POS0712 YEAR-4 OBSERVATIONAL FOLLOW-UP OF BELIMUMAB SAFETY (MORTALITY AND MALIGNANCIES) IN PATIENTS WITH SLE WHO COMPLETED A PHASE 4, 52-WEEK, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED SAFETY STUDY

Background

Belimumab (BEL) is an approved systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treatment. Despite BEL clinical studies demonstrating a favourable benefit–risk profile, varying incidence rates of mortality and adverse events of special interest, including malignancies, require further evaluation.

Objectives

To assess long-term safety following BEL therapy.

Methods

This was a Year (Yr)-4 post-treatment follow-up of the Phase 4, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Belimumab Assessment of Safety in SLE (BASE) study (GSK Study BEL115467; NCT01705977).1 Overall, 4003 adults with active, autoantibody-positive SLE received BEL (10 mg/kg IV) or PBO, plus standard therapy (ST), for 48 weeks. Patients (pts) then entered a Yr 2–5 follow-up period in which they received physician-directed ST. All pts were contacted annually by telephone, including pts who discontinued treatment. Mortality and new malignancies (including nonmelanoma skin cancer) were the endpoints collected, and rates summarised. We present Yr-4 follow-up data by Yr-1 treatment received.

Results

Baseline characteristics for the Yr-4 follow-up population (N=3204) were similar to the Yr-1 double-blind study population (N=4003). By the Yr-4 follow-up, cumulatively 12.7% and 11.0% of pts in the BEL and PBO Yr-1 groups had received BEL as part of physician-directed care, respectively (data not shown). As shown in the Table 1, cumulative follow-up adjusted mortality rates were lower in the BEL vs PBO Yr-1 treatment group for Yrs 2 to 4. Cumulative follow-up adjusted new primary malignancy rates were lower in the BEL vs PBO Yr-1 treatment group for Yrs 2 and 3, but similar in Yr 4.

Table 1.

Yr 1 plus Yrs 2–4 post-treatment* follow-up mortality and new primary malignancy rates by Yr-1 study treatment

Pts with events per yr, n (%)Pt incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs(Cumulative rate, %)BELPBOTotalBELPBOTotalYr-1 (as-treated) populationN=2002N=2001N=4003Deaths13 (0.65)22 (1.10)35 (0.87)0.66 (0.65)1.11 (1.10)0.87New primary malignancies†9 (0.45)10 (0.50)19 (0.47)0.450.500.47Yr-2 (as-treated in Yr-1) populationN=1695N=1670N=3365Deaths9 (0.53)21 (1.26)30 (0.89)0.60 (1.10)1.18 (2.15)0.89 (1.62)New primary malignancies3 (0.18)7 (0.42)10 (0.30)0.34 (0.60)0.48 (0.85)0.41 (0.72)Yr-3 (as-treated in Yr-1) populationN=1659N=1630N=3289Deaths9 (0.54)17 (1.04)26 (0.79)0.58 (1.55)1.14 (3.00)0.86 (2.27)New primary malignancies, n (%)7 (0.42)9 (0.55)16 (0.49)0.37 (0.95)0.49 (1.25)0.43 (1.10)Yr-4 (as-treated in Yr-1) populationN=1622N=1582N=3204Deaths by MedDRA SOC14 (0.86)13 (0.82)27 (0.84)0.65 (2.25)1.07 (3.65)0.86 (2.95)Infections/infestations4 (0.25)5 (0.32)9 (0.28)Cardiac disorders2 (0.12)1 (0.06)3 (0.09)General disorders/ administration site conditions2 (0.12)2 (0.13)4 (0.12)Respiratory/thoracic/ mediastinal disorders2 (0.12)1 (0.06)3 (0.09)Nervous system disorders2 (0.12)1 (0.06)3 (0.09)Other‡2 (0.12)3 (0.18)5 (0.15)New primary malignancies10 (0.62)5 (0.32)15 (0.47)0.43 (1.45)0.44 (1.45)0.43 (1.45)

*Pts in the post-treatment follow-up period are no longer receiving study treatment. †Includes nonmelanoma skin cancer.

‡Contains 1 event for 5 distinct pts of each of renal/urinary disorders, and neoplasms (BEL); musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders, injury/poisoning/procedural complications, and vascular disorders (PBO).

MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; SOC, system organ class

Conclusion

Post-treatment Yr-4 follow-up results in BASE, the largest double-blind trial in pts with SLE to date, support the safety of BEL therapy, with no new BEL safety concerns identified in this analysis.

References

[1]Sheikh SZ, et al. Lancet Rheumatol 2020;3:e122–30

Acknowledgements

This analysis was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Medical writing support was provided by Lulu Hill, MPharmacol, Fishawack Indicia Ltd. UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK.

Disclosure of Interests

Saira Sheikh Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Morton Scheinberg Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Alnylam, AbbVie, PTC Therapeutics, James Cheng-Chung Wei Consultant of: TSH Biopharm, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun and UCB Pharma, Dana Tegzová: None declared, William Stohl Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Gilead, RICARDO ACAYABA DE TOLEDO Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, Novartis, Celltrion, Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, Novartis, GSK, Tamara Mucenic Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: GSK, Janssen, Roche, Eli Lilly, Gilead, UCB, Mauricio R Abello Banfi: None declared, Kathleen Maksimowicz-McKinnon Grant/research support from: Chemocentryx, Carlos Abud-Mendoza Speakers bureau: GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Consultant of: Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Astellas, Mercedes García Speakers bureau: GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Ignacio Garcia-De La Torre: None declared, Andrew Liu Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Abhishek Roy Employee of: GSK, Paul Wilde Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Sofia Fernandes Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Julia Harris Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

AB0288 SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: YEAR 2 FOLLOW-UP OF A LARGE PHASE 4, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY

Background:

Belimumab (BEL), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), is approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clinical studies have yielded varying incidence rates of mortality and adverse events of special interest, such as malignancies, thereby necessitating large-scale, long-term assessment following BEL exposure.

Objectives:

To assess all-cause mortality and new primary malignancies during post-treatment Year 2 follow-up in adult patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE who received intravenous (IV) BEL or placebo (PBO), plus standard therapy in the 52-week double-blind treatment period of the ongoing BASE trial.1

Methods:

This was a post-treatment follow-up of the Phase 4, double-blind study (BASE1; GSK Study BEL115467; NCT01705977), which randomised 4019 adults with active SLE and receiving standard therapy to BEL (10 mg/kg IV) or PBO on Days 0, 14, 28, and monthly thereafter until Week 48. All patients (including those who discontinued BEL before the end-of-treatment phase) were contacted by phone annually (+/-30-day time window). Rates of mortality and new primary malignancy are summarised for Year 2 follow-up, presented by the treatment received during the 52-week double-blind treatment period (Year 1).

Results:

Baseline patient characteristics and disease activity collected at the start of the study, evaluated in patients with Year 2 follow-up were similar to the overall Year 1 study population. Cumulatively by Year 2 follow-up, 10.7% and 9.5% of patients had been exposed to commercial BEL in the BEL and PBO groups, respectively. Cumulative follow-up adjusted mortality and malignancy rates (per 100 patient years) were lower in the BEL vs PBO Year 1 treatment group (Table 1).

Conclusion:

Year 2 follow-up results of BASE, the largest clinical trial of SLE to date,1 provide continued support for the BEL safety profile. No new BEL safety concerns were identified in patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE receiving standard therapy.

Funding: GSK

References:

[1]Sheikh SZ, et al. Lancet Rheum. 2020 (ePub ahead of print) doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30355-6

Table 1.

Year 2 post-treatment* follow-up mortality and new primary malignancy rates by study treatment during Year 1

BELPBOTotalYear 1 as-treated populationN=2002N=2001N=4003Year 1 deaths, n (%)13 (0.65)22 (1.10)35 (0.87)Year 1 new primary malignancies, n (%)9 (0.45)10 (0.50)19 (0.47)Year 2 (as-treated in Year 1) populationN=1681N=1666N=3347Year 2 deaths by MedDRA SOC, n (%)9 (0.54)21 (1.26)30 (0.90)Cardiac disorders2 (0.12)6 (0.36)8 (0.24)Infections and infestations4 (0.24)2 (0.12)6 (0.18)Uncoded1 (0.06)3 (0.18)4 (0.12)General disorders/administration site conditions1 (0.06)2 (0.12)3 (0.09)Gastrointestinal disorders1 (0.06)1 (0.06)2 (0.06)Neoplasms02 (0.12)2 (0.06)Other05 (0.30)†5 (0.15)Cumulative deaths by Year 2 follow-up, n (%)22 (1.10)43 (2.15)65 (1.62)Incidence rate per 100 patient years0.601.180.89Year 2 new primary malignancies by MedDRA SOC, n (%)3 (0.18)4 (0.24)7 (0.21)Neoplasms2 (0.12)4 (0.24)6 (0.18)Hepatobiliary disorders1 (0.06)01 (0.03)Cumulative malignancies by Year 2 follow-up, n (%)12 (0.60)14 (0.70)26 (0.65)Patient incidence rate per 100 patient years0.340.400.37

*Patients in the post-treatment follow-up period are no longer receiving study treatment; †1 event/patient: blood/lymphatic system, musculoskeletal/connective tissue, nervous system, psychiatric, and renal/urinary disorders.

MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; SOC, system organ class.

Acknowledgements:

Medical writing assistance was provided by Katalin Bartus, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd., UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

Saira Sheikh Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Morton Scheinberg Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Alnylam, AbbVie, PTC Therapeutics, James Cheng-Chung Wei Consultant of: TSH Biopharm, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Sun and UCB, Dana Tegzová: None declared, William Stohl Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Gilead, Tamara Mucenic Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: GSK, Janssen, Roche, Eli Lilly, Gilead, UCB, Raj Punwaney Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Regina Kurrasch Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Julia Harris Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Saima Muzaffar Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Sofia Fernandes Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Norma Lynn Fox Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Andrew Liu Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Holly Quasny Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Belimumab in Anti-Double-Stranded DNA-Positive, Hypocomplementemic Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab, a human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody against B lymphocyte stimulator, in a subset of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who were hypocomplementemic (C3 <90 mg/dl and/or C4 <10 mg/dl) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) positive (≥30 IU/ml) at baseline.

METHODS

In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (BEL112341; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01484496), patients with moderate to severe SLE (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index [SELENA-SLEDAI] score ≥8) were randomized (2:1) to receive weekly subcutaneous (SC) belimumab 200 mg or placebo, plus standard SLE therapy, for 52 weeks. The primary end point was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at week 52. Secondary end points were time to severe flare and reduction in corticosteroid dose (weeks 40-52). Safety was assessed throughout.

RESULTS

Of the 836 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 356 were hypocomplementemic and anti-dsDNA positive at baseline (108 in the placebo group and 248 in the SC belimumab 200 mg group). Compared with placebo, the belimumab group contained more SRI-4 responders (47.2% versus 64.6%; P = 0.0014), had a lower incidence of severe flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI flare index (31.5% versus 14.1%), and had a greater percentage of patients who reduced corticosteroid dosage by ≥25% to ≤7.5 mg/day during weeks 40-52 (11.4% versus 20.7%; P = 0.0844). Adverse events (AEs) were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that in hypocomplementemic, anti-dsDNA-positive SLE patients, weekly SC belimumab 200 mg significantly improves SRI-4 response, decreases severe flare incidence, and reduces corticosteroid use versus placebo; a trend toward greater benefit compared with the overall ITT population was observed. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of belimumab.

A 6-month open-label extension study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond 1 year.

Methods

This was a 24-week, open-label extension following a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of belimumab SC. Patients who completed the double-blind phase were eligible to enter the open-label phase. All patients received weekly belimumab 200 mg SC plus standard SLE therapy. Outcome measures included safety and efficacy (SLE Response Index (SRI) and SLE Flare Index (SFI) rates), and changes in biomarker and B cell levels.

Results

Of 677 patients who completed the 52-week, double-blind phase, 662 entered the open-label phase; 206 had previously received placebo and 456 had previously received belimumab. Despite differences in total belimumab exposure (24 weeks in the placebo-to-belimumab group versus 76 weeks in the belimumab group), the proportions of patients experiencing more than one adverse event (AE) or a serious AE in the open-label phase were similar between groups (placebo-to-belimumab: 51.5 and 6.8%; belimumab: 48.2 and 5.5%, respectively). Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity. Efficacy was maintained through the extension phase. An SRI response was achieved by 16.1% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 76.3% patients in the belimumab group. Furthermore, 1.0% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 2.6% of patients in the belimumab group experienced a severe SFI flare.

Conclusion

Belimumab SC was well tolerated and efficacy was maintained during the extension phase of this study. The safety profile of belimumab SC is consistent with that of previous experience with belimumab.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01484496

Rituximab in refractory autoimmune diseases: Brazilian experience with 29 patients (2002-2004)

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against B-lymphocytes that express CD 20, is already available for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Due to the increased relevance of B-cell regulation in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, rituximab is being used in the treatment of patients whose condition is refractory to conventional therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the short-term efficacy and tolerance of rituximab in patients with various autoimmune diseases who were treated at the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in the city of Sao Paulo.

RESULTS

During the period 2002-2004, 29 patients with various autoimmune diseases were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 for 4 consecutive weeks, or two doses of 1 g 2 weeks apart. We observed remarkable short-term results in all cases, except for one patient with thrombocytopenic purpura. Of note, we describe the results in two patients with diseases not previously treated with rituximab (hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenstrom and eosinophilic fasciitis with hypergammaglobulinemia). Treatment was well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events. We also observed a marked reduction in steroid dosage.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab seems to be safe and effective in the treatment of patients with a variety of autoimmune diseases that are refractory to other modalities of treatment.

Antimitochondrial (pyruvate dehydrogenase) autoantibodies in autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Anti-pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) antibodies were determined in 1451 sera of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and several autoimmune rheumatic conditions by ELISA and immunoblotting. They were detected in sera of 93% of the patients with PBC (179 of 192 patients) in 60 of 277 (22%) patients with Sjogren's syndrome (SjS), 34 of 437 (8%) patients with scleroderma, 33 of 191 patients with SLE (17%), and 5 of 55 (10%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but in none of the patients with polymyositis or the antiphospholipid syndrome. The ELISA studies were confirmed by immunoblots showing binding of autoimmune rheumatic sera to the same epitope (74 kd) of mitochondria that the PBC sera reacted with. The identical binding characteristics were also confirmed by protein competition assays with purified PDH. In 4 of 53 patients with SjS who were positive for anti-PDH, high titers as in PBC were detected. The anti-PDH antibodies in Sjogren's patients were associated with deranged liver function tests and extraglandular features but did not correlate with any other non-organ-specific antibody. Follow-up studies confirmed the association of the emergence of anti-PDH antibodies with defects in liver function tests. The antibodies were more prevalent in SLE and RA when they were associated with Sjogren's syndrome (30 and 18.8%, respectively). Among patients with different forms of scleroderma, anti-PDH antibodies were noted in subjects with systemic sclerosis, morphea, and Raynaud's phenomenon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison between autoantibodies in malaria and leprosy with lupus

Sera from 16 patients with falciparum malaria, 16 patients with vivax malaria and 31 patients with leprosy were tested for autoantibodies to intracellular proteins and nucleic acids. Precipitating antibodies to soluble protein extracts were not detected in any serum. Sera from malaria patients showed prominent immunofluorescence staining of the HEP2 nuclear membrane as well as frequent 75% (24/32) and intense Western blot reactivity. In contrast, only 20% and 36% of patients with leprosy had positive immunofluorescence or positive immunoblots respectively, and reactivity was weak in most cases. Neither the malaria nor leprosy sera contained autoantibodies with specificities similar to the characteristic lupus autoantibodies such as double stranded DNA (dsDNA), Ro/SSA, La/SSB, Sm, RNP and P proteins. Low levels of antibodies to single stranded (ssDNA) were however found in 11 (34%) malaria sera and in seven (23%) leprosy sera. Thirteen percent of patients with leprosy had anti-histone antibodies. These findings demonstrate considerable differences in the capacity of infectious agents to induce autoantibodies and also the infrequency with which autoantibodies characteristic of idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus are induced.

Influenza: response of T-cell lymphopenia to thymosin

Eighteen volunteers in tow study groups were inoculated with influenza A (H3N2) and their peripheral blood T, B and null cells enumerated at subsequent intervals. Infection with wild-type virus or with a live, attenuated virus vaccine markedly reduced the proportion and absolute number of T-cell rosettes 24 hours after inoculation. T-Cell depression preceded the onset of clinical illness in symptomatic subjects, continued during illness, and returned to normal with recovery. T-cell lymphopenia was most pronounced in volunteers infected with wild-type virus and was accompanied by an increase in null cells. Lymphocytes from six wild-virus recipients with T-cell leukopenia were incubated in vitro with a calfthymus extract (thymosin), significantly increasing the percentage of T rosettes in all six subjects (P less than 0.0001). These data indicate that influenza is accompanied by pronounced quantitative and functional changes in T cells.

The heterogeneity of leukemic reticuloendotheliosis, "hairy cell leukemia". Evidence for its monocytic origin

The presence of B, T, and monocyte markers were studied on the spleen and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two patients with leukemic reticuloendotheliosis. A high proportion of cells from both patients bore a receptor for cytophilic antibody, both in suspension and frozen tissue section. Cells in suspension lacked surface immunoglobulins or a receptor for sheep red blood cells. These results favor the evidence that "hairy cells" are monocytic in origin.