Risk factors for COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure in a respiratory sub-intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is burdened by high mortality. Data are lacking about non-ICU patients. Aims of this study were to: (i) assess the incidence and prevalence of CAPA in a respiratory sub-intensive care unit, (ii) evaluate its risk factors and (iii) impact on in-hospital mortality. Secondary aims were to: (i) assess factors associated to mortality, and (ii) evaluate significant features in hematological patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. A cohort of CAPA patients was compared to a non-CAPA cohort. Among patients with CAPA, a cohort of hematological patients was further compared to another of non-hematological patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty patients were included in the study. Median P/F ratio at the admission to sub-intensive unit was 225 mmHg (IQR 155-314). 55 (15.7%) developed CAPA (incidence of 5.5%). Eighteen had probable CAPA (37.3%), 37 (67.3%) possible CAPA and none proven CAPA. Diagnosis of CAPA occurred at a median of 17 days (IQR 12-31) from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Independent risk factors for CAPA were hematological malignancy [OR 1.74 (95%CI 0.75-4.37), p = 0.0003], lymphocytopenia [OR 2.29 (95%CI 1.12-4.86), p = 0.02], and COPD [OR 2.74 (95%CI 1.19-5.08), p = 0.014]. Mortality rate was higher in CAPA cohort (61.8% vs 22.7%, p < 0.0001). CAPA resulted an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality [OR 2.92 (95%CI 1.47-5.89), p = 0.0024]. Among CAPA patients, age > 65 years resulted a predictor of mortality [OR 5.09 (95% CI 1.20-26.92), p = 0.035]. No differences were observed in hematological cohort.

CONCLUSION

CAPA is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates. It should be promptly suspected, especially in case of hematological malignancy, COPD and lymphocytopenia.

Conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP therapy in patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure: A pilot study

Background

Respiratory failure is a severe complication in COVID-19 pneumonia that, in addition to oxygen therapy, may require CPAP support. It has been postulated that COVID-19 lung injury may share some features with those observed in HALI. Thus, a correct target PaO2during oxygen supplementation may be crucial to protect the lung from further tissue damage. Aims of the study were: 1) to evaluate the effects of conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP therapy on mortality and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure; 2) to evaluate the effect of conservative oxygen supplementation on new-onset organ failure and secondary pulmonary infections.

Methods

This was a single-center, historically controlled study of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving either conservative or non-conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP. A cohort receiving conservative oxygen supplementation was studied prospectively in which oxygen supplementation was administered with a target PaO2<100 mmHg. Results of this cohort were compared with those of a cohort who had received liberal oxygen supplementation.

Results

Seventy-one patients were included in the conservative cohort and 75 in the non-conservative cohort. Mortality rate was lower in the conservative cohort (22.5%versus62.7%, p<0.001). Rates of ICU admission and new-onset rate organ failure were lower in conservative cohort (14.1%versus37.3%, p=0.001, and 9.9%versus45.3% p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

In patients with COVID-19 and severe respiratory failure, conservative oxygen supplementation during Helmet CPAP was associated to improved survival, lower ICU admission rate and less new-onset organ failure.

Determinants and Trends of Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Adult Celiac Patients on a Long-term Follow-up (2000-2020)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data on factors governing long-term adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) in celiac disease (CD) are scarce. We aimed to determine trends and clinical predictors of long-term GFD adherence in adult CD.

METHODS

Initial and long-term (>3 years) GFD adherence, clinical characteristics at baseline and follow-up were collected retrospectively from celiac patients followed-up over 20 years (2000-2020). Predictors of long-term GFD adherence at diagnosis, and follow-up were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

248 patients (37 ± 12 years, 186F, median time on a GFD 90 months) were included. Twenty-five (10.1%) had only short-term follow-up (<3 years) while 223 (89.9%) had initial and long-term dietary assessment. 187/223 (83.9%) patients were initially adherent and 36/223 (16.1%) were not. 17/36 (47.2%) patients initially not adherent become adherent, while only 4/187 (2.1%) initially adherent patients became not adherent. In the long-term, 200/223 (89.7%) were adherent and 21/223 (9.4%) patients were not. Adherence improved more frequently than worsened (OR, 39.5; 95% CI, 11.4-178.5; P < .01). Classical symptoms (diarrhea, weight loss) at diagnosis of CD predicted stricter long-term GFD adherence (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.21-8.81; P = .02), while anemia (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.82; P = .02) and dermatitis herpetiformis (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.91; P = .04) predicted poorer long-term adherence. At follow-up, initial GFD adherence (OR, 42.70; 95% CI, 10.70-171.00; P = .04) was the major determinant of long-term GFD adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

GFD adherence changes over time in <10% of patients, generally improving when it does. Major determinants of long-term GFD adherence are classical symptoms at diagnosis and initial adherence to a GFD. Patients with anemia or dermatitis herpetiformis at diagnosis require stricter dietetic input.

Prevalence, incidence and clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult coeliac patients

OBJECTIVES

Data on SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) in adult coeliac disease (CD) are lacking. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical features of COVID-19 in adult coeliac patients regularly followed-up at our centre since January 2015.

METHODS

Data about general health status and clinical features of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were prospectively collected over the phone. Data about CD were retrospectively collected from clinical notes. Prevalence and incidence of COVID-19 were compared between the coeliac cohort and the figures in the general population of Lombardy, Northern Italy between 20 February to 5 June 2020 provided by the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) and the Lombardy regional government.

RESULTS

Nine out of 324 patients contracted COVID-19, thus resulting in a prevalence of 2.78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-4.58] and an incidence rate of 8.15/1000 person-month (95% CI 4.24-15.66). Prevalence of COVID-19 ascertained by means of nasal swab was 1.79% (95% CI 0.22-3.35) and the incidence rate 5.26/1000 person-month (95% CI 2.19-12.63), without difference from the general population. Clinical type of CD, age, sex, duration and adherence to a gluten-free diet, and mucosal healing did not differ between coeliac patients with and without COVID-19. None of the 9 patients with COVID-19 required hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CD do not seem to carry an increased risk of COVID-19 compared to the general population and their disease course is mild.

The GLU-10: a validated ten-point score to identify poorly instructed coeliac patients in need of dietary interventions

BACKGROUND

A standard tool to assess patients' knowledge about gluten and the gluten-free diet (GFD) is lacking.

METHODS

We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess GFD knowledge. A 10-point questionnaire (GLU10) covering different aspects of knowledge about gluten content in food/non-food products and the gluten-free living was developed. To validate this questionnaire, it was administered to adult coeliac patients already instructed on gluten and the GFD and non-coeliac controls. Patients were prospectively recruited at our gastroenterology outpatient clinic between August 2020 and February 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients (52 coeliac patients and 54 controls) participated in the validation phase. Coeliac patients scored significantly higher than controls on the GLU10 questionnaire (median 6 points vs 2 points,p<0.001). Higher self-reported knowledge of the GFD was related to a higher score (p<0.001). ROC curve confirmed the ability of the GLU10 questionnaire to discriminate between subjects with good and poor GFD knowledge (AUC 0.94, 95%CI 0.90-0.98). A score of 5 was identified as the best cut-off (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 94.4%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, being a coeliac patient (p<0.001) and having a university degree (p=0.04) were associated to a high GLU10 score (≥5).

CONCLUSIONS

GLU10 is the first validated questionnaire for assessing knowledge of a GFD in coeliac patients and the general population.

Prevalence and clinical features of bile acid diarrhea in patients with chronic diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

Bile acid diarrhea is a form of chronic diarrhea caused by excessive bile reaching the colon. Conditions involving the terminal ileum and cholecystectomy are predisposing factors but an idiopathic form of bile acid diarrhea has also been described. In this study we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea in patients consecutively evaluated for chronic diarrhea in an Outpatient Gastroenterology Clinic.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients admitted for chronic diarrhea (>4 weeks) between June 2018 and April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Bile acid diarrhea was suspected in patients with ileal disease, cholecystectomy or post-prandial diarrhea. Patients' age at diagnosis, sex, presenting symptoms, results of main test and examinations, final diagnoses and date of last follow-up visit were also collected. Exclusion of chronic diarrhea of other causes and a 6-month clinical improvement with cholestyramine treatment confirmed the diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea.

RESULTS

In total, 139 patients aged 46 ± 20 years (76 women and 63 men) were included. Diarrhea due to an organic cause was diagnosed in 16 patients. A clinical response to cholestyramine persisting for more than 6 months led to a diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea in 39 (aged 52 ± 19 years) out of the remaining 123 patients with functional forms of diarrhea. Therefore, the prevalence of bile acid diarrhea was 28.1% (95% confidence interval 19.9%-38.4%) in patients with chronic diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Bile acid diarrhea is a very common, yet under-recognized cause of chronic functional diarrhea. A therapeutic trial of cholestyramine is a valid diagnostic strategy.

Long-term morbidity and mortality in Whipple's disease: a single-center experience over 20 years

Background: Little is known about long-term morbidity and mortality in Whipple's disease (WD). Aim: To describe morbidity and mortality in patients with WD on a long-term follow-up. Materials & methods: Comorbidities, mortality and causes of death were retrospectively registered. Results: A total of 35 patients with WD (9F, 54 ± 11 years) were followed-up for a median of 104 months. Nine patients developed ten complications; three patients died. A total of 31 severe comorbidities apparently unrelated to WD were found in 20 patients: preneoplastic/neoplastic disorders in seven, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events in seven, pneumonia in four, candidiasis in ten patients. Conclusion: WD is frequently complicated by potentially life-threatening infectious, neoplastic and thromboembolic disorders, thus highlighting the need for a life-long multidisciplinary follow-up.