Dexamethasone treatment for COVID-19 is related to increased mortality in hematologic malignancy patients: results from the EPICOVIDEHA Registry

Not available.

Differences in the Course of CD4 and CD8 Cells After Chemoradiotherapy in People Living with HIV with Anal Cancer

Incidence of anal carcinoma (AC) in people living with HIV (PLWH) is increased compared to the general population. Adverse effects of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the immune system are associated with a significant detrimental prognosis on overall survival in patients receiving CRT for solid tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate immunological factors, in particular the differences in recovery of CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts before and after CRT for AC in PLWH. Retrospective single-center chart review extraction to analyze immunological data collected from PLWH with AC; descriptive statistics were used. Thirty-six PLWH with histologically proven AC were included in the analysis. Absolute CD4 cell count 60 months after CRT was 67.2% of the value at the beginning of CRT, whereas the CD8 cell count reached 82.3%. These differences were statistically significant (p = .048), whereas CD4/CD8-ratio remained stable. The findings of the presented study regarding CD4+ and CD8+ cell recovery after CRT are congruent with results from prior studies in non-HIV infected patients. Although not reaching the level of prior CRT T cell numbers, the ability to generate CD8+ cells seems to be better recovered, while CD4+ regeneration is more impaired. These observations are best explained by faster recovery of CD8+ cells via thymic-independent pathways, which are not available for regeneration of CD4+ cells. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are required to analyze the specific CD4+ and CD8+ cell subsets.

Analysis of acute COVID-19 including chronic morbidity: protocol for the deep phenotyping National Pandemic Cohort Network in Germany (NAPKON-HAP)

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic causes a high burden of acute and long-term morbidity and mortality worldwide despite global efforts in containment, prophylaxis, and therapy. With unprecedented speed, the global scientific community has generated pivotal insights into the pathogen and the host response evoked by the infection. However, deeper characterization of the pathophysiology and pathology remains a high priority to reduce morbidity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

NAPKON-HAP is a multi-centered prospective observational study with a long-term follow-up phase of up to 36 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. It constitutes a central platform for harmonized data and biospecimen for interdisciplinary characterization of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and long-term outcomes of diverging disease severities of hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

Primary outcome measures include clinical scores and quality of life assessment captured during hospitalization and at outpatient follow-up visits to assess acute and chronic morbidity. Secondary measures include results of biomolecular and immunological investigations and assessment of organ-specific involvement during and post-COVID-19 infection. NAPKON-HAP constitutes a national platform to provide accessibility and usability of the comprehensive data and biospecimen collection to global research.

CONCLUSION

NAPKON-HAP establishes a platform with standardized high-resolution data and biospecimen collection of hospitalized COVID-19 patients of different disease severities in Germany. With this study, we will add significant scientific insights and provide high-quality data to aid researchers to investigate COVID-19 pathophysiology, pathology, and chronic morbidity.

Cytokine-responsive T- and NK-cells portray SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-responders and infection in multiple myeloma patients

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) routinely receive mRNA-based vaccines to reduce COVID-19-related mortality. However, whether disease- and therapy-related alterations in immune cells and cytokine-responsiveness contribute to the observed heterogeneous vaccination responses is unclear. Thus, we analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with MM during and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and breakthrough infection (BTI) using combined whole-transcriptome and surface proteome single-cell profiling with functional serological and T-cell validation in 58 MM patients. Our results demonstrate that vaccine-responders showed a significant overrepresentation of cytotoxic CD4+ T- and mature CD38+ NK-cells expressing FAS+/TIM3+ with a robust cytokine-responsiveness, such as type-I-interferon-, IL-12- and TNF-α-mediated signaling. Patients with MM experiencing BTI developed strong serological and cellular responses and exhibited similar cytokine-responsive immune cell patterns as vaccine-responders. This study can expand our understanding of molecular and cellular patterns associated with immunization responses and may benefit the design of improved vaccination strategies in immunocompromised patients.

Covid-19 triage in the emergency department 2.0: how analytics and AI transform a human-made algorithm for the prediction of clinical pathways

The Covid-19 pandemic has pushed many hospitals to their capacity limits. Therefore, a triage of patients has been discussed controversially primarily through an ethical perspective. The term triage contains many aspects such as urgency of treatment, severity of the disease and pre-existing conditions, access to critical care, or the classification of patients regarding subsequent clinical pathways starting from the emergency department. The determination of the pathways is important not only for patient care, but also for capacity planning in hospitals. We examine the performance of a human-made triage algorithm for clinical pathways which is considered a guideline for emergency departments in Germany based on a large multicenter dataset with over 4,000 European Covid-19 patients from the LEOSS registry. We find an accuracy of 28 percent and approximately 15 percent sensitivity for the ward class. The results serve as a benchmark for our extensions including an additional category of palliative care as a new label, analytics, AI, XAI, and interactive techniques. We find significant potential of analytics and AI in Covid-19 triage regarding accuracy, sensitivity, and other performance metrics whilst our interactive human-AI algorithm shows superior performance with approximately 73 percent accuracy and up to 76 percent sensitivity. The results are independent of the data preparation process regarding the imputation of missing values or grouping of comorbidities. In addition, we find that the consideration of an additional label palliative care does not improve the results.

Increasing numbers and complexity of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection-14 years of prospective evaluation at a German tertiary care centre with multi-centre validation of findings

OBJECTIVES

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common and severe infection. This study aims to describe temporal trends in numbers, epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of SAB.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of three prospective SAB cohorts at the University Medical Centre Freiburg between 2006 and 2019. We validated our findings in a large German multi-centre cohort of five tertiary care centres (R-Net consortium, 2017-2019). Time-dependent trends were estimated using Poisson or beta regression models.

RESULTS

We included 1797 patients in the mono-centric and 2336 patients in the multi-centric analysis. Overall, we observed an increasing number of SAB cases over 14 years (6.4%/year and 1000 patient days, 95% CI: 5.1% to 7.7%), paralleled by an increase in the proportion of community-acquired SAB (4.9%/year [95% CI: 2.1% to 7.8%]) and a decrease in the rate of methicillin-resistant-SAB (-8.5%/year [95% CI: -11.2% to -5.6%]). All of these findings were confirmed in the multi-centre validation cohort (6.2% cases per 1000 patient cases/year [95% CI: -0.6% to 12.6%], community-acquired-SAB 8.7% [95% CI: -1.2% to 19.6%], methicillin-resistant S. aureus-SAB -18.6% [95% CI: -30.6 to -5.8%]). Moreover, we found an increasing proportion of patients with multiple risk factors for complicated/difficult-to-treat SAB (8.5%/year, 95% CI: 3.6% to 13.5%, p < 0.001), alongside an overall higher level of comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity score 0.23 points/year, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.37, p 0.005). At the same time, the rate of deep-seated foci such as osteomyelitis or deep-seated abscesses significantly increased (6.7%, 95% CI: 3.9% to 9.6%, p < 0.001). A reduction of in-hospital mortality by 0.6% per year (95% CI: 0.08% to 1%) was observed in the subgroup of patients with infectious diseases consultations.

DISCUSSION

We found an increasing number of SAB combined with a significant increase in comorbidities and complicating factors in tertiary care centres. The resulting challenges in securing adequate SAB management in the face of high patient turnover will become an important task for physicians.

Aerosol measurement identifies SARS-CoV 2 PCR positive adults compared with healthy controls

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 is spread primarily through droplets and aerosols. Exhaled aerosols are generated in the upper airways through shear stress and in the lung periphery by 'reopening of collapsed airways'. Aerosol measuring may detect highly contagious individuals ("super spreaders or super-emitters") and discriminate between SARS-CoV-2 infected and non-infected individuals. This is the first study comparing exhaled aerosols in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and healthy controls.

DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study in 288 adults, comprising 64 patients testing positive by SARS CoV-2 PCR before enrollment, and 224 healthy adults testing negative (matched control sample) at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, from February to June 2021. Study objective was to evaluate the concentration of exhaled aerosols during physiologic breathing in SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and -negative subjects. Secondary outcome measures included correlation of aerosol concentration to SARS-CoV-2 PCR results, change in aerosol concentration due to confounders, and correlation between clinical symptoms and aerosol.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant difference in respiratory aerosol concentrations between SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive (median 1490.5/L) and -negative subjects (median 252.0/L; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences due to age, sex, smoking status, or body mass index. ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.8918.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of respiratory aerosols were significantly elevated in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, which helps to understand the spread and course of respiratory viral infections, as well as the detection of highly infectious individuals.

221. Assessment and Proposed Revision of Clinical Trial Clostridioides difficile Infection Clinical Response and Outcomes Definitions

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) research is limited by a lack of standardized definitions for clinical response and disease outcomes, which impacts clinical drug development and results comparison between studies. We aimed to assess outcome definitions in CDI therapeutic trials to propose new versions that are clinically relevant, discrete and objective.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group of CDI experts met monthly to review response endpoints from published clinical trials of antibiotic therapy for CDI. Previously published phase III or IV trials were assessed for outcome definitions. Discussions were held to reach a consensus on new clinical trial endpoints for adults and children to improve the accuracy and clinical relevance of measures of treatment success.

Results

Significant heterogeneity was noted amongst the primary endpoints in phase III and IV CDI antibiotic treatment trials. Initial clinical cure (ICC), strictly defined as < 3 unformed bowel movements/24 hour, and sustained clinical cure (SCC) were primary outcome measures for recent clinical trials. The strict ICC definition incompletely measures treatment success as assessed in clinical practice and, since ICC is necessary to achieve SCC, may lead to type II error for SCC. A set of proposed alternative outcome definitions was developed using the terms initial response (IR) and sustained response (SR) (Figure 1). IR allows for investigator assessment of overall improvement in CDI response more analogous to clinical practice and will lead to more patients eligible to meet SR. Achievement of SR requires both IR and no need for retreatment of CDI by day 30 after antibiotic completion and is the more relevant endpoint for CDI therapeutic development. The use of a less restrictive IR definition will more accurately capture early responses to treatment and importantly increase the validity of SR. The shortening of follow-up period by 30 days is also anticipated to reduce costs and efforts associated with conducting trials.

Timeline of CDI outcome assessments for clinical trials

Conclusion

The set of definitions proposed here will more accurately capture clinical success and standardize the approach to outcome assessment in trials of CDI therapeutics.

Disclosures

Carolyn D. Alonso, MD, Cidara Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant Oliver A. Cornely, Prof. Dr., Abbott: Honoraria|Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Actelion: Board Member|Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria|Allecra Therapeutics: Board Member|Amplyx: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Honoraria|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Biocon: Advisor/Consultant|Biosys: Advisor/Consultant|BMBF: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Board Member|Cidara: Expert Testimony|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|CoRe Consulting: Stocks/Bonds|Da Volterra: Advisor/Consultant|DLR: Grant/Research Support|DZIF: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Board Member|EU Directorate-General for Resarch and Innovation: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|German Patent and Trade Mark Office: German patent (DE 10 2021 113 007.7)|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight: Honoraria|Hikma: Honoraria|IQVIA: Board Member|Janssen: Board Member|Matinas: Advisor/Consultant|Matinas: Grant/Research Support|MedPace: Advisor/Consultant|MedPace: Grant/Research Support|MedScape: Honoraria|MedUpdate: Honoraria|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck/MSD: Grant/Research Support|Merck/MSD: Honoraria|Molecular Partners: Advisor/Consultant|MSG-ERC: Advisor/Consultant|Mundipharma: Grant/Research Support|Mylan: Honoraria|Noxxon: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Board Member|Pardes: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Projektträger Jülich: Grant/Research Support|PSI: Advisor/Consultant|PSI: Board Member|Pulmocide: Board Member|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Board Member|Wiley (Blackwell): Editor-in-Chief, Mycoses Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Paratek Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Seres Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Summit Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant Stacy A. Kahn, MD, Lilly: Stocks/Bonds Ciaran P. Kelly, n/a, Artugen: Advisor/Consultant|Facile Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring Pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Finch: Advisor/Consultant|Finch: Advisor/Consultant|First Light Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|First Light Biosciences: Ownership Interest|Milky Way Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Milky Way Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Summit Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Larry K. Kociolek, MD, MSCI, Merck: Grant/Research Support Thomas J. Louie, MD, Artugen: Advisor/Consultant|Artugen: Grant/Research Support|Crestone: Advisor/Consultant|Crestone: Grant/Research Support|Finch Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Finch Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Rebiotix: Advisor/Consultant|Rebiotix: Grant/Research Support|Seres Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|summit plc: Advisor/Consultant|summit plc: Grant/Research Support|Vedanta Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Vedanta Biosciences: Grant/Research Support Maria Vehreschild, Prof. Dr., 3M: speaker fee|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: speaker fee|biologische heilmittel heel gmbh: Grant/Research Support|BioNtech: Grant/Research Support|EUMEDICA: Advisor/Consultant|Farmak International Holding: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Speaker fee|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Immunic AG: Advisor/Consultant|MaaT: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: speaker fee|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: speaker fees|Pfizer: speaker fee|Roche Molecular Systems: Grant/Research Support|Roche Molecular Systems: speaker fees|SocraRTec R&D GmbH: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda California: Grant/Research Support Professor Mark H. Wilcox, MD, FRCPath, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Board Member|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Phico Therapeutics: Board Member|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Seres: Board Member|Seres: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support Erik R. Dubberke, MD, MSPH, Abbott: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Synthetic Biologics: Grant/Research Support.

1142. Plasma with high titers of anti-SARS-Cov2 antibodies improves outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy and cancer in a randomized controlled trial

Background

Patients with hematological malignancy or other cancers as well as immunosuppression bear a high risk for severe COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are efficient at early stages of the disease but may lose potency with new variants. Trials on plasma from convalescent donors in unselected patients have not shown clinical benefit. No randomized trials focussing on patients with underlying disease have been published.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of plasma (CVP - convalescent or after vaccination) in patients with COVID-19 at high risk for adverse outcome in Germany. We assessed the effect of high-titer CVP (2 units from different donors, 238-337 ml each, on subsequent days). Patients with hematological or other malignancy (group 1), immunosuppression (group 2), age &gt;50 and ≤75 years and lymphopenia and/or high D-dimers (group 3) or age &gt;75 years (group 4) who were hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and with an oxygen saturation ≤94% were included. Primary outcome measure was time to clinical improvement on a seven-point ordinal scale, secondary outcome was mortality (Janssen et al. Trials 2020 Oct 6;21(1):828).

Results

Overall, 133 patients were randomized, 68 received CVP with an additional 10 patients as a crossover on day 10. Median age (range) was 68 years (39-95) in the CVP group and 70 (38-90) in controls. For the entire cohort, no significant difference was seen in time to improvement (median days: CVP 12.5 vs. control 18; HR 1.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.85), p=0.29). Subgroup analysis (group 1+2) revealed shortened time to improvement (median days CVP 13 vs. control 32; HR 2.03 (95%CI 1.17-3.6), p=0.01) and mortality was reduced (mortality CVP n=6 (18%) vs. control n=10 (29%). No significant differences in time to improvement were observed in group 3 or 4 (HR 0.72 (95%CI 0.41-1.28), p=0.26). No relevant adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

CVP improves time to clinical improvement and mortality for COVID-19 patients with underlying hematological disease/cancer or other reasons of impaired immune response. Even with new variants, high-titer CVP may offer a widely available and inexpensive therapy option in high-risk groups.

Funding

BMBF FKZ 01KI20152; EudraCT 2020-001632-10.

Disclosures

Uta Merle, MD, Gilead: Sponsored congress travel and accommodation Markus Weigand, MD, Bbraun: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Biotest: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Eumedica: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Gilead: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|MSD: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Pfizer: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|Shionogi: Speakers fee/ad boards fee|SOBI: Speakers fee/ad boards fee Martin Bornhäuser, MD, Alexion: Honoraria|Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria|Novartis: Honoraria Nael Alakel, MD, Amgen: personal fee, travel grant|Gilead: personal fee, travel grant|MSD Sharp and Dohme GmbH: personal fee, travel grant|Pfizer: personal fee, travel grant Timo Wolf, MD, Gilead Sciences: Lecture fee, travel grant|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Lecture fee, travel grant|Merck Sharp Dome: Lecture fee, travel grant Maria Vehreschild, Prof. Dr., 3M: speaker fee|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: speaker fee|biologische heilmittel heel gmbh: Grant/Research Support|BioNtech: Grant/Research Support|EUMEDICA: Advisor/Consultant|Farmak International Holding: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring: Speaker fee|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Immunic AG: Advisor/Consultant|MaaT: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: speaker fee|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: speaker fees|Pfizer: speaker fee|Roche Molecular Systems: Grant/Research Support|Roche Molecular Systems: speaker fees|SocraRTec R&D GmbH: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda California: Grant/Research Support Hanns-Martin Lorenz, MD, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Abbvie: Honoraria|Actelion: Advisor/Consultant|Actelion: Honoraria|Alexion: Advisor/Consultant|Alexion: Honoraria|Amgen: Advisor/Consultant|Amgen: Grant/Research Support|Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Honoraria|Baxter: Advisor/Consultant|Baxter: Advisor/Consultant|Baxter: Honoraria|Baxter: Honoraria|Bayer Vital: Advisor/Consultant|Bayer Vital: Honoraria|Biogen: Advisor/Consultant|Biogen: Honoraria|BMS: Advisor/Consultant|BMS: Honoraria|Boehringer Ingelheim: Advisor/Consultant|Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria|Celgene: Advisor/Consultant|Celgene: Honoraria|Fresenius: Advisor/Consultant|Fresenius: Honoraria|Genzyme: Advisor/Consultant|Genzyme: Honoraria|Gilead/Galapagos: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead/Galapagos: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|Hexal: Advisor/Consultant|Hexal: Honoraria|Janssen-Cilag: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria|Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|Lilly: Honoraria|Medac: Advisor/Consultant|Medac: Honoraria|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Mundipharm: Advisor/Consultant|Mundipharm: Honoraria|Mylan: Advisor/Consultant|Mylan: Honoraria|Novartis: Advisor/Consultant|Novartis: Honoraria|octapharm: Advisor/Consultant|octapharm: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Honoraria|Roche/Chugai: Advisor/Consultant|Roche/Chugai: Honoraria|Sandoz: Advisor/Consultant|Sandoz: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Honoraria|Shire: Advisor/Consultant|Shire: Honoraria|SOBI: Advisor/Consultant|SOBI: Honoraria|Thermo Fisher: Advisor/Consultant|Thermo Fisher: Honoraria|UCB: Advisor/Consultant|UCB: Honoraria.

Atherosclerosis licenses for an exceeding immune response in COVID-19 disease

Background

COVID-19 is characterized by emergency hematopoiesis with a dysregulated myeloid compartment, comprising proinflammatory and immunosuppressive immune cells. Preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major risk factor for severe and fatal COVID-19 outcomes. Individuals with atherosclerosis are known to have a proinflammatory immune cell phenotype. However, the mechanisms of how CVD causes worse outcomes during SARS-Cov2 infection remain unknown.

Purpose

To investigate the mechanisms of how immune cells link atherosclerosis to worse COVID-19 outcomes

Methods

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from hospitalized SARS-Cov2 infected patients in an uncomplicated phase of the disease not requiring intensive-care treatment with (n=5) and without (n=6) preexisting atherosclerosis was performed.

Results

Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar (atherosclerosis vs. no atherosclerosis: mean age 75 vs. 70 years, oxygen requirement 2.2 vs. 3.2 l/min, CRP 10.7 vs. 6.6 mg/dl, IL-6 61.6 vs. 60.6 pg/ml, all p>0.05). In accordance with previous COVID-19 scRNA-seq studies, we found low-density neutrophils, immature neutrophils, neutrophil like plasmablasts and mostly classical monocytes in the myeloid compartment. Low-density neutrophils from patients with atherosclerosis demonstrated an increased expression of proinflammatory (IL18R1 fold change (fc) = 3.3, IL18RAP fc=1.9, HMGB2 fc=1.8, S100A12 fc=1.7, TLR2 fc=1.5, S100A9 fc=1.4 C3AR1 fc=1.8, TLR4 fc= 1.4, all adjusted p-values <1.3x10^–98) and immunosuppressive genes (IL1R2 fc=2.6, ARG1 fc=1.7, ANXA1 fc= 1.6, all adjusted p-values <4.1x10^–67). Interestingly, we found an enrichment of proinflammatory COVID-19 specific neutrophil like plasmablasts in patients with atherosclerosis (p=0.049) with an increased expression of inflammatory genes (S100A12 fc=2.5, S100A9 fc=2.5, S100A8 fc=1.8, HMGB2 fc=2.8, IL18R1 fc=3.9 S100A10 fc=2, all adjusted p-values <1.1x10^–54). In accordance, monocytes from patients with atherosclerosis showed an enrichment of inflammatory (S100A9 fc=1.6, NEAT1 fc=1.8, C3AR1 fc= 1.5, TLR2 fc= 1.5, IL13RA1 q=1.3, CCR2 fc=1.2, all p-values <1.3x10^–60) and immunomodulatory genes (IL1R2 fc=3.5, CD163 fc=2.2, all adjusted p-values <2.7x10^–87).

Conclusions

Our data show for the first time that patients with atherosclerosis have a dysregulated myeloid immune response already in the uncomplicated phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Upregulated genes and cell populations found in this study have previously been associated with severe COVID-19. Therefore, the enhanced inflammatory response may contribute to the worse outcome of patients with CVD and might be addressed by antiinflammatory drugs. Further efforts are needed to understand how atherosclerosis may control chromatin accessibility to predispose for an enhanced inflammatory response.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): German Heart Foundation

Next steps after 15 stimulating years of human gut microbiome research

Gut microbiome research has bloomed over the past 15 years. We have learnt a lot about the complex microbial communities that colonize our intestine. Promising avenues of research and microbiome-based applications are being implemented, with the goal of sustaining host health and applying personalized disease management strategies. Despite this exciting outlook, many fundamental questions about enteric microbial ecosystems remain to be answered. Organizational measures will also need to be taken to optimize the outcome of discoveries happening at an extremely rapid pace. This article highlights our own view of the field and perspectives for the next 15 years.

Patterns of cardiac involvement in patients with long COVID syndrome using cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Background

Long COVID (LC) is an increasingly recognized late complication of COVID-19 infection. Cardiovascular involvement has also been implicated, however, the type and extent of the underlying cardiovascular injury remains unknown.

Purpose

To evaluate the association between ongoing symptoms and findings with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in consecutive patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study of patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness and no previously known cardiovascular disease were included between April 2020 and April 2021. Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and CMR imaging a minimum of 4 weeks from the diagnosis were obtained.

Results

Of the 389 included patients, 192 (49%) were male, the mean (±standard deviation) age was 44 (±13) years and 61 (16%) required hospitalization during the acute illness. The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 94 (71–165) days. 298 (77%) of patients continued to experience ongoing cardiovascular symptoms (long COVID, LC), including dyspnea, palpitations, atypical chest pain and fatigue at the time of CMR at least 4 weeks after the infection. In most patients, the symptoms were only effort related 137 (46%), whereas in 98 (33%) the symptoms affected the activities of daily life; 10 (3%) had severe and debilitating symptoms at rest. Compared to those with no LC (NLC, n=91), LC patients were more commonly hospitalized, had significantly higher native T1, native T2, and showed pericardial enhancement and effusion (Figure 1). There were no differences in cardiac biomarkers, left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular ejection fraction and mass. Proportionally, men and women were similarly affected (n=144 (73%) vs. n=157 (80%), p=0.18). Previous hospitalization was associated with hypertension and ongoing detectable troponin. LC status was associated with previous hospitalization and CMR findings of raised native T1 and native T2, and in females also pericardial enhancement. Severity of symptoms were associated with increased native T1 and T2 and decreased end-diastolic volume, whereas cardiac function showed no significant difference.

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, ongoing cardiovascular symptoms were common. The LC status was related to previous hospitalization and CMR imaging findings of myopericardial inflammation. The extent and type of cardiovascular findings was associated with the severity of symptoms. These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The German Heart Foundation (Deutsche Herzstiftung) and Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany

All-cause mortality and disease progression in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with or without antibiotic therapy: an analysis of the LEOSS cohort

Purpose

Reported antibiotic use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is far higher than the actual rate of reported bacterial co- and superinfection. A better understanding of antibiotic therapy in COVID-19 is necessary.

Methods

6457 SARS-CoV-2-infected cases, documented from March 18, 2020, until February 16, 2021, in the LEOSS cohort were analyzed. As primary endpoint, the correlation between any antibiotic treatment and all-cause mortality/progression to the next more advanced phase of disease was calculated for adult patients in the complicated phase of disease and procalcitonin (PCT) ≤ 0.5 ng/ml. The analysis took the confounders gender, age, and comorbidities into account.

Results

Three thousand, six hundred twenty-seven cases matched all inclusion criteria for analyses. For the primary endpoint, antibiotic treatment was not correlated with lower all-cause mortality or progression to the next more advanced (critical) phase (n = 996) (both p > 0.05). For the secondary endpoints, patients in the uncomplicated phase (n = 1195), regardless of PCT level, had no lower all-cause mortality and did not progress less to the next more advanced (complicated) phase when treated with antibiotics (p > 0.05). Patients in the complicated phase with PCT > 0.5 ng/ml and antibiotic treatment (n = 286) had a significantly increased all-cause mortality (p = 0.029) but no significantly different probability of progression to the critical phase (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In this cohort, antibiotics in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were not associated with positive effects on all-cause mortality or disease progression. Additional studies are needed. Advice of local antibiotic stewardship- (ABS-) teams and local educational campaigns should be sought to improve rational antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients.

Analysis of Humoral Immune Responses in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection

Background

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has caused a pandemic with tens of millions of cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths. The infection causes COVID-19, a disease of the respiratory system of divergent severity. Here, the humoral immune response of a cohort of 143 COVID-19 patients from the University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Germany was characterized.

Methods

SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SARS-CoV-2 and hCoV NL63 neutralization activity was analyzed with pseudotyped lentiviral vectors.

Results

COVID-19 severity increased with age and male patients encountered more serious symptoms than females. Disease severity correlated with the amount of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgA and the neutralization activity of the antibodies. The amount of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies decreased with time after PCR conformation of the infection and antibodies directed against the nucleoprotein waned faster than spike directed antibodies. In contrast, for the common flu coronavirus NL63, COVID19 disease severity seemed to correlate with low NL63-neutralizing activities, suggesting the possibility of cross-reactive protection.

Conclusion

The results describe the humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and might aid the identification of correlates of protection needed for vaccine development.

Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

IMPORTANCE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. Case reports of hospitalized patients suggest that COVID-19 prominently affects the cardiovascular system, but the overall impact remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the presence of myocardial injury in unselected patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this prospective observational cohort study, 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness were identified from the University Hospital Frankfurt COVID-19 Registry between April and June 2020.

EXPOSURE

Recent recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on swab test of the upper respiratory tract.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were obtained. Comparisons were made with age-matched and sex-matched control groups of healthy volunteers (n = 50) and risk factor-matched patients (n = 57).

RESULTS

Of the 100 included patients, 53 (53%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years. The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 71 (64-92) days. Of the 100 patients recently recovered from COVID-19, 67 (67%) recovered at home, while 33 (33%) required hospitalization. At the time of CMR, high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was detectable (greater than 3 pg/mL) in 71 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (71%) and significantly elevated (greater than 13.9 pg/mL) in 5 patients (5%). Compared with healthy controls and risk factor-matched controls, patients recently recovered from COVID-19 had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher left ventricle volumes, and raised native T1 and T2. A total of 78 patients recently recovered from COVID-19 (78%) had abnormal CMR findings, including raised myocardial native T1 (n = 73), raised myocardial native T2 (n = 60), myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (n = 32), or pericardial enhancement (n = 22). There was a small but significant difference between patients who recovered at home vs in the hospital for native T1 mapping (median [IQR], 1119 [1092-1150] ms vs 1141 [1121-1175] ms; P = .008) and hsTnT (4.2 [3.0-5.9] pg/dL vs 6.3 [3.4-7.9] pg/dL; P = .002) but not for native T2 mapping. None of these measures were correlated with time from COVID-19 diagnosis (native T1: r = 0.07; P = .47; native T2: r = 0.14; P = .15; hsTnT: r = -0.07; P = .50). High-sensitivity troponin T was significantly correlated with native T1 mapping (r = 0.33; P < .001) and native T2 mapping (r = 0.18; P = .01). Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with severe findings revealed active lymphocytic inflammation. Native T1 and T2 were the measures with the best discriminatory ability to detect COVID-19-related myocardial pathology.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study of a cohort of German patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, CMR revealed cardiac involvement in 78 patients (78%) and ongoing myocardial inflammation in 60 patients (60%), independent of preexisting conditions, severity and overall course of the acute illness, and time from the original diagnosis. These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

Treatment of invasive fungal diseases in cancer patients-Revised 2019 Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal diseases remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy. The choice of the most appropriate antifungal treatment (AFT) depends on the fungal species suspected or identified, the patient's risk factors (eg length and depth of granulocytopenia) and the expected side effects.

OBJECTIVES

Since the last edition of recommendations for 'Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients' of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) in 2013, treatment strategies were gradually moving away from solely empirical therapy of presumed or possible invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) towards pre-emptive therapy of probable IFD.

METHODS

The guideline was prepared by German clinical experts for infections in cancer patients in a stepwise consensus process. MEDLINE was systematically searched for English-language publications from January 1975 up to September 2019 using the key terms such as 'invasive fungal infection' and/or 'invasive fungal disease' and at least one of the following: antifungal agents, cancer, haematological malignancy, antifungal therapy, neutropenia, granulocytopenia, mycoses, aspergillosis, candidosis and mucormycosis.

RESULTS

AFT of IFDs in cancer patients may include not only antifungal agents but also non-pharmacologic treatment. In addition, the armamentarium of antifungals for treatment of IFDs has been broadened (eg licensing of isavuconazole). Additional antifungals are currently under investigation or in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, updated recommendations for the treatment of proven or probable IFDs are given. All recommendations including the levels of evidence are summarised in tables to give the reader rapid access to key information.

Changes in the cervical microbiota of cervical cancer patients after primary radio-chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Several recent studies have identified a potential interaction between the vaginal microbiota and gynecological cancers, but little is known about the cervical microbiota and its changes during cancer treatment. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative changes of cervical microbiota in patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

Cervical cytobrush samples of 15 cervical patients undergoing chemoradiation treatment were collected 1 day before starting external beam radiation therapy and on the day of the last fraction of brachytherapy. After DNA extraction, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region was performed on the MiSeq platform, followed by data processing and statistical analyses concerning the alpha and beta diversity of 16 samples (7 samples were excluded because of incomplete sample sets).

RESULTS

The amount of amplicon yield after polymerase chain reaction analysis in post-radiation samples was significantly lower compared with the baseline samples (pre 31.49±24.07 ng/µl; post 1.33±1.94 ng/µl; p=0.007). A comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples did not show significant differences regarding beta diversity (weighted UniFrac). There was no significant difference in alpha diversity, which is used to characterize species diversity within a particular community and takes into account both number and abundance (Shannon Diversity Index pre-treatment samples: 2.167±0.7504 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.79); post-treatment samples: 1.97±0.43 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.33); p=0.38). Interindividual differences in patients could partly explain some variation of the samples (permutational multivariate analysis of variance).

CONCLUSION

There was a strong reduction in cervical bacterial loads after chemoradiation. Neither alpha nor beta diversity varied significantly when baseline samples were compared with post-treatment samples.

2268. Clinical Implications of Azole-Resistant vs. Azole-Susceptible Invasive Aspergillosis in Hematological Malignancy (CLARITY): A Multicenter Study

Background

In recent years, survival of patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) has improved mainly due to availability of extended spectrum triazoles. These advances are jeopardized by the emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, the most common causative pathogen of IA. Despite several studies suggesting high probability of azole treatment failure in patients with azole-resistant isolates, the clinical implications of azole-resistant IA compared with azole-susceptible IA remain unclear.

Methods

In patients with hematological malignancies, cases of proven or probable IA (EORTC/MSG 2008) caused by A. fumigatus are registered. Retrospective data are documented, comprising demographics, diagnosis, treatment, response and outcome. Participating sites provided susceptibility results or isolates. Provided isolates were analyzed in a central laboratory.

Results

Since January 2018, 51 sites in 15 countries worldwide enrolled 154 cases diagnosed with IA between 2010 and 2019, of which 23 (14.9%) had azole-resistant IA. Of 44 cases, the respective clinical fungal isolate was analyzed in the central laboratory. A mixed fungal infection was reported for 34 patients (22.1%), 1 (2.9%) in the azole-resistant group; most were related to non-fumigatus Aspergillus species (n = 12, 35.3%) and non-Aspergillus molds (n = 10, 29.4). Most patients were male (n = 98, 63.6%); 19 (82.6%) in the azole-resistant group, 79 (60.3%) in the azole-susceptible group. Age was documented in categories instead of the exact age. Median age group was 50–69 years in both groups (ranging from 7–11 to 70–89 years for azole-resistant cases, 1–12 months to 70–89 years for azole-susceptible cases). Underlying disease and survival are shown in the table.

Conclusion

A worldwide network of investigators contributes to the CLARITY registry study. Completion of recruitment and subsequent data analysis are planned for 2019. Further sites may be added if azole-resistant cases are encountered.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

2119. Matched-Paired Analysis of Patients Treated for Invasive Mucormycosis—Standard Treatment vs. Posaconazole New Formulations (MoveOn)

Background

Current first-line (first) antifungal treatment for invasive mucormycosis (IM) consists of liposomal amphotericin B (AMB). Salvage (SAL) treatment options are limited and often based on posaconazole oral suspension (POSsusp). However, with the approval of posaconazole new formulations (POSnew), patients could benefit from improved pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of POSnew as first-line and SAL treatments for IM.

Methods

We performed a case-matched analysis with proven or probable IM patients from the FungiScope® Registry. 1st-POSnew and 1st-AMB+POSnew cases were matched with 1st-AMB-based treatment controls, and SAL-POSnew cases were matched with SAL-POSsusp controls. Each case was matched with up to three controls based on severity, hematological/oncological malignancy, surgery and/or renal dysfunction.

Results

Five patients receiving first-line POSnew alone, 18 receiving first-line POSnew combined with AMB, and 22 receiving salvage POSnew were identified. By day 42, favorable response was reported for 80.0% (n = 4/5) of patients receiving first-line POSnew, for 27.8% (n = 5/18) receiving first-line POSnew plus AMB, and for 50.0% (n = 11/22) receiving salvage POSnew. Day-42 all-cause mortality of patients receiving POSnew was lower compared with mortality in their respective controls (20.0% (n = 1/5) in 1st-POSnew vs. 53.3% (n = 8/15) in 1st-AMB; 33.3% (n = 6/18) in 1st-AMB+POSnew vs. 52.0% (n = 26/50) in 1st-AMB; 0.0% (n = 0/22) in SAL-POSnew vs. 4.4% (n = 2/45) in SAL-POSsusp).

Conclusion

In the observed patients, POSnew was effective in terms of treatment response and-associated mortality of IM. POSnew may be an alternative for the treatment of IM.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

BIOLUMA: A phase II trial of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab to evaluate efficacy and safety in lung cancer and to evaluate biomarkers predictive for response—Preliminary results from the NSCLC cohort

e20550

Background: Patient selection, dosing regimens and resistance mechanisms for immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy remain unmet medical needs in lung cancer. Combining blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 can be more effective than monotherapy but is accompanied by an increase in toxicity. Thus, to circumvent unnecessary toxicity it is of great interest to identify patients who will benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade alone and to add ipilimumab only in case of primary or secondary progression. We present interim data from the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort of the ongoing BIOLUMA trial which evaluates efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in lung cancer with a broad translational program to identify potential biomarkers predictive of response and/or resistance including whole exome sequencing (WES) of serial biopsies, functional analysis of peripheral T-cells and gut microbiome analyses. Methods: BIOLUMA is a multicentre non-randomised phase II trial in 2nd line patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Patients are treated with nivolumab 240 mg until disease progression and subsequently with a combination therapy of nivolumab 3 mg/kg q2w and ipilimumab 1mg/kg q6w. Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) after addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab treatment. Analysis of sequential tumor biopsies, blood and gut microbiome is performed at different timepoints. Results: To date, 26 patients have been enrolled and 9 patients were transferred to the combination therapy after progression on nivolumab monotherapy. Drop out rate between the treatment arms is high, mainly due to rapid disease progression and adverse events which don’t allow addition of ipilimumab. ORR is available for 8 of these patients: 6 patients (75%) had PD as best response, and 1 (12.5%) each had a stable disease and partial response, respectively. The patient who achieved a PR had experienced primary tumor progression on nivolumab monotherapy before. Toxicity rate was similar to what has been reported from other trials. Conclusions: In NSCLC, addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab in nivolumab refractory patients seems to be safe, but the response rate is low and the drop out between the treatment parts high. Given these data, early termination of this cohort is currently discussed. Clinical trial information: NCT03083691.

BIOLUMA: A phase II trial of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab to evaluate efficacy and safety in lung cancer and to evaluate biomarkers predictive for response—Preliminary results from the SCLC cohort

8563

Background: Patient selection, dosing regimens and resistance mechanisms for immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy remain unmet medical needs in lung cancer. We present interim data from the small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort of the ongoing BIOLUMA trial which evaluates efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in lung cancer with a broad translational program to identify potential biomarkers predictive of response and/or resistance including whole exome sequencing (WES) of serial biopsies, functional analysis of peripheral T-cells and gut microbiome analyses. Methods: BIOLUMA is an investigator initiated, multicentre non-randomised phase II trial in 2nd line patients with SCLC. The initial all-comer SCLC cohort was recently amended for inclusion of patients with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) only. Patients are pre-screened for TMB by WES at the time of first diagnosis. After progression on platinum-based therapy, 4 cycles of nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w in combination with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w and subsequent nivolumab 240 mg flat dose as monotherapy are given. Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) of the upfront combination therapy. Analysis of sequential tumor biopsies, blood and gut microbiome is performed at different timepoints. Results: The SCLC cohort was amended to include TMB high patients only, after two treatment-related deaths had occurred and emerging data indicated treatment benefit depends on high TMB status for the combination therapy. Both patients with treatment-related death had a CT-scan documented partial response (not confirmed according to RECIST due to death). One each died of pneumonitis and encephalitis. From the all-comer cohort, efficacy data are available for 18 patients. ORR was 38.8% with 7 partial and no complete responses. Stable disease occurred in 16.7% (n = 3) resulting in a DCR of 55.5%. TMB pre-screening for the amended cohort is currently ongoing. Conclusions: In the SCLC cohort, upfront combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab shows remarkable ORR but is accompanied by high toxicity rates. In order to ensure a reasonable balance of risks and treatment benefit, only TMB high patients are included after an amendment of the cohort to improve the risk/benefit ratio. Clinical trial information: NCT03083691.

Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

BACKGROUND

The clinical effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (rCDI) has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. To assess the current status of FMT in Germany with respect to active centers, local standards, clinical effectiveness and safety, the MicroTrans Registry (NCT02681068) was established.

METHODS

In a long-term retrospective multicenter observational study by the German Clinical Microbiome Study Group (GCMSG), primary and secondary cure on day 30 and 90, as well as occurrence of treatment-related adverse events were assessed. In addition to patient demographic data, we provide an overview of the FMT procedures and techniques used at different centers.

RESULTS

Overall, 133 eligible patients from 33 centers were included, of which 64.7% were female (n = 86). The mean age was 75 years (interquartile range: 59.5-81.5). Administration via the duodenal route (n = 59; 44.4%) was the most frequently applied option, followed by colonic (n = 55; 41.1%), capsule (n = 13; 9.8%), and gastric administration (n = 4; 3.0%). Primary cure on day 30 and 90 was achieved in 84.2% (n = 101/120) and 78.3% (n = 72/92) of patients, respectively. Including re-treatment, secondary response was achieved in 87.5% (d 30; n = 105/120) and 85.9% (d 90; n = 79/92), respectively. Treatment- elated adverse events were documented in 16 patients (12.0%).

CONCLUSION

FMT is a safe and effective treatment option for rCDI. However, FMT is currently available only in few centers in Germany, and treatment options vary from one center to another.