Disability, support and long-term social care of an elderly Spanish population, 2008-2009: an epidemiologic analysis

BACKGROUND

Though poorly known, relationships between disability, need of help (dependency) and use of social services are crucial aspects of public health. The objective of this study was to describe the links between disability, officially assessed dependency, and social service use by an industrial population, and identify areas of inequity.

METHODS

We took advantage of a door-to-door survey conducted in the Cinco Villas district, Spain, in 2008-2009, which provided data on disability, morbidity, and service use among 1216 residents aged ≥50 years, and officially assessed dependency under the 2006 Dependency Act (OAD). Using logistic regression, we combined data collected at homes/residences on 625 disability screened-positive participants, and administrative information on degree of OAD and benefits at date of visit.

RESULTS

Based on 163 disabled persons, the prevalence of residential/community-care users was 13.4% overall, with 6.0% being market-provided, 2.5% supported by the 2006 Act, and 4.9% supported by other public funds. Of 111 OAD applicants, 30 had been assigned an OAD degree; in 29 cases this was the highest OAD degree, with 12 receiving direct support for residential care and 17 receiving home care. Compared to unassessed dependency, the highest OAD degree was linked to residential care (OR and 95% CI) 12.13 (3.86-38.16), declared non-professional care 10.99 (1.28-94.53), and publicly-funded, non-professional care 26.30 (3.36-205.88). In contrast, 43 persons, 58% of the severely/extremely disabled, community-dwelling sample population, 81% of whom were homebound, including 10 persons with OAD but no implemented service plan, made no use of any service, and of these, 40% lacked a non-professional carer.

CONCLUSIONS

Formal service use in the Cinco Villas district attained ratios observed for established welfare systems but the publicly-funded proportion was lower. The 2006 Act had a modest, albeit significant, impact on support for non-professional carers and residential care, coexisting with a high prevalence of non-use of social services by severely disabled persons.

Analysis of disability using WHODAS 2.0 among the middle-aged and elderly in Cinco Villas, Spain

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of disability, as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), among the middle-aged and elderly population is poorly known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine disability prevalence in a resident population sample aged ≥50 years, in the Cinco Villas district, Spain, from June 2008 through June 2009.

METHODS

We used the WHODAS 2.0 36-item questionnaire to quantify the prevalence of disability, globally and by domain, together with a 13-item combined measure of three domains, Getting around, Self-care and Life activities, claimed to reflect the need of integrated services. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses of the relationship between disability and different variables using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Disability was detected by global WHODAS score in 604 of a total of 1214 persons, i.e., a prevalence of 49.8% 95% CI (46.9-52.5), with the corresponding figures for mild, moderate, severe, and extreme disability being 26.8%, 16.0%, 7.6% and 0.1%, respectively. Disability increased with age, was higher among women, and for specific domains. Prevalence of severe/extreme disability among women vs. men was as follows: Getting around, 26.8% vs. 12.1%; Life activities, 25.2% vs. 6.8%; and Self-care, 9.5% vs. 6.0%. Disability was more frequent among subjects diagnosed with dementia, chronic liver disease, severe mental disease, and stroke. The abovementioned 13-item measure yielded prevalence figures for disability levels quite similar to those obtained using 36-item scores.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, this study furnishes detailed disability prevalence figures and data on associated variables in a middle-aged and elderly Western population.