The oncoprotein MLL-ENL disturbs hematopoietic lineage determination and transforms a biphenotypic lymphoid/myeloid cell

Mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) fusion proteins are associated with a unique class of leukemia that is characterized by the simultaneous expression of lymphoid-specific as well as myeloid-specific genes. Here we report the first experimental model of MLL. Murine bone marrow cells were retrovirally transduced to express the MLL-eleven nineteen leukemia (MLL-ENL) fusion protein. When cultivated in flt-3 ligand, stem cell factor and interleukin-7 (IL-7) in a stroma-free culture system MLL-ENL-transduced as well as control cells showed a wave of B-lymphopoiesis. Whereas the controls exhausted their proliferative capacity in a CD19+/B220+ state, a continuously proliferating CD19-/B220+ cell population emerged in the MLL-ENL-transduced cultures. Despite the lymphoid surface marker, these cells were of monocytoid morphology. The immortalized cells contained unrearranged retrovirus, expressed MLL-ENL mRNA and were able to grow in syngenic recipients. From the diseased animals an MLL-ENL positive, B220+/CD19- cell type could be reisolated and cultivated in vitro. In analogy to human MLL, MLL-ENL-transformed cells not only coexpressed lymphocyte-specific (rag1, rag2, pax5, Tdt) and monocyte-specific genes (lysozyme, c-fms), but also showed rearrangements of the genomic immunoglobulin locus. This model shows that MLL-ENL influences events of early lineage determination and it will enable the investigation of the underlying molecular processes.

Transcriptional activation is a key function encoded by MLL fusion partners

Chromosomal translocations that fuse the mixed lineage leukemia gene (MLL) to a variety of unrelated partner genes are frequent in pediatric leukemias. The novel combination of genetic material leads to the production of active oncoproteins that depend on the contributions of both constituents. In a search for a common function amongst the diverse group of MLL fusion partners we constructed artificial fusions joining MLL with generic transactivator and repressor domains (acidic blob, GAL4 transactivator domain, Herpes simplex VP16 activation domain, KRAB repressor domain). Of all constructs tested, only MLL-VP16 was able to transform primary bone marrow cells and to induce a block of early myeloid differentiation like an authentic MLL fusion. Interestingly, the transformation capability of the artificial MLL fusions was correlated with the transcriptional potential of the resulting chimeric protein but it was not related to the strength of the isolated transactivation domain that was joined to MLL. These results prove for the first time that a general biological function - transactivation - might be the common denominator of many MLL fusion partners.

MLL-ENL causes a reversible and myc-dependent block of myelomonocytic cell differentiation

The translocation t(11;19) is a recurrent feature of a subgroup of acute leukemias occurring in infants. This event fuses the genes MLL and ENL and creates the leukemogenic oncoprotein MLL-ENL. We studied the effect of retroviral MLL-ENL expression in primary mouse hematopoietic cells and show here that MLL-ENL requires the oncoprotein Myc to establish a reversible differentiation arrest of a myelomonocytic precursor population. MLL-ENL-transduced cells proliferated as immature myeloid cells in the presence of interleukin 3. The addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor reversed the maturation block set by MLL-ENL and induced the development of mature granulocytes and macrophages accompanied by growth arrest. Gene expression analysis indicated a down-regulation of the proto-oncogene c-myc and of several c-myc target genes during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mediated differentiation. The role of c-myc in the MLL-ENL transformation pathway was tested by modulating the effective Myc protein concentrations in MLL-ENL transduced cells. Cotransduction of dominant-negative Myc neutralized the MLL-ENL effect and precluded transformation. In contrast, constitutive expression of Myc cooperated with MLL-ENL and caused the transformation of a cell population with an irreversible maturation arrest.

The ENL moiety of the childhood leukemia-associated MLL-ENL oncoprotein recruits human Polycomb 3

The translocation t(11;19) is frequently found in acute leukemia in infants. This event truncates the proto-oncogene MLL and fuses the 5' end of MLL in frame with the ENL gene. ENL contributes a crucial protein-protein interaction domain to the resulting oncoprotein MLL-ENL. Here we show by yeast two-hybrid assays, GST-pull-down experiments and in a far western blot analysis that this domain is necessary and sufficient to recruit a novel member of the human Polycomb protein family (hPc3). hPc3 RNA was detected throughout the human hematopoietic system. Similar to other Polycomb proteins hPc3 acts as a transcriptional repressor. The ENL-hPc3 interaction was verified by mutual co-precipitation of the proteins from cell extracts. ENL and hPc3 tagged with fluorescent proteins co-localized in living cells in a nuclear dot pattern. An internal region of hPc3 was responsible for binding to ENL. Finally, hPc3 binds to the C-terminus of AF9, another common MLL fusion partner. The recruitment of a repressive function by ENL opens up a new insight into a possible mechanism of leukemogenesis by the fusion protein MLL-ENL.

ENL, the MLL fusion partner in t(11;19), binds to the c-Abl interactor protein 1 (ABI1) that is fused to MLL in t(10;11)+

Translocations of the chromosomal locus 11q23 that disrupt the MLL gene (alternatively ALL-1 or HRX) are frequently found in children's leukemias. These events fuse the MLL amino terminus in frame with a variety of unrelated proteins. Up to date, 16 different fusion partners have been characterized and more are likely to exist. No general unifying property could yet be detected amongst these proteins. We show here that the frequent MLL fusion partner ENL at 19p13.1 interacts with the human homologue of the mouse Abl-Interactor 1 (ABI1) protein. ABI1 in turn, is fused to MLL in the t(10;11)(p11.2;q23) translocation. ABI1 was identified as an ENL binding protein by a yeast two-hybrid screen. The interaction of ENL and ABI1 could be verified in vitro by far-Western blot assays and GST-pulldown studies as well as in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. A structure-function analysis identified an internal region of ENL and a composite motif of ABI1 including an SH3 domain as mutual binding partners. These data introduce novel aspects that might contribute to the understanding of the process of leukemogenesis by MLL fusion proteins.

The leukemogenic fusion of MLL with ENL creates a novel transcriptional transactivator

Translocations affecting the chromosomal locus 11q23 are hallmarks of infant leukemias. These events disrupt the MLL gene (also ALL-1 or HRX) and fuse the MLL amino terminus in frame with a variety of unrelated proteins. The ENL gene on 19p13.1 is a recurrent fusion partner of MLL. Whereas potential functions have been suggested for isolated domains of either MLL or ENL no experimental data exist for the biological properties of the complete chimeric MLL-ENL protein. We show here that the fusion of MLL with ENL creates a novel molecule that is a potent general transcriptional transactivator in transient reporter gene assays. MLL-ENL strongly transactivated several unrelated promoters including the promoter of Hoxa7 a potential target gene for the unaltered MLL protein. This transactivation capability was cell type specific and it was critically dependent on the contributions of the methyltransferase-homology (MT) region of MLL in combination with the C-terminus of ENL. Squelching experiments and gel retardation studies identified the ENL C-terminus as a binding partner for an unknown factor and the MLL MT region as a unique general DNA binding motif. The potential implications of these findings for the leukemogenesis by MLL-ENL are discussed.

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity associated with the yeast viral p91/20S RNA ribonucleoprotein complex

20S RNA is a noninfectious viral single-stranded RNA found in most laboratory strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 20S RNA encodes a protein of 91 kDa (p91) that contains the common motifs found among RNA-dependent RNA polymerases from RNA viruses. p91 and 20S RNA are noncovalently associated in vivo, forming a ribonucleoprotein complex. We detected an RNA polymerase activity in p91/20S RNA complexes isolated by high-speed centrifugation. The activity was not inhibited by actinomycin D nor alpha-amanitin. The majority of the in vitro products was 20S RNA and the rest was the complementary strands of 20S RNA. Because the extracts were prepared from cells accumulating 20S RNA over its complementary strands, these in vitro products reflect the corresponding activities in vivo. When the p91/20S RNA complexes were subjected to sucrose gradient centrifugation, the polymerase activity cosedimented with the complexes. Furthermore, an RNA polymerase activity was detected in the complex by an antibody-linked polymerase assay using anti-p91 antiserum, suggesting that p91 is present in the active RNA polymerase machinery. These results together indicate that p91 is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase or a subunit thereof responsible for 20S RNA replication.

Yeast viral 20 S RNA is associated with its cognate RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

Most Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains carry in their cytoplasm 20 S RNA, a linear single-stranded RNA molecule of 2.5 kilobases in size. 20 S RNA copy number is greatly induced in stress conditions such as starvation, with up to 100,000 copies per cell. 20 S RNA has coding capacity for a protein of 91 kDa (p91) with sequences diagnostic of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of (+) strand and double-stranded RNA viruses. We detected p91 in 20 S RNA-carrying strains with specific antisera. The amount of p91 in growing cells is higher than that of stationary cells and similar to the one in 20 S RNA-induced cells. Although 20 S RNA is not encapsidated into viral particles, p91 non-covalently forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with 20 S RNA. This suggests a role of p91 in the RNA to RNA synthesis processes required for 20 S RNA replication. Although the strain analyzed also harbors 23 S RNA, a closely related single-stranded RNA, 23 S RNA is not associated with p91 but with its putative RNA polymerase, p104. Similarly, 20 S RNA is not associated with p104 but with p91. These results suggest that 20 S RNA and 23 S RNA replicate independently using their respective cognate RNA polymerases.