Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and the benefit of adding celecoxib (C) to irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine regimens compared with placebo (P).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI: irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 15 and 22); FA (200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29 and 30); 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus, then 22-h, 600 mg/m(2) infusion) or CAPIRI: irinotecan (250 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion on days 1 and 22); capecitabine p.o. (1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-15 and 22-36). Patients were additionally randomly assigned to receive either placebo or celecoxib (800 mg: 2 x 200 mg b.i.d.).

RESULTS

The trial was closed following eight deaths unrelated to disease progression in the 85 enrolled (629 planned) patients. Response rates were 22% for CAPIRI + C, 48% for CAPIRI + P, 32% for FOLFIRI + C and 46% for FOLFIRI + P. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were shorter for CAPIRI versus FOLFIRI (PFS 5.9 versus 9.6 months and OS 14.8 versus 19.9 months) and celecoxib versus placebo (PFS 6.9 versus 7.8 months and OS 18.3 versus 19.9 months).

CONCLUSION

Due to the small sample size following early termination, no definitive conclusions can be drawn in relation to the noninferiority of CAPIRI compared with FOLFIRI.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of OSI-7904L, a liposomal thymidylate synthase inhibitor in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

OSI-7904L is a liposomal formulation of a potent thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor. This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of OSI-7904L administered in combination with oxaliplatin every 21 days in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

METHOD

A 3+3 study design was utilized at predefined dose levels. Polymorphisms in the TS enhancer region and XPD enzyme were investigated as potential predictors of efficacy and toxicity.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received 76 cycles of treatment. At the highest dose level (OSI-7904L 9 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) investigated, one of nine patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 oral mucositis with cycle 1 and five further patients required dose reductions. The toxicity profile of stomatitis, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, sensory neuropathy and skin rash was consistent with that expected for a TS inhibitor/oxaliplatin combination regimen. PK analysis showed high interpatient variability with no detectable interaction between OSI-7904L and oxaliplatin. Partial radiological responses were documented in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended regimen for further investigation is OSI-7904L 9 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2).

Capecitabine plus irinotecan versus 5-FU/FA/irinotecan ± celecoxib in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Long-term results of the prospective multicenter EORTC phase III study 40015

3577

Background: Oral fluoropyrimidines in combination with irinotecan may be an alternative to infusional 5-FU/FA+irinotecan. Cox-2 inhibitors may enhance the antineoplastic activity of chemotherapy (CT). Methods: Patients with ECOG PS<2, age>18 and measurable disease were randomised in a 2×2 factorial design to FOLFIRI (Douillard’s regimen) or capecitabine 2×1g/m2 d1–14 plus irinotecan 250mg/m2 d1, qd22 (CAPIRI), and to daily celecoxib 2x400mg (C) or placebo (P). 692 patients were planned to compare PFS as primary endpoint. The trial was suspended after 85 pts (44 CAPIRI and 41 FOLFIRI) due to the occurrence of 8 fatal events unrelated to disease progression (Köhne, ASCO 2005, A3525). Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Three pts did not start treatment. Of the pts who started CT, 53% (23/43) in the CAPIRI and 33% (13/39) in the FOLFIRI arms required a dose reduction. Grade ≥3 diarrhoea occurred in 37% (16/43) and 13 % (4/39) on CAPIRI and FOLFIRI, respectively. Median number of CT cycles: 3 (CAPIRI) and 5 (FOLFIRI). Median dose intensity for irinotecan: 83% (CAPIRI) and 85% (FOLFIRI). Response rate (RR): 5/23 (22%) in CAPIRI+C, 10/21 (48%) in CAPIRI+P, 6/19 (32%) in FOLFIRI+C and 10/22 (45%) in FOLFIRI+C. RR for CAPIRI vs FOLFIRI: 15/44 (34%) versus 16/41 (39%), RR for Celecoxib vs Placebo: 11/42 (26%) vs. 20/43 (46 %). Median PFS: 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.4–8.9) with CAPIRI vs 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.9–11.8) with FOLFIRI (HR=1.31, 95%CI: 0.8–2.1), and 6.9 months (95% CI: 5.5–10.4) with C vs 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.0–12.0) with P (HR=1.1, 95%CI: 0.7–1.8). Median OS: 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.7–18.3) with CAPIRI vs 19.9 months (95% CI: 18.9-n.a.) with FOLFIRI (HR=3.2, 95%CI: 1.4–7.3), and 18.3 months (95% CI: 10.2-n.a.) with C versus 19.9 months (95% CI: 16.7-n.a.) with P (HR=1.25, 95%CI: 0.6–2.6). Conclusions: The data suggest that celecoxib might reduce response to CT and this warrants further preclinical investigation. The stratified analysis failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of CAPIRI as compared to FOLFIRI. Small sample size and confounding safety issues prevent us from drawing definitive conclusions. Results of larger studies would be needed.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Preliminary pharmacogenetic evaluation of toxicity data in the prospective multicentre EORTC trial 40015 in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)

3072

Background: EORTC phase III study 40015 was initiated in 2003 to compare capecitabine (C) + irinotecan (CPT-11) vs 5FU/LV/irinotecan ± celecoxib in 1st line treatment of mCRC. The study was suspended after enrollment of 85 pts due to 8 fatal events not related to disease progression, 4 of which included thrombo-embolic events. Purpose: To test whether genetic polymorphisms involved in metabolism of the drugs are related to the increased toxicity observed in the study. Methods: 71 pts signed informed consent for genetic analyses and material was available for 58 pts. DNA was extracted from normal colonic mucosa or peripheral leukocytes. Polymorphisms were determined using PCR-based RFLP and direct sequencing. Genotypes known to be associated with increased toxicity (diarrhea, mucositis, leucopenia) were classified as unfavorable. Results: Unfavorable genotypes were distributed equally between C+CPT-11 and LV/5FU+CPT-11 arms. Baseline characteristics and treatment duration were similar in the pts with or without unfavorable genotypes. Unfavorable genotypes of thymidylate synthase (TS-5; TS-3) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) were associated with increased grade 3/4 toxicity. 18/35 (51%) pts with unfavorable UGT1A1 genotype experienced toxicity grade 3/4 compared to 3/23 (13%) pts with favorable genotype. 16/36 pts (44%) with unfavorable TS-5 genotype showed toxicity grade 3/4 compared to 5/22 (23%) pts with favorable genotype. Toxicity grade 3/4 was observed in 18/41 (44%) pts with unfavorable TS-3 genotype and 3/17 (18%) pts with favorable genotype. Increasing grade 3/4 toxicity rates were observed in the pts expressing 0/1 (2/16 [13%]), 2 (7/24 [29%]) or 3 (12/16 [75%]) unfavorable genotype(s) (p=0.0001). Among the 4 pts who died of a thrombo-embolic event, only one has been analysed at this stage and showed a Factor (V) Leiden mutation linked to 10-fold increased risk for thrombo-embolic events. Analyses are ongoing and complete data will be available for presentation. Conclusion: Our data suggest an association between polymorphisms of TS and UGT1A1 and toxicity. No differences of pharmacogenetic patterns were observed that could explain the increased rate of fatal events in the C/CPT-11 arm.

[Table: see text]

Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM). Interim results of EORTC Intergroup randomized phase III study 40983

3500

Background: After resection of LM, 5y survival is 30%, but cancer recurrence is frequent. The benefit of combining surgery and CT has not yet formally been proven. Methods: This study evaluates the value of pre- and postoperative CT in patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Between September 2000 and July 2004, 364 patients were randomized between peri-operative FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 and LV5FU2), 6 cycles before and 6 cycles after surgery (182 patients), and surgery alone (182 patients). The primary endpoint was progression free survival. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate tumor response to pre-operative treatment and determine if CT induces a tumor size reduction. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms: median age: 62.5 yrs, prior adjuvant CT: 41.8%, 1 to 3 metastases: 92.3%, T3 or T4: 80.8%. In the CT arm, 97.7% of the patients were documented to have completed pre-operative CT (81.5% received 6 preoperative cycles). 28.9% of the patients who started pre-operative CT required a dose reduction. Of all patients entered in the trial, 88.3% and 94.9% underwent surgery in the CT and surgery arms, respectively. Resection was achieved in 95.6% of the patients operated (84.4% of all patients) in the CT arm, and 89.2% of the patients operated (84.7% of all patients) in the surgery arm. As previously reported, preoperative chemotherapy was safely administered. From imaging data (CT scan), median sum of largest diameters of lesions was 45 mm [Q1-Q3:28.0–70.0] (both arms) before treatment and decreased to 30 mm [Q1-Q3: 15.0–55.0] after CT (median relative difference of 29.7%). At pathological examination, median sum of largest diameters of lesions was 34.5 mm [Q1-Q3:20.0–53.0] in the CT arm and 45 mm [Q1-Q3: 29.0–69.0] in the surgery arm. Conclusions: CT scan measurements were consistent with those performed at pathological examination. Pre-operative CT with 6 cycles of FOLFOX4 resulted in a decrease in diameter of lesions. Since size of metastases at time of surgery is known to have an impact on survival, it is possible that preoperative chemotherapy will improve survival. Survival data should be available at the end of 2006.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Results of a feasibility study (EORTC 30001)

The aim of this open, non-randomised, 2-stage feasibility study was to determine whether radical prostatectomy (RP) was safe and could provide cure for good prognosis patients with clinical T3 prostate cancer, in a multicentre setting. Cure was defined as a 3 months post-operative of undetectable serum PSA in combination with the presence of pathologically negative margins in the surgical specimen. Forty patients were enrolled of whom 38 were eligible. Six patients (5 pN+ and 1 pNx) did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded leaving 32 evaluable pN0 patients of whom 19 (59.4%, SE=4.26) achieved a complete response (CR) and in whom only two serious toxic events (STEs) were observed. The results of the first phase of the study passed the toxicity criteria (<3 STE's) but failed on the cure rate (>20 CRs). This resulted in discontinuation of the study after the first stage. The main reason for failure was the incidence of positive margins in the resected specimen. Although the study was stopped after the first phase, 28 of the 32 pN0 patients (87.5%) had undetectable serum PSA at 3 months. We continue to believe that RP with extensive resection can be beneficial as monotherapy for T3aN0M0 prostate cancer.

Phase III trial of satraplatin, an oral platinum plus prednisone vs. prednisone alone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Satraplatin is a novel oral platinum (IV) complex that shows activity against hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in cisplatin-resistant human tumor lines in phase I and phase II trials. A randomized multicenter phase III trial with a target sample size of 380 patients was initiated in men with HRPC. After 50 randomized patients, the trial was closed to further accrual by the sponsoring company. An ad hoc analysis of all available data is reported here. Eligibility criteria included pathological proof of prostate cancer, documented progression despite prior hormonal manipulation, WHO PS 0-2, and no daily intake of narcotic analgesics. Patients were randomized between satraplatin 100 mg/m(2) for 5 days plus prednisone 10 mg orally BID or prednisone alone. Compliance was excellent. 48/50 patients have progressed and 42 have died, mostly due to prostate cancer. Median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI: 13.7-28.4) on the satraplatin plus prednisone arm and 11.9 months (95% CI: 8.4-23.1) on prednisone alone (hazard ratio, HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.46-1.55). A >50% decrease in prostrate specific antigen (PSA) was seen in 9/27 (33.3%) in the satraplatin plus prednisone arm vs. 2/23 (8.7%) on the prednisone alone arm. Progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.8-13.7) on the satraplatin plus prednisone arm as compared to 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.1- 4.7) on the prednisone alone arm (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.92). This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.023). Toxicity was generally minimal in both arms. This randomized comparison of a combination of satraplatin and prednisone versus prednisone alone supports the antitumor activity of the combination. Its role in the treatment of HPRC remains to be elucidated in an appropriate phase III setting.

Strontium89 Chloride versus Palliative Local Field Radiotherapy in Patients with Hormonal Escaped Prostate Cancer: A Phase III Study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group

OBJECTIVES

To compare toxicity, subjective response rate, time to subjective progression and overall survival in patients with painful bone metastases of hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with a single intravenous injection of 150MBq (4mCi) Strontium(89) Chloride (S) or palliative local field radiotherapy (R) with the usual radiotherapy regimen used at each centre. The costs of both treatments were also assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

101 patients were randomized to S and 102 to R. Time to event endpoints were compared with the Logrank test and Kaplan-Meier curves, in the intent-to-treat population (2-sided alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. There was a borderline statistically significant difference in overall survival in favour of the local field radiotherapy (R: 11 months; S: 7.2 months; p=0.0457). There was no difference in progression-free survival or time to progression. Subjective response was seen in 34.7% in the S-arm and in 33.3% in the R-arm. A biochemical response was observed in 10% and 13% of the R- and S-groups, respectively. There was no difference in treatment toxicity between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic HRPC, pain treatment with local field radiotherapy is associated with a better overall survival compared to Strontium(89). The lower costs of local field radiotherapy also favour the use of this treatment in patients with HRPC. The reason for the apparent survival benefit of localised radiation treatment is not clear.

The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the use of transaxial and coronal MR imaging improves the ability to localize the apex of the prostate and the anterior part of the rectum compared to the use of transaxial CT alone, and whether the incorporation of MR could improve the coverage of the prostate by the radiotherapy field and change the volume of rectum irradiated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma underwent a CT and an axial and coronal MR scan in treatment position. The CT and MR images were mathematically aligned, and three observers were asked to contour independently the prostate and the rectum on CT and on MR. The interobserver variability of the prostatic apex location and of the delineation of the anterior rectal wall were assessed for each image modality. A dosimetry study was performed to evaluate the dose to the rectum when MR was used in addition to CT to localize the pelvic organs.

RESULTS

The interobserver variation of the prostatic apex location was largest on CT ranging from 0.54 to 1.07 cm, and smallest on coronal MR ranging from 0.17 to 0.25 cm. The interobserver variation of the delineation of the anterior rectum on MR was small and constant along the whole length of the prostate (0.09+/-0.02 cm), while for CT it was comparable to that for the MR delineation at the base of the prostate, but it increased gradually towards the apex, where the variation reached 0.39 cm. The volume of MR rectum receiving more than 80% of the prescribed dose was on average reduced by 23.8+/-11.2% from the CT to the MR treatment plan.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the additional use of axial and coronal MR scans, in designing the treatment plan for localized prostate carcinoma, improves substantially the localization accuracy of the prostatic apex and the anterior aspect of the rectum, resulting in a better coverage of the prostate and a potential to reduce the volume of the rectum irradiated to a high dose.

Dangerous chemicals: EDEXIM: The European database on export and import of certain dangerous chemicals

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2455/92 has been adopted by the Council of the European Communities, in 1992, to improve information exchange on certain dangerous chemicals with third countries, particularly developing countries. To implement the notification procedure in accordance with the Regulation, a database has been developed to manage and simplify the procedure. The software exists in three versions; one adapted for use by the Designated Authorities of the Member States, another for the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) and the third one is an information version aimed at Designated National Authorities outside the European Union and Industry. The database "EDEXIM" is currently working in a PC environment and is being developed as an on-line system with a stand-alone client/server architecture.