The teaching of headache medicine in France: A questionnaire-based study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with headache represents an important part of a neurologist's activity. It requires sufficient training for neurology residents. In France, residents in neurology can complete this training by attending specialized consultations or by participating in a postgraduate training program called "Diplôme Inter-Universitaire Migraine et Céphalées" (DIUMC).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the French residents' knowledge in headache medicine and the impact of different types of training in headache medicine that are available in France.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was carried out among 548 French residents in neurology.

RESULTS

The questionnaires of 121 residents (22.1%) were analyzed. Among them, 54.5% (66/121) had no complementary training apart from the internship (Group 1), 21.5% (26/121) had attended only specialized consultations (Group 2), and 24% (29/121) had participated in the DIUMC (Group 3). There was no difference between all groups regarding the knowledge of the prevalence of primary or chronic headaches. There was almost no difference between the groups in the management of episodic migraine. In contrast, the management of tension-type headache and chronic headache was better known by residents of Group 3 than residents of Group 1. In these two diseases, residents of Group 3 offered prophylactic treatment more often. Almost 29% of the residents (35/121) had read the French guidelines for the diagnosis and management of migraine. In Group 3, residents had read them significantly more often (1.6% in Group 1, 38.5% in Group 2 and 62.1% in Group 3, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows the lack of knowledge among French neurology residents regarding headache medicine. It highlights the interest of specific training programs that could improve the practical and theoretical knowledge of future neurologists.

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Mutations: A Clinical and Genetic Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

PRRT2 variants have been reported in a few cases of patients with hemiplegic migraine. To clarify the role of PRRT2 in familial hemiplegic migraine, we studied this gene in a large cohort of affected probands.

METHODS

PRRT2 was analyzed in 860 probands with hemiplegic migraine and PRRT2 mutations were identified in 30 probands. Genotyping of relatives identified a total of 49 persons with mutations whose clinical manifestations were detailed.

RESULTS

PRRT2 mutations were found in 12 of 163 probands previously tested negative for CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A mutations, and in 18 of 697 consecutive probands screened simultaneously on the four genes. In this second group, pathogenic variants were found in 105 subjects, mostly in ATP1A2 (42%), followed by CACNA1A (26%), PRRT2 (17%) and SCN1A (15%). The PRRT2 mutations included seven distinct variants, five of which already described in persons with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, and two new variants. Eight probands had a deletion of the whole PRRT2 gene.Among the 49 PRRT2 mutated patients, 26 had pure hemiplegic migraine, 16 had hemiplegic migraine associated with another manifestation: epilepsy (8), learning disabilities (5), hypersomnia (4) or abnormal movement (3). Three patients had epilepsy without migraine, two had paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia without migraine, and one was asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

PRRT2 should be regarded as the fourth autosomal dominant gene for hemiplegic migraine, and screened in any affected patient, together with the three other main genes. Further studies are needed to understand how the same loss of function PRRT2 mutations can lead to a wide range of neurologic phenotypes including paroxysmal movement disorder, epilepsy, learning disabilities, sleep disorder and hemiplegic migraine.

Alien Hand, Restless Brain: Salience Network and Interhemispheric Connectivity Disruption Parallel Emergence and Extinction of Diagonistic Dyspraxia

Diagonistic dyspraxia (DD) is by far the most spectacular manifestation reported by sufferers of acute corpus callosum (CC) injury (so-called “split-brain”). In this form of alien hand syndrome, one hand acts at cross purposes with the other “against the patient’s will”. Although recent models view DD as a disorder of motor control, there is still little information regarding its neural underpinnings, due to widespread connectivity changes produced by CC insult, and the obstacle that non-volitional movements represent for task-based functional neuroimaging studies. Here, we studied patient AM, the first report of DD in patient with complete developmental CC agenesis. This unique case also offers the opportunity to study the resting-state connectomics of DD in the absence of diffuse changes subsequent to CC injury or surgery. AM developed DD following status epilepticus (SE) which resolved over a 2-year period. Whole brain functional connectivity (FC) was compared (Crawford-Howell [CH]) to 16 controls during the period of acute DD symptoms (Time 1) and after remission (Time 2). Whole brain graph theoretical models were also constructed and topological efficiency examined. At Time 1, disrupted FC was observed in inter-hemispheric and intra-hemispheric right edges, involving frontal superior and midline structures. Graph analysis indicated disruption of the efficiency of salience and right frontoparietal (FP) networks. At Time 2, after remission of diagnostic dyspraxia symptoms, FC and salience network changes had resolved. In sum, longitudinal analysis of connectivity in AM indicates that DD behaviors could result from disruption of systems that support the experience and control of volitional movements and the ability to generate appropriate behavioral responses to salient stimuli. This also raises the possibility that changes to large-scale functional architecture revealed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (rs-fMRI) may provide relevant information on the evolution of behavioral syndromes in addition to that provided by structural and task-based functional imaging.

Status migrainosus and migraine aura status in a French tertiary-care center: An 11-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Status migrainosus (SM) and migraine aura status (MAS) are two migraine complications. Few data exist in literature.

METHODS

This 11-year retrospective study in one French center describes patients' characteristics, modifications of the migraine before complication, evolution after the episode and management in patients who had SM or MAS according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-II) criteria.

RESULTS

Among 8821 patients, 24 had SM, three had MAS and one had both forms. Mean duration of SM was 4.8 weeks and four weeks for MAS. Stress and menstruation were the main precipitating factors for SM (68.8% and 31.3%, respectively). No precipitating factor was found for MAS. For a majority of patients, the frequency of migraine attack was the same before and after SM or MAS. SM and MAS occurred more frequently in patients with initial low-frequency migraine attacks. Eight patients had a relapse of SM and three of MAS. Fifteen were hospitalized for amitriptyline intravenous treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

SM and MAS are rare. Our results highlight a high rate of relapse and a similar frequency of migraine attacks before and after SM.