Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus

BACKGROUND

Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae.

METHODS

Participants were sent a survey via the online tool "Survey Monkey" consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

RESULTS

Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as 'appropriate'; four statements were considered 'uncertain', and ultimately finally discarded.

CONCLUSIONS

Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.

Treatment with IL5-/IL-5 receptor antagonists in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)

Purpose

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe delayed drug hypersensitivity reaction with exanthema, eosinophilia, and organ manifestations. After culprit drug withdrawal, systemic corticosteroids (CS) are the most widely used treatment, often requiring high doses for months. Blocking the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis with mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab is a promising targeted treatment with a good safety profile and no immunosuppressive effect. The aim of this study is to summarize current experience with the anti-IL5/IL-5-receptor therapy in DRESS.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with DRESS and treated with mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab in DRESS was performed. In addition, a PubMed-Medline search for publications on DRESS with anti-IL-5/IL‑5 receptor treatment was performed.

Results

Of the 14 cases identified, 6 patients were treated with mepolizumab, 6 with benralizumab, 1 patient with reslizumab, and 1 patient was switched from benralizumab to mepolizumab. The main indication for an IL‑5 blockade was a therapy-refractory course (7/14 [50.0%]), recurrent relapses (3/14 [21.4%]), and severe organ dysfunction (2/14 [14.3%]). In 13/14 (93%) cases, a rapid clinical improvement with suppression of eosinophilia and reduction of CS could be achieved. In all but two cases under mepolizumab (dose 100-600 mg) or reslizumab (dose according to body weight), two or more doses were necessary until resolution of DRESS. In 4/7 cases under benralizumab, a single 30 mg dose was sufficient.

Conclusion

Blockade of the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis appears to be a promising treatment in DRESS with fast clinical improvement, which may allow more rapid reduction of CS, and a good safety profile. In addition, a summary of recommendations on when to use blockade of the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis in DRESS treatment is provided.

Virus-Like Particles Are Efficient Tools for Boosting mRNA-Induced Antibodies

mRNA based vaccines against COVID-19 have proven most successful at keeping SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at bay in many countries. Recently, there is an increased interest in heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategies for COVID-19 to maintain antibody responses for the control of continuously emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs) and to overcome other obstacles such as supply shortage, costs and reduced safety issues or inadequatly induced immune-responses. In this study, we investigated the antibody responses induced by heterologous prime-boost with vaccines based on mRNA and virus-like particles (VLPs). The VLP-based mCuMV_TT-RBM vaccine candidate and the approved mRNA-1273 vaccine were used for this purpose. We find that homologous prime boost regimens with either mRNA or VLP induced high levels of high avidity antibodies. Optimal antibody responses were, however, induced by heterologous regimens both for priming with mRNA and boosting with VLP and vice versa, priming with VLP and boosting with mRNA. Thus, heterologous prime boost strategies may be able to optimize efficacy and economics of novel vaccine strategies.

Humoral response to mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with humoral immunodeficiency disease

OBJECTIVES

Although mRNA-based vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 induce a robust immune response and prevent infections and hospitalizations, there are limited data on the antibody response in individuals with humoral immunodeficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response after two vaccine doses with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in patients with humoral immunodeficiency disease.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed 39 individuals with hypogammaglobulinemia under immunoglobulin replacement therapy. IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies (anti-S) were measured 4 weeks to 4 months after two doses of an mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients, who developed a humoral immune response to the spike protein were evaluated and compared to 19 healthy controls.

RESULTS

After vaccination with two vaccine doses, 26/39 patients (66.7%) with humoral immunodeficiency disease and all healthy controls developed anti-S. In subjects with baseline IgG <3 g/l, only 1/5 (20%) showed a humoral immune response. 10 out of 26 with CVID (38.5%) and 7/9 under immunosuppressive drugs (77.8%) developed no immune response (13 subjects with no response) compared to 0/19 in healthy controls. Subgroup analysis in patients without immunosuppressive drugs revealed lower anti-S in patients with moderate to severe humoral immunodeficiency disease: baseline IgG <3 g/l: 12.0 AU/ml (95%CI 12.0-125.0), baseline IgG 3-5 g/l: 99.9 AU/ml (95%CI 14.4-400.0), baseline IgG >5 g/l: 151.5 AU/ml (95%CI 109.0-400.0), healthy controls 250.0 AU/ml (95%CI 209.0-358.0), p = 0.007.

CONCLUSION

In most patients with mild to moderate humoral immunodeficiency we found only slightly lower anti-S antibodies compared with healthy controls after two vaccine doses with BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. However, in patients with a decreased baseline IgG below 3 g/l and/or under immunosuppressive drugs, we found severely impaired humoral immune responses.

The Activation Pattern of Drug-Reacting T Cells Has an Impact on the Clinical Picture of Hypersensitivity Reactions

Rationale

β-lactam antibiotics cause drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) with various clinical pictures from minor affections like maculopapular exanthema (MPE) and urticaria to severe cutaneous adverse reactions and anaphylaxis. Currently, two different reactivity patterns have been shown to initiate an immune reaction by activating T cells—the hapten concept and the pharmacological interaction with immune receptor (p–i) concept.

Objectives

In this study, the relationship between the reactivity pattern of drug-reacting T cells of drug allergic patients and their clinical picture has been investigated.

Findings

Drug-reacting T-cell clones (TCCs) were isolated from patients hypersensitive to β-lactams. Analysis of their reactivity pattern revealed an exclusive use of the hapten mechanism for patients with immediate reactions and for patients of MPE. In patients suffering from drug reactions with eosinophils and systemic symptoms, a severe DHR, analysis of isolated drug-reacting TCC identified the p–i concept as the unique mechanism for T-cell activation.

Conclusions

The results show a shift from hapten pattern in mild allergic reactions to p–i pattern in severe life-threatening allergic reactions. They strongly argue against the current preclinical risk evaluation of new drugs based on the ability to form haptens.

A novel functional mast cell assay for the detection of allergies

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of allergic diseases has been hampered by the lack of safe and convenient tests to reliably identify culprit allergens and to closely follow changes in disease activity over time. Because allergy diagnosis is a complex and laborious multistep procedure, there is an urgent need for simpler but still functionally accurate ex vivo assays allowing objective diagnosis, substantiating treatment choices, and quantifying therapeutic responses.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we sought to develop a novel functional cell-based assay that relies on passive sensitization of allergic effector cells with patient serum, circumventing current limitations in allergy diagnosis.

METHODS

We genetically engineered a conditional homeobox B8 (Hoxb8)-immortalized progenitor line from the bone marrow of mice that are transgenic for the human high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRIα). These cells can be reproducibly differentiated into mature Hoxb8 mast cells within 5 days of culture in virtually unlimited numbers.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that the established Hoxb8 mast cell assay can be used to accurately measure total IgE levels, identify culprit allergens, longitudinally monitor allergen-specific immunotherapy, and potentially determine the time point of tolerance induction upon allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergy. To facilitate the analysis of large testing volumes, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept for a high-throughput screening application based on fluorescent cell barcoding using the engineered Hoxb8 mast cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that this novel mast cell assay could represent a valuable tool to support clinicians in the identification of IgE-mediated allergies and in the quantification of treatment efficacy as well as duration of therapeutic response.

[Cough from an allergological as well as from the ENT aspect]

Cough from an allergological as well as from the ENT aspect Abstract. Cough is a common problem in the allergological, but less so in the rhinological consultation. The differential diagnostic spectrum for cough is extensive and may range from rhinitis and asthma to eosinophilic esophagitis and rarer diseases. In the case of chronic cough (> 2 months), the four most frequent causes must be sought, or be excluded (upper airway cough syndrome, asthma [cough-variant-asthma], non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease). Aeroallergens such as pollen, house-dust mites or occupational substances play a major role in allergies. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for cough to be a main symptom of an antibody deficiency or a Sicca symptom complex. The more chronic the cough, the more thoroughly an investigation is indicated - often interdisciplinary. Therapy depends on the cause of the cough. In allergic respiratory diseases, allergy-specific immunotherapy may be indicated.

Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to orodispersible budesonide in a case with eosinophilic esophagitis

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease that has been known since the early 1990s. Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) belong to the therapeutic cornerstones. We describe a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to Jorveza®, a newly developed orodispersible budesonide tablet licensed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old Caucasian woman with EoE was newly treated with Jorveza®. Hours after the first intake, she felt a “strange pruritus” in the throat. This sensation worsened with each subsequent intake. On day 4 she developed oral mucosal symptoms (paresthesia of the tongue, sore and an itchy throat). Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic reaction were observed. Patch testing using two commercial test series as well as the orodispersible budesonide tablet revealed a strong sensitization, proving a T cell mediated allergy to budesonide.

Conclusions

Orodispersible budesonide is increasingly prescribed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The development of oropharyngeal symptoms after initiating should alert the treating physician to the possibility of a hypersensitivity reaction.

IgE-mediated chlorhexidine allergy-Cross-reactivity with other biguanide disinfectants

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely utilized disinfectant that can cause IgE-mediated urticaria/anaphylaxis. The cross-reactivity of patients with IgE-mediated CHX allergy with other disinfectants, which share structural similarities with CHX like polyhexanide (polyhexamethylene biguanide; PHMB), alexidine (ALX), or octenidine (OCT), is unknown.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with anaphylaxis or urticaria upon CHX exposure and positive skin prick test (SPT) and/or positive CHX ImmunoCAP test (Phadia TFS, Uppsala, Sweden) were recruited. IgE to the biguanide and/or hexamethylene structure was investigated with PHMB ImmunoCAP (n = 32) and by basophil activation tests (BAT) with CHX and ALX (n = 37). Inhibition tests of CHX and PHMB ImmunoCAPs by CHX, ALX, PHMB, and OCT were performed.

RESULTS

IgE reactivity to PHMB as surrogate marker for biguanide/hexamethylene reactivity was detected in 5/32 sera. Seven of 37 patients showed a positive BAT with ALX, but only under optimized conditions. Binding to CHX ImmunoCAP was inhibited by ALX in 1/32 sera, and binding to PHMB was blocked by ALX (1/5) and by OCT in another (1/5). In SPT, 9/10 patients were positive for CHX and 3 of them with ALX (only at highest concentration at 5 mg/mL). A further patient reacted primarily with OCT and showed IgE cross-reactivity with CHX, ALX, and PHMB.

CONCLUSION

The IgE response to CHX seems polyclonal. The chloroguanide ending of CHX is the main epitope for the IgE and is suitable as screening assay to detect CHX reactivity. IgE-reactivities with the biguanide or hexamethylene components of other disinfectants (ALX, PHMB) can be detected by SPT, PHMB ImmunoCAP, and ALX-BAT in 15%-33% of CHX-allergic patients.

Sensitization to Hymenoptera venom in pollen allergic patients: Frequency and involvement of cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants (CCD)

Sensitization to Hymenoptera venom in patients without a history of systemic allergic reactions to Hymenoptera stings is frequently found and can be due to the presence of specific IgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD). This study investigates 105 pollen allergic subjects for the presence of specific IgE to honeybee or wasp venom, pollen, the MUXF3 carbohydrate epitope from bromelain and recombinant Hymenoptera venom components. In addition, in a subgroup of patients (n = 10) a basophil activation test (BAT) using bee and wasp venom was performed. Specific IgE to Hymenoptera venom was detected in 45.7% of the pollen allergic subjects and in 26.7% of the non-atopic controls, both without a history of systemic allergic reactions to Hymenoptera stings. The high sensitization rate in atopic patients could partially be explained by cross-sensitization between pollen and Hymenoptera venom due to specific IgE to CCDs. In our study population, only 20% showed a sensitization to CCDs. Primary sensitization due to sting exposure, high total IgE values or unspecific binding and detection of low affinity antibodies in the test procedure could be reasons. Thus, determination of specific IgE to Hymenoptera venom in patients without a history of systemic allergic reactions as screening test is not recommended.

The role of drug, dose, and the tolerance/intolerance of new drugs in multiple drug hypersensitivity syndrome

BACKGROUND

Multiple drug hypersensitivity syndrome (MDH) is used to describe persons with a drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) to at least two chemically unrelated drugs, confirmed by skin test or in vitro assay.

METHODS

Medical records of 25 patients with MDH, tested and confirmed at our allergy division, were retrospectively evaluated in terms of clinical course, involved drugs, daily drug dose, latency periods, test results of skin test and cellular assays, and tolerated drugs in subsequent pharmacological treatments.

RESULTS

Multiple drug hypersensitivity syndrome almost exclusively appeared as a delayed, often severe DHR and started in 14/25 with a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Penicillins (13/25, 52.0%) and cephalosporins (6/25, 24.0%), typical high-dose drugs, were most often identified as elicitors of MDH, especially at the first DHR, followed by aromatic antiepileptics (7/25, 28.0%), vancomycin (4/25, 16.0%), and antibiotic sulfonamides (4/25, 16.0%). Cephalosporins, clindamycin, and radio contrast media (RCM) were mainly involved in subsequent DHR. The median daily drug dose of all drug trigger was 1875.0 mg (662.5; 2100.0) at the first DHR and 600.0 mg (300.0; 1300.0) at subsequent DHR, P = .0420.

CONCLUSION

High-dose drugs, especially beta-lactam antibiotics, RCM and clindamycin, are common elicitors of subsequent DHR in patients with MDH. Macrolides, quinolones, doxycycline, nonaromatic antiepileptics, and paracetamol were often tolerated. As the same drugs elicited both flare-up reactions and real DHR, drug-induced flare-up reactions may be precursors of a possible second DHR and MDH. The administration of highly dosed drugs should be avoided in patients at risk for MDH.

Das Kreuz mit der Kreuzallergie: Betalaktamantibiotika-Allergie

Zusammenfassung. Betalactamantibiotikaallergien sind die am häufigsten erwähnten Medikamentenallergien. In der Hausarztpraxis oder im Falle einer Hospitalisation äussern Patienten oft, an einer Penicillinallergie zu leiden, weswegen in diesen Fällen meist keine Betalactamantibiotika verwendet werden. Häufig handelt es sich bei einer vermeintlichen Allergie jedoch um Nebenwirkungen wie Diarrhoe, Nausea oder Bauchschmerzen. Der grösste Teil dieser Patienten verträgt Betalactamantibiotika ohne Probleme, weswegen eine allergologische Abklärung wichtig ist. Hierfür ist eine gute Anamnese und Dokumentation zentral, da Hautteste und in vitro Verfahren eine eingeschränkte Sensitivität haben. Ergänzend kann mittels Provokationstest eine fragliche Allergie oder alternative, potentiell kreuzreaktive Betalactamantibiotika in Hinblick auf ihre Verträglichkeit geprüft werden. Die Kreuzreaktivität mit Cephalosporinen, insbesondere der 3. Generation und höher, wird meist überschätzt. Kreuzreaktionen zu Carbapenemen sind selten.

7th drug hypersensitivity meeting: part one

Oral Abstracts

O1 Functionally distinct HMGB1 isoforms correlate with physiological processes in drug-induced SJS/TEN

Daniel F. Carr, Wen-Hung Chung, Rosalind E. Jenkiins, Mas Chaponda, Gospel Nwikue, Elena M. Cornejo Castro, Daniel J. Antoine, Munir Pirmohamed

O2 Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams, does the t cell recognition pattern influence the clinical picture?

Natascha Wuillemin, Dolores Dina, Klara K. Eriksson, Daniel Yerly

O3 Specific binding characteristics of HLA alleles associated with nevirapine hypersensitivity

Rebecca Pavlos, Elizabeth Mckinnin, David Ostrov, Bjoern Peters, Soren Buus, David Koelle, Abha Chopra, Craig Rive, Alec Redwood, Susana Restrepo, Austin Bracey, Jing Yuan, Silvana Gaudieri, Mary Carrington, David Haas, Simon Mallal, Elizabeth Phillips

O4 Do we need to measure total ige for the interpretation of analytical results of ImmunoCAP dnd 3gAllergy specific IgE?

Douwe De Boer, Paul Menheere, Chris Nieuwhof, Judith Bons

O5 Neutrophil activation in systemic anaphylaxis: results from the multicentric NASA study

Friederike Jonsson, Luc De Chaisemartin, Vanessa Granger, Caitlin Gillis, Aurelie Gouel, Catherine Neukirch, Fadia Dib, Pascale Roland Nicaise, Dan Longrois, Florence Tubach, Sylvie Martin, Pierre Bruhns, NASA Study Group

O6 Purpuric drug eruptions due to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a clinic-pathological study of 32 cases

Kai-Lung Chen, Shu-Ling Liao, Yi-Shuan Sheen, Yung-Tsu Cho, Che-Wen Yang, Jau-Yu Liau, Chia-Yu Chu

Poster presentations: Poster Walk 1—Anaphylaxis (P01–P09)

P1 Anaphylactic reactions during anaesthesia and the perioperative period

Rita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Natália Fernandes, Leonor Viegas, M. A. Pereira-Barbosa

P2 Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: is there a cross-reactivity to alexidine?

Antonia Bünter, Nisha Gupta, Tatjana Pecaric Petkovic, Nicole Wirth, Werner J. Pichler, Oliver Hausmann

P3 Cefotaxime-induced severe anaphylaxis in a neonate

Mehtap Yazicioglu, Pinar G. Ozdemir, Gokce Ciplak, Ozkan Kaya

P4 Clinical features and diagnosis of anaphylaxis resulting from exposure to chlorhexidine

Peter John Cooke

P5 Drug-induced anaphylaxis: five-year single-center survey

Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Filipe Benito-Garcia, Marta Chambel, Mário Morais-Almeida

P6 Intraoperative severe anaphylactic reaction due to patent blue v dye

Luis Marques, Eva Alcoceba, Silvia Lara

P7 Kounis syndrome in the setting of anaphylaxis to diclofenac

Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Carmen Botelho, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P8 Perioperative anaphylaxis audit: Royal Melbourne Hospital

Katherine Nicholls, William Lay, Olivia Smith, Christine Collins, Gary Unglik, Kymble Spriggs, Priscilla Auyeung, Jeremy McComish, Jo A. Douglass

P9 Recurrent peri-operative anaphylaxis: a perfect storm

Jonny G. Peter, Paul Potter

Poster Walk 2: DH regions and patient groups (P10–P19)

P10 A rare presentation of amoxicillin allergy in a young child

Fabrícia Carolino, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas

P11 Adverse drug reactions in children: antibiotics or virus?

Ana Sofia Moreira, Carmo Abreu, Eva Gomes

P12 Allergic reactions in invasive medical procedures

Bárbara Kong Cardoso, Elza Tomaz, Sara Correia, Filipe Inácio

P13 Antibiotic allergy in children: room for improvement

Annabelle Arnold, Natasha Bear, Kristina Rueter, Grace Gong, Michael O’Sullivan, Saravanan Muthusamy, Valerie Noble, Michaela Lucas

P14 Drug hypersensitivity reactions in children and results of diagnostic evaluation

Neringa Buterleviciute, Odilija Rudzeviciene

P15 Nonimmediate cutaneous drug reactions in children: are skin tests required?

Ana Sofia Moreira, Carmo Abreu, Eva Gomes

P16 Pediatric patients with a history of penicillin allergy and a positive penicillin skin test may not be at an increased risk for multiple drug allergies

Sara May, Thanai Pongdee, Miguel Park

P17 Proved hypersensitivity to drugs according data of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos

Linas Griguola, Arturas Vinikovas, Simona Kašinskaite, Violeta Kvedariene

P18 Self-reported prevalence of drug hypersensitivity reactions among students in Celal Bayar University, Turkey

Ayse Aktas, Suheyla Rahman, Huseyin Elbi, Beyhan Cengiz Ozyurt

P19 Severe drug hypersensitivity reactions in pediatric age

Ozlem Cavkaytar, Betul Karaatmaca, Pinar Gur Cetinkaya, Saliha Esenboga, Umit M. Sahiner, Bulent E. Sekerel, Ozge Soyer

Poster Walk 3: Desensitisation (P20–P28)

P20 A protocol for desensitisation to valaciclovir

Celia Zubrinich, Bianca Tong, Mittal Patel, Michelle Giles, Robyn O’Hehir, Robert Puy

P21 A rare case of desensitization to modafinil

Josefina Cernadas, Luís Amaral, Fabrícia Carolino

P22 A sixteen-day desensitization protocol in delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to oral drugs

Semra Demir, Asli Gelincik, Muge Olgac, Raif Caskun, Derya Unal, Bahauddin Colakoglu, Suna Buyukozturk

P23 Desensitization to intravenous etoposide using a 12 and a 13-step protocol. Two cases report

Olga Vega Matute, Amalia Bernad, Gabriel Gastaminza, Roselle Madamba, Carlos Lacasa, M. J. Goikoetxea, Carmen D’Amelio, Jose Rifón, Nicolas Martínez, Marta Ferrer

P24 Drug desensitisation in oncology: the experience of an immunoallergology department for 5 years

Carmelita Ribeiro, Emília Faria, Cristina Frutuoso, Anabela Barros, Rosário Lebre, Alice Pego, Ana Todo Bom

P25 Filgrastim anaphylaxis: a successful desensitization protocol

Luis Amaral, Josefina Cernadas

P26 Galsulfase hypersensitivity and desensitization of a mucopolysaccharidosis VI patient

Luis Felipe Ensina, Carolina Aranda, Ines Camelo Nunes, Ana Maria Martins, Dirceu Solé

P27 Rapid drug desensitization with biologicals: one-center experience with four biologicals

Sevim Bavbek, Resat Kendirlinan, Pamir Çerçi, Seda Tutluer, Sadan Soyyigit, Zeynep Çelebi Sözener, Ömür Aydin, Reyhan Gümüsburun

P28 Successful desensitization to a high dose of methotrexate in a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction

Josefina Cernadas, Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Fabrícia Carolino, Marta Almeida

Poster Walk 4: SJS (P29–P38)

P29 Assessment of impact of infection on drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions and rhabdomyolysis using the Japanese adverse drug event report database

Kimie Sai, Takuya Imatoh, Ryosuke Nakamura, Chisato Fukazawa, Yasushi Hinomura, Yoshiro Saito

P30 Characterization of erythema multiforme and severe cutaneous adverse reactions hospitalizations

Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Cláudia Correia, Lídia Gomes, Sara Gil-Mata, Luís Araújo, Luís Delgado

P31 Effects of infection on incidence/severity of SJS/TEN and myopathy in Japanese cases analyzed by voluntary case reports

Ryosuke Nakamura, Kimie Sai, Takuya Imatoh, Yoshimi Okamoto-Uchida, Koji Kajinami, Kayoko Matsunaga, Michiko Aihara, Yoshiro Saito

P32 Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor—a antagonists in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a randomized controlled trial and immunosuppressive effects evaluation

Chuang-Wei Wang, Shih-Chi Su, Shuen-Iu Hung, Hsin-Chun Ho, Chih-Hsun Yang, Wen-Hung Chung

P33 Evolution of drug causality in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Europe: analysis of 10 years RegiSCAR-Study

Maren Paulmann, Ariane Dunant, Maja Mockenhaupt, Peggy Sekula, Martin Schumacher, Sylvia Kardaun, Luigi Naldi, Teresa Bellón, Daniel Creamer, Cynthia Haddad, Bruno Sassolas, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore, Jean-Claude Roujeau

P34 Long-term sequelae in patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a 5-year analysis

Maren Paulmann, Carmen Kremmler, Peggy Sekula, Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore, Luigi Naldi, Sylvia Kardaun, Maja Mockenhaupt

P35 Major emotional complications and decreased health related quality of life among survivors of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Anthony Feinstein, Rena Hashimoto, Raed Alhusayen, Sonia Whyte-Croasdaile, Yaron Finkelstein, Marjorie Burnett, Shachar Sade, Robert Cartotto, Marc Jeschke, Neil H. Shear

P36 Retrospective analysis of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japanese patients: treatment and outcome

Naoko Takamura, Yumiko Yamane, Setsuko Matsukura, Kazuko Nakamura, Yuko Watanabe, Yukie Yamaguchi, Takeshi Kambara, Zenro Ikezawa, Michiko Aihara

P37 Severe physical complications among survivors of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Rena Hashimoto, Hall Chew, Raed Alhusayen, Sonia Whyte-Croasdaile, Yaron Finkelstein, Marjorie Burnett, Shachar Sade, Robert Cartotto, Marc Jeschke, Neil H. Shear

P38 Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis combined with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a case report

Brittany Knezevic, Una Nic Ionmhain, Allison Barraclough, Michaela Lucas, Matthew Anstey

Poster Walk 5: Other organs/unexpected immune reactions (P39–P47)

P39 A case report of patient with anti-tuberculosis drug-related severe liver failure

Toru Usui, Xiaoli Meng, John Farrell, Paul Whitaker, John Watson, Neil French, Kevin Park, Dean Naisbitt

P40 Acute interstitial nephritis induced by ibuprofen

Ana Castro Neves, Susana Cadinha, Ana Moreira, J. P. Moreira Da Silva

P41 Cetuximab induced acneiform rash—two case reports

Daniela Ledic Drvar, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Suzana Ljubojevic Hadzavdic, Romana Ceovic

P42 Enteropathy associated with losartan

Ana Montoro De Francisco, Talía De Vicente Jiménez, Amelia García Luque, Natalia Rosado David, José Mª Mateos Galván

P43 Granuloma annulare after therapy with canakinumab

Razvigor Darlenski

P44 Hypersensitivity eosinophilic myocarditis or acute coronary syndrome? Case report

Dario Gulin, Jozica Sikic, Jasna Cerkez Habek, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Edvard Galic

P45 Piperacillin-induced immune haemolytic anaemia: a severe and frequent complication of antibiotic treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis

Philip Specht, Doris Staab, Beate Mayer, Jobst Roehmel

P46 Progesterone triggered pemphigus foliaceus: case report

Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Caius Solovan, Anca Chiriac

P47 Ramipril: triggered generalized pustular psoriasis

Paola Djurinec, Kresimir Kostovic, Mirna Bradamante, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Romana Ceovic

Poster Walk 6: NSAIDs (P48–P56)

P48 Aspirin desensitization in cardiovascular disease—Portuguese experience

Jose Pedro Almeida, Joana Caiado, Elisa Pedro, Pedro Canas Da Silva, Manuel Pereira Barbosa

P49 Asthma and/or rhinitis to NSAIDs with good tolerance to ASA

Gador Bogas, Natalia Blanca-López, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Inmaculada Doña, José Augusto Agúndez, Elena García-Martín, José Antonio Cornejo-García, Cristobalina Mayorga, María José Torres, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P50 Clinical characteristics of 196 patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) hypersensitivity

Sengül Aksakal, Aytül Zerrin Sin, Zeynep Peker Koç, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Ömür Ardeniz, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Okan Gülbahar, Ali Kokuludag

P51 Development of immediate hypersensitivity to several NSAIDs maintaining good tolerance to ASA

Natalia Pérez-Sánchez, Natalia Blanca-López, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Gador Bogas, Inmaculada Doña, María Salas, María José Torres, Miguel Blanca, Gabriela Canto

P52 Diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol in a large series of cases

Inmaculada Doña, Maria Salas, Francisca Gomez, Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Perez-Alzate, Gador Bogas, Esther Barrionuevo, Maria Jose Torres, Inmaculada Andreu, Miguel Ángel Miranda, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P53 Hypersensitivity to paracetamol according to the new classification of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs

Gabija Didžiokaite, Olesia Gaidej, Simona Kašinskaite, Violeta Kvedariene

P54 Ibuprofen and other aryl propionic derivates can induce immediate selective hypersensitivity responses

Diana Perez-Alzate, Natalia Blanca-López, Maria Isabel Garcimartin, Inmaculada Doña, Maria Luisa Somoza, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Gador Bojas, Jose Antonio Cornejo-Garcia, Maria Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P55 Subjects developing immediate responses to several NSAIDs can be selective with good tolerance to ASA

Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Francisco Javier Ruano Perez, Inmaculada Doña, Maria Luisa Somoza, Inmaculada Andreu, Miguel Angel Miranda, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Jose Antonio Cornejo-Garcia, Miguel Blanca, Maria Gabriela Canto

P56 Utility of low-dose oral aspirin challenges for diagnosis of aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Elina Jerschow, Teresa Pelletier, Zhen Ren, Golda Hudes, Marek Sanak, Esperanza Morales, Victor Schuster, Simon D. Spivack, David Rosenstreich

Poster Walk 7: NSAID 2 (P57–P65)

P57 Alternate regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) MRNA expression may predispose patients to aspirin-induced exacerbations

Renato Erzen, Mira Silar, Nissera Bajrovic, Matija Rijavec, Mihaela Zidarn, Peter Korosec

P58 Anaphylaxis to diclofenac: what about the underlying mechanism?

Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Fabrícia Carolino, Luís Amaral, Carmen Botelho, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P59 COX-2 inhibitors: are they always a safe alternative in hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

Luis Amaral, Fabricia Carolino, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P60 Management of patients with history of NSAIDs reactions prior to coronary angioplasty

Mona Al-Ahmad, Tito Rodriguez

P61 Oral drug challenge with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug under spirometric control: clinical series of 110 patients

João Pedro Azevedo, Emília Faria, Beatriz Tavares, Frederico Regateiro, Ana Todo-Bom

P62 Prevalence and incidence of analgesic hypersensitivity reactions in Colombia

Pablo Andrés Miranda, Bautista De La Cruz Hoyos

P63 Recent endoscopic sinus surgery lessens reactions during aspirin challenge in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Teresa Pelletier, Waleed Abuzeid, Nadeem Akbar, Marc Gibber, Marvin Fried, Weiguo Han, Taha Keskin, Robert Tamayev, Golda Hudes, Simon D. Spivack, David Rosenstreich, Elina Jerschow

P64 Safe use of imidazole salycilate in a case of multiple NSAIDs induced urticaria-angioedema

Elisa Boni, Marina Russello, Marina Mauro

P65 Selective hypersensitivity reactions to ibuprofen—seven years experience

Marta Ferreira Neto

Poster Walk 8: Epidemiological methods (P66–P72)

P66 Allopurinol hypersensitivity: a 7-year review

Lise Brosseron, Daniela Malheiro, Susana Cadinha, Patrícia Barreira, J. P. Moreira Da Silva

P67 Antibiotic allergy labelling is associated with increased hospital readmission rates in Australia

Brittany Knezevic, Dustin Sprigg, Michelle Trevenen, Jason Seet, Jason Trubiano, William Smith, Yogesh Jeelall, Sandra Vale, Richard Loh, Andrew Mclean-Tooke, Michaela Lucas

P68 Experts’ opinions on severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions-report of a survey from the 9th international congress on cutaneous adverse drug reactions 2015

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Wen-Hung Chung, Neil H. Shear

P69 HLA-A*31-positive AGEP with carbamazepine use and other severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) detected by electronic medical records screening

Sabine Müller, Ursula Amstutz, Lukas Jörg, Nikhil Yawalkar, Stephan Krähenbühl

P70 Patients with suspected drug allergy: a specific psychological profile?

Eunice Dias-Castro, Ana Leblanc, Laura Ribeiro, Josefina R. Cernadas

P71 Use of an electronic device and a computerized mathematic algorithm to detect the allergic drug reactions through the analysis of heart rate variability

Arantza Vega, Raquel Gutierrez Rivas, Ana Alonso, Juan Maria Beitia, Belén Mateo, Remedios Cárdenas, Juan Jesus Garcia-Dominguez

P72 Variation in ERAP influences risk for HLA-B*57:01 positive abacavir hypersensitivity

Rebecca Pavlos, Kaija Strautins, Ian James, Simon Mallal, Alec Redwood, Elizabeth Phillips

Poster Walk 9: DRESS/AGEP (P73–P81)

P73 A clinical case of DRESS syndrome in a child after administration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid

Rita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Ana Neves, Maria Do Céu Machado, M. A. Pereira-Barbosa

P74 Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) induced by mesalazine, reliable and oftenly used drug to treat inflammatory bowel disease

Ceyda Tunakan Dalgiç, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Gökten Bulut, Fatma Ömür Ardeniz, Okan Gülbahar, Ali Kokuludag, Aytül Zerrin Sin

P75 Changes of blood plasmacytoid dendritic cells, myeloid dendritic cells, and basophils during the acute stage of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and other drug eruptions

Shao-Hsuan Hsu, Yung-Tsu Cho, Che-Wen Yang, Kai-Lung Chen, Chia-Yu Chu

P76 Characterization of isoniazid/rifampicin-specific t-cell responses in patients with DRESS syndrome

Young-Min Ye, Gyu-Young Hur, Hae-Sim Park, Seung-Hyun Kim

P77 DRESS syndrome secondary to sulfasalazine with delayed TEN: a case presentation

Syed Ali, Michaela Lucas, Peter N. Hollingsworth, Andrew P. C. Mclean-Tooke

P78 Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) features according to the culprit drug

Zohra Chadly, Nadia Ben Fredj, Karim Aouam, Haifa Ben Romdhane, Naceur A. Boughattas, Amel Chaabane

P79 Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms induced by allopurinol: not always easy to diagnose

Marina Lluncor Salazar, Beatriz Pola, Ana Fiandor, Teresa Bellón, Elena Ramírez, Javier Domínguez Ortega, Santiago Quirce, Rosario Cabañas

P80 Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome induced by two drugs simultaneously: a case report

Krasimira Baynova, Marina Labella, Manuel Prados

P81 The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by the second-line antituberculosis drugs and Epstein–Barr virus infection

Agne Ramonaite, Ieva Bajoriuniene, Brigita Sitkauskiene, Raimundas Sakalauskas

Poster Walk 10: Miscellaneous drug hypersensitivity (P82–P91)

P82 A case of cycloserine-induced lichenoid drug eruption confirmed with a lymphocatye transformation test

Jae-Woo Kwon, Shinyoung Park

P83 Allergic reaction to topical eye drops: 5 years’ retrospective study in a drug allergy unit

Diana Silva, Leonor Carneiro Leão, Fabricia Carolino, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P84 Allergy to heparins

Diana Perez-Alzate, Natalia Blanca-López, Maria Luisa Somoza Alvarez, Maria Garcimartin, Maria Vazquez De La Torre, Francisco Javier Ruano Pérez, Elisa Haroun, Gabriela Canto Diez

P85 Allopurinol-induced adverse drug reactions

Katinka Ónodi-Nagy, Ágnes Kinyó, Lajos Kemény, Zsuzsanna Bata-Csörgo

P86 Analysis of a population with immediate hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: an 11 year review

Joana Sofia Pita, Emília Faria, Rosa Anita Fernandes, Ana Moura, Nuno Sousa, Carmelita Ribeiro, Carlos Loureiro, Ana Todo Bom

P87 Anaphylaxis against mivacurium in a 12-months old boy at first-time exposure

Wolfgang Pfützner

P88 Antihistamine-exacerbated chronic spontaneous urticaria: a paradox?

Nadine Marrouche, Clive Grattan

P89 Anti-osteoporotic agents-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Asians

Yu-En Chen, Chun-Bing Chen, Wen-Hung Chung, Yu-Ping Hsiao, Chia-Yu Chu

P90 Diagnosis of allergic reactions to eye drops

Maria Vazquez De La Torre, Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Perez-Alzate, Maria Isabel Garcimartin, Francisco Javier Ruano, Maria Luisa Somoza, Elisa Haroun, Gabriela Canto

P91 Diagnostic approach in suspected hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids

Fabrícia Carolino, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas

[18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer: value in primary staging and follow-up]

Positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) is a encouraging imaging technique allowing a highly sensitive whole-body search for malignant foci detected by their increased glucose metabolism compared with benign tissues. Several studies are now available that indicate its added value for diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer. In all, patient management seems to be changed in 20-30% of patients who undergo Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in addition to standard staging procedures. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is also useful in monitoring radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Regarding preoperative staging of primary colorectal cancer the literature is very limited.

[F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in colorectal carcinoma]

Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) with the radiolabeled glucose analog F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) is a sensitive diagnostic tool that images tumors based on increased uptake of glucose. Several recent publications have shown that F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography is more sensitive than computed-tomography (CT) in detecting colorectal cancer. In patients with increasing CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) and no evidence of recurrent disease on CT F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography often detects recurrent cancer. In all, patient management seems to be changed in about 25% of patients who undergo F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in addition to standard staging procedure. Limited reports to date on both chemotherapy and radiotherapy support the role of F-18-fluorodexyglucose-positron emission tomography in assessing treatment response. Also regarding preoperative staging of primary colorectal cancer the literature is very limited.

[The value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose in positron emission tomography diagnosis of breast carcinoma]

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG-PET) has become an important issue in the diagnosis of malignant tumors within the last years. In breast cancer PET has been established in the diagnosis of the primary tumor as well as in recurrences with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 75%-100%; additional a sensitivity of more than 90% and a specificity of about 75% is also seen in axillary lymph nodes detection. With our own results we were able to prove sensitivity of positron emission tomography in diagnosing the primary lesion, locoregional lymph nodes and the staging of metastases. Furthermore, positron emission tomography seems to be superior to conventional imaging modalities in staging primary and recurrent breast cancer, distant metastases and lymph nodes outside the axilla.