4
|
Rugo H, Dieras V, Cortes J, Patt D, Wildiers H, O'Shaughnessy J, Zamora E, Yardley DY, Carter GC, Sheffield KM, Li L, Andre VA, Derbyshire RE, Li XI, Frenzel M, Huang YJ, Dickler MN, Tolaney SM. Abstract P6-18-19: Real-world survival of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy - A comparison with MONARCH 1. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-18-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), abemaciclib demonstrated promising single-agent activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC).1 Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 19.7% (95% CI: 13.3, 27.5) and at 18 months minimum follow-up median overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months. Due to the single-arm trial design of MONARCH 1, there is a need to view these results in clinical context relative to available treatment options. This study compared the OS results of abemaciclib in MONARCH 1 vs that in a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort with similar patient and disease characteristics.
Methods
MONARCH 1 study design and key eligibility criteria were previously described.1 The real-world cohort was based on Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived, nationally representative (USA-based) database comprising patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction, for patients with MBC between January 1, 2011 through February 28, 2018. A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort was created based on the key eligibility criteria of MONARCH 1 and included patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2- MBC who received single-agent chemotherapy (eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) following 1-2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting, had an ECOG PS of 0-1, and no prior CDK4 & 6 therapy. The index date was the start of the eligible single-agent chemotherapy, and patients were followed from the index date until date of death, loss to follow-up, or end of the database, whichever occurred earlier. OS results were adjusted using 2 methods (Mahalanobis distance matching and entropy balancing with bootstrapping) to account for baseline demographic and clinical differences between the real-world and trial cohorts.
Results
A real-world cohort (n=281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n=132) was identified. A subsequent matching based on Mahalanobis distance was performed to match MONARCH 1 population (n=108) with the real-world cohort (n=108). The matched cohorts demonstrated similar patient and disease characteristics. Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm vs 13.6 months in the matched cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.77). Results of a sensitivity analysis performed using entropy balancing were consistent with an adjusted median OS of 12.7 months in the real-world cohort (n=281)with HR of 0.57 (95% CI from bootstrapping: 0.44, 0.78).
Conclusion
Methodological advances to adjust for potential biases, and improvements in data quality, have evolved enabling the ability to leverage a real-world cohort as an external comparator arm. This study demonstrates the ability to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for MONARCH 1. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and adequately place the clinical benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context.
References
Dickler et al, CCR 2017
Citation Format: Rugo H, Dieras V, Cortes J, Patt D, Wildiers H, O'Shaughnessy J, Zamora E, Yardley DY, Carter GC, Sheffield KM, Li L, Andre VA, Derbyshire RE, Li XI, Frenzel M, Huang Y-J, Dickler MN, Tolaney SM. Real-world survival of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy - A comparison with MONARCH 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - V Dieras
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - J Cortes
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - D Patt
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - H Wildiers
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - E Zamora
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - DY Yardley
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - GC Carter
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - KM Sheffield
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - L Li
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - VA Andre
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - RE Derbyshire
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - XI Li
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - M Frenzel
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - Y-J Huang
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - MN Dickler
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - SM Tolaney
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Centre Eugene Marquis UNICANCER, Rennes Cedex, France; Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Texas Oncology, Austin, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rastogi P, Toi M, Harbeck N, Bourayou N, Frenzel M, Johnston S. Abstract OT3-05-05: MonarchE: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in patients with high risk, node positive, early stage, HR+, HER2- breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-05-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Abemaciclib, an oral, selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 dosed on a twice daily continuous schedule, has demonstrated clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer when administered as monotherapy (MONARCH 1) and in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3. In neoMONARCH, abemaciclib plus anastrozole as neoadjuvant therapy reduced the breast tumor cell proliferation marker Ki67 to a greater extent than anastrozole alone after 2 weeks of treatment. Endocrine monotherapy is the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting. However, a proportion of pts relapse despite this therapy. A population with a higher risk of recurrence (15% at 5 years) may be identified based on the clinical and pathological characteristics of disease. Optimizing adjuvant therapy for these pts is an important need.
Trial Design: MonarchE (NCT03155997) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial that will evaluate the potential for abemaciclib to enhance adjuvant ET. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily continuous schedule plus standard of care (SOC) adjuvant ET versus SOC adjuvant ET alone and stratified by prior chemotherapy (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or none), menopausal status (pre- or post-), and region (N. America/Europe, Asia, or other). Pts may have started ET within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Pts will receive abemaciclib for up to 2 years in combination with ET per physician's choice (such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, +/- ovarian suppression). ET alone will be continued as clinically indicated. All randomized pts will be followed for a total of 10 years.
Eligibility Criteria: Eligible pts (male or female) must have early stage resected HR+, HER2- invasive breast cancer with either ≥ 4 positive pathological axillary lymph nodes (pALNs), or 1 to 3 positive pALNs and at least one of the following high risk markers: primary tumor size ≥5 cm, histological grade 3 tumor, or centrally assessed Ki67 index of ≥20% (in a subset of pts). Pts must have completed definitive locoregional therapy (+/- (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy) and be randomized no more than 12 weeks after completion of last non-ET (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy). Pts must have tumor tissue available for biomarker analysis prior to randomization.
Specific Aims: The primary objective of monarchE is to evaluate invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) per the STEEP System.1 Secondary objectives include evaluation of IDFS in pts with Ki67 index of ≥20%, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pt health outcomes.
Statistical Methods: Assuming an IDFS hazard ratio of .73, the study is powered to approximately 80% to test the superiority of abemaciclib plus standard ET at a 1-sided α=0.025 using a stratified log-rank test.
Target accrual: Approximately 3580 pts
Contact information: 1-877-285-4559
Reference:
1. Hudis et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):2127-2132.
Citation Format: Rastogi P, Toi M, Harbeck N, Bourayou N, Frenzel M, Johnston S. MonarchE: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in patients with high risk, node positive, early stage, HR+, HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-05-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Toi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - N Harbeck
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - N Bourayou
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Frenzel
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Johnston
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
M'kacher R, Girinsky T, Colicchio B, Ricoul M, Dieterlen A, Jeandidier E, Heidingsfelder L, Cuceu C, Shim G, Frenzel M, Lenain A, Morat L, Bourhis J, Hempel WM, Koscielny S, Paul JF, Carde P, Sabatier L. Telomere shortening: a new prognostic factor for cardiovascular disease post-radiation exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 164:134-137. [PMID: 25274533 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Telomere length has been proposed as a marker of mitotic cell age and as a general index of human organism aging. Telomere shortening in peripheral blood lymphocytes has been linked to cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality. The authors investigated the potential correlation of conventional risk factors, radiation dose and telomere shortening with the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) following radiation therapy in a large cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that hypertension and telomere length were the only independent risk factors. This is the first study in a large cohort of patients that demonstrates significant telomere shortening in patients treated by radiation therapy who developed cardiovascular disease. Telomere length appears to be an independent prognostic factor that could help determine patients at high risk of developing CAD after exposure in order to implement early detection and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M'kacher
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France Laboratory of Radiation Sensitivity and Radio-carcinogenesis INSERM 1030, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France
| | - T Girinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France
| | - B Colicchio
- Laboratoire MIPS - Groupe TIIM3D, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse Cedex F-68093, France
| | - M Ricoul
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - A Dieterlen
- Laboratoire MIPS - Groupe TIIM3D, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse Cedex F-68093, France
| | - E Jeandidier
- Department of genetics, CHU, Mulhouse Cedex 68093, France
| | - L Heidingsfelder
- MetaSystems GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 6, Altlussheim D-68804, Germany
| | - C Cuceu
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - G Shim
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - M Frenzel
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France Laboratory of Radiation Sensitivity and Radio-carcinogenesis INSERM 1030, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France Laboratoire MIPS - Groupe TIIM3D, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse Cedex F-68093, France Department of genetics, CHU, Mulhouse Cedex 68093, France MetaSystems GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 6, Altlussheim D-68804, Germany Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France Department of Radiology, Marie Lannelongue, Chatenay-Malabry 92019, France Department of hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France
| | - A Lenain
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - L Morat
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - J Bourhis
- Laboratory of Radiation Sensitivity and Radio-carcinogenesis INSERM 1030, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France Laboratoire MIPS - Groupe TIIM3D, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse Cedex F-68093, France Department of genetics, CHU, Mulhouse Cedex 68093, France
| | - W M Hempel
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| | - S Koscielny
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France
| | - J F Paul
- Department of Radiology, Marie Lannelongue, Chatenay-Malabry 92019, France
| | - P Carde
- Department of hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94 804, France
| | - L Sabatier
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Oncology, CEA, DSV/iRCM, Fontenay-aux-Roses 92265, France
| |
Collapse
|