Racial disparities in the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Background

Racial bias has always been a concern for healthcare. Lack of guideline directed utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in cardiogenic shock (CS) may lead to implicit and racial bias.

Purpose

To identify the racial differences in the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and its association with outcomes.

Methods

National Inpatient Database from 2015–2018 using ICD 10 codes was used. Patients >18 years of age admitted for cariogenic shock were included.

Results

Among 1,021,274 patients hospitalized for cardiogenic shock, overall MCS was utilized in 11.4% (N=116,539). Use of MCS for patients stratified by race was 12.2% white (N=85543), 8% Blacks (N=14688), 11.3% Hispanics (N=11067), 13.8% Asian (N=4417), 12.3% Native American (N=825). IABP was the most commonly used MCS device, followed by Impella, ECMO and LVAD. Overall odds of MCS insertion was significantly higher in white population [1.18 (1.13–1.23) <0.001] and significantly lower in Blacks [0.65 (0.61–0.69) <0.001] and Hispanics [0.89 (0.83–0.97) 0.004]. Among black patients with CS requiring MCS, odds of LVAD insertion were similar compared to other races [1.03 (0.89–1.19) 0.714], while odds of all other types of MCS devices including ECMO [0.83 (0.72–0.95) 0.009], IABP [0.63 (0.59–0.68) <0.001] and Impella [0.61 (0.54–0.70) <0.001] were significantly lower compared to other races. This trend also holds true for patients with CS associated with acute myocardial infarction. Among all patients with CS, the odds of mortality were significantly lower among white patients [0.92 (0.90–0.95) <0.001], on the contrary, odds of mortality were significantly higher in Blacks [1.06 (1.02–1.10) 0.001] and Asians [1.11 (1.02–1.20) 0.012]. Interestingly, when only comparing patients who underwent MCS utilization for CS, odds of mortality were similar in black population compared to other races. [1.03 (0.91–1.17) 0.636].

Conclusion(s)

There still exist significant racial differences in the use of mechanical circulatory devices for cardiogenic shock potentially leading to significantly higher mortality in black population compared to whites. This difference in mortality is mitigated with equal use of MCS devices in cardiogenic shock among all races.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.