[Prevention of postoperative adhesions]

Postoperative adhesions represent a common consequence in patients who underwent abdominal or pelvic surgery. Such adhesions can be asymptomatic, but they can cause complications such as chronic abdomino-pelvic pain, secondary infertility, an increase in bowel obstruction risk and more complexity for future surgery, including longer surgery times and an increase in morbidity. Normally, adhesions appear after offences against the peritoneum, causing flogosys, and develop both in new sites, previously not involved, and in sites already interested in adhesiolysis. Previous laparotomy is an important risk factor, as after laparatomy a minimum of 93% of patients present adhesions during a following surgery. Furthermore, the rate of recurrence after adhesiolysis is 85%. Among several strategies employed, valid prevention methods are: using minimally invasive surgery techniques, reducing the incision area, containing tissue dehydration during surgery and an accurate hemostasis. Also, for preventing and reducing adhesions, the usage of NSAIDs, fibrinolytics and anticoagulants, as well as the application of substances acting as a physical barrier, have been proposed. Recently, crystalloid solutions have been introduced, using the hydro-flotation principle for intraperitoneal organs. This research aims to analyze causes and epidemiology for postoperative adhesions, with particular regard to gynecological operations and to describe and compare the means available to prevent them.

[The role of laparoscopy in ovarian carcinoma]

The role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers is continuously expanding. Although few trials have focused on the safety of laparoscopy in oncology, laparoscopy is now widely used for most gynecological malignancies. Laparoscopy is widely used to manage benign ovarian masses, but its role in managing ovarian cancer still needs to be defined. The role of laparoscopy in ovarian cancer surgery may be divided into three following categories: 1) laparoscopic staging of apparent early ovarian cancer; 2) laparoscopic assessment of disease extent and potential for resectability; 3) laparoscopic reassessment, or second-look operation, or rule out recurrence. Laparoscopic approach has shown several advantages like a reduction in operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, and total hospital charges. The limitations of laparoscopic practice include inadequate port-site metastasis, tumour dissemination due to cyst rupture and incomplete staging. In addition, there were limitations in performing extensive laparoscopic sampling of areas of tumor persistence including retroperitoneal lymph nodes. In literature there are no randomized studies assessing the use of laparoscopy in the management of ovarian cancer. Moreover, most of the studies in literature comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy are carried out by surgeons specialized in one of two approaches, so that the results can not be compared.