Cancer care for Ukrainian refugees: Strategic impact assessments in the early days of the conflict

BACKGROUND

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 has resulted in destruction of healthcare infrastructure and triggered the largest wave of internally displaced populations and refugees since World War Two. Conflicts in transitioned countries such as Ukraine create new non-communicable disease (NCD) challenges, especially for cancer care for refugees and humanitarian assistance in host countries. In the early days, rapid attempts were made to model possible impacts.

METHODS

By evaluating open source intelligence used in the first three months of the conflict through snowball search methods, we aimed to address: (i) burden of cancer in Ukrainian population, specifically considering translating to the refugees population, and its cancer care capacity; ii) baseline capacity/strengths of cancer systems in initial host countries. Moreover, using a baseline scenario based on crude cancer incidence in Ukraine, and considering data from UNHCR, we estimated how cancer cases would be distributed across host countries. Finally, a surveillance assessment instrument was created, intersecting health system's capacity and influx of internally displaced populations and refugees.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The total new cancer patients per month in pre-conflict Ukraine was estimated as 13,106, of which < 1 % are paediatric cases. The estimated cancer cases in the refugee population (combining prevalent and incident), assuming 7.5 million refugees by July 2022 and a female:male ratio of 9:1, was 33,121 individuals (Poland: 19284; Hungary: 3484; Moldova: 2651; Slovakia: 2421; Romania: 5281). According to our assessments, Poland is the only neighbouring country classified as green/yellow for cancer capacity, i.e. sufficient ablility to absorb additional burden into national health system; Slovakia we graded as yellow, Hungary and Romania as yellow/red and Moldova as red.

OS05.4.A Do neurocognitive deficits explain the differences between brain tumour patients and their proxies assessing the patient’s I-ADL?

BACKGROUND

Neurocognitive deficits are common among brain tumour patients, and may impact on patient awareness of deficits in instrumental activities in daily life (IADL). This study aimed to examine differences between patient-reported and proxy-reported assessments of the patient’s performance of IADL, and whether the level of (dis)agreement is associated with neurocognitive deficits.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A phase III EORTC questionnaire measuring IADL in brain tumour patients (EORTC IADL-BN32) and six neurocognitive test measures were administered as part of a larger multicentre international study designed to develop a brain tumour specific IADL questionnaire. Bland-Altman plots and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluated patient- and proxy-reported IADL on a group level. Subsequently, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare patient-proxy difference scores (patient IADL score - their proxy IADL score) between patients who were considered clearly neurocognitively impaired (≥2 neurocognitive test measures; ≤2.0 SD below healthy controls) and patients who were not. Furthermore, multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to examined which sociodemgraphic, clinical, and particularly neurocognitive variables were independently associated with patients and proxies differing in their evaluation of patient’s IADL.

RESULTS

Patients (N=81) and proxies (N=81), on group level, did not significantly differ on either the IADL individual item or scale scores. However, significant differences were found on patient-proxy difference scores between patients who were (N=37) and were not (N=44) considered clearly neurocognitively impaired for 10/32 individual items and one of the scales (i.e. Scale 4: Administrative tasks), all showing that the proxies of clearly neurocognitively impaired patients reported more problems relative to the patients themselves, compared to proxies of patients not clearly neurocognitively impaired. Furthermore, for each scale, a neurocognitive variable, either impaired information processing speed, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency or the number of neurocognitive test measures impaired, was found to be independently associated with proxies reporting more problems. For 4/5 scales, a clinical variable was additionally independently associated with proxies reporting more problems. Only one variable was independently associated with patient reporting more problems, namely being in active treatment was found to be associated with patients reporting more problems on Scale 4: Administrative tasks.

CONCLUSION

Results imply a consistent trend of clearly neurocognitively impaired patients underreporting problems with IADL compared to their proxies. It would therefore be advised to administer both the patient- and proxy-version of the EORTC IADL-BN32, particularly if neurocognitive deficits are presumed.

Can we use gonadotropin plasma concentration as surrogate marker for BMI-related incomplete estrogen suppression in breast cancer patients receiving anastrozole?

BACKGROUND

BMI has been suggested to impact on estrogenic activity in patients receiving anastrozole resulting in a reduced treatment efficacy in obese women. Current evidence in this regard is controversially discussed. Since estradiol is inversely correlated with gonadotropins it can be assumed that an impact of BMI is also reflected by gonadotropin plasma concentrations. We aim at investigating the impact of BMI on the hormonal state of breast cancer (BC) patients receiving anastrozole indicated by LH, FSH and SHBG as well as estradiol.

METHODS

We determined gonadotropin-, estradiol- and anastrozole- serum concentrations from postmenopausal, early stage breast cancer patients receiving upfront anastrozole within routine after care. Gonadotropin plasma concentrations were derived from the routine laboratory examination report. A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method was used for the measurement of anastrozole serum concentrations. BMI was assessed within the routine after-care check-up.

RESULTS

The overall sample comprised 135 BC patients with a mean age of 65.3 years. BMI was significantly correlated with LH, FSH and SHBG. This association was neither influenced by age nor by anastrozole serum concentrations according to the regression model. Despite aromatase inhibition 12% of patients had detectable estrogen levels in routine quantification.

CONCLUSION

Obese women have an altered hormonal situation compared to normally weight women under the same dose of anastrozole. Our study findings are a further indicator for the relevance of BMI in regard of anastrozole metabolism and possible estrogenic activity indicated by gonadotropin plasma level.

Cancer patients' understanding of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores presented as bar charts

OBJECTIVE

To investigate cancer patients' understanding of graphical presentations of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with brain tumour patients participating in routine patient-reported outcome (PRO) monitoring. We assessed understanding of longitudinal quality of life (QOL) profiles, presented as bar charts objectively and with self-ratings. In addition, patients' opinions on congruency of the QOL scores with their self-perceived health status were evaluated.

RESULTS

We recruited 40 brain tumour patients (57.5% female; mean age 52.7, SD 13.7). In total, 90% of patients rated the graphs as easy to understand. Accordingly, almost all questions on assessing understanding objectively were answered correctly by at least 80% of the patients. More than 95% indicated that the displayed QOL scores matched their personal perception of symptom burden and functional health in the observed period.

CONCLUSION

Patients are able to understand their QOL results when presented graphically and are able to interpret important changes. Displayed QOL scores obtained with the EORTC QLQ-C30 are consistent with the patients' personal perception of physical and emotional functioning, pain and fatigue.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Knowledge about patients' understanding of graphically displayed QOL results contributes to creation of optimal evidence-based feedback on the patients' present QOL and its trajectory.

Abstract P2-09-22: Long-term psychosocial consequences and counsellees' satisfaction after genetic counselling for hereditary breast- and ovarian cancer - A patient reported outcome study

Background: Genetic counselling and testing (GCT) for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (BOC) has become a standard option in BOC care in Europe allowing for prognostic information on the individual risk for disease onset/ relapse as well as on treatment options comprising prophylactic surgery or surveillance programs. However, data on the psychosocial long-term consequences is limited, especially in high-risk counsellees opting against genetic testing. We aimed at investigating the long-term psychosocial consequences of GCT for hereditary BOC in all counsellees irrespective of their decision after counselling.

Patients and Methods: Counsellees for BOC with and without a previous disease who had undergone genetic counselling at Innsbruck Medical University between 2011 and 2014 were asked to participate in a cross-sectional Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment (incl. Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment, Genetic counseling satisfaction scale, Satisfaction with Decision Scale, Breast Cancer Heredity Knowledge Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale/ HADS, Short Form 12 Health Survey, Cancer Worry Scale/ CWS) targeting on psychological distress, cancer worry, patient knowledge and patient satisfaction with genetic counselling and decisions by means of an anonymous mail survey. Subsequent decisions for vs. against genetic testing and if eligible, for surveillance vs. prophylactic surgery were also assessed. A reference sample of BC survivors was recruited at the outpatient unit.

Results: An overall sample of 137 counselees was included in the analysis (67.9% decided to undergo genetic testing for a HCPS, 22.6% decided not to be tested, 9.5% were still uncertain about their decision). 22.6% of counsellees experienced clinically relevant levels of anxiety and 9.8% scored above the cut-off for clinically relevant depression according to the HADS. Mean CWS score was 11 (SD 3.6, 3-24). Counsellees did not differ from breast cancer survivors regarding anxiety and depression according to the HADS (depression: p&lt;0.5). Mean patient satisfaction with decisions amounted to 25.4 (SD 5.78, min. 4 to max. 30); a mean satisfaction with counselling of 25 (5.4) was observed. Less overall satisfaction with genetic counselling (β=0.445, t=5.552, p=0.000) and lower certainty about decision for/ against genetic testing after counselling (β=-0.169, t=-2.105, p=0.037) were highly predictive for lower long-term patient satisfaction with decisions.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that genetic counselling for BOC has no overall deleterious psychosocial consequences in long-term. Levels of depression and anxiety were comparable to those of the general population, while distress levels did not differ from those of breast cancer survivors without a hereditary BOC predisposition. The overall satisfaction with counselling as well as the certainty with decisions on testing and related medical interventions are highly predictive for the long-term satisfaction with decisions. Hence, genetic counselling should focus on supporting counsellees in forming clear decisions and include identifying counsellees with increased cared needs in this regard by means of PRO assessment in follow-up.

Citation Format: Hubalek M, Sztankay M, Meraner V, Martini C, Sperner-Unterweger B, Weber I, Morscher R, Zschocke J, Egle D, Dünser M, Oberguggenberger A. Long-term psychosocial consequences and counsellees' satisfaction after genetic counselling for hereditary breast- and ovarian cancer - A patient reported outcome study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-22.

Abstract P1-11-02: Psychological morbidity in breast cancer survivors: Prevalence rates and determinants

Background: The number of breast cancer survivors (BCS) is steadily increasing due to improved treatment options, early detection and younger age at diagnosis. Thus, it is increasingly important to determine and better understand the psychological outcome following a cancer diagnosis and treatment in long-term. This might contribute to meeting the long-term health care demands of cancer survivors. We aimed at investigating levels and determinants of anxiety and depression (AD) in BCS.

Patients and Methods: We included BCS with a non-metastatic disease in the stage of after-care. AD was determined as part of a cross-sectional, comprehensive patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment (incl. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-G/+B/+ES, Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, Sexual Activity Questionnaire and Body Image Scale) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Prevalence rates of AD and sample characteristics are presented descriptively using percentages, means and standard deviations. Predictors of anxiety and depression are identified by means of regression analysis.

Results: A final sample of 743 breast cancer survivors who were on average 2.9 years post diagnosis (range: 0.1-11.3 years) participated in the study. Mean patient age was 56.4a (SD 11.5a), 2/3 of patients were postmenopausal. 22.5% of patients reported clinically relevant levels of anxiety and 11.2% of depression. Older age (β=0.012, t=2.53, p&lt;0.05), higher endocrine symptoms (β=-0.037, t=-8.89, p&lt;0.01) and reduced functional well-being (β=-0.034, t=-7.73, p&lt;0.01) were predictive for anxiety and depression in the regression model. The model explained 39.3% of the variance of anxiety and depression.

Conclusion: A distinct proportion of BCS report clinically relevant, long-term psychological morbidity. Especially older BCS, experiencing higher levels of endocrine symptoms and reduced functional well-being, seem to be at risk for psychological morbidity. A routine PRO-screening for psychological morbidity including the assessment of associated risk factors in this patient population might contribute to the identification of those women in need for psychological/ psychiatric treatment and in conjunction, improve cancer care.

Citation Format: Hubalek M, Sztankay M, Oberguggenberger A, Meraner V, Egle D, Mangweth-Matzek B, Beer B, Huber N, Sperner-Unterweger B. Psychological morbidity in breast cancer survivors: Prevalence rates and determinants. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-02.

Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a more comprehensive picture of patients' quality of life than do mere physicians' ratings. Electronic data collection of PRO offers several advantages and allows assessments at patients' homes as well. This study reports on patients' personal internet use, their attitudes towards electronic and web-based PRO assessment (clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO) and the feasibility of these two assessment modes.

METHODS

At the Medical University of Innsbruck and Kufstein County Hospital, cancer patients who participated in clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO were asked to complete a comprehensive evaluation form on their personal internet usage, attitudes towards and the feasibility of routine clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO with the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) software.

RESULTS

In total, 113 patients completed the evaluation form for clinic-ePRO (Ø 45 years, SD 14) and 45 patients for home-ePRO (Ø 58 years, SD 10; 33.1 per cent inclusion rate for this sample). Most patients expressed willingness to complete routine clinic-ePRO assessments in the future (94.7 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 84.4 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and to discuss their data with attending physicians (82.2 per cent, home-ePRO patients only). Overall, patients preferred the software over paper-pencil questionnaires (67.2 per cent of clinic-ePRO patients and 60 per cent of home-ePRO patients) and experienced it as easy to use. Only a few minor suggestions for improvement were made (e.g. adjustable font sizes).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO was in general shown to be feasible and well accepted. However, to be more inclusive in the implementation of clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO, educational programs concerning their particular benefit in oncology practice potentially could enhance patients' attitudes towards, and consequently their acceptance of and compliance with electronic PRO assessments.

The ecology of ticks in the Tribec and Hronský Inovec Mountains

Ecological studies on ticks are an essential part of epidemiological investigations on arbovirus infections. The paper deals with the distribution, bionomy, trophic relationships and rearing of ticks in the laboratory and refers to the role of Ixodes ricinus ticks as vectors of the tick-borne encephalitis virus. The ticks that are common to the region are I. ricinus, I. hexagonus, I. trianguliceps, Haemaphysalis concinna, H. punctata, H. inermis and Dermacentor marginatus. I. ricinus, which is very widely distributed, is the principal vector of tick-borne encephalitis. The hosts, both mammals and birds, of the different stages (larvae, nymphs and adults) of the ticks are listed.