[Cushing's syndrome with inhaled corticosteroid: Drug interactions to avoid]

Cushing's syndrome is an iatrogenic event occurring during co-administration of inhaled corticosteroids and potent inhibitors of P450 cytochromes. We report the clinical case of a 29-year-old woman with a past history of asthma treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) treated with itraconazole (ITZ), and Mycobacterium xenopi infection treated with moxifloxacin (MXF), ethambutol (EMB) and clarithromycin (CLR). Four months after initiation of antibiotic and antifungal medication, the patient contracted Cushing's syndrome. Its etiology consisted in interaction between FP, ITZ and CLR, which led to pronouncedly increased corticosteroid concentrations in circulating plasma cells. Following on the one hand cessation of FP and ITZ and on the other hand hydrocortisone supplementation, evolution was favorable. Several cases of iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome induced by co-administration of FP and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors have been reported in the literature. If possible, FP should be avoided in patients being treated with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Due to its differing physicochemical properties, beclometasone may be considered as the safest therapeutic alternative.

SARS‐CoV‐2 Vaccine Response in Lung Transplant Recipients: A French Multicenter Study

Purpose

Many scientific societies recommend SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination for solid-organ transplant recipients. The immunogenicity of two or three vaccine doses in lung transplant (LTx) recipients is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral response to the vaccine in LTx and heart-lung transplant (HLTx) recipients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of LTx and HLTx recipients at seven centers in France. Anti-spike-protein antibody titers after two or three SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine injections were measured.

Results

We studied 2186 patients (1091 [51%] males) with a median age of 49 [45-55] years. Double LTx was performed in 1792 (82%) patients. The main reasons for LTx were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=656, 30%), fibrosis (n=459, 21%), and cystic fibrosis (n=350, 16 %). Median time from LTx to vaccination was 59 [29-108] months and mean time from the last vaccine dose to serological testing was 3 months [1.5-3.8]. We used WHO definitions to classify antibody titers as negative (&lt. 30 BAU/mL), suboptimal (30-260 BAU/mL), or protective (&gt 260 BAU/mL). Of the first 1081 patients, 270 (25%) were partially vaccinated and 649 (60%) fully vaccinated (three doses or history of COVID-19 then two doses); Among these patients,133 (12%) were infected by covid. Of the 649 fully vaccinated patients, 461 (71%), 84 (13%), and 97 (15%) had negative, suboptimal, and protective antibody titers, respectively. The proportion of patients with protective titers was 8% vs. 18% in patients vaccinated within 5 years vs. 5 or more years after LTx, respectively. Among covid-infected patients, 48% developed a protective rate, whether fully or partially vaccinated.

Conclusion

LTx recipients usually fail to develop protective antibody titers in response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Once further data are collected, we will seek to identify risk factors for a poor antibody response.

[Spontaneous pneumomediastinum]

INTRODUCTION

Pneumomediastinum, which can be spontaneous or secondary, is defined by the presence of free air in the mediastinum as shown on a chest X-ray and/or chest CT, with or without subcutaneous emphysema. Secondary pneumomediastinum develops in various contexts (thoracic traumatism, perforation of central airway or digestive tract, pneumothorax, barotraumatism complicating mechanical ventilation…). Spontaneous pneumomediastinum , which will be the focus of this review, develops without any of the above-mentioned conditions.

STATE OF ART

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a rare entity which usually occurs in young people either without medical history or with an history of asthma. A trigger event is detected in 40% to 60% of cases. Positive diagnosis is made on chest radiographt but thoracic CT is more sensitive. Distinction between spontaneous pneumomediastinum and secondary pneumomediastinum is in general easy but may sometimes be more difficult, particularly in case of oesophageal perforation. The evolution of spontaneous pneumomediastinum is most often benign but, rare complications may occur. Management is most often conservative.

PERSPECTIVES

There is no consensual management of spontaneous pneumediastinum because of the lack of randomized prospective studies. This may be explained by the rarity of the disease. The actual trend is to offer to the patients a conservative treatment, which could be ambulatory in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a rare entity developing mainly in young subjects. The evolution is in general benign, justifying a conservative approach.