SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY (SBES): IS IT READY FOR PRIME TIME?

Introduction To date, some data available in literature on simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES) have shown good outcomes in terms of both effectiveness and safety. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes pertaining to the effectiveness and safety of SBES performed in our series of patients with bilateral renal stones. Materials and Methods A prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent SBES for bilateral renal stones at our institution between June 2017 and September 2021 was performed. Routine preoperative and 1-month postoperative work-up included history, physical examination, urinalysis, urine culture, and blood tests, including the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. An abdominal non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) scan was performed in all cases preoperatively and 1-month postoperatively. Peri/postoperative complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The primary endpoint of the study was stone-free rate (SFR), and the secondary endpoints were Clavien-Dindo complications grade 1 or higher. Results Altogether, 101 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. SFR for all renal units was achieved in 82 patients (81.1%) at the 1-month follow-up. Twelve patients underwent additional flexible ureteroscopy for residual fragments, and seven asymptomatic patients with single small residual fragment were observed. Eighteen patients (17.8%) experienced Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II complications, whereas one patient (1%) experienced Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa complication (renal arteriovenous fistula embolization under local anesthesia). Conclusions SBES is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of bilateral renal stones. Further randomized studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these favorable outcomes of SBES to establish it as an alternative to staged surgeries in patients with bilateral renal stones. Appropriate patient selection is of paramount importance for achieving good outcomes without experiencing severe complications.

Decision making and treatment options in endourology post-coronavirus disease 2019 - adapting to the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe and critically discuss the most recent evidence regarding stone management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and post-COVID-19 era.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a need to plan for resuming the normal elective stone surgery in the post-COVID era, keeping a clear record of all surgeries that are being deferred and identifying subgroups of surgical priorities, for the de-escalation phase. Telehealth is very useful because it contributes to reduce virus dissemination guaranteeing at the same time an adequate response to patients' care needs. Once the pandemic is over, teleurology will continue to be utilized to offer cost-effective care to urological patients and it will be totally integrated in our clinical practice.

SUMMARY

This COVID-19 pandemic represents a real challenge for all national health providers: on the one hand, every effort should be made to assist COVID patients, while on the other hand we must remember that all other diseases have not disappeared in the meanwhile and they will urgently need to be treated as soon as the pandemic is more under control. A correct prioritization of cases when surgical activity will progressively return back to normality is of paramount importance.

Is There an Oncological Benefit of Performing Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Penile Cancer and Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis?

We aim to review the literature for studies investigating the oncological outcomes of patients with penile cancer (PC) undergoing bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the presence of inguinal lymph node metastasis (LNM) who are at risk of harboring pelvic metastasis. A search of English language literature was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database up to 3 December 2020 to identify articles addressing bilateral PLND in PC patients. Eight articles investigating bilateral PLND met our inclusion criteria. Patients with pelvic LNM have a dismal prognosis and, therefore, PLND has an important role in both the staging and treatment of PC patients. Ipsilateral PLND is recommended in the presence of ≥2 positive inguinal nodes and/or extranodal extension (ENE). Significant survival improvements were observed with a higher pelvic lymph node yield, in patients with pN2 disease, and in men treated with bilateral PLND as opposed to ipsilateral PLND. Nevertheless, the role of bilateral PLND for unilateral inguinal LNM remains unclear. Although the EAU guidelines state that pelvic nodal disease does not occur without ipsilateral inguinal LNM, metastatic spread from one inguinal side to the contralateral pelvic side has been reported in a number of studies. Further studies are needed to clarify the disseminative pattern of LNM, in order to establish PLND templates according to patients’ risk profiles and to investigate the benefit of performing bilateral PLND for unilateral inguinal disease.

Efficacy of the Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of a Staghorn Calculus in Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia

Background: Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is an unusual anomaly in which both kidneys lie fused on one side, with double pelvis and ureters draining into both sides of the bladder. Complex renal stones are a considerable challenge to endourologists, and when a staghorn stone is associated with abnormal anatomy, its treatment is even more difficult. Today there is no consensus about the right treatment for complex renal stones in CFRE. So, the objective of this case is to present the efficacy of the endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for the treatment of a staghorn renal stone in one patient with CFRE. Case Presentation: We described a case of a 23-year-old man with prolonged lasting and pain on the left flank associated with intermittent gross hematuria. Enhanced CT revealed a crossed fused kidney on the left side, drained by an intercommunicating pelvis and a single ureter, with a staghorn stone wholly occupying both renal units. The patient was effectively treated by one single session of ECIRS. Conclusion: The ECIRS is a good alternative to consider in patients with CFRE that have a staghorn calculus with a reasonable success rate.