Long Term Corneal Flattening After Corneal Crosslinking in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus

Purpose

We evaluate the long-term visual, refractive, and keratometric outcomes after corneal crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KC) and the incidence of an extreme corneal flattening effect.

Settings

Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Lima, Perú.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Forty-five eyes that underwent CXL with epithelial removal between June 2006 and September 2011. Data analysis was performed at preoperative evaluation, 1 year postoperatively, and at least 10 years or more postoperatively. Outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and Scheimpflug (Pentacam) analysis. Progression was defined by an increase in steep keratometry (Ks) of 1.5D or greater between 2 examinations. Extreme flattening effect was defined as a decrease in K values equal to or greater than 5 diopters (D).

Results

Mean follow-up time was 11 ± 1.07 years (range 10-13 years). There was a significant improvement in Ks, UCVA, CDVA, and spherical equivalent at the last visit. The overall rate of progression was 2.22% (1/45). Extreme flattening was observed in 15.5% (7/45) of the eyes, and this was associated with a loss of CDVA in 4.44% (2/45) of the eyes. One eye with corneal flattening of 11.5 D lost 7 lines of CDVA and required corneal transplantation.

Conclusion

CXL is a safe and effective procedure to stop the progression of KC with a good overall long-term success rate. Extreme corneal flattening may be more common than commonly recognized, and severe corneal flattening associated with a decrease in CDVA may occur.

Comparison of preoperative simulated and postoperative real safety distances using anterior segment OCT in patients with phakic IOL according to iris configuration

AIM: To compare the simulated safe distance (SSD) preoperatively versus real safe distance (RSD) postoperatively in patients with iris-claw phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation according to iris configuration. METHODS: Totally 60 eyes of 60 patients underwent pIOL implantation for surgical correction of myopia. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured with the IOLMaster 700, and nasal and temporal safety distances (SD) were measured pre- and postoperatively using Anterior Segment Visante-OCT. SD was defined as a line measured between the edge of the optic or its simulated image to the endothelium. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: convex, concave, and plane according to preoperatory iris configuration. Statistical analysis was performed using the R program, for the comparison of independent groups and multiple comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn test were used respectively. RESULTS: Mean difference between nasal preoperative SSD and postoperative RSD was -0.36±0.38, -0.29±0.48, and -0.18±0.30 mm in the concave, convex, and plane group, respectively. Mean difference between temporal SSD and RSD was -0.36±0.37, -0.14±0.38, and -0.24±0.33 mm in the concave, convex, and plane group, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between SSD and RSS for both nasal and temporal sides in the concave and plane group (P<0.002). CONCLUSION: Preoperative SSD and postoperative RSD for iris-claw pIOL shows significant differences in patients with concave and plane iris.