Diagnostic value of transthoracic needle biopsy in lung tumors

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic ultrasonography is widely used in imaging peripheral lesions and invasive interventional procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of thoracic ultrasonography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy and the factors affecting the diagnosis of peripheral tumoral lung lesions.

METHODS

The lesion size, biopsy needle type, number of blocks, complications, and pathology results were compared in 83 patients between January 2015 and July 2018. The cases with pathological non-diagnosis and definite pathological diagnosis were determined. For the assessment of the factors affecting diagnosis, the size of the lesions and the biopsy needle type were evaluated. Biopsy preparations containing non-diagnostic atypical cells were referred to a cytopathologist. The effect of the cytopathological examination on the diagnosis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Pathological diagnosis was made in 66.3% of the cases; cell type could not be determined in 22.9% of the cases, and they were referred to a cytopathologist. After the cytopathologist's examination, the diagnosis rate increased to 80.7%. Diagnosis rates were higher when using tru-cut than Chiba and higher in cases with tumor size >2 cm than smaller.

CONCLUSION

Thoracic ultrasonography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy is a preferred approach to the diagnosis of peripheral tumoral lung lesions, given its high diagnostic rate, in addition to being cheap, highly suitable for bedside use, and safe, and the lack of radiation exposure.

Exploring the Impact of Positional Sleep Apnea in a Turkish Population: Unveiling the Untold Story

BACKGROUND The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with demographical, clinical and polysomnographic features of positional sleep apnea through different criterion of positional sleep apnea (POSA vs e-POSA) in a large patient cohort from a tertiary referral center MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 782 OSA patients who were further diagnosed with POSA (total: n=470, e-POSA: n=204) or non-POSA (n=312) based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) events by overnight polysomnography were included. Demographical, clinical, and polysomnographic characteristics were recorded, while independent predictors of POSA and e-POSA were determined via linear regression analysis. RESULTS Severe OSA (AHI ≥30/h) was less common in the POSA (33.4% vs 71.5%, P<0.001) and e-POSA (9.8% vs 62.3%, P<0.001) groups than in the non-POSA and non-e-POSA groups, respectively. For POSA and e-POSA, male sex (OR 2.195, P<0.001 and OR 2.021, P=0.004, respectively), low body mass index (BMI; OR 0.932, P<0.001 and OR 0.948, P=0.006), low AHI (OR 0.954 and OR 0.902, P<0.001 for each), and less desaturation (T90%, OR 0.972 and OR 0.968, P<0.001 for each) were the common statistically significant predictors. Younger age was an independent predictor of POSA (OR 0.97, P=0.003). POSA (median 20.4 s) and e-POSA (20.5 s) groups demonstrated similar apnea-hypopnea durations (min) as the non-POSA (median 21.1 s) group. CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed that male sex and lower values of BMI, AHI, and desaturation were common determinants of POSA and e-POSA, while younger age independently predicted POSA. POSA and e-POSA had similar clinical and polysomnographic characteristics and shared the unvaried hypoxic burden.

Use of Radiology, D-Dimer, and Mean Platelet Volume Combination as a Prognostic Marker in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease-19 Patients

Introduction

The search for biomarkers that could help in predicting disease prognosis in the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is still high on the agenda.

Objective

To find out the efficacy of D-dimer and mean platelet volume (MPV) combination as a prognostic marker in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with bilateral infiltration.

Materials and Methods

Study design: Retrospective observational cohort. Patients who were presented to our hospital between March 16, 2020 and June 07, 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome of the study was specified as the need for intensive care, while the secondary outcomes were duration of treatment and hospitalization. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analyzes were carried out to assess the efficacy of D-dimer and MPV parameters as prognostic markers.

Results

Between the mentioned dates, 575 of 1,564 patients were found to be compatible with COVID-19, and the number of patients who were included in the study was 306. The number of patients who developed the need for intensive care was 40 (13.1%). For serum D-dimer levels in assessing the need for intensive care, the area under the curve (AUC) was found to be 0.707 (95% CI: 0.620–0.794). The AUC for MPV was 0.694 (95% CI: 0.585–0.803), when D-dimer was ≥1.0 mg/L. When patients with a D-dimer level of ≥1.0 mg/L were divided into two groups considering the MPV cut-off value as 8.1, the rate of intensive care transport was found to be significantly higher in patients with an MPV of ≥8.1 fL compared to those with an MPV of &lt;8.1 fL (32.6 vs. 16.0%, p = 0.043). For the prognostic efficacy of the combination of D-dimer ≥ 1.0 mg/L and MPV ≥ 8.1 fL in determining the need for intensive care, following values were determined: sensitivity: 57.7%, specificity: 70.8%, positive predictive value (PPV): 32.0%, negative predictive value (NPV): 84.0%, and accuracy: 63.0%. When D-dimer was ≥1.0, the median duration of treatment in MPV &lt;8.1 and ≥8.1 groups was 5.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 5.0–10.0] days for both groups (p = 0.64). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 7.0 (IQR: 5.0–10.5) days in the MPV &lt;8.1 group, while it was 8.5 (IQR: 5.0–16.3) days in the MPV ≥ 8.1 group (p = 0.17).

Conclusion

In COVID-19 patients with a serum D-dimer level of at least 1.0 mg/L and radiological bilateral infiltration at hospitalization, if the MPV value is ≥8.1, we could predict the need for intensive care with moderate efficacy and a relatively high negative predictive value. However, no correlation could be found between this combined marker and the duration of treatment and the LOS.

What are the Prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases and the Characteristics of These Patients?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to assess the characteristics of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stable COPD patients (age, >40 years) were included in the study between January 2014 and June 2014. Patients with acute exacerbations and a previous lung resection were excluded. Data regarding demographic characteristics were recorded. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale was used to assess the severity of breathlessness. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) was performed. Abdominal aortic diameter was measured using abdominal ultrasonography (AUS), and AAA was diagnosed as an aortic diameter of ≥30 mm at the renal artery level.

RESULTS

In total, 82 patients were examined. AAA was detected in five (6.1%) patients. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease were present in four patients with AAA. The average mMRC score was 3.2±0.4, and the mean CAT score was 18.4±6.0. Aneurysmal diameter was >50 mm in four patients and 37 mm in one patient. Statistically significant differences were found between patient with AAA and those without AAA with respect to the mean abdominal aortic diameters at the renal artery and iliac artery levels (p=0.012 and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that AAA is associated with COPD, with a prevalence rate of 6.1%. AAA is usually asymptomatic until a clinical status of rupture, which is associated with a higher mortality risk. Early diagnosis of AAA is lifesaving. In COPD patients, AAA might be easily determined using AUS, which is a noninvasive and relatively cheap procedure.

Role of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Differential Diagnosis of Exudative Pleural Effusion

OBJECTIVES:

Pleural effusion is a common diagnostic and clinical problem. The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion may be difficult and may require several procedures, including invasive ones. Certain studies have investigated biochemical parameters to facilitate the diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion; however, it remains a challenging problem in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the potential role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, which can be easily obtained by determining the cell count of the pleural fluid, in the differential diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion.

METHODS:

Records from patients who underwent thoracentesis and pleural fluid analysis between May 1, 2013, and March 1, 2015, were obtained from the electronic database of our hospital. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into five groups according to their diagnosis: malignant pleural effusion, para-malignant pleural effusion, para-pneumonic effusion, tuberculosis-related effusion or other. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio value was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. The patient groups were compared according to the given parameter.

RESULTS:

A total of 465 patients who met the inclusion criteria among 1616 patients with exudative pleural effusion were included in the study. The mean neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio value was significantly lower in tuberculosis-related pleural effusion compared to malignant, para-pneumonic and para-malignant effusions (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.012, respectively). The areas under the curve for tuberculosis pleurisy compared to malignant, para-pneumonic and para-malignant effusions were 0.38, 0.36, and 0.37, respectively. Lower cut-off values had higher sensitivity but lower specificity for tuberculosis pleurisy, while higher cut-off values had higher specificity but lower sensitivity for this condition.

CONCLUSION:

The pleural fluid neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, which is an inexpensive, reproducible, and easily calculated hematological parameter, may facilitate the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion.

A cross-sectional observational study to investigate daily symptom variability, effects of symptom on morning activities and therapeutic expectations of patients and physicians in COPD-SUNRISE study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lung disease characterized with limitation of airflow that is not completely reversible, progressive deterioration of airways and systemic inflammation. This study has been planned to determine daily symptom variability of patients, expectations of patient and physicians from treatment and patient profiles. A total of 514 patients with COPD from 25 centers were included in this national, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. Data regarding demographic features, concomitant diseases, history and treatment of COPD and expectations of patients and physicians were all obtained in a single visit. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of the patients was 64.1 (9.5) years; age range was 41-92 years, 50% of the patients were younger than 65 years and 91% were males. Educational level of the patients was at least primary school in 80.2%; and 54.3% (30.4%) of the patients had at least one concomitant disease, particularly a cardiovascular disease. Mean (SD) duration of having COPD was 5.4 (4.6) years. The majority of patients were at moderate (43.2%) and severe (35.0%) COPD stages and one or more exacerbations per year was determined in 71%. Inhaled beta-2 agonists (84.2%), inhaled steroids (76.3%) and inhaled long-acting anti-cholinergics (70.0%) were the most commonly used medications. Dyspnea (99.0%), sputum production (92.8%) and wheezing (90.5%) were the most common symptoms, and symptom variability for dyspnea (41.1%), sputum production (61.0%) and cough (53.5%) were seen the most in the morning hours (p< 0.001). Most commonly affected morning activity was climbing up/down the stairs (point of effect: 6.7), followed by wearing socks/shoes (point of effect: 4.3) and showering/bathing (point of effect: 4.2) by COPD. Major treatment expectations of patients were greater symptomatic relief (82.3%) and greater mobility (70.0%), faster symptomatic relief (61.1%) and improvement in morning activities (59.3%); while major treatment expectations of physicians included increased quality of life (100.0%) and decreased morbidity (96.0%). Quitting smoking was the most commonly recommended (88.3%) and implemented (67.9%) non-drug protective approach aimed at decreasing the frequency of exacerbations. Consequently, our results demonstrate that COPD is not a disease of only the elderly, is an important healthcare issue that often disrupt daily living of the patients due to inadequate disease awareness leading to overlooking of the symptoms by patient and physicians, and that a patient-centered approach based on the living standards, life expectancies and preferences of patients was crucial in patient management.