ESKALE study, a French real-world study of esketamine nasal spray for patients with treatment-resistant depression

Introduction

Esketamine nasal spray has been developed to treat adults with treatment resistant depression. On Dec.2019, EMA granted a market access approval in this indication.

Objectives

ESKALE is a descriptive study of treatment resistant depression patients treated with esketamine in France.

Methods

Observational retrospective study. 157 patients are included in 3 cohorts depending on their treatment initiation date. This abstract presents the second interim results of patients treated with esketamine and whom data collection ranges from Oct.2019 and Sept.2021.

Results

66.7% of patients were females. Average age was 49 years old with 26 patients > 65 years old. Duration of the current depressive episode was 26.0 months (mean). 48.8% of patient have > 1 suicide attempt during whole life. At esketamine initiation, 78.2% patients were clinically perceived to have severe depression with a MADRS score of 32.4 (median) and a PHQ9 score of 19.5 (median). For the overall sample, esketamine was prescribed in median as a 3rd line and for 40.5% of patients after neurostimulation. The majority of the patient started esketamine at 28 mg or 56 mg and increased the dose to 84 mg. After 4 months of treatment, clinical benefits are the following: decrease of MADRS total score -16.5 points (median) corresponding to 58% of responders and a PHQ9 total score decrease of -8.6 points (median). No new safety signal detected.

Conclusions

This second interim analysis describes patients’ profiles and clinical evolution over a longer period and a broader population than the first interim analysis. The conditions of use are consistent with the ones approved by health authorities.

Disclosure

I (Marie-Alix Codet) works as a full employee at Janssen Cilag

[Evolution of electro-convulsive therapy activity in France since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic]

La pandémie récente de COVID-19 a entraîné des changements organisationnels majeurs dans les lieux de soins et notamment en hospitalisation en psychiatrie. Pour évaluer l’évolution de l’activité des différents centres pratiquant l’ECT, une enquête nationale en ligne a été réalisée. 65 réponses de toute la France ont été analysées. Plus de 90 % des centres pratiquant l’ECT ont connu une diminution de leur activité. Plus inquiétant encore, la moitié des centres ont subi un arrêt total de leur activité et un quart des centres accusent une diminution de plus de la moitié de leur activité habituelle. Les soins psychiatriques post-pandémie COVID-19 s’annoncent difficiles. Il est essentiel de ne pas ajouter à cette difficulté les complications, souvent graves, qui seront liées au retard ou à l’arrêt de la pratique de l’ECT. Il conviendra aussi de rester vigilant quant aux conséquences spécifiques neuropsychiatriques qui feront suite à la pandémie.

[Validation of the French version of the self-evaluation of negative symptoms (SNS)]

INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a disorder affecting 1% of the population and is associated with severe functional impairment. Negative symptoms are responsible for the majority of this impairment, and many patients with schizophrenia have negative symptoms. However, their evaluation is still a challenge. Thus, standardized assessments are needed to facilitate identification of these symptoms. Many tools have been developed, but most are based on observer ratings. Self-evaluation can provide an additional outcome measure and allow patients to be more engaged in their treatment. The Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) has been developed recently. This is a remarkably understandable instrument for patients with schizophrenia as it allows them to readily complete it without assistance, providing information with respect to their own perception of negative symptoms. The SNS is a self-assessment that permits patients to evaluate themselves in 5 dimensions of negative symptoms. This validation study for the SNS revealed good psychometric properties alongside satisfactory acceptance by patients.

AIM

This study was to confirm the validation of the French version of the self-evaluation of negative symptoms (SNS).

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to the DSM-IV-R, with a stable regimen of anti-psychotic drugs for the last two months, aged more than 18 years old were eligible for the study. Symptoms were rated using the SNS, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenics (CDSS), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression and Parkinsonism. Patients were asked to fulfill the SNS twice, 6 weeks apart.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were evaluated. Cronbach's coefficient (α=0.8) showed good internal consistency. The SNS significantly correlated with the SANS (r=0.6), the negative sub-score of the BPRS (r=0.6) and the Clinician Global Impression on the severity of negative symptoms (r=0.7). SNS scores did not correlate with level of insight (r=0.08) or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale positive sub-scores (r=0.2). SNS scores correlated with CDSS scores. However, we did not find correlation between the first item of the CDSS which evaluates depression and the "diminished emotional range" sub-score of SNS. The test-retest of SNS revealed no changes of scores at two evaluations 6 weeks apart.

CONCLUSION

The acceptance by patients of the SNS was excellent. The French version of the SNS demonstrated a good internal consistency, good convergent validity and good discriminant validity. The study demonstrates the ability of patients with schizophrenia to accurately report their own experiences. Self-assessments of negative symptoms should be more widely employed in clinical practice because they may allow patients with schizophrenia to develop appropriate coping strategies.