POS1223 DIFFERENT ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 VACCINE RESPONSE UNDER B- AND T-CELL TARGETED THERAPIES VERSUS ANTI-CYTOKINE THERAPIES IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIDES

Background

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is effective in preventing severe forms of COVID-19, but there remain concerns about a reduced vaccine response in patients suffering from inflammatory arthritides who are treated by immunosuppressive therapies.

Objectives

We analysed the impact of bDMARDs on the humoral anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response of patients followed in day hospitals.

Methods

We studied the vaccine response after a complete vaccine regimen followed in day hospital in 5 French hospitals and treated with an intravenous bDMARD between September 2019 and August 2021. After obtaining their informed consent, we included patients with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology. They were considered non-responders if the antibody level detected was inferior to the threshold of positivity of the kit used.

Results

205 patients were included (148 females/57 males). The median age was 64 years (Interquartile Range [IQR] 56-71). 25 were treated with tocilizumab (TCZ), 36 with abatacept (ABA), 53 with infliximab (IFX) and 91 with rituximab (RTX). When considering both patients after a complete vaccination schema (2 doses, or 1 dose in case of prior COVID-19) and those with 1 booster dose, 34 patients (16.6%) were non-responders (2 [5.9%] treated by IFX, none treated by TCZ, 9 [26.5%] treated by ABA and 23 [67.7%] treated by RTX). In multivariate analysis, the only characteristics that significantly and independently differed between responders and non-responders were last bDMARD and corticosteroid therapy at the time of 1st vaccination (Table 1). In RTX-treated patients, the delay from last infusion to 1st vaccine dose was significantly shorter in non-responders (median 4.3 IQR [2.9-6.1] months in non-responders versus 8.4 IQR [5.7-14.5] in responders, p=0.0007). Median survival, i.e. achieving a vaccine response in 50% of RTX-treated subjects, was achieved after 277 days (95CI [209-310]) in patients vaccinated with 2 or 3 doses (Figure 1). In ABA-treated patients, the delay from last infusion to 1st vaccine dose was not different between non-responders and responders.

Table 1.

Patients’ characteristics and comparisons between responders and non-responders.

All patients (n=205)Responders (n=171)Non responders (n=34)Univariate p valueMultivariatep valueAge (median [IQR]), in years64 [56-71]64 [54-70]69 [57-75.5]0.070.40Female sex, n (%)148 (72.2)125 [73.1)23 (67.7)0.53Inflammatory arthritides, n (%)0.16**0.24 Rheumatoid Arthritis156 (78.0)128 (74.9)28 (82.4)0.51 Spondyloarthritis33 (16.1)31 (18.1)2 (5.9)0.12 Others*16 (7.8)12 (5.9)4 (1.9)0.31Last bDMARDs at time of 1st vaccination, n (%)0.0004ABA/RTX versus IFX/TCZ < 0.00010.00024 Infliximab53 (25.9)51 (29.8)2 (5.9) Tocilizumab25 (12.2)25 (14.6)0 Abatacept36 (17.6)27 (15.8)9 (26.5) Rituximab91 (44.4)68 (39.8)23 (67.7)Associated treatments at time of 1st vaccination CsDMARDs, n (%)126 (61.5)107 (62.6)19(55.9)0.56 Methotrexate91 (44.4)78 (45.6)13 (38.2)0.46 Median dose in users (mg /week) [IQR]15 [10-17.5]13.8 [10-15.6]15 [13.8-20]0.07 Corticosteroids, n (%)25 (12.2)19 (11.1)6 (17.6)0.29 Median dose (mg /day) [IQR]0 [0-0]0 [0-0]0 [0-2]0.0350.016Previous COVID-19 infection, n (%)23 (11.2)21 (12.3)2 (5.9)0.38Type of vaccine, n (%)0.62 Pfizer169 (82.4)142 (83.0)27 (79.4)0.62 Moderna14 (68.3)11 (6.4)3 (8.8)0.71 Astra-Zeneca17 (8.3)15 (8.8)2 (5.9)0.74 Janssen5 (2.4)3 (1.8)2 (5.9)0.19Vaccination, n (%) Complete167 (81.5)141 (82.5)28 (16.8)0.47 Complete + 1 booster dose56 (27.3)43 (25.1)13 (38.2)0.14Figure 1.

Cumulative seropositive rate according to the interval (days) between the last course of rituximab administration and vaccination

Conclusion

ABA and RTX alter the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and were associated with nearly all vaccine non-responses in the present study. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with a lower vaccine response regardless of its indication or the concomitant use of bMARD.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0700 IMPACT OF DELAYING INITIATION OF METHOTREXATE BY 1 MONTH ON THE OUTCOME OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AT 1 YEAR

Background

It is recommended that vaccinations should be performed prior to start methotrexate (MTX) knowing that delaying initiation of background therapy may have an impact on the progression of RA.

Objectives

To access the impact of delaying initiation of MTX by 1 month on the outcome of RA at 1 year.

Methods

The VACIMRA study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial comparing the vaccine protection obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1-month delay between anti-pneumococcal vaccine PCV13 and methotrexate initiation in one arm, versus immediate introduction of MTX following vaccination in the other arm. We analyzed disease activity based on DAS28-ESR at baseline (M0), 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months between the 2 groups. For structural progression, we performed a radiographic analysis of 79 RA patients included in the Montpellier center at baseline, 6 and 12 months. This analysis was performed by the same physician two times, blinded to the patient’s group. Structural damage progression at 6 months and 1 year was assessed according to van-der-Heijde-modified Sharp score (vSHS) on radiographs performed at inclusion, at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Comparisons of the means of activity scores and radiographic scores were made with the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Of the 276 patients randomized, 261 could be analyzed (131 in the IMMEDIATE group and 130 in the DELAY group). At inclusion, there were no significant differences in demographic, disease activity (DAS28-ESR), biological and radiographic characteristics between the 2 groups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

VariableModalityTotal populationGROUP IMMEDIATEGROUPE DELAYpGender, n(%)N=261n=131n=1300.97Man74 (28.35)37 (28.24)37 (28.46)Woman187 (71.65)94 (71.76)93 (71.54)Age (years)Mean (± SD)55.74 (± 14.68)55.31 (± 15.27)56.16 (± 14.11)0.76MTX true naive (n(% col))No13 (4.98)8 (6.11)5 (3.85)0.40yes248 (95.02)123 (93.89)125 (96.15)Age at diagnosis (years)Mean (± SD)N=205 55.86 (± 15.16)n=98 55.31 (± 16.07)n=107 56.37 (± 14.34)0.80Positive rheumatoid factorn(% col)166 (64.59)84 (65.12)82 (64.06)0.86Positive ACPAn(% col)174 (68.24)89 (68.99)85 (67.46)0.79CRP (mg/L)Mean (± SD)N=260 17.62 (± 24.87)n=131 15.36 (± 17.95)n=129 19.91 (± 30.23)0.65DAS28-ESRMean (± SD)N=249 5.01 (± 1.11)n=125 5.03 (± 1.13)n=12 4.98 (± 1.10)0.54Sharp modified VdH total radiographic scoreMean (± SD)N=93 1.53 (± 3.62)n=47 1.57 (± 3.68)n=46 1.48 (± 3.60)0.88

DAS 28-ESR evolution during 1 year of follow-up

There was a significant difference in the means of DAS28-ESR at 1 month between the DELAY and IMMEDIAT groups (3.96 ± 1.46 vs 3.41 ± 1.33; p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the means of DAS28-ESR between the 2 groups at 3 months (3.19± 1.46 in the 2 groups p<0.91), at 6 months (3.11 ± 1.42 vs 3.24 ± 1.43; p=0.46, respectively) and at 12 months (2.96 ± 1.34 vs 2.98 ± 1.26p=0.89) (Graphic). Similarly, there was no significant difference in mean radiographic scores at 6 months (2.00 ± 4.41 vs. 1.80 ± 4.03 p=0.81) or at 12 months (2.23 ± 4.86 vs. 2.00 ± 4.07 p=0.93).

There was no significant variation between radiographic scores at 6 months compared to baseline in either group (mean difference 0.21 ± 0.52 vs. 0.36 ± 1.01, p=0.90) nor at 12 months compared to baseline (mean difference 0.40 ± 1.06 vs. 0.62 ± 1.58, p=0.85).

Conclusion

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, initiation of methotrexate 1 month after PCV13 vaccination has no significant impact on RA activity and structural outcome at 1 year. Performing vaccinations 1 month before starting MTX can be proposed without significant impact on RA outcome at 1 year.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1076 OBESITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH LESS LIKELIHOOD OF REMISSION/ LOW DISEASE IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS, A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF 414 PATIENTS

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and is associated with higher disease activity [1].

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate whether obese patients with PsA were less likely to achieve remission/low disease in a real-life multi-centre cohort.

Methods

We used data from the ReFlap study (NCT03119805)[2], which recruited consecutive adult patient with definite PsA for more than 2 years of disease duration from 14 countries. We collected demographic characteristics, self-reported weight and height, clinical data and patient reported outcomes. Remission/low disease was defined as Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤ 4, or Minimal disease activity (MDA). Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2. We compared patient characteristics, disease activity parameters and impact scores between patients with obesity versus non-obese. A multivariable regression model was performed for demographic variables associated with reaching each definition of remission/low disease, adjusted on age, sex, level of education, disease duration, current use of conventional (c-) and biological (b-) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Results

Among 414 patients (49.3% women, mean disease duration 11.0 ±8.2 years), 119 (28.7%) had BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 (obese). Obese patients were more likely to be female, had higher swollen joint and enthesitis counts, higher self-reported pain, poorer physical function, more fatigue and poorer mental health (Table 1). Obese patients were half as likely to achieve MDA or DAPSA remission in multivariable analysis with odd ratios of 0.6 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.3, 0.8, p=0.049) and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p=0.012), respectively for obese compared to non-obese patients (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and remission achievement between obese and non-obese patients with psoriatic arthritis

Non-obese (n=295)BMI ≥30 (n=119)pFemale, %44.361.50.002Number of comorbidities1.61 (0.93)2.83 (2.01)<0.001Tender joints, 0-683.56 (7.81)5.75 (10.0)0.018Swollen joints, 0-662.19 (7.29)1.46 (2.39)0.285Leeds enthesitis index, 0-60.48 (1.23)0.86 (1.70)0.012PGA disease activity, 0-103.90 (2.73)4.76 (2.67)0.004DAPSA14.9 (15.5)18.3 (16.1)0.045HAQ-DI, 0-30.56 (0.65)0.89 (0.70)<0.001PsAID-12, 0-103.11 (2.36)3.96 (2.50)0.001pain, 0-103.80 (2.81)4.54 (2.83)0.017fatigue, 0-103.93 (3.01)4.68 (3.17)0.025work or leisure activities, 0-103.39 (3.01)4.75 (3.11)<0.001functional capacity, 0-103.36 (2.97)4.40 (3.16)0.002depression, 0-101.88 (2.70)2.75 (3.26)0.006

Mean (SD) shown unless specified otherwise. HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; PGA: patient global assessment of disease activity; DAPSA: Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis; PsAID: Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease.

Conclusion

In this real-life data from 14 countries, obesity was frequent and PsA patients with BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 were more likely to be female, and had higher subjectively reported disease activity and illness impact compared to those with lower BMI. Obese patients had a two-fold lower likelihood of achieving remission/low disease defined by both MDA and DAPSA compared to non-obese patients. PsA patients with comorbid obesity may have different disease profiles from non-obese patients, and require specific management.

References

[1]Eder, L., et al., Obesity is associated with a lower probability of achieving sustained minimal disease activity state among patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015. 74(5): p. 813-7.

[2]Gorlier, C., et al., Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019. 78(2): p. 201-208.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Pfizer.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1457 OPALE: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF THE REAL-WORLD USE OF AN ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR AND EVALUATION OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS ON THE THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE. PATIENTS NUTRITIONAL STATUS AT BASELINE

Background

Chronic inflammatory diseases treatment has been greatly improved since the introduction of TNF inhibitors and later, of their biosimilars. In addition, epidemiological and interventional studies suggest a pathophysiological or therapeutic role, respectively, of nutrition in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (IRDs).

Objectives

The objective of the OPALE observational study was to describe in real life the profile of patients treated with an adalimumab biosimilar and to assess the impact of nutrition on disease evolution and response to treatment.

Methods

The study planned a one-year follow-up of patients with at least three visits: inclusion, six months and one year. In this study, 754 patients treated with Fresenius-Kabi adalimumab were included: 54.4 % of patients with an IRD, 42.8 % with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and 2.8 % patients with a psoriasis. Patients’ condition was assessed using a Clinical Global Impression of disease scale (CGI, primary end point of the study). Nutritional status was assessed through clinical data (weight, BMI (Body Mass Index), abdominal circumference) and the available biological analyses results. Screening for sarcopenia was based on a SARC-F score ≥ 4. Nutritional behavior was assessed using a diet questionnaire with a list of 48 foods divided into 6 classes (Fruits & vegetables, meat, fish & eggs, dairy products & fats, starchy foods, sweet foods and drinks). Foods voluntarily withdrawn due to illness and those avoided at acute flare-ups were recommended to be reported. This analysis aims to describe IRD patients’ nutritional status at baseline.

Results

From 754 included patients, 410 patients presented with an IRD (Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), n= 80 / Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), n=102 / SpondyloArthritis (SpA), n=228). Mean patients’ age was 47.7± 14.1 years, 56% are female, mean BMI was 26.0 ± 5.4 kg/m2. From this IRD population, 28.5% of patients have a family history of chronic inflammatory disease.

Mean disease duration was of 6.4 ± 8.4 years. Concerning the previous IRD treatment, 47.4% of patients had previously been treated by methotrexate among them 58% were still receiving this treatment at inclusion. Among IRD patients recruited in OPALE study, 72.8% received Fresenius Kabi adalimumab as their first biotherapy. Most of patients were assessed on the CGI scale as markedly ill (50.7%) or moderately ill (29.9%) and 110 patients (37.3%) had a score ≥ 4 on the SARC-F questionnaire (mean age 48.9 ± 14.1 years and mean BMI 27.2 ±5.6 kg/m2).

Concerning the disease history at baseline, the descriptive analysis of self-administered questionnaire shows that 68.3% of patients may have changed their nutritional behavior because of their illness, by banishing several foods (mean number: 12.7 ± 10.1). These restrictions are increased during flare-ups: 32.7% of patients removed an average of 6.0 ± 5.8 additional foods number. These changes are in part based on the patients’ own beliefs: 17% of them consider that certain foods can improve their illness, 35% of patients think they have identified the foods likely to make it worse (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient-reported influence of certain foods on disease

PsARASpATOTAL IRD(n=60)(n=72)(n=177)(n=309)Patients identifying foods with negative influence21225810137.5% [24.9% - 51.5%]32.4% [21.5% - 44.8%]36.0% [28.6% - 44.0%]35.4% [29.9% - 41.3%]Patients identifying foods with positive influence912274816.4% [7.8% - 28.8%]17.6% [9.5% - 28.8%]17.2% [11.7% - 24.0%]17.1% [12.9% - 22.1%]

Conclusion

These preliminary baseline data from OPALE observational study confirm the risk of decreased muscle mass in IRD. Mean BMI of patients screened for sarcopenia is higher than that of non-sarcopenic patients (respectively 27.2 ± 5.6 kg/m2 and 25.6 ± 4.8 kg/m2; p=0.02). These results plead for a systematic screening for sarcopenia in IRD patients. The risk of sarcopenia could be further aggravated by inappropriate nutritional behaviors aimed at excluding food groups, which would justify dietary education of these IRD patients.

Disclosure of Interests

Martin SOUBRIER Consultant of: Fresenius Kabi, Manuelle VIGUIER Consultant of: Fresenius Kabi, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet Consultant of: Fresenius Kabi, Sebastien Czernichow Consultant of: Fresenius Kabi

POS0587 TRAJECTORIES AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EVOLUTION OF HAND GRIP AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by an early reduced grip strength which persists over time despite the remission of the disease suggesting the presence of a sarcopenia.

Objectives

To study the evolution of the grip strength measured by the handgrip. by identifying different trajectories and associated factors.

Methods

Patients with active RA who visited the Rheumatology Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital for initiating bDMARD were invited to participate to the longitudinal cohort RCVRIC analyzing cardiovascular risk and chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease. Within the RCVRIC cohort 175 RA initially underwent a handgrip determination. 143 patients had at least 2 handgrip measurements over 2 years, allowing analysis of trajectories by the “Group Based Trajectory Modeling” method. For the trajectories, handgrip was expressed in terms of percentage of the theoretical value defined according to age and sex. The clinical characteristics of the disease, the therapeutic response, and the body composition associated with each trajectory were analyzed.

Results

At inclusion, the handgrip was normal among only 4% of patients, with an alteration of 51% of its theoretical value. After 2 years of follow-up, a majority of patients improved their handgrip trajectory to reach an average of 68% of the theoretical one, but only 15.7% of the patients normalized their handgrip. Four trajectories have been identified along with associated factors:

1st trajectory consists of low handgrip with little improvement and was composed of: 9 patients (6.3%), median age 60 years [53.6;69.3], 88% women, disease duration 17.99 years [6.78;24.9], DAS 28 ESR 4.68 ± 1.29, and initial handgrip 21% of the theoretical value [8;24].

2nd trajectory shows good improvement (+72%) and was composed of: 70 patients (49%), median age 58.9 years [54.4;64.3], 84% women, disease duration 5.99 years [1.46;14.8], DAS 28 ESR 4.43 ± 1.07, and initial handgrip 32% of the theoretical value [17.8;46.4].

3rd trajectory shows moderate improvement (+25%) and was composed of: 43 patients (30%), median aged 60.7 years [45.7;69.4], 79% women, disease duration 3.5 years [1.25;9.9], DAS 28 ESR 4.0 ± 1.03 and initial handgrip 60% of the theoretical value [48.2;76].

4th trajectory shows high handgrip and was composed of: 21 patients (14.7%), 57% women, median age 57.9 years old [49.7; 67.4], disease duration 3.81 years [2.14; 10.7], DAS 28 ESR 3.68 ±1.29 and initial hand grip 92% of the theoretical value [85; 100].

Significant differences at inclusion between the 4 trajectories were observed. The 4th trajectory was characterized by a higher proportion of men (p=0.05), lower disease activity (DAS 28 ESR (p=0.02), SDAI (p=0.04)), better initial handgrip (p=0.03) and 6 min walk test (p=0.0001), and a lower percentage of fat mass (p=0.04). In contrast, a higher disability (HAQ, p=0.002), a lower total lean body mass (p=0.001) and poorer therapeutic response (p=0.04) were noted in trajectories 1 and 2.

Conclusion

After 2 years of follow-up, a majority of patients improved their handgrip trajectory. However, very few patients normalized their hand grip. Four trajectories of handgrip were identified; the main indicators of hand grip’s improvement were the control of the disease activity, low functional disability, walking performance, a low percentage of fat mass and high lean mass.

References

[1]Cruz-Jentoft AJ, and al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. janv 2019

[2]An HJ, and al. Sarcopenia in Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 7 août 2020

[3]Shiratori AP and al. Evaluation protocols of hand grip strength in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review. Rev Bras Reumatol. avr 2014

[4]Dodds RM, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PloS One. 2014;

Acknowledgements

I thank the department of rheumatology of Clermont Ferrand.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

OP0066 IMPACT OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF TROPHERYMA WHIPPLEI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-EXISTING CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: DATA FROM THE NATIONAL Tw-IRD REGISTRY

Background

Tropheryma whipplei (Tw) infection is a rare condition, characterized by inflammatory joint symptoms in more than 75% of the cases, which can lead the physician to diagnose chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) and to initiate DMARDs. DMARDs are often ineffective and may reveal digestive signs, systemic manifestations or involvement of other organs. We hypothesized that treatment of Tw infection has a favorable impact on rheumatologic and extra-rheumatologic manifestations attributed to IRD.

Objectives

To validate this hypothesis, we initiated a registry with the objectives to describe the characteristics of IRD and their treatments, the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of Tw infections and the impact of the treatment of Tw infection on the evolution of IRD and associated DMARDs.

Methods

We initiated a French National register including adult patients with pre-existing IRD, treated with DMARDs, later diagnosed with Tw infection. Cases were identified through a call for observation via the “Club Rhumatismes et inflammations” website. We collected clinical and biological data about the characteristics of IRD and their treatments, the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of Tw infections, and the impact of the treatment of Tw infection on the evolution of IRD and associated DMARDs.

Results

Seventy-three IRD patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 49 years (SD +/- 10.9), with 78% of men, median IRD duration was 79 months (IQR 36; 140), including rheumatoid arthritis (31 cases), spondyloarthritis (14 cases), psoriatic arthritis (6 cases) and other IRDs (22 cases). All IRD patients were treated with DMARDs, with no therapeutic response in 51% of the cases, worsening of rheumatologic symptoms in 34% of the cases, and occurrence of extra-articular manifestations in 27% of the cases. Screening for Tw infection mainly involved saliva and stool PCR, while diagnostic modalities involved organ specific PCR and biopsies, in particular duodenal biopsies (PCR positive in 87% of cases and histology in only 38% of cases). At the time of Tw infection diagnosis, mean age was 58 years (SD +/- 10.1), all patients had joint involvement, 33% axial involvement, 11% entheseal involvement, 84% extra-articular manifestations, 93% elevated CRP, 86% hypoalbuminemia and 67% anemia. Tw infection treatment modalities (median follow-up of 22 months) mainly involved a combination of doxycycline (95%) and hydroxychloroquine (96%), with complete recovery in 79% of the cases and Tw-related deaths in 2 cases. At the same time, Tw infection treatment was associated with IRD remission in 93% of cases, with a median time to remission of 2 months (IQR 1; 4.25), leading to DMARD withdrawal in 94% of cases and corticosteroid therapy withdrawal in 65% of cases.

Conclusion

A Tw infection should be considered in IRD patients with peripheral joint involvement and inadequate response to DMARDs, particularly in the presence of extra-articular manifestations, elevated CRP and hypoalbuminemia. In such patients, positive results of screening and diagnostic tests for Tw infection may lead to the initiation of Tw infection treatment which is associated with complete recovery of Tw infection and rapid remission of the IRD, allowing DMARD and corticosteroid therapy withdrawal in most the cases.

References

[1]Marth T. Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2016;16(3):e13–22.

[2]Puéchal X. Whipple’s arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2016;83(6):631–5.

Acknowledgements

Club Rhumatismes et Inflammations.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

OP0282 RITUXIMAB ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERE COVID-19 AMONG PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIDES: A 1-YEAR MULTICENTER STUDY IN 1116 SUCCESSIVE PATIENTS RECEIVING BIOLOGIC AGENTS

Background:

At a time when vaccines are being prioritized for individuals most at risk, there is currently no clear evidence that risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher for patients with than without inflammatory arthritides (IA). Biologic use was not associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes for yet but the case of rituximab (RTX) remains an issue, given its immunological long term effect, the role of humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 and its indirect effect on T-cell response. A potential association between rituximab and worse COVID-19 outcomes was raised by case reports and retrospective, declarative studies (with few data on the total number of patients exposed).

Objectives:

To address differently the issue of the risk of COVID-19 related to RTX and limit biases, we examined the occurrence of severe COVID-19 in all patients receiving intravenous biologic agents at day-hospitals during the pandemic in France.

Methods:

From 1st September 2019 to 1st January 2021, we analyzed patients with IA prospectively treated with intravenous biologic agents (RTX, abatacept, infliximab or tocilizumab) in 7 clinical centers in France. We obtained the list of patients receiving intravenous biologic agents in each center from the pharmacist of the hospitals. Therefore, all consecutive patients receiving 1 of the 4 drugs at the time of the study were included in each center. Patients with no follow-up after September 2020 were systematically contacted by phone. The occurrence of a severe COVID -19 (i.e. resulting in death, hospitalization or increase in length of hospitalization related to COVID-19) was the primary outcome criteria.

Results:

In total, 1116 patients receiving intravenous biologic agents were included: 449 with infliximab, 392 RTX, 170 tocilizumab and 105 abatacept. From 1st September 2019, the median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range 14-16). In total, 10 cases of severe COVID-19 occurred, 9 treated with RTX and 1 with infliximab (supplementary Table 1). Four deaths occurred in our cohort during follow-up but none was related to COVID-19 (1 patient treated by tocilizumab, 1 by RTX and 2 by infliximab). In univariate analysis, the proportion of severe COVID-19 was significantly higher for patients receiving RTX than other biologic agents (9/392 vs 1/724, p=0.0003, OR [95%CI] 17.0 [2.1-134.6]). To take into account potential confounders, we performed multivariate analysis accounting for baseline parameters that differed between RTX and other biologic groups. RTX remained significantly associated with risk of severe COVID-19 (p=0.019) (Table 1).

Patient characteristicsRituximab (n= 392)Other bDMARDs (n= 724)Univariate analysis, p-valueMultivariate analysis, p-valueMedian age (years), — [IQR]64 [56-71]57.3 [47.0-67.0]< 0.00010.51Female — n (%)285 (72.7)426 (58.8)< 0.00010.58IA diagnosis< 0.00010.12Median follow-up from 1st September to last news14 [13-15]15 [14-16]< 0.00010.86Confirmed severe COVID-19 cases —n (%)9 (2.3)1 (0.1)0.00030.019Comorbidities** (history of) — n (%) Cardiovascular disease60 (15.4)167 (23.1)0.00250.77 Chronic lung disease,92 (23.5)84 (11.6)0.00010.88Median BMI (kg/m2) — [IQR]25.8 [23.2-29.4]27.3 [23.4-31.2]0.0150.80Treatments — n (%) Methotrexate179 (45.8)322 (44.5)0.71 Leflunomide41 (10.5)39 (5.4)0.00230.43 Hydroxychloroquine35 (8.9)24 (3.3)0.00010.15 Glucocorticoids127 (41.8)100 (19.4)< 0.00010.36 Median dose (mg/day) — [IQR]1 [0-5]0 [0-0]< 0.0001

No significant difference in terms of baseline gammaglobulins (p=0.46) or number of previous RTX infusions (p=0.57) was observed among patients receiving RTX with or without a severe COVID-19.

Conclusion:

The present results highly indicate increased risk of severe COVID-19 with RTX. Among patients with inflammatory arthritides, those receiving RTX should be prioritized for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, sufficiently long before infusion/reinfusion and the immunization checked, or an alternative targeted therapy proposed.

Acknowledgements:

We thank Dr. Karine Demesmay and all the pharmacists who helped us for this study.

Disclosure of Interests:

Renaud FELTEN Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Marie Duret: None declared, Elodie BAUER: None declared, Marc Ardizzone: None declared, H Julien Djossou: None declared, Jean-Hugues Salmon: None declared, Cassandre Fabre: None declared, Julia Walther: None declared, Isabelle CHARY VALCKENAERE: None declared, marion geoffroy: None declared, Laurent Messer: None declared, Francis Berenbaum: None declared, Martin SOUBRIER: None declared, Jérémie SELLAM Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Galapagos, Sandoz, Fresenius Kabi, Grant/research support from: Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg: None declared

POS1475-HPR EFFECT OF ARGENTINE TANGO PRACTICE ON TOTAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY TIME IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATISM: A PILOT STUDY

Background:

Most patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatism (CIR) have a physical activity (PA) level below recommendations [1,2]. Currently, adapted structures offer a range of activities supervised by adapted physical activity educators. To the best of our knowledge, Argentinean tango is not yet offered in these structures.

Objectives:

The objective of this pilot study was to study the effect of 24 consecutive sessions of Argentinean tango on the total PA level in patients with CIR, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (AS).

Methods:

In this controlled, randomized, open-label, clinical trial with two parallel arms, patients were required to attend two tango sessions per week, 48 sessions from 0 (M0) to 6 months (M6) for the intervention group (IG) and 24 sessions from 3 months (M3) to M6 for the control group (CG). Total PA time was measured at M3 using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) [3].

Results:

A total of 27 patients (23 women) were included, including 15 with RA and 12 with AS. Mean age was 59 ± 12 years, and median disease duration was 10 years (IQR: 3-19). The majority of patients had background treatment (conventional and/or biological). At M3, 22 patients could be evaluated (11 GC patients and 11 GI patients), as 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 2 were unable to come in due to health or professional reasons. The 11 GI patients attended a median of 16 sessions (IQR: 8-22), i.e., approximately one session per week. At M3, the total PA time was not increased, regardless of the measurement method, GPAQ questionnaire (effect size and 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03 [-0.60; 0.67], p=0.91) or accelerometer (effect size and 95% CI: 0.43 [-0.37; 1.24], p=0.26), and regardless of the intensity of the PA. No significant change was found for sedentary time, disease activity, fatigue, or anxiety. However, improvements were found in body appreciation as assessed by the Body Appreciation Scale 2 questionnaire (p=0.016), balance (p=0.053), wrist bending angle (p=0.092), and shoulder amplitude (p=0.093). The few participants in this study is explained by the geographic distance of the classes and their homes, the lack of availability of patients in professional activity, fatigue, or not liking dance (mainly among men).

Conclusion:

The results of this pilot study suggest that one Argentinean tango session per week in CIR patients is more achievable than two sessions as originally planned. As the practice of classes in hospitals is constrained due to geographic distance, the sessions could be offered in adapted structures. Nevertheless, our pilot study shows that the Argentinean tango is beneficial for body appreciation in patients with CIR. A qualitative study is needed to better understand these effects.

References:

[1]Haute Autorité de Santé (2007). Rheumatoid arthritis: therapeutic aspects excluding drugs and surgery - medico-social and organizational aspects. Professional recommendations service - Medical-economic evaluation and public health service.

[2]Haute Autorité de Santé (2008). Spondylarthritis: guide - long-term condition. Good Professional Practices Department - Communication Department.

[3] Cleland CL, Hunter RF, Kee F, Cupples ME, Sallis JF, Tully MA. (2014 Dec). Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health. 10;14:1255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0298 ARE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS BEING TREATED OPTIMALLY ACROSS THE WORLD? DISPARITIES IN HEALTH CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS ACROSS COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT GDP’S, AN ANALYSIS OF 429 PATIENTS FROM 13 COUNTRIES

Background:

In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), EULAR recommendations are to aim for remission or low disease activity(1). Many treatments are now available, though some are costly and not widely available in all countries. Country of patient care, and in particular Gross Domestic Product (GDP) may be linked to PsA outcomes(2). Although patients with high disease activity are eligible for targeted therapies such as biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), they may not be able to get the benefits from these efficacious treatments in all countries equally.

Objectives:

The objective was to explore the rate of PsA patients with high to moderate disease activity, not receiving bDMARDs across countries, and to assess the consequences on functional incapacity.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional analysis of an observational study (ReFlap, NCT03119805)(3), which included adult patients with PsA with ≥ 2 years disease duration from 14 countries. One country was excluded from this analysis since only 7 patients were included. We explored the rate of patients with significant disease activity (i.e based on DAPSA > 14) and no ongoing bDMARD prescription. Countries of inclusion were analysed separately, and classified into tertiles by GDP/capita (lowest tertile: Brazil, Turkey, Russia, Romania, Estonia; middle tertile: Spain, Italy, UK, France; highest tertile: Canada, Germany, USA and Singapore). The rate of no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients was analysed by country and compared between the 3 tertiles of GDP/capita by parametric tests. Functional capacity (HAQ) was compared between no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients and the other patients (pooling patients with moderate or high disease activity with bDMARD, low disease activity and remission with or without bDMARD). There was no imputation of missing data.

Results:

Of the 459 patients, 429 had complete data available and were analysed: mean age 52.3 (SD 12.6) years, mean disease duration 10.2 (SD 8.2) years, 215 (50.1%) males. The rate of no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients was 18.4% (76/414). The rate ranged from 7.4% (UK and Spain) to 40% (Russia): Figure 1. A link was seen with the country and the tertiles of countries according to GDP/capita, with higher rate of no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients in the lowest GDP/capita countries (28.8%, 15.3% and 14.3% in the 3 GDP/capita tertiles, respectively, p=0.005; Figure 1). Of note, 40/76 no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients received a treatment intensification during the visit. Among no bDMARDs - DAPSA > 14 patients, functional incapacity was higher than in the other patients, as expected (mean HAQ 0.96 (SD 0.64) vs 0.57 (SD 0.63), p<0.001).

Figure 1.

The size of the bubbles represent the number of patients per country (range, 13 to 89). The horizontal lines represent the mean proportion of patients with no bDMARDs – DAPSA > 14 for each tertiles of countries by GDP/capita.

Conclusion:

In this exploratory comparison of disease patterns and treatments choices in 13 countries, we observed that more PsA patients with high or moderate disease activity and living in low GDP/capita countries were less likely to be treated with bDMARDs. As a consequence, no bDMARDs – DAPSA > 14 patients had worse functional incapacity. Equitable access to bDMARDs should be aimed for all patients regardless of their country of origin.

References:

[1]Gossec L et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-712.

[2]Gossec L et al. Are There Country Differences in Disease Activity and Life Impact of Psoriatic Arthritis? An Analysis of 436 Patients from 14 Countries [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10).

[3]Gorlier C et al. Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):201-208.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

Cannabis use assessment and its impact on pain in rheumatologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Despite classic analgesic or effective treatments in rheumatic diseases, such as synthetic DMARDs in RA, patients remain in pain and often turn to non-prescribed pharmacological alternatives, such as cannabis self-therapeutic use. However, this medical use of cannabis has not been thoroughly studied.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review up to June 2020. The incidence of cannabis consumption was calculated by metaproportion. Differences between cannabis users and non-users were expressed as standardized mean differences using the inverse-variance method. We also assessed the effects of cannabis on pain.

RESULTS

A total of 2900 patients reported cannabis consumption in a sample of 10 873 patients [incidence 40.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28, 0.54)], and 15.3% (95% CI: 0.07, 0.27) specified that they were currently taking cannabis. Cannabis use was higher in the four fibromyalgia studies [68.2% (95% CI: 0.41, 0.90), n = 611] compared with seven articles concerning RA or lupus [26.0% (95% CI: 0.14, 0.41), n = 8168]. Cannabis consumption was associated with a decrease in pain intensity [VAS pain at baseline 8.2 (2.9) vs 5.6 (3.5) mm over time; pooled effect size -1.75 (95% CI: -2.75, -0.76)]. Cannabis users were younger [58.4 (11.4) vs 63.6 (12.1) years; P <0.001], more often smokers [OR 2.91 (95% CI: 1.84, 4.60)] or unemployed [OR 2.40 (95% CI: 1.31, 4.40)], and had higher pain intensity [5.0 (2.4) vs 4.1(2.6) mm; P <0.001] than non-users.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 20% of patients suffering from rheumatologic diseases actively consume cannabis, with an improvement in pain. The issue of cannabis use in the management of these patients should be addressed during medical consultation, essentially with cannabis-based standardized pharmaceutical products.

Disease-modifying drug retention rate according to patient age in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of the ESPOIR cohort

Physicians are sometimes hesitant to use disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as they are deemed too fragile, although there are no sufficient scientific evidence. We aimed to compare DMARD treatment retention in early RA patients from the ESPOIR cohort, according to age upon inclusion. Overall, treatment retention was evaluated as the percentage of patients whose DMARDs were not stopped, with stratification by age group: < 50, 50-64, and > 65 years. Survival curves were measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the entire ESPOIR cohort (n = 813), 7% were > 65 years old. Methotrexate (MTX) was used by 521 patients, and was the sole DMARD for 198 patients. MTX treatment retention appeared better in patients > 65 years old compared to < 50 years old [HR 0.45 (0.25; 0.81); p = 0.008, n = 195/198] with adjustment on sex, smoking, positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, positive rheumatoid factor, body mass index, changes in DAS28 and corticosteroid treatment. The proportion of patients using etanercept (n = 111), and this drug's retention rate, did not differ according to patient age. The proportion of patients treated with adalimumab (n = 104) was significantly higher in patients < 50 years old (p = 0.003), and treatment retention was marginally better among younger patients [HR 1.68 (0.88; 3.22), p = 0.12]. Within the ESPOIR cohort, DMARD retention did not appear to differ according to age-except for better retention of MTX treatment in patients 50-64 years old, and of adalimumab in patients < 50 years old.

A six-week antibiotic treatment of endocarditis with spondylodiscitis is not associated with increased risk of relapse: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We compared the relapse rate at 1 year in patients with vertebral osteomyelitis with or without associated endocarditis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients hospitalized in the infectious disease, rheumatology, cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and two internal medicine units for vertebral osteomyelitis (blood culture and/or disco-vertebral biopsy) and compatible imaging, between 2014 and 2017. We compared patients with associated endocarditis (VO-EI group) and without endocarditis (VO group) using logistic regression to determine the factors associated with relapse and EI. The main outcome was the relapse rate at 1 year.

RESULTS

Out of the 207 eligible patients, 62 were included (35 in the VO group and 27 in the VO-EI group). Four patients presented with a new VO during follow-up, one (2.86%) patient in VO group and three (11.11%) in VO-EI group (P=0.68). There were more men in the VO-EI group than in the VO group (74.07% vs. 48.57%, P=0.04), valvulopathies (13/27 vs. 8/35, P=0.06), vertebral localization (1.22±0.50 vs. 1.03±0.17, P=0.04) and septic kidney embolism (5/27 vs. 0/35, P=0.01). Control blood cultures were more often positive in the VO-EI group (12/27 vs. 8/35, P=0.04). In 45% of patients, the germ was a staphylococcus, 29% streptococci, 10% enterococci, 10% gram-negative bacillus (GNB). There were more streptococci and enterococci in the VO-EI group than in the VO group (44.44% vs. 17.14% and 18.52% vs. 8.57%, respectively). Antibiotic safety was good and comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

In a relatively small population, we did not find significantly more relapse in the endocarditis group.

THU0370 CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIAL EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL BENEFIT OF A TIGHT-CONTROL AND TREAT-TO-TARGET STRATEGY IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: THE RESULTS OF THE TICOSPA TRIAL

Background:

Current recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management include tight control and treat-to-target (TC) strategies, but no study has evaluated its potential benefit

Objectives:

To evaluate the benefit of TC strategies in comparison to usual care (UC) in patients with axSpA.

Methods:

Study design:Pragmatic, prospective, cluster-randomized controlled (2 arms), one-year trial (NCT03043846).Centers: 18 axSpA expert centers randomly allocated (1:1) to the treatment arm: TC vs. UC.Patients: axSpA diagnosis and ASAS criteria, non-optimally treated with NSAIDs, bDMARD-naïve, and ASDAS > 2.1 at inclusion.Study treatment:a) TC arm: the strategy was pre-specified by the scientific committee based on current axSpA recommendations and aiming at a target (ASDAS <2.1); visits every 4w;b) UC arm:treatment decisions were at the rheumatologist’s discretion with visits every 12w.Outcomes:the % of patients with a significant (>30%) improvement in the ASAS-HI score over one-year follow-up was the main outcome. Other outcomes (disease activity, quality of life, treatment, …) over follow-up were evaluated (Table 1). The number/type of adverse events were collected.Statistical analysis: this was an intention-to-treat analysis. To take into account the cluster-randomization design, for all outcomes, two models were performed: first a two-level mixed model with 2 random effects was used to estimate the % of responders/the change of the outcome over follow-up (i.e. mod1); in a second step, the imbalanced variables observed at baseline were included in the model (i.e.mod2). Cost-effectiveness was assessed by estimating the (baseline- and cluster-adjusted) incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for TC vs. UC.

Estimated outcomes at week 48Cluster-adjusted (mod1)Cluster and imbalance-adjusted (mod2)TCUCASDAS LDA*76.5%59.5%<0.010.03ASDAS ID25.9%18.7%--ASDAS CII61.2%46.0%<0.010.02ASDAS MI16.5%14.9%--ASAS4052.3%34.7%<0.010.01ASAS2094.9%85.9%<0.010.03BASDAI 5079.0%43.8%0.010.03Physician Global (0-10)2.0 (0.2)1.8 (0.2)--CRP (mg/L)3.9(1.4)3.5 (1.5)--BASG (0-10)2.6 (0.5)3.4 (0.5)0.09-BASFI (0-10)1.7(0.5)2.4 (0.5)--ASAS HI SMD47.3%36.1%--EQ5D0.7(0.1)0.8(0.1)0.02-ASAS-NSAID score1.5(2.2)- 4.9 (2.9)--

Results:

160 patients were included (80 in TC and 80 in UC). Mean age was 37.9(11.0) years with a disease duration of 3.7(6.2) years, 51.2% were males. A radiographic damage of the SI-joints, a (ever) positive MRI sacroiliitis and HLA-B27+ were seen in 46.9%, 81.9% and 75.0% patients respectively. Mean ASDAS at inclusion was 3.0 (0.7) and mean ASASHI was 8.6 (3.7). 72 patients per group attended the one-year visit. Although 47.3% vs. 36.1% patients in the TC and UC arms achieved a significant improvement in ASASHI at the one-year visit, the difference was not statistically significant, with either model. Across all other outcomes a trend was observed in favor of the TC arm (Table 1). The number of bDMARDs was significantly higher in TC arm (56.2% vs. 27.2%). The number of infections was comparable in both groups (15 vs. 16 in the TC and UC, respectively), with only 2 severe infections occurring in the UC arm. From a societal perspective, TC resulted in an additional 0.04 QALY and saved €265 when compared to UC and a 67% probability of being cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €20,000 per QALY.

Conclusion:

In this setting of SpA expert centers, UC resulted in a good outcome in a substantial number of patients but the TC was not superior for the primary outcome despite a greater number of bDMARDs prescription. Nevertheless, a general trend in favor of the tight control was observed, with a comparable safety profile and was found to be favorable from a societal health economic perspective.

Acknowledgments:

this trial has been conducted thanks to an unrestricted grant from UCB

Disclosure of Interests:

Anna Moltó Grant/research support from: Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Clementina López-Medina: None declared, Filip van den Bosch Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Annelies Boonen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: Galapagos, Lilly (all paid to the department), Casper Webers: None declared, Emmanuelle Dernis Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Floris A. van Gaalen: None declared, Martin SOUBRIER: None declared, Pascal Claudepierre Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, Mirian Starmans-Kool: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Maxime Dougados Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma

AB0310 TROUGH CONCENTRATION AND ESTIMATED CLEARANCE CAN DETECT IMMUNOGENICITY TO ADALIMUMAB IN RA PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE LONGITUDINAL MULTICENTRE STUDY

Background:

Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab increase drug clearance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Objectives:

To study the ability of drug concentration or estimating clearance to identify ADA to adalimumab.

Methods:

Adalimumab concentration was measured with a validated ELISA. ADA was measured using a capture ELISA (Theradiag®) and the Meso scale discovery (MSD) platform. Using a bayesian PK model, adalimumab clearance was estimated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Predictions for ADA presence were calculated, and the correlation between ADA and adalimumab clearance was analysed.

Results:

We analyzed 108 samples from 53 RA patients. Serum concentrations and clearance estimates showed good prediction performance for ADA presence (Table 1). There was a correlation between adalimumab clearance and ADA (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Immunogenicity prediction of adalimumab, using trough concentration or estimated clearance

Time of visitADA methodAdalimumab trough concentrationAdalimumab estimated clearanceAUC ROCp-valueAUC ROCp-valueMonth 1THER.55.6411.52.8358MSD.65.0821.61.1872Month 3THER.89.0006.91.0003MSD.73.0096.72.0131Month 6THER.95.0035.95.0035MSD.85.0004.84.0006Month 12THER.87.0045.86.0057MSD.88.0002.88.0002Figure 1.

correlation between adalimumab estimated clearance and ADA as provided by the Meso scale discovery (MSD) plateform

Conclusion:

Adalimumab concentration and clearance should be considered as reliable predictors for ADA presence in RA patients.

Acknowledgments:

Measurement of adalimumab serum concentrations was performed within the ‘Centre pilote de suivi biologique des anticorps thérapeutiques’ (CePiBAc)– Pilot centre for therapeutic antibodies monitoring platform of Tours University Hospital, which was cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). We thank Oscar Knight, Delphine Delord and Fabien Giannoni (ABIRISK lab technician), Caroline Brochon and Anne Claire Duveau (CePIBAc), Aliette Decock-Giraudaud (Centre de ressource-Biobank), Sophie Tourdot (ABRISIK Project manager), Aline Doublet (Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Agnès Hincelin-Méry (Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France). This work has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI JU) under grant agreement no. 115303, the resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) companies’ in-kind contributions.

Disclosure of Interests:

David Ternant Consultant of: Sanofi and Amgen., Jamal Elhasnaoui: None declared, Natacha Szely: None declared, Salima Hacein-Bey: None declared, Aude Gleizes: None declared, Christophe Richez Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB., Jessica Manson: None declared, Martin SOUBRIER: None declared, Olilvier Brocq: None declared, Jérôme Avouac: None declared, Anna Fogdell-Hahn Grant/research support from: Biogen Idec and Pfizer., Consultant of: Pfizer, Biogen, Merck-Serono, and Sanofi-Genzyme., Pierre Dönnes: None declared, Gilles Paintaud Grant/research support from: Amgen, Genzyme (Sanofi), Lilly, Merck, Novartis, and Roche Pharma., Consultant of: Chugai, Novartis and Shire (Takeda), with remunerations received by his institution., Céline Desvignes: None declared, Florian Deisenhammer: None declared, Sebastian Spindeldreher Employee of: Novartis, Marc Pallardy: None declared, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: BMS, Gilead, Medimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, UCB, Denis Mulleman Grant/research support from: Non-governmental organisation Lions Club Tours Val de France, French Society for Rheumatology., Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis.

FRI0095 SARILUMAB IMPROVED PATIENT-PERCEIVED IMPACT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WHATEVER THE BASELINE DISEASE ACTIVITY: FIRST RESULTS FROM AN INTERVENTIONAL NON CONTROLLED STUDY: SARIPRO, IN MODERATE AND SEVERE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Background:

Sarilumab, an anti-IL-6R antibody, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe RA and shown efficacy on disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Detailed analyses of drug efficacy from the patient point of view is important. SariPRO is a pragmatic interventional study close to the daily practice.

Objectives:

To assess the effectiveness of sarilumab on several PROs using the RAID (Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease) score.

Methods:

The SariPRO study (NCT 03449758) was a French multicenter interventional study assessing the effects of sarilumab 200 mg on PROs in patients with moderately to severely active RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs. The primary endpoint was change in total RAID score from baseline to week 24 (RAID ranges 0-10 where 10 is maximal impact). Changes from baseline for RAID, DAS28-ESR and CDAI according to baseline disease activity were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AE). All statistical analyses were descriptive, 95% CI was given when appropriate.

Results:

84 patients were included in 31 centers and 62 were evaluable and analyzed for effectiveness. They had similar characteristics to the 84 patients at baseline and were as expected for an RA population initiating a biologic: mean (SD) age: 59.9 (12.4) years, 71.0% female, disease duration 9.7 (10.3) years, rheumatoid factor positivity 82.5%, ACPA positivity 86.4%, and DAS28=4.9 (11). Total RAID score decreased significantly from 5.7 (2.0) at baseline to 3.3 (2.5) at W24; mean change was -2.4 [95% CI: -3.0; -1.8]. Furthermore, this improvement was noted both for highly and less active patients at baseline: for patients with DAS28-ESR < 5.1 (n=31), mean change was -1.56 [-2.28; -0.83] and for patients with DAS28-ESR≥5.1 (n=27), mean change was -1.98 [-2.91; -1.05]. Changes in DAS28-ESR and CDAI were significant (-2.8 [-3.2; -2.4] and -15.2 [-18.5; -11.8], respectively). AEs were consistent with the safety profile of anti-IL-6R antibodies and with results from RCTs (data not shown).

Conclusion:

In this real world study, treatment with sarilumab during 24 weeks in RA patients led to an improvement in the total RAID score irrespective of baseline levels of disease activity. This is the first time RAID score is used as the primary endpoint in a study.

References:

[1]Study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme

Disclosure of Interests:

Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, René-Marc Flipo Consultant of: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Johnson and Johnson, MSD France, Novartis, Sanofi, Thierry Schaeverbeke: None declared, Christine Albert: None declared, Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, marie-Christophe Boissier: None declared, Cyrille Confavreux: None declared, Gregoire CORMIER: None declared, Emmanuelle Dernis Speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Elisabeth Gervais Solau: None declared, Sophie Godot: None declared, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Consultant of: BMS, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Co., Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Philippe Goupille Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Slim Lassoued: None declared, Thierry Lequerre: None declared, Frederic Lioté Consultant of: CME: Nordic Pharma, Christian Marcelli: None declared, Yves Maugars: None declared, Minh Nguyen: None declared, Aleth Perdriger: None declared, Yves-Marie Pers: None declared, Edouard Pertuiset: None declared, Lucile Poiroux: None declared, Carole Rosenberg: None declared, Christian Roux: None declared, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Martin SOUBRIER: None declared, Pascale Vergne-Salle: None declared, Charles Zarnitsky: None declared, Eric Fakra Consultant of: Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sanofi, Hubert MAROTTE Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Sqibb, Lilly France, MSD, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, SanofiAventis, Paid instructor for: Sanofi-Aventis, Speakers bureau: Sanofi-Aventis, Florence E Lévy-Weil Employee of: Sanofi Genzyme employee

1210 Development Of An Auditory Neurofeedback During Sleep Onset Process

Introduction

Biofeedback is proposed as an alternative method to help patients with insomnia reducing their anxiety. Some studies have shown that auditory neurofeedback can be effective at reducing sleep-onset latency. However, the AASM sleep stage classification only describes the sleep-onset as a binary state (i.e. wake or N1) which makes it not adapted for neurofeedback. We introduced a simple 4-stages classification for sleep-onset, on 10 seconds EEG epoch. The aim of this study was to develop an automatic method to detect these stages, and an online algorithm embedded in the Dreem headband (DH) that adapted the auditory feedback based on the current stage.

Methods

Fourteen subjects underwent an overnight PSG monitoring, from which the first sleep-onset period was extracted. We defined the simple 4-stages classification for sleep-onset on 10 seconds EEG epoch as following: SO1) &gt; 75% of the epoch covered by alpha frequencies SO2) between 25% and 50% of the window covered with alpha frequencies, SO3) Alpha frequencies covered less than 25% and theta frequencies covered less than 30% of the epoch, and SO4) Theta frequency covered more than 30% of the epoch. For the manual scoring, 4 sleep scorers have been given the instructions and a Q&A session after scoring the first two records. For the algorithm, a sound triggering algorithm was linked to a neural network trained on the scored data, to dynamically adapt the sound to the sleep-onset stage.

Results

The scorers reached an average agreement of 68 + 15% over all the records. The neural network reached an accuracy of 68%. Per state the accuracy was: 71 ± 32% (S1), 52 ± 22% (S2), 54 ± 23% (S3), 79 ± 21% (S4). The automatic neurofeedback was able to adapt sound stimulations in real-time based on stages and was well perceived among first testers.

Conclusion

The results of this preliminary work show that we can reach a higher agreement by reducing the epoch duration and use this classification to produce automatic biofeedback during the sleep onset period. Further studies using a data-driven method should be conducted.

Support

This study supported by Dreem sas.

Dynamic 23Na MRI - A non-invasive window on neuroglial-vascular mechanisms underlying brain function

A novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and reconstruction method for obtaining a series of dynamic sodium ²³Na-MRI acquisitions was designed to non-invasively assess the signal variations of brain sodium during a hand motor task in 14 healthy human volunteers on an ultra high field (7T) MR scanner. Regions undergoing activation and deactivation were identified with reference to conventional task-related BOLD functional MRI (fMRI). Activation observed in the left central regions, the supplementary motor areas and the left cerebellum induced an increase in the sodium signal observed at ultra short echo time and a decrease in the ²³Na signal observed at long echo time. Based on a simple model of two distinct sodium pools (namely, restricted and mobile sodium), the ultra short echo time measures the totality of sodium whereas the long echo time is mainly sensitive to mobile sodium. This activation pattern is consistent with previously described processes related to an influx of Na⁺ into the intracellular compartments and a moderate increase in the cerebral blood volume (CBV). In contrast, deactivation observed in the right central regions ipsilateral to the movement, the precuneus and the left cerebellum induced a slight decrease in sodium signal at ultra short echo time and an increase of sodium signal at longer echo times. This inhibitory pattern is compatible with a slight decrease in CBV and an efflux of intracellular Na⁺ to the extracellular compartments that may reflect neural dendritic spine and astrocytic shrinkage, and an increase of sodium in the extracellular fraction. In conclusion, cerebral dynamic ²³Na MRI experiments can provide access to the ionic transients following a functional task occurring within the neuro-glial-vascular ensemble. This has the potential to open up a novel non-invasive window on the mechanisms underlying brain function.

French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI)

OBJECTIVE

French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI), self-questionnaire designed to evaluate rheumatoid foot according to 3 domains: pain, disability and activity restriction.

METHODS

The first step consisted of translation/back translation and cultural adaptation according to the validated methodology. The second stage was a prospective validation on 53 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who filled out the FFI. The following data were collected: pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and activity restrictions (McMaster Toronto Arthritis questionnaire). A test/retest procedure was performed 15 days later. The statistical analyses focused on acceptability, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and Principal Component Analysis), test-retest reproducibility (concordance coefficients), external validity (correlation coefficients) and responsiveness to change.

RESULTS

The FFI-F is a culturally acceptable version for French patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. Reproducibility was correct (correlation coefficients>0.56). External validity and responsiveness to change were good.

CONCLUSION

The use of a rigorous methodology allowed the validation of the FFI in the French language (FFI-F). This tool can be used in routine practice and clinical research for evaluating the rheumatoid foot. The FFI-F could be used in other pathologies with foot-related functional impairments.