Circulating tumor DNA as a noninvasive marker of resectability in ovarian carcinomas

5548

Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death by gynecological cancer. Complete surgery remains one of the main prognostic factors. Laparoscopic exploration is mandatory to assess surgical resectability at diagnosis or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no clinical or biological marker that can correctly predict resectability and may be able to avoid a second laparoscopic exploration for initially unresectable diseases. Our aim was to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) value as a predictive non-invasive marker of evolution towards resectability for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We explored in this work one of the secondary objectives of the CIDOC study (NCT03302884). CIDOC is a multicenter prospective study aiming to explore ctDNA value as early marker of disease relapse after first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with mucinous histology or early stages not requiring chemotherapy are excluded. Plasma samples are collected at diagnosis, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and during follow-up. After DNA extraction, panel-based next generation sequencing is performed on both tumor samples and germline DNA, and somatic mutations of interest are selected for ctDNA monitoring. ctDNA analyses are conducted using droplet digital PCR (BioRad QX200) by measuring the variant allele fraction (VAF) of previously identified mutations. Results: This intermediary analysis has included 47 patients diagnosed between March 2017 and December 2019. Median age was 69 years old (48 – 84). Most of the patients had advanced disease (89.4% stage FIGO III or IV), serous histology (94.8%), and high grade tumor (92.3%). Most of the patients underwent complete interval cytoreductive surgery (76.3% vs 17.4% complete upfront surgery). Most of the tumors had TP53 mutations (85.1%), following by alterations involving DNA repair genes (38.3%). Median cell-free DNA concentration at baseline was 0.38 ng/µL (0 – 12.8). ctDNA was identified in 92.1% of patients at baseline with a median VAF of 1.84% (0 – 42.52%). ctDNA VAF was correlated to the peritoneal dissemination ( p= 0.039) assessed with the peritoneal cancer index. ctDNA clearance after preoperative chemotherapy tended to be correlated to achievement of complete interval surgery for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p= 0.108). Conclusions: ctDNA may be a promising non-invasive marker to assess peritoneal cancer spreading and to predict surgical resectability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If confirmed in larger populations, this may enable to avoid additional surgical explorations for patients who remain ctDNA positive after chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03302884.

Advance Approval of Outpatient Chemotherapy via Phone Call Optimizes Healthcare Delivery without Compromising Patient Satisfaction with Care

Patient satisfaction is linked to the amount of time spent with the physician. At the same time, long waiting times in hospitals are a major source of patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine whether advance approval of outpatient chemotherapy (CT) via phone call can optimize healthcare delivery without compromising patient satisfaction with care. Between 2013 and 2016, 343 patients with breast/gynecological cancer scheduled to undergo CT on day 8 and/or day 15 of the CT cycle were enrolled in a before-after study conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. In the control group, 168 patients received a face-to-face consultation with an oncologist on the day of CT for approval of the upcoming CT session. In the intervention group, 175 patients received a phone call from a healthcare provider the day before CT, where assessment of toxicity from the previous CT session was recorded and submitted to an oncologist for approval of the upcoming CT session. At the end of the 6th CT cycle, patient satisfaction was evaluated using EORTC IN-PATSAT32. A total of 233 questionnaires were analyzed (response rate: 77.7%). Satisfaction with care was similar between the two groups. No differences in perceived health status were observed, but self-reported time in hospital was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.007). Advance approval of outpatient CT via phone call is feasible and particularly relevant in the current context of immunotherapy development.

Phone call for chemotherapy validation in outpatient unit as a way to optimize health care without compromising patients'€™ satisfaction and quality of life

6588

Background: Patients’ satisfaction is known to be closely linked to the time spent with the physician. However, longer waiting times may be a source of dissatisfaction as well as organizational dysfunctions of the outpatient unit. Is a validation of chemotherapy by phone call instead of a medical consultation with a senior physician before chemotherapy (CT) is feasible without compromising patients’ satisfaction and quality of life? Methods: Pts with OMS < 1, able to respond to phone call, < 76 years, receiving day 8 and or d15 of CT were included. We enrolled 343 pts in a before/after study between 2013 and 2016. In the “before” step (control arm), 168 pts had a systematic physician consultation the same day before CT administration. In the intervention arm 175 pts received a phone call by a junior physician the day preceding CT administration. A specific questionnaire for CT -related toxicity of the previous cycle was recorded and CT was validated or not by physician. The day after, pts received prepared CT without appointment with the oncologist and delay in administration for already prepared CT. At the end of CT protocol, socio demographics, patients’ satisfaction (In-PatSat32) and health status (EQ-5D) questionnaires were completed by patients. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 83% and 74% in before and after step respectively, 241 questionnaires were analyzed. Satisfaction with care showed similar In-PatSat32 scores between arms, for satisfaction with: physician, nurse, organization and services. No differences of perceived health status and toxicity were observed between both groups, but patients’ time spent in hospital was lower in the intervention group versus the control group, (p = 0.007). Conclusions: An alternative care pathway implementing phone calls before CT administration if feasible without compromising pts’ satisfaction, quality of life and toxicity. We believe that saving time of pts, physicians and pharmacists is a way to optimize the model of care in outpatient unit, particularly in the immunotherapy area with more pts received intra venous treatment, probably for a long time.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy with stem cell support for non-metastatic breast cancer

The importance of dose-intensity has been suggested in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a high-dose intensity doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen with supporting G-CSF and blood stem cells. Twenty-five patients with non-metastatic breast cancer received four cycles of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m2) at 3 week intervals. Apheresis was performed after the first cycle and if necessary after the second cycle. Stem cells were reinfused after the third and fourth cycles. G-CSF was started on day 3 of each cycle (5 microg/kg/day) and was stopped the day before the last apheresis or when absolute neutrophil count was above 0.5 x 10(9)/l. Median received dose-intensity was respectively 25 mg/m2/week (range 22-26) and 1000 mg/m2/week (range 904-1065) for doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Grade IV thrombocytopenia occurred in 8% of cycles. Two patients needed platelets and 12 red cell transfusion. Fifteen patients were readmitted for a median duration of 4 days (range 1-7). We have established a safe, outpatient, high-dose intensity doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen with supporting G-CSF and blood stem cells which can be submitted for comparison with the current standards.

Correction of aplastic anaemia complicating paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria: absence of eradication of the PNH clone and dependence of response on cyclosporin A administration

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is defined as a somatic mutation of a clonal population of stem cells. Consequently, when aplastic anaemia (AA) occurs in patients with a history of PNH, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is considered as the only effective treatment. The impact of immunosuppressive therapy has not been reported in this situation. We present observations of three PNH patients who developed AA and were effectively treated with cyclosporin A (CSA). Because of lack of improvement with other treatments, CSA alone was given at a dose of 5-10mg/kg/d. Complete response (CR) was obtained in two patients after 6 and 24 months respectively. A partial response (PR) was observed in the third patient after 12 months. Transient elevated LDH and haemosiderinuria persisted in all cases. DAF and MIRL deficiency were still documented in the two patients in CR. Two patients (one CR, one PR) ceased CSA therapy after 12 months and relapsed within 3-6 months. CSA was reinitiated and led to platelet recovery in one patient after 6 months. The persistence of the abnormal PNH clone is coherent with the hypothesis that CSA does not act directly on the PNH clone but probably acts through regulation of the inhibitory effects of immunocompetent cells on haemopoiesis. These observations suggest that patients suffering from severe AA complicated PNH should not be excluded from immunosuppressive therapy.