tachyarrhythmic event, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are a mainstay of therapy to prevent sudden death. However, ICD shocks are painful, can result in clinical depression, and do not offer complete protection against death from arrhythmia. We designed this randomized trial to examine whether prophylactic radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic ventricular tissue would reduce the incidence of ICD therapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients with a history of a myocardial infarction underwent defibrillator implantation for spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The patients did not receive antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients were randomly assigned to defibrillator implantation alone or defibrillator implantation with adjunctive catheter ablation (64 patients in each group). Ablation was performed with the use of a substrate-based approach in which the myocardial scar is mapped and ablated while the heart remains predominantly in sinus rhythm. The primary end point was survival free from any appropriate ICD therapy.

RESULTS

The mortality rate 30 days after ablation was zero, and there were no significant changes in ventricular function or functional class during the mean (+/-SD) follow-up period of 22.5+/-5.5 months. Twenty-one patients assigned to defibrillator implantation alone (33%) and eight patients assigned to defibrillator implantation plus ablation (12%) received appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing or shocks) (hazard ratio in the ablation group, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.78, P=0.007). Among these patients, 20 in the control group (31%) and 6 in the ablation group (9%) received shocks (P=0.003). Mortality was not increased in the group assigned to ablation as compared with the control group (9% vs. 17%, P=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial, prophylactic substrate-based catheter ablation reduced the incidence of ICD therapy in patients with a history of myocardial infarction who received ICDs for the secondary prevention of sudden death. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN62488166 [controlled-trials.com].).

Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial

AIMS

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvenous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead extraction with an electrosurgical dissection sheath (EDS) system in a single-centre experience. Methods Over 10 years, 462 patients have undergone transvenous lead extraction in our institution. From these, 120 consecutive patients (with 161 leads) were randomized to either radiofrequency (RF) current supported extraction or standard countertraction lead removal (60 patients in each arm, 96 men and 24 women). The mean age of randomized patients was 62.7 +/- 9.6 years. In 16 patients, we explanted 17 ICD leads. The average time from the date of implantation to the extraction procedure was 73.4 +/- 15.7 months. The most common reason for lead extraction was infection (95.6%). Results The complete extraction of 78 leads (93%) was achieved in the RF group and 56 leads (73%) with the standard transvenous lead extraction system by counter-traction (P < 0.01). Among these leads, we successfully removed nine of 10 ICD leads (90%) in the RF group and only four of seven ICD leads (57%) in the standard group. We also observed a significant reduction in the time taken for the successful removal of pacemaker and ICD leads using the RF system (9.6 +/- 6.2 min versus 21 +/- 9 min, P < 0.01). Partial success was achieved in six patients with the RF system and in 11 with standard sheaths. In those cases where we failed to remove the lead from the body we sent all but one patient to cardiac surgery. Serious complications were associated with the standard system in two patients, both of whom developed septic pulmonary embolization. Serious bleeding occurred in three patients, one with standard and two with the EDS lead extraction system.

CONCLUSION

The EDS extraction system is significantly more effective and quicker. However, the standard counter-traction method is still an effective alternative when used in a highly experienced centre.