Humoral immune responses against the immature laminin receptor protein show prognostic significance in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by a highly variable clinical course. The role of an autologous tumor-specific immune control contributing to the variable length of survival in CLL is poorly understood. We investigated whether humoral immunity specific for the CLL-associated Ag oncofetal Ag/immature laminin receptor (OFA/iLR) has a prognostic value in CLL. Among sera of 67 untreated patients with CLL, 23 (34.3%) had detectable OFA/iLR Abs that were reactive for at least one specific OFA/iLR epitope. Patients with humoral responses compared with patients with nonreactive sera had a longer progression-free survival (p = 0.029). IgG subclass analyses showed a predominant IgG1 and IgG3 response. OFA/iLR Abs were capable of recognizing and selectively killing OFA/iLR-expressing CLL cells in complement-mediated and Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assays. In the analysis of 11 CLL patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 8 showed high values for OFA/iLR Abs that specifically recognized the extracellular domain of the protein, suggesting a potential role of anti-OFA/iLR-directed immune responses to the graft-vs-leukemia effect in CLL. Our data suggest that spontaneous tumor-specific humoral immune responses against OFA/iLR exist in a significant proportion of CLL patients and that superior progression-free survival in those patients could reflect autologous immune control.

Incidence and risk factors of central nervous system recurrence in aggressive lymphoma--a survey of 1693 patients treated in protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a devastating and usually fatal complication of aggressive lymphoma. The extent of the disease, the proliferation rate and the sites of extranodal involvement have been discussed as risk factors. We analyzed the patients treated on protocols of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) between 1990 and 2000, evaluated the rate and prognostic factors for CNS recurrence and developed a risk model trying to identify subsets of patients suitable for future prophylactic strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1993 to 2000, 1399 patients [<or=60 years with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and >60 years irrespective of LDH] were randomized to receive six cycles of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP)-21, CHOP-14 or six cycles of CHOP+etoposide (CHOEP)-21, CHOEP-14 in a 2x2 factorial study design in the NHL-B1/B2 studies. From 1990 to 1997, 312 patients<or=60 years with an elevated LDH were randomized to five cycles CHOEP+involved field (IF) radiotherapy or three cycles CHOEP followed by high-dose BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (NHL-A study).

RESULTS

A total number of 1711 patients were initially eligible for this study, of whom 18 patients had to be excluded due to primary CNS involvement. In the remaining 1693 assessable patients, 37 cases of relapse or progression to the CNS (2.2%) were observed. The protocol asked for an intrathecal (i.th.) prophylaxis in patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma only (n=17), but overall 71 patients (71 of 1693=4.2%) received prophylaxis by decision of the treating physicians. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified increased LDH (P<0.001) and involvement of more than one extranodal site (P=0.002) as independent predictors of CNS recurrence in the NHL-B1/B2 study population. Treatment with etoposide also evolved as a prognostic factor because the risk of CNS failure was significantly reduced after CHOEP (P=0.017). Elderly patients presenting with both an elevated LDH and lymphoma involvement in liver, bladder or adrenals had an up to 15-fold risk of spread of the disease to the CNS.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CNS relapse in 1693 patients treated for aggressive lymphomas on DSHNHL protocols from 1990 to 2000 was low (2.2%), although CNS prophylaxis was administered to <5% of patients. Thus, a general prophylaxis for all patients is not warranted, the less so since the effectiveness of i.th. prophylaxis itself is judged controversially. Increased LDH and involvement of more than one extranodal site were confirmed as independent risk factors. A cumulative 20% incidence of CNS disease in certain prognostic subgroups of elderly patients may render these candidates for i.th. prophylaxis; however, this approach would imply a potential overtreatment of approximately 80% of these patients deemed at high risk.

CHOP/CHOEP-14 followed by consolidation with alemtuzumab in untreated aggressive T-cell lymphomas (DSHNHL 2003–1): Feasibility and toxicity of a phase II trial of the German High Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Group DSHNHL

7538

Background: The clinical course of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) is unfavourable. Treatment protocols developed for aggressive B-NHL are employed, with significantly worse outcomes. The MoAb alemtuzumab (CAM) has shown promising activity in T-NHL, although its use may be complicated by severe infections. Methods: In 2003, the DSHNHL group initiated a prospective multicenter phase II trial for previously untreated PTCL. Six cycles of either CHOEP-14 (< 60 y) or CHOP-14 (> 60 y) with G-CSF support are followed by a short consolidation course with CAM, when either a CR or a good PR has been achieved. Inclusion criteria: PTCL-NOS, AILD, intestinal T-NHL, anaplastic large cell T-NHL (ALK negative); age 18–70 y; all IPIs; ECOG PS 0–3. The primary endpoint is feasibility, measured by occurrence SAE and protocol adherence. Secondary endpoints are remission rate, TTF, OS, DFS, tumor control and TRM. CAM is given at a total dose of 133 mg over 4 weeks. Prophylaxis against PCP and herpes infections is mandatory during CAM therapy and is continued until CD 4 cells are > 200/μl. CMV-positive patients are monitored weekly. Results: 35 (of the planned 37) pts have been enrolled, 31 are evaluable. 5/31 pts are still undergoing chemotherapy. 7/31 pts had progressive disease or NC under/after chemotherapy and did not receive CAM. 18 of the 19 pts who achieved a CR/PR (15/4) received CAM. 12 of the CAM pts are in continuous CR, 7 had progressive disease or relapsed. There was no treatment-related death. Of 7 registered SAEs, 3 were related to chemotherapy, 4 to CAM (1 fungal pneumonia, 2 CMV pneumonias, 1 bacterial sepsis after dental procedure). Other CAM side effects were: Herpes Zoster (1), CMV-reactivation (1), grade III-IV neutropenias (2). All pts recovered with appropriate treatment. Conclusion: Preliminary analysis demonstrates that the combination of CHO/E/P-14 followed by a short course of CAM consolidation therapy is feasible without TRM. The adverse effects related to infections can be severe but manageable upon careful monitoring and close follow-up. The phase II trial will close in 4/2006, to be followed by a randomized phase III trial of A-CHOP-14 vs CHOP-14.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bi-weekly dosing preserves the efficacy of rituximab in elderly patients with poor-prognosis DLBCL: Results from the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study group (DSHNHL)

7536

Background: The addition of rituximab (R) to 3-weekly CHOP-21 improved overall results in elderly patients with DLBCL, but was more effective in good-prognosis (g-p: IPI = 1,2) than poor-prognosis (p-p: IPI = 3,4,5) patients (JCO 23:4117, 2005). Similarly, addition of R to bi-weekly CHOP-14 in the RICOVER-60 trial resulted in improved time to treatment failure (TTF) in 828 elderly (61–80 years) DLBCL patients (Blood 106:9a, 2005). To study the effects of R when combined with CHOP-14 in different subgroups of elderly DLBCL patients. Methods: Intention-to-treat-analysis of the primary endpoint time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and the secondary endpoint overall survival (OS) in the subgroup of g-p and p-p patients treated within the RICOVER trial which compared 6 and 8 cycles of CHOP-14, both with and without R. Results: Of 828 evaluable patients (61–80 years, stage I-IV), 503 had g-p (CHOP-14 = 252; R-CHOP-14 = 251) and 325 p-p (CHOP-14 = 161; R-CHOP-14 = 163). After a median observation of 26 months, there was no difference between 6 and 8 cycles in either subgroup. In contrast, addition of R resulted in a similar improvement of TTF in both g-p (67% vs. 81%, p = 0.001) and p-p (36% vs. 52%, p = 0.004) patients. The improvement of survival is not yet different in either group: g-p: 82% (CHOP-14) vs. 88% (R-CHOP-14), p = 0.458; p-p: 58% (CHOP-14) vs. 64% (R-CHOP-14), p = 0.146. Pharmacokinetic studies show a pronounced nadir of R levels after the first R-CHOP-14, with R levels increasing after each subsequent cycle. The R nadir after the first R-CHOP is expected to be even more pronounced in a 3-weekly schedule and might explain the small improvement reproted for 3-weekly R in elderly patients with p-p DLBCL. Conclusions: Our subgroup and pharmacokinetic analysis indicate that not only dose-dense chemotherapy, but also dose-dense rituximab contribute to the excellent results of the RICOVER-60 trial. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe.

[Table: see text]

Four versus six courses of a dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) and autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with aggressive lymphoma and high-risk features at the time of diagnosis are reported to have a poor prognosis with standard therapy. Attempts to improve the results achieved with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) using second-generation or third-generation chemotherapy have failed. In the current study, the authors increased the doses and dose intensity of drugs used for the conventional first-line therapy of aggressive lymphoma and designed a Phase II randomized trial that compared four and six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (megaCHOEP) supported by the transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients age < 60 years with aggressive lymphoma and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were randomized to receive either 4 (Arm A) or 6 (Arm B) courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone (megaCHOEP). The last three treatment courses were supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Although the total doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were comparable, the dose intensity during the first 3 treatment courses was planned to be 2.8-fold and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, for patients in Arm A.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients in Arm A (90.2%) but only 18 patients in Arm B (69.2%) were able to complete therapy (P = 0.048). The complete response rate was 65.8% in Arm A and 50.0% in Arm B; the disease recurrence rates were 18.5% versus 61.5% (P = 0.011). Freedom from treatment failure at 2 years was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 36.9-68.2%) in Arm A and 23.1% (95% CI, 6.9-39.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.02). The overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 54.9-85.0%) in Arm A and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.0-65.3%) in Arm B (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that dose intensity, in particular early dose intensity, significantly influences disease control with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. These results also may explain the failure of HDT with low early dose intensity to improve the results obtained with conventional chemotherapy.

Dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) followed by repeated stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of aggressive high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a 4-course high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) protocol including autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) after courses 2, 3, and 4 was investigated in 110 patients, aged 18 to 60 years, with primary diagnosis of aggressive NHL (aNHL), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels above normal. At dose level 1 (DL1), course 1 consisted of cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) 70 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 450 mg/m2, and prednisone 500 mg. With courses 2 and 3 cyclophosphamide and etoposide were escalated to 4500 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. With course 4 cyclophosphamide and etoposide were given at 6000 mg/m2 and 1000 mg/m2, respectively. At DL2 etoposide was further increased to 600, 960, 960, and 1480 mg/m2 with courses 1 to 4, respectively. Therapy as per protocol was completed by 81.8% of patients. Overall survival at 5 years was 67.2%, freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 62.1%, and treatment-related mortality was 4.5%. There was a trend to better FFTF at DL2 compared to DL1 (66.9% versus 54.2%). Repetitive HDT with escalated CHOP plus etoposide is feasible and effective treatment of patients with aNHL. DL2 of this therapy is being used in an ongoing phase 3 study.

NAD(P)H oxidase and multidrug resistance protein genetic polymorphisms are associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients treated with anthracyclines develop cardiotoxicity (anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity [ACT]), mainly presenting as arrhythmias (acute ACT) or congestive heart failure (chronic ACT). There are no data on pharmacogenomic predictors of ACT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We genotyped participants of the German non-Hodgkin lymphoma study (NHL-B) who were followed up for the development of heart failure for a median of >3 years. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected from 82 genes with conceivable relevance to ACT. Of 1697 patients, 55 developed acute and 54 developed chronic ACT (cumulative incidence of either form, 3.2%). We detected 5 significant associations with polymorphisms of the NAD(P)H oxidase and doxorubicin efflux transporters. Chronic ACT was associated with a variant of the NAD(P)H oxidase subunit NCF4 (rs1883112, -212A-->G; symbols with right-pointing arrows, as edited?' odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.0). Acute ACT was associated with the His72Tyr polymorphism in the p22phox subunit (rs4673; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.9) and with the variant 7508T-->A (rs13058338; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.1) of the RAC2 subunit of the same enzyme. In agreement with these results, mice deficient in NAD(P)H oxidase activity, unlike wild-type mice, were resistant to chronic doxorubicin treatment. In addition, acute ACT was associated with the Gly671Val variant of the doxorubicin efflux transporter multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6 to 8.4) and with the Val1188Glu-Cys1515Tyr (rs8187694-rs8187710) haplotype of the functionally similar MRP2 (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.4). Polymorphisms in adrenergic receptors previously demonstrated to be predictive of heart failure were not associated with ACT.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variants in doxorubicin transport and free radical metabolism may modulate the individual risk to develop ACT.

Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL

The combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, given every 3 weeks (CHOP-21) is standard chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas. To determine whether CHOP given every 2 weeks (CHOP-14) or the addition of etoposide (CHOEP-21, CHOEP-14) can improve results in patients ages 18 to 60 years with good prognosis (normal lactic dehydrogenase [LDH] level), 710 patients were randomized to 6 cycles of CHOP-21, CHOP-14, CHOEP-21 (CHOP plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1-3), or CHOEP-14 in a 2 x 2 factorial study design. Patients in the biweekly regimens received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting from day 4. Patients received radiotherapy (36 Gy) to sites of initial bulky disease and extranodal disease. CHOEP achieved better complete remission (87.6% versus 79.4%; P =.003) and 5-year event-free survival rates (69.2% versus 57.6%; P =.004, primary end point) than CHOP, whereas interval reduction improved overall survival (P =.05; P =.044 in the multivariate analysis). Although the CHOEP regimens induced more myelosuppression, all regimens were well tolerated. CHOEP should be the preferred chemotherapy regimen for young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH level) aggressive lymphoma.

Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, given every 3 weeks (CHOP-21), is standard chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas. To determine whether biweekly CHOP (CHOP-14) with or without etoposide is more effective than CHOP-21, 689 patients ages 61 to 75 years were randomized to 6 cycles of CHOP-21, CHOP-14, CHOEP-21 (CHOP plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1-3), or CHOEP-14. Patients in the 2-weekly regimens received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting from day 4. Patients received radiotherapy (36 Gy) to sites of initial bulky disease and extranodal disease. Complete remission rates were 60.1% (CHOP-21), 70.0% (CHOEP-21), 76.1% (CHOP-14), and 71.6% (CHOEP-14). Five-year event-free and overall survival rates were 32.5% and 40.6%, respectively, for CHOP-21 and 43.8% and 53.3%, respectively, for CHOP-14. In a multivariate analysis, the relative risk reduction was 0.66 (P =.003) for event-free and 0.58 (P <.001) for overall survival after CHOP-14 compared with CHOP-21. Toxicity of CHOP-14 and CHOP-21 was similar, but CHOEP-21 and in particular CHOEP-14 were more toxic. Due to its favorable efficacy and toxicity profile, CHOP-14 should be considered the new standard chemotherapy regimen for patients ages 60 or older with aggressive lymphoma.

Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that intensified variants of the classical 3-weekly CHOP-21 chemotherapy [cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (H), vincristine (O), prednisone (P)] may improve treatment outcome in aggressive lymphoma. Three variants using either an addition of etoposide (CHOEP-21: 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3), the shortening to 2-week intervals using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF; CHOP-14) or both (CHOEP-14) are currently compared with CHOP-21 in the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). To enable more extensive testing of these schemes we here characterise their practicability regarding schedule adherence, acute haematotoxicity and need for supportive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trial included patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) aged </=60 years (NHL-B1) and patients aged 61-75 years (NHL-B2). The data are taken from an interim analysis. Data from 959 patients (CHOP-21: 232; CHOP-14: 238; CHOEP-21: 244; CHOEP-14: 245) from 162 institutions with a total of 5331 therapy cycles were evaluated.

RESULTS

The dose adherence in the NHL-B1 trial was excellent. The median relative dose (RD; i.e. actually given compared to planned dose) exceeds 98% for the myelosuppressive drugs in all four regimens. Only </=5% of patients received a relative dose <80% (RD <80). The median treatment duration could be shortened as scheduled for both CHOP-14 by 36 days and CHOEP-14 by 35 days. The dose adherence in the NHL-B2 trial was excellent for CHOP-21 and CHOP-14 for the myelosuppressive drugs (median RD >/=98%, RD <80 </=15%). Addition of etoposide, however, was accompanied by more dose erosion (median RD >/=97%, RD <80 </=17% for CHOEP-21 and </=27% for CHOEP-14). The median treatment duration could be shortened by 34 days with CHOP-14 compared with CHOP-21. Less treatment shortening was feasible for CHOEP-14 compared with CHOP-21 (median of 29 days). CHOP-14 and CHOP-21 were similar regarding toxicity profile, rate of infection, use of antibiotics, rate of transfusions and hospitalisation. CHOEP schemes were associated with a higher rate of infections, more transfusion requirements, more antibiotic use and longer hospitalisation than the CHOP schemes, particularly in patients aged >60 years. Haematopoietic recovery was age- and treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

CHOP-14 with the addition of rhG-CSF is safe and practicable in a large multicentre setting in patients aged 18-75 years. Despite shorter treatment intervals it can be delivered at the same dose as the classical 3-weekly CHOP with a comparable toxicity profile. The addition of etoposide is feasible and safe for patients </=60 years old in both the CHOEP-21 and CHOEP-14 schemes. For patients >60 years of age the addition of etoposide is associated with marked dose erosion due to increased toxicity. In this age group CHOEP should be used with caution.