Evaluation of Unsolicited Feedback from Patients with Cancer and Their Families as a Strategy to Improve Cancer Care Delivery

BACKGROUND

Unsolicited patient feedback (compliments and complaints) should allow the healthcare system to address and improve individual and overall patient, family, and staff experiences. We evaluated feedback at a tertiary cancer centre to identify potential areas for optimizing care delivery.

METHODS

unsolicited feedback submitted to the Patient Relations Department, relating to the Divisions of Medical and Radiation Oncology, at the Ottawa Hospital, was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 580 individual reports submitted from 2016 to 2022, patient demographics were available for 97% (563/580). Median patient age was 65 years (range 17-101), and 53% (301/563) were female. The most common cancer types were breast (127/545, 23%) and gastrointestinal (119/545, 22%) malignancies, and most (64%, 311/486) patients had metastatic disease. Feedback was submitted mainly by patients (291/579, 50%), and predominantly negative (489/569, 86%). The main reasons for complaints included: communication (29%, 162/566) and attitude/conduct of care (28%, 159/566). While feedback rates were initially stable, an increase occurred from 2019 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsolicited feedback remains mostly negative, and relates to physician communication. If we are to drive meaningful changes in care delivery, more standardized means of assessing feedback and implementation strategies are needed. In addition, in an era of increased healthcare provider burnout, strategies to enhance formal positive feedback are also warranted.

The REthinking Clinical Trials Program Retreat 2023: Creating Partnerships to Optimize Quality Cancer Care

Patients, families, healthcare providers and funders face multiple comparable treatment options without knowing which provides the best quality of care. As a step towards improving this, the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) pragmatic trials program started in 2014 to break down many of the traditional barriers to performing clinical trials. However, until other innovative methodologies become widely used, the impact of this program will remain limited. These innovations include the incorporation of near equivalence analyses and the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical trial design. Near equivalence analyses allow for the comparison of different treatments (drug and non-drug) using quality of life, toxicity, cost-effectiveness, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. AI offers unique opportunities to maximize the information gleaned from clinical trials, reduces sample size estimates, and can potentially "rescue" poorly accruing trials. On 2 May 2023, the first REaCT international symposium took place to connect clinicians and scientists, set goals and identify future avenues for investigator-led clinical trials. Here, we summarize the topics presented at this meeting to promote sharing and support other similarly motivated groups to learn and share their experiences.

Key Considerations for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in Older Adults: An Expert Consensus of the Canadian Treatment Landscape

The prevalence of breast cancer amongst older adults in Canada is increasing. This patient population faces unique challenges in the management of breast cancer, as older adults often have distinct biological, psychosocial, and treatment-related considerations. This paper presents an expert consensus of the Canadian treatment landscape, focusing on key considerations for optimizing selection of systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer in older adults. This paper aims to provide evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for healthcare professionals involved in the care of older adults with breast cancer. By recognizing and addressing the specific needs of older adults, healthcare providers can optimize treatment outcomes and improve the overall quality of care for this population.

Shorter Durations of Anti-HER2 Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: The Physician Perspective

Despite evidence from clinical trials showing the efficacy of shorter durations of therapy, most HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients receive a year of anti-HER2 therapy. A survey of Canadian oncologists was conducted online, with electronic data collection, and the analysis is reported descriptively. Measures collected included current practices with respect to the duration of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, perspectives on data regarding shorter durations of treatment, and interest in further trials on this subject. Responses were received from 42 providers across Canada. Half (50%, 21/42) reported having never recommended 6 months of anti-HER2 therapy. The primary reason physicians consider a shorter duration is in response to treatment-related toxicities (76%, 31/41). Most participants (79%, 33/42) expressed the need for more data to determine which patients can be safely and effectively treated with shorter durations. Patient factors such as young age, initial stage, hormone receptor status, and type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were attributed to reluctance to offer shorter durations of treatment. Many respondents (83%, 35/42) expressed interest in participating in the proposed clinical trial of 6 months of anti-HER2 therapy. In contemporary Canadian practice, 12 months of anti-HER2 therapy remains the primary practice. Future trials are required to better define the role of shorter treatment durations.

Evaluating the Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Breast Cancer Clinical Trial Data Sets

PURPOSE

There is strong interest from patients, researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, medical journal editors, funders of research, and regulators in sharing clinical trial data for secondary analysis. However, data access remains a challenge because of concerns about patient privacy. It has been argued that synthetic data generation (SDG) is an effective way to address these privacy concerns. There is a dearth of evidence supporting this on oncology clinical trial data sets, and on the utility of privacy-preserving synthetic data. The objective of the proposed study is to validate the utility and privacy risks of synthetic clinical trial data sets across multiple SDG techniques.

METHODS

We synthesized data sets from eight breast cancer clinical trial data sets using three types of generative models: sequential synthesis, conditional generative adversarial network, and variational autoencoder. Synthetic data utility was evaluated by replicating the published analyses on the synthetic data and assessing concordance of effect estimates and CIs between real and synthetic data. Privacy was evaluated by measuring attribution disclosure risk and membership disclosure risk.

RESULTS

Utility was highest using the sequential synthesis method where all results were replicable and the CI overlap most similar or higher for seven of eight data sets. Both types of privacy risks were low across all three types of generative models.

DISCUSSION

Synthetic data using sequential synthesis methods can act as a proxy for real clinical trial data sets, and simultaneously have low privacy risks. This type of generative model can be one way to enable broader sharing of clinical trial data.

Abstract P3-07-18: CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC)

CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) John Hilton, David W. Cescon, Andrew Robinson, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Sara Kristina Taylor, Arif Awan, Terry Ng, Moira Rushton, Marie-France Savard, Lindsay Muyot, Marie Claude Reeves, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Mark Bray, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour, Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau Background: CFI-400945 is a selective oral inhibitor of Polo-like Kinase 4 (PLK4), which controls centriole duplication and mitotic progression, and was identified as a drug target based on functional screening of genomically unstable breast cancers. CFI-400945 monotherapy has anti-proliferative activity and enhances antitumor activity when combined with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in transplantable murine cancer models. Material and methods: In this multi-centre phase II trial of CFI-400945 and durvalumab combination therapy, the primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Patients with aTNBC with adequate organ function, PS 0-1, previously treated with >1 line of chemotherapy including anthracycline and/or taxane, were eligible. CFI-400945 32mg monotherapy was administered on a 7-day on, 7-day off schedule for cycle 1 (which reduced the likelihood of significant hematologic toxicity). From cycle 2 onwards, CFI-400945 32mg daily was administered in combination with durvalumab 1500mg IV every 28 days; responses were assessed every 8 weeks. Following trial activation, 3 patients received a CFI-400945 dose of 40mg (same schedule) for a total of 9 cycles before 32mg was declared as the new recommended phase 2 dose (based on other ongoing trials using CFI-400945). A Simon 2-stage design was used; ≥3/15 responses in stage 1 were required to expand to stage 2. Exploratory PD-L1 expression was measured on immune and tumor cells using the SP263 assay. Results: 15 patients received a total of 45 cycles (1-12 cycles per patient). Median age was 56 (31-76); 53% PS1; 20% 3 prior chemotherapy lines and; 27% 4 sites of metastatic disease. Immune vs tumor cell PD-L1 expression was 1% in 50% and 23% of patients, respectively (immune and tumor cell expression was mutually exclusive). Immune vs tumor cell PD-L1 expression was 10% in 17% and 15% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 hematological adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (40%), neutropenia (20%), anemia and thrombocytopenia (7% for both). One serious AE at least possibly related to treatment was seen: grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Frequent AEs (˃5%) considered at least possibly related to CFI-400945 were: nausea and anorexia (both 20%), fatigue and dysgeusia (both 13%), headache, dizziness, maculo-papular rash, back pain and gastroesophageal reflux disease (all 7%), Frequent AEs (˃5%) considered at least possibly related to durvalumab were: anorexia (13%), arthritis, fatigue, back pain, pain in extremity and hot flashes (all 7%). No responses were observed in 14 evaluable patients during stage 1, therefore the pre-specified threshold for anti-tumor activity to proceed to stage 2 was not met. Disease control rate (complete response, partial response or stable disease ˃16 weeks in duration) was 7% (1/14). Conclusions: CFI-400945 and durvalumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities of the combination. However, in this heavily pretreated and PD-L1 unselected TNBC population, no responses were observed and the pre-specified threshold for anti-tumor activity for stage 2 was not met. The trial was closed to accrual on April 26, 2022. Final analysis and correlative analyses are ongoing. Acknowledgements: Coordinated by the CCTG. Funding supported by Astra Zeneca. CFI-400945 provided by Treadwell Therapeutics and durvalumab provided by Astra Zeneca.

Citation Format: John Hilton, David W. Cescon, Andrew Robinson, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Sara Taylor, Arif Awan, Terry L. Ng, Moira Rushton, Marie-France Savard, Lindsay Muyot, Marie Claude Reeves, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Mark Bray, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour, Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau. CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-18.

Abstract PD18-10: Treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with the novel combination of zanidatamab, palbociclib, and fulvestrant

Background: HER2+ mBC remains incurable, with a need for new HER2-directed therapies and regimens, including chemotherapy-free options. Zanidatamab (zani) is a novel HER2-targeted bispecific antibody that binds HER2 in a unique trans configuration, driving multiple mechanisms of antitumor activity, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity. A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is an approved treatment for HER2-negative/HR+ mBC and this combination has also demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity when paired with HER2-targeted therapy(ies) in HER2+/HR+ mBC. Here, we report results from ZWI-ZW25-202 (NCT04224272), an ongoing single-arm phase 2 study of zani combined with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Methods: Eligibility requirements include: HER2+/HR+ unresectable, locally advanced BC or mBC; ECOG PS of 0 or 1; prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T DM1 (additional prior HER2-targeting agents are permitted); and no prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Part 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of the zani/palbo/fulv combination and determined the recommended doses for use in Part 2, where the antitumor activity of the combination is being evaluated. Endpoints include safety outcomes, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6), confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per RECIST v1.1; disease control rate (DCR=complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]); duration of response (DOR); PFS; and overall survival. Results: As of 24 Feb 2022, 34 pts (33 HER2+/HR+ per central analysis) with a median age of 52 (range 36-77) have been treated. In the metastatic setting, pts had received a median (range) of 4 (1-10) prior systemic regimens, including 3 (1-8) different prior HER2 targeted therapies, and 1 (0-4) endocrine therapy. Seven pts (20%) had prior T DXd treatment and 7 pts had prior fulv treatment. All pts received zani (20 mg/kg Q2W) and standard doses of palbo and fulv. Eighteen pts (53%) remained on treatment; median duration of zani treatment was 6.9 mo (range 0.5-16.3). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of neutropenia occurred in 1 of 7 DLT-evaluable pts in Part 1. Among all pts (n=34), the most common (>20%) treatment (zani, palbo and/or fulv)-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (74%), neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (62%), stomatitis (41%), asthenia (26%), nausea (24%), and anemia (21%). Grade (Gr) ≥3 TRAEs in 2 or more pts included neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (50%), anemia (6%), diarrhea (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). AEs of special interest were all Gr ≤2 and included 4 pts with cardiac events (LVEF decrease of ≥10% from baseline) and 1 pt with infusion-related reaction. There were no treatment-related serious AEs. Palbo was discontinued for 1 pt due to an AE (AST increase); no pt discontinued zani treatment as a result of AEs. Two deaths occurred: 1 due to disease progression and 1 due to an unrelated AE of pneumonia caused by COVID-19. In 29 pts with measurable disease, the cORR was 34.5% (95% CI: 17.9, 54.3), all responses were cPRs, of which 1 is pending CR confirmation. DOR ranged from 2.3 to 14.9+ mo, with 8 confirmed responses ongoing, and the DCR was 93.1% (95% CI: 77.2, 99.2). Interim median PFS was 11.3 mo (range 0.03-16.7; 95% CI: 5.6, not estimable). PFS6 analysis is planned following the completion of enrollment. Conclusions: Zani in combination with palbo and fulv shows encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses in heavily pretreated pts and a manageable safety profile. This regimen has the potential to be a chemotherapy-free treatment option in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Enrollment in the study is continuing.

Citation Format: Santiago Escrivá-de-Romani, Emilio Alba, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Sara Hurvitz, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Maria Gión, Cristiano Ferrario, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Rossanna C. Pezo, Erika Hamilton, Marc Webster, Timothy Pluard, Muralidhar Beeram, Begoña Jiménez Rodríguez, Hannah Linden, Cristina Saura, Adam Omidpanah, Phoebe Harvey, Marie-France Savard. Treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with the novel combination of zanidatamab, palbociclib, and fulvestrant [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD18-10.

Abstract OT2-21-01: A randomized, multicenter pragmatic trial comparing bone pain from a single dose of pegfilgrastim to 5 doses of daily filgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (REaCT-5G)

Background: Current guidelines recommend the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) associated with commonly used breast cancer chemotherapy regimens. Filgrastim (FIL) is a short-acting G-CSF injection that requires daily subcutaneous injection starting 24-72 hours after chemotherapy for 5 to 10 days. Pegfilgrastim (PEG) is a long-acting, pegylated formulation that requires a single injection 24-72 hours after chemotherapy. G-CSF causes bone pain in approximately 70% of patients, which can be severe in over 25% of cases. While registration trials for PEG showed bone pain from PEG was comparable to FIL when given for a median duration of 11 days, many oncologists are now only prescribing FIL for 5 days based on a multicenter RCT showing that 5 days of FIL is non-inferior to 7 or 10 days of FIL in terms of FN and treatment-related hospitalizations. Furthermore, the cost of 5 days of FIL ($CA 721.55 for 300 mcg dose) is half of the price of a single dose of PEG ($CA 1424.63). Therefore, if 5 days of FIL leads to significantly less bone pain, this may improve health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) for patients, improve adherence to G-CSF, and improve cost-effectiveness. Methods: Patients receiving neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer requiring primary FN prophylaxis with G-CSF will be approached for this pragmatic, multicenter, open-label superiority RCT. Using the Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) methodology that incorporates an integrated oral consent model, eligible and consented patients will be randomized to either 5 days of FIL or one day of PEG with each cycle of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is bone pain during the first 5 days after G-CSF injection using area under the curve (AUC) of the daily pain score from days 1-5 (AUC score 0 to 40) of the Bone Pain Diary. Secondary endpoints include incidence of FN and treatment-related hospitalizations, incidence of chemotherapy delay, dose-reduction, or discontinuation, incidence of chemotherapy-related mortality, rate of G-CSF compliance, healthcare resource utilization, HR-QoL, and cost-effectiveness. Participants will also complete a Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ) exploring the relative importance of different factors in deciding between PEG vs. 5 days of FIL both before randomization and at the end of the study. To achieve 80% power in an ANCOVA analysis and assuming 5% are loss to follow-up, the planned sample size is 232 patients (116 per arm). The randomization (1:1 ratio) will be stratified by treatment center (4 centers) and chemotherapy regimen (taxane-based vs. anthracycline-based in the first 4 cycles). Results: The study opened for enrollment on June 9, 2021. As of July 6, 2021, the study has opened at one site, and 13 patients have been randomized.Conclusion: This will be the first RCT using a patient-reported Bone Pain Diary that was co-developed by patient partners to measure bone pain between 5 days of FIL vs. PEG. In collaboration with patient partners, the study incorporates a tool (TPQ) that explores factors that may be important in deciding between PEG and FIL, with the aim of translating the findings of this study into real world clinical practice.

Citation Format: Terry L. Ng, Monica Taljaard, Marie-France Savard, Carol Stober, Stuart Nicholls, Lisa Vandermeer, Kednapa Thavorn, Claudia Hampel, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, John F. Hilton, Mark Clemons. A randomized, multicenter pragmatic trial comparing bone pain from a single dose of pegfilgrastim to 5 doses of daily filgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (REaCT-5G) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-21-01.

Abstract OT1-11-02: A pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial evaluating the dose timing (morning vs evening) of endocrine therapy and its effects on tolerability and compliance (REaCT-CHRONO Study)

Background. Endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstay treatment for hormonal receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. ET non-compliance and non-persistence vary from 30 to 70% and are associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival. ET side effects are an important cause of non-adherence. In clinical practice, there are anecdotal reports that time of the day at which ET is taken may affect ET side effects and compliance. However, we are not aware of any high-quality studies supporting this practice. In other fields of medicine, there is evidence to suggest that the time of the day at which medication is taken can alter its effect and/or the adherence. This is known as chronotherapy. Methods. In this pragmatic, open-label, multicenter trial, eligible and consented patients with an early stage or locally advanced HR+ breast cancer will be randomized (1:1) to receive either: an ET morning dose (Arm A: within 1 hour of the patient wake up time) or an ET evening dose (Arm B: within 1 hour of patient bed time). The primary endpoint is endocrine toxicity and tolerability measured by the change in total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Subscale (FACT-ES) score from baseline to 12 weeks following the beginning of ET. Secondary endpoints include: endocrine toxicity/tolerability and quality of life measured respectively by the change in total score and individual items of FACT-ES and FACT-B (a validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for patients with a Breast cancer) from baseline to 4, 8, 12 and 52 weeks following the beginning of ET, rates of non-persistence or non-compliance and cost-effectiveness. A timing preference questionnaire will be filled out at the beginning and the end of the study by patients to evaluate their preferred time. As per the Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program, the integrated consent model will be used and patients will complete questionnaires in the online patient portal. For randomization, a permuted block design developed by the Ottawa Methods Centre will be used and patients will be stratified by center, type of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen yes/no) and if prior chemotherapy was received. Using a two-sided, alpha=0.05 Fisher’s exact test, and assuming a 10% of loss to follow up, the planned sample size is 235 patients. Accrual. This study opened for enrollment at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre on June 30, 2021 and will open soon at the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre. The maximum accrual period is 2 years. Conclusion. This will be world’s first prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate ET dose timing (morning versus evening) and its effects on tolerability and adherence. Changing the time of the day at which a medication is taken is a new, simple and easy intervention that does not generate additional costs and can improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Funding provided by: NOAMA (Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association) Innovation Grant (2021) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04864405

Citation Format: Marie-France Savard, Mohammed Ibrahim, Gregory Pond, Deanna Saunders, Lisa Vandermeer, Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless, Lesley Fallowfield, Mark Clemons. A pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial evaluating the dose timing (morning vs evening) of endocrine therapy and its effects on tolerability and compliance (REaCT-CHRONO Study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-11-02.

Survival in Women with De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Real-World Evidence from a Publicly-Funded Canadian Province and the United States by Insurance Status

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patient outcomes may vary according to distinct health care payers and different countries. We compared 291 Alberta (AB), Canada and 9429 US patients < 65 with de novo MBC diagnosed from 2010 through 2014. Data were extracted from the provincial Breast Data Mart and from the National Cancer Institute's SEER program. US patients were divided by insurance status (US privately insured, US Medicaid or US uninsured). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to assess differences in OS and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox models. Multivariate models were adjusted for age, surgical status, and biomarker profile. No difference in OS was noted between AB and US patients (HR = 0.92 (0.77-1.10), p = 0.365). Median OS was not reached for the US privately insured and AB groups, and was 11 months and 8 months for the US Medicaid and US uninsured groups, respectively. The 3-year OS rates were comparable between US privately insured and AB groups (53.28% (51.95-54.59) and 55.54% (49.49-61.16), respectively). Both groups had improved survival (p < 0.001) relative to the US Medicaid and US uninsured groups [39.32% (37.25-41.37) and 40.53% (36.20-44.81)]. Our study suggests that a universal health care system is not inferior to a private insurance-based model for de novo MBC.

Does the Time of Day at Which Endocrine Therapy Is Taken Affect Breast Cancer Patient Outcomes?

Background: Non-compliance and non-persistence with endocrine therapy for breast cancer is common and usually related to treatment-induced side effects. There are anecdotal reports that simply changing the time of day when taking endocrine therapy (i.e., changing morning dosing to evening dosing or vice versa) can reduce side effects. Literature review: We conducted a literature review to evaluate whether changing the timing of tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitor administration impacted patient outcomes. No randomized control trials or prospective cohort studies that looked at time of day of endocrine therapy were identified through our review of literature from 1947 until August 2020. Conclusions: Given the rates of endocrine therapy non-compliance and non-persistence reported in the literature, ranging from 41–72% and 31–73%, respectively, simply changing the time of day when medications are taken could be an important strategy. We could identify no trials evaluating the effect of changes in timing of administration of endocrine therapy on breast cancer patient outcomes. Randomized control trials are clearly indicated for this simple and cost-effective intervention.

De-escalating adjuvant therapies in older patients with lower risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are standard treatments for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, many older patients are at greater risk of treatment-related toxicities and non-cancer related death, and less likely to benefit from these standard treatments. A systematic review was performed evaluating outcomes of omitting RT or ET in older patients aged ≥50 treated with BCS for lower-risk breast cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were queried from 1980 to April 30th, 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) evaluating omission of RT and/or ET compared to RT plus ET in patients. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with findings reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

From 3860 citations, 10 prospective studies met eligibility criteria. Omission of RT alone was evaluated in 7 RCTs (n = 4604) and one PCS (n = 667); omission of ET alone was assessed in 1 PCS (n = 271); and omission of either ET or RT was compared to ET plus RT in 1 RCT (n = 495). Adjuvant RT compared to no RT reduced 5- and 10-year in-breast tumor recurrence [5-year: RR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.09-0.27 l 10-year: 0.28, 95 %CI 0.16-0.5], but had no effect on survival [5-year: RR 0.94, 95 %CI 0.77-1.15; 10-year: 1.01, 95 %CI 0.9-1.12].

CONCLUSION

The current body of evidence suggests that RT can be omitted in older patients with lower-risk disease. However, more trials on the omission of ET are required to better inform treatment decisions.

Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among First-Line Sunitinib Patients with Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium Risk Group

BACKGROUND

International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups are important when considering therapeutic options for first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with clear cell mRCC initiating first-line sunitinib between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective database study. Median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were stratified by IMDC risk groups and evaluated for those in the combined intermediate and poor risk group and separately for those in the intermediate risk group with one versus two risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1,769 patients treated with first-line sunitinib, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate, and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the three risk groups, patients had similar age, gender, and sunitinib initiation year. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 7.1 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 23.2 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS (35.1 vs. 21.9 months) and TTD (10.3 vs. 6.6 months) were significantly different between intermediate risk patients with one versus two risk factors.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study found a median OS of 52 months for patients with favorable IMDC risk treated with first-line sunitinib, setting a new benchmark on clinical outcomes of clear cell mRCC. Analysis of intermediate risk group by one or two risk factors demonstrated distinct clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This analysis offers a contemporary benchmark for overall survival (median, 52.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 43.4-61.2) among patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as first-line therapy in a real-world setting and classified as favorable risk according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group classification. This study demonstrates that clinical outcomes differ between IMDC risk groups as well as within the intermediate risk group based on the number of risk factors, thus warranting further consideration of risk group when counseling patients about therapeutic options and designing clinical trials.

An Update on Predictive Biomarkers in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

One of the major challenges of personalized oncology lies in identifying predictive biomarkers of response to therapy that are practical in the clinical setting. Although many new targeted and immune-based treatments have emerged in recent years as effective systemic therapy options in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), optimizing the selection and sequencing of treatments for any individual patient with this disease remains a significant challenge. The CheckMate-214 trial demonstrated that the International mRCC Database Consortium risk model is an effective predictive biomarker in the first-line treatment of mRCC. To date this remains the only prospectively validated predictive biomarker in mRCC. A number of other promising biomarker candidates are under active investigation but require prospective validation before widespread clinical adoption. PATIENT SUMMARY: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk model is currently the only validated tool that can help clinicians in determining which patients should receive sunitinib versus a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab as a first treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Other tools are being actively investigated.

A network approach to developing immuno-oncology combinations in Canada

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized care for many cancer indications, with considerable effort now being focused on increasing the rate, depth, and duration of patient response. One strategy is to combine immune strategies (for example, ctla-4 and PD-1/L1-directed agents) to harness additive or synergistic efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Despite encouraging results with such combinations in multiple tumour types, numerous clinical challenges remain, including a lack of biomarkers that reliably predict outcome, the emergence of therapeutic resistance, and optimal management of immune-related toxicities. Furthermore, the selection of ideal combinations from the myriad of immune, systemic, and locoregional therapies has yet to be determined. A longitudinal network-based approach could offer advantages in addressing those critical questions, including long-term follow-up of patients beyond individual trials. The molecular cancer registry Personalize My Treatment, managed by the Networks of Centres of Excellence nonprofit organization Exactis Innovation, is uniquely positioned to accelerate Canadian immuno-oncology (io) research efforts throughout its national network of cancer sites. To gain deeper insight into how a pan-Canadian network could advance research in io combinations, Exactis invited preeminent clinical and scientific advisors from across Canada to a roundtable event in November 2017. The present white paper captures the expert advice provided: leverage longitudinal patient data collection; facilitate network collaboration and assay harmonization; synergize with existing initiatives, networks, and biobanks; and develop an io combination trial based on Canadian discoveries.

Real-world assessment of clinical outcomes among first-line (1L) sunitinib (SUN) patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by the international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) risk group

610

Background: Prognostic factors such as the IMDC criteria have included all types of targeted therapy. This study assesses clinical outcomes and provide benchmarks for mRCC pts treated specifically with 1L SUN in the real world to provide contemporary benchmarks for outcomes and survival. Methods: Clear cell mRCC pts initiating SUN as 1L therapy between 2010-2018 were included in a retrospective database study. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS: time to death) by IMDC risk groups based on Karnofsky Performance Status < 80%, diagnosis to treatment interval < 1 year, anemia, neutrophilia, hypercalcemia and thrombocytosis. Results: Among 1,769 1L SUN pts with clear cell in the RW clinical database, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, pts had similar mean age in years, gender distribution, and year of SUN initiation (age: 63.8, 62.9 and 62.6; male: 74%, 75%, and 72%; SUN initiation year of 2010-2013: all 71%). In the favorable risk group, 99% received nephrectomy vs 88% in intermediate and 66% in poor risk group. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months (mos) in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and was 7.1 mos in the combined intermediate/poor risk groups. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 mos in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and was 23.2 mos in the combined intermediate/poor risk groups. Conclusions: This real world study based on a contemporary cohort of 1L SUN mRCC pts found a median OS of 52 mos which sets a new benchmark for clear cell mRCC in the favorable risk group. OS in the intermediate and poor risk groups are similar to previous reports. This affects pt counselling and clinical trial design.

Redrawing the Lines: The Next Generation of Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Although not considered curative in nature, new therapeutic advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have substantially improved patient outcomes. This article discusses the state-of-the-art and emerging therapeutic options for management of MBC. BC systemic therapy targets multiple key pathways, including estrogen receptor signaling, HER2 signaling, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Other therapeutic strategies include targeting DNA repair, inhibiting immune checkpoints, and developing antibody-drug conjugates. Although surgery historically was reserved for palliation of symptomatic, large, or ulcerating masses, some data suggest a possibly expanding role for more aggressive locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy. As technology develops, biomarker-specific, line-agnostic, and receptor-agnostic treatment strategies will redraw the current lines of MBC care. However, tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. To effectively reshape our approach to MBC, careful consideration of the patient perspective, the costs and value of novel treatments, and accessibility (especially in developing countries) is paramount.

The phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase PI4KIIIalpha is required for the recruitment of GBF1 to Golgi membranes

Sorting from the Golgi apparatus requires the recruitment of cytosolic coat proteins to package cargo into trafficking vesicles. An important early step in the formation of trafficking vesicles is the activation of Arf1 by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GBF1. To activate Arf1, GBF1 must be recruited to and bound to Golgi membranes, a process that requires Rab1b. However, the mechanistic details of how Rab1 is implicated in GBF1 recruitment are not known. In this study, we demonstrate that the recruitment of GBF1 also requires phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate [PtdIns(4)P]. Inhibitors of PtdIns(4)P synthesis or depletion of PI4KIIIalpha, a phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, prevents the recruitment of GBF1 to Golgi membranes. Interestingly, transfection of dominant-active Rab1 increased the amount of PtdIns(4)P at the Golgi, as detected by GFP-PH, a PtdIns(4)P-sensing probe. We propose that Rab1 contributes to the specificity and timing of GBF1 recruitment by activating PI4KIIIalpha. The PtdIns(4)P produced then allows GBF1 to bind to Golgi membranes and activate Arf1.