Results from three phase 1 trials of NNC9204-1177, a glucagon/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist: Effects on weight loss and safety in adults with overweight or obesity

OBJECTIVE

Glucagon/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor co-agonists may provide greater weight loss than agonists targeting the GLP-1 receptor alone. We report results from three phase 1 trials investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the glucagon/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist NNC9204-1177 (NN1177) for once-weekly subcutaneous use in adults with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

Our focus was a 12-week, multiple ascending dose (MAD), placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in which adults (N = 99) received NN1177 (on an escalating dose regimen of 200, 600, 1300, 1900, 2800, 4200 and 6000 μg) or placebo. Two other trials also contributed to the findings reported in this article: a first human dose (FHD)/single ascending dose (SAD), placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in which adults (N = 49) received NN1177 (treatment doses of 10, 40, 120, 350, 700 and 1100 μg) or placebo, and a drug-drug interaction, open-label, single-sequence trial in which adults (N = 45) received a 4200-μg dose of NN1177, following administration of a Cooperstown 5 + 1 index cocktail. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints were assessed.

RESULTS

For the FHD/SAD and MAD trials, baseline characteristics were generally balanced across treatment cohorts. The geometric mean half-life of NN1177 at steady state was estimated at between 77 and 111 h, and clinically relevant weight loss was achieved (up to 12.6% at week 12; 4200 μg in the MAD trial). Although NN1177 appeared tolerable across trials, several unexpected treatment-related safety signals were observed; increased heart rate, decreased reticulocyte count, increased markers of inflammation (fibrinogen and C-reactive protein), increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, impaired glucose tolerance and reduced blood levels of some amino acids.

CONCLUSION

Although treatment with NN1177 was associated with dose-dependent and clinically relevant weight loss, the observed safety signals precluded further clinical development.

AV-101, a novel inhaled dry-powder formulation of imatinib, in healthy adult participants: a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study

Background

Oral imatinib has been shown to be effective, but poorly tolerated, in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). To maintain efficacy while improving tolerability, AV-101, a dry powder inhaled formulation of imatinib, was developed to deliver imatinib directly to the lungs.

Methods

This phase 1, placebo-controlled, randomised single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study evaluated the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of AV-101 in healthy adults. The SAD study included five AV-101 cohorts (1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo, and a single-dose oral imatinib 400-mg cohort. The MAD study included three AV-101 cohorts (10 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg) and placebo; dosing occurred twice daily for 7 days.

Results

82 participants (SAD n=48, MAD n=34) were enrolled. For the SAD study, peak plasma concentrations of imatinib occurred within 3 h of dosing with lower systemic exposure compared to oral imatinib (p<0.001). For the MAD study, systemic exposure of imatinib was higher after multiple doses of AV-101 compared to a single dose, but steady-state plasma concentrations were lower for the highest AV-101 cohort (90 mg) compared to simulated steady-state oral imatinib at day 7 (p=0.0002). Across AV-101 MAD dose cohorts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cough (n=7, 27%) and headache (n=4, 15%).

Conclusions

AV-101 was well tolerated in healthy adults, and targeted doses of AV-101 significantly reduced the systemic exposure of imatinib compared with oral imatinib. An ongoing phase 2b/phase 3 study (IMPAHCT; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05036135) will evaluate the safety/tolerability and clinical benefit of AV-101 for PAH.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Vibegron 75 mg Administered as an Intact or Crushed Tablet in Healthy Adults

Oral pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder, a condition that increases with age, includes anticholinergics and β₃ -adrenergic receptor agonists. Older adults, including those with dysphagia, may have difficulty swallowing tablets. In this phase 1 study in healthy adults, we assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of the β₃ -adrenergic receptor agonist vibegron administered as a single 75-mg dose as an intact tablet versus crushed and mixed with applesauce. Additional end points included safety (assessed by adverse events), perception of taste (assessed via questionnaire), and stability over 4 hours after crushing and mixing in applesauce (assessed by chromatography). Overall, 30 participants were randomized, and 29 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Crushing a vibegron tablet and mixing with applesauce decreased vibegron maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity by ≈30% and ≈10%, respectively; however, these decreases were not considered clinically significant. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 16 (53.3%) participants. Approximately half of participants reported the vibegron and applesauce mixture tasted as expected; of those reporting the taste was different than expected, 50% reported the taste as bitter. The mixture was stable for 4 hours in applesauce. The results of this study showed that crushing and administering vibegron with applesauce may be an appropriate option for patients with overactive bladder and swallowing difficulties.

Anti-KIT monoclonal antibody CDX-0159 induces profound and durable mast cell suppression in a healthy volunteer study

Background

Mast cells (MC) are powerful inflammatory immune sentinel cells that drive numerous allergic, inflammatory, and pruritic disorders when activated. MC‐targeted therapies are approved in several disorders, yet many patients have limited benefit suggesting the need for approaches that more broadly inhibit MC activity. MCs require the KIT receptor and its ligand stem cell factor (SCF) for differentiation, maturation, and survival. Here we describe CDX‐0159, an anti‐KIT monoclonal antibody that potently suppresses MCs in human healthy volunteers.

Methods

CDX‐0159‐mediated KIT inhibition was tested in vitro using KIT‐expressing immortalized cells and primary human mast cells. CDX‐0159 safety and pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a 13‐week good laboratory practice (GLP)‐compliant cynomolgus macaque study. A single ascending dose (0.3, 1, 3, and 9 mg/kg), double‐blinded placebo‐controlled phase 1a human healthy volunteer study (n = 32) was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CDX‐0159.

Results

CDX‐0159 inhibits SCF‐dependent KIT activation in vitro. Fc modifications in CDX‐0159 led to elimination of effector function and reduced serum clearance. In cynomolgus macaques, multiple high doses were safely administered without a significant impact on hematology, a potential concern for KIT inhibitors. A single dose of CDX‐0159 in healthy human subjects was generally well tolerated and demonstrated long antibody exposure. Importantly, CDX‐0159 led to dose‐dependent, profound suppression of plasma tryptase, a MC‐specific protease associated with tissue MC burden, indicative of systemic MC suppression or ablation.

Conclusion

CDX‐0159 administration leads to systemic mast cell ablation and may represent a safe and novel approach to treat mast cell‐driven disorders.

Transition from Syringe to Autoinjector Based on Bridging Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist Selatogrel in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Selatogrel is a potent, reversible, and selective antagonist of the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor currently developed for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In the completed Phase I/II studies, selatogrel was subcutaneously (s.c.) administered as a lyophilizate-based formulation by syringe by a healthcare professional. In the Phase III study, selatogrel will be self-administered s.c. as a liquid formulation with an autoinjector at the onset of AMI symptoms to shorten treatment delay. This clinical bridging study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selatogrel between the different formulations.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, three-period, cross-over Phase I study in 24 healthy subjects. In each period, a single subcutaneous dose of 16 mg selatogrel was administered as (1) a Phase III liquid formulation by autoinjector (Treatment A), (2) a Phase III liquid formulation by prefilled syringe (Treatment B), or (3) a Phase I/II reconstituted lyophilizate-based formulation by syringe (Treatment C). PK parameters including area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞), maximum plasma concentration (C_max), time to reach C_max(t_max), and terminal half-life (t_1/2) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters were estimated using PK/PD modeling, including the time of first occurrence of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) ≥ 80% (t_onset), duration of IPA above 80% (t_duration), and responder rate defined as the percentage of subjects with t_onset ≤ 30 min and t_duration ≥ 3 h. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

Comparing Treatment A to Treatment C, the exposure (AUC_0-∞) was bioequivalent with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval) of 0.95 (0.92-0.97) within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). Absorption following Treatment A was slightly slower with a t_max occurring approximately 30 min later and a 20% lower C_max. The autoinjector itself had no impact on the PK of selatogrel, as similar values of C_max and AUC_0-∞ were determined after administration as a Phase III liquid formulation by autoinjector or by prefilled syringe (i.e., GMR [90% confidence interval] of 1.06 [0.97-1.15] and 0.99 [0.96-1.03] for C_max and AUC_0-∞, respectively). PK/PD modeling predicted that the median t_onset will occur slightly later for Treatment A (7.2 min) compared to Treatment C (4.2  min), while no relevant differences in t_duration and responder rate were estimated between the two treatments. Selatogrel was safe and well tolerated following all three treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

PK and simulated PD effects of selatogrel were similar across treatments.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04557280.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose Phase 1 study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and food and faecal microbiome effects of ibezapolstat administered orally to healthy subjects

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in the USA, with limited treatment options. Ibezapolstat is a novel DNA polymerase IIIC inhibitor with in vitro activity against C. difficile.

Objectives and methods

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ibezapolstat in healthy volunteers. Microbiome changes associated with ibezapolstat were compared with vancomycin over a 10 day course using shotgun metagenomics.

Results

A total of 62 subjects aged 31 ± 7 years (45% female; average BMI: 25 ± 3 kg/m²) were randomized. Ibezapolstat was well tolerated with a safety signal similar to placebo. Ibezapolstat had minimal systemic absorption with the majority of plasma concentrations less than 1 µg/mL. In the multiday, ascending dose study, ibezapolstat concentrations of 2000 µg/g of stool were observed by Day 2 and for the remainder of the dosing time period. In the multiday, multiple-dose arm, baseline microbiota was comparable between subjects that received ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin. At Day 10 of dosing, differential abundance analysis and β-diversity demonstrated a distinct difference between the microbiome in subjects given vancomycin compared with either dose of ibezapolstat (P = 0.006). α-Diversity changes were characterized as an increase in the Actinobacteria phylum in subjects that received ibezapolstat and an increase in Proteobacteria in subjects given vancomycin.

Conclusions

Ibezapolstat was shown to be safe and well tolerated, with minimal systemic exposure, high stool concentrations and a distinct microbiome profile compared with oral vancomycin. These results support further clinical development of ibezapolstat for patients with C. difficile infection.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of concomitant administration of multiple doses of cagrilintide with semaglutide 2·4 mg for weight management: a randomised, controlled, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

Cagrilintide, a long-acting amylin analogue, and semaglutide 2·4 mg, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, are both being investigated as options for weight management. We aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of this drug combination.

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending dose, phase 1b trial, individuals aged 18-55 years with a body-mass index 27·0-39·9 kg/m² and who were otherwise healthy were recruited from a single centre in the USA. The trial included six sequential overlapping cohorts, and in each cohort eligible participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous cagrilintide (0·16, 0·30, 0·60, 1·2, 2·4, or 4·5 mg) or matched placebo, in combination with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg, without lifestyle interventions. In each cohort, the doses of cagrilintide and semaglutide were co-escalated in 4-week intervals to the desired dose over 16 weeks, participants were treated at the target dose for 4 weeks, and then followed up for 5 weeks. Participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was number of treatment-emergent adverse events from baseline to end of follow-up. Secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints assessed from day of last dose (week 19) to end of treatment (week 20) were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 168 h (AUC_{0-168 h}) and maximum concentration [C_max] of cagrilintide and semaglutide; exploratory pharmacokinetic endpoints were half-life, time to C_max [t_max], plasma clearance, and volume of distribution of cagrilintide and semaglutide; and exploratory pharmacodynamic endpoints were changes in bodyweight, glycaemic parameters, and hormones. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic endpoints were assessed in all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03600480, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between July 25, 2018, and Dec 17, 2019, 285 individuals were screened and 96 were randomly assigned to cagrilintide (0·16-2·4 mg group n=12; 4·5 mg group n=11) or placebo (n=24), in combination with semaglutide 2·4 mg, of whom 95 were exposed to treatment (one patient in 0·60 mg cagrilintide group was not exposed) and included in the safety and full analysis datasets. The mean age was 40·6 years (SD 9·2), 56 (59%) of 95 participants were men and 51 (54%) were Black or African American. Of 566 adverse events reported in 92 participants (69 [97%] of 71 participants assigned to 0·16-4·5 mg cagrilintide and 23 [96%] of 24 assigned to placebo), 207 (37%) were gastrointestinal disorders. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and the proportion of participants with one or more adverse event was similar across treatment groups. Exposure was proportional to cagrilintide dose and did not affect semaglutide exposure or elimination. AUC_{0-168 h} ranged from 926 nmol × h/L to 24 271 nmol × h/L, and C_max ranged from 6·14 nmol/L to 170 nmol/L with cagrilintide 0·16-4·5 mg. AUC_{0-168 h} ranged from 12 757 nmol × h/L to 15 305 nmol × h/L, and C_max ranged from 96·4 nmol/L to 120 nmol/L with semaglutide 2·4 mg. Cagrilintide 0·16-4·5 mg had a half-life of 159-195 h, with a median t_max of 24-72 h. Semaglutide 2·4 mg had a half-life of 145-165 h, with a median t_max of 12-24 h. Plasma clearance and volume of distribution for both cagrilintide and semaglutide were similar across treatment groups. At week 20, mean percentage bodyweight reductions were greater with cagrilintide 1·2 and 2·4 mg than with placebo (15·7% [SE 1·6] for cagrilintide 1·2 mg and 17·1% [1·5] for cagrilintide 2·4 mg vs 9·8% [1·2] for pooled placebo cohorts 1-5; estimated treatment difference of -6·0% [95% CI -9·9 to -2·0] for cagrilintide 1·2 mg and -7·4% [-11·2 to -3·5] for cagrilintide 2·4 mg vs pooled placebo), and with cagrilintide 4·5 mg than with matched placebo (15·4% [1·3] vs 8·0% [2·2]; estimated treatment difference -7·4% [-12·8 to -2·1]), all in combination with semaglutide 2·4 mg. Glycaemic parameters improved in all treatment groups, independently of cagrilintide dose. Changes in hormones were similar across treatment groups.

INTERPRETATION

Concomitant treatment with cagrilintide and semaglutide 2·4 mg was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Future larger and longer trials are needed to fully assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment combination.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk A/S.

Safety and Tolerability of Concomitant Administration of Multiple-Dose AM833 With Semaglutide 2.4 MG for Weight Management

Background: Combining weight management medications with different modes of action may provide more effective treatment options for people with obesity. Subcutaneous (sc) AM833, a long-acting amylin analog, and sc semaglutide 2.4 mg, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, are both under clinical development for weight management.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of concomitant administration of six ascending doses of weekly AM833 (0.16, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, or 4.5 mg) + semaglutide vs placebo + semaglutide in subjects with overweight or obesity. The 20-week trial included a 16-week escalation period followed by a 4-week treatment period at target dose and a 5-week follow-up. Eligible subjects were male or female of non-childbearing potential, aged 18–55 years, with BMI 27−39.9 kg/m². The primary endpoint was number of adverse events (AE) from baseline to follow-up. Secondary endpoints included PK parameters (area under the curve [AUC] 0–168 h [AUC_0-168], maximum concentration [C_max], half-life [t_1/2] and time to C_max [t_max]). Changes in body weight (exploratory endpoint) were analyzed separately for AM833 0.16−2.4 mg + semaglutide (vs pooled placebo) and AM833 4.5 mg + semaglutide (vs matched placebo) due to a different semaglutide dose escalation regimen used in this treatment arm.

Results: Of 96 subjects randomized, 95 were exposed to treatment (59% male; mean age 40.6 years, body weight 95.7 kg, BMI 32.1 kg/m²) and 80 (83%) completed the trial. The number of AEs ranged from 37–89 with AM833 (0.16–4.5 mg) + semaglutide and 132 with pooled placebo + semaglutide. Most AEs were mild or moderate and the proportion of subjects with ≥1 AE was similar across treatment arms. About one-third of all AEs were gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (n=207 of 566), primarily nausea, dyspepsia, and vomiting. A greater proportion of subjects reported GI AEs with AM833 1.2–4.5 mg + semaglutide vs placebo + semaglutide. The second most common AEs were injection site reactions (n=72), all mild and not dependent on AM833 dose. Exposure to AM833 was proportional to dose for both AUC_0-168 and C_max, and did not affect semaglutide exposure and elimination. AM833 0.16−4.5 mg t_1/2 ranged from 159–195 h and median t_max ranged from 24–72 h. At week 20, body weight changes from baseline with AM833 1.2 and 2.4 mg + semaglutide were greater vs pooled placebo + semaglutide (−15.7% and −17.1% vs −9.8%, respectively; p<0.001) and with AM833 4.5 mg + semaglutide vs matched placebo + semaglutide (−15.4% vs −8.0%; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Treatment with AM833 at all tested doses + semaglutide was generally well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. PK data support once-weekly dosing. The combination of AM833 1.2, 2.4, or 4.5 mg + semaglutide led to greater weight loss compared with placebo + semaglutide.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Quizartinib

Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent, and selective type II FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor in development for acute myeloid leukemia. This parallel‐group study evaluated potential food effects on quizartinib absorption in healthy subjects who received a single 30‐mg dose after overnight fasting (n = 34) or a high‐fat, high‐calorie meal (n = 30). Blood samples were collected through 504 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated were maximum observed concentration (C_max) and area under plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_last) and from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf). Mean quizartinib pharmacokinetic profiles were similar under fasted and fed conditions. The geometric least squares means ratios (%) for fed/fasted and associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_inf were 91.58 (82.15‐102.08), 105.39 (90.79‐122.35), and 108.39 (91.54‐128.34), respectively. The 90%CI for the ratio fell within the 80% to 125% limits for C_max and AUC_last, with 90%CI for AUC_inf slightly outside the limits (ie, 128%). Food delayed quizartinib time to C_max by 2 hours. All adverse events were either mild or moderate; no discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. Based on these results, quizartinib can be administered without regard to food.

LB7. A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo- and Vancomycin-Controlled, First-In-Human (FIH) Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Fecal Microbiome Effects of ACX-362E, a Novel Anti-Clostridial DNA Polymerase IIIC (polIIIC) Inhibitor

Background

ACX-362E, a novel DNA polIIIC inhibitor, is a narrow-spectrum antibacterial selectively active against certain Gram-positive bacteria, including Clostridioides difficile (MIC90 = 4 µg/mL). The objectives of this phase I study was to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and fecal microbiome effects of ACX-362E

Methods

This three-part FIH phase 1, double-blind, randomized healthy volunteer trial determined the safety profile, food effect, and systemic/stool pharmacokinetics of escalating single (150, 300, 600, and 900 mg) and multiple (300 and 450 mg) doses of oral ACX-362E vs. placebo (PBO). Fecal microbiome effects (metagenomic sequencing and qPCR) of multiple-dose ACX-362E were compared with 6 subjects receiving concomitant open-label vancomycin 125 mg four times daily. Dose escalation to each new cohort occurred following review of safety and PK data by a safety oversight committee.

Results

Forty-four subjects received ACX-362E (single dose = 24, multiple doses = 12, food effect = 8) and 12 PBO. Overall, ACX-362E was well tolerated at all dose levels. Adverse events were generally mild and transitory, and no moderate, severe, cumulative, or dose-limiting drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were observed. Mean plasma half-life was approximately 2 hours and no accumulation occurred with repeated dosing (Figure 1). Systemic exposure was less than 1 μg/mL and decreased with food. Fecal concentrations during multiple dosing exceeded the C. difficile MIC by multiples of up to ~2,500. ACX-362E had minimal effect on Bacteroidetes phylum and caused significantly less dysbiosis than vancomycin (Figure 2).

Conclusion

This FIH clinical trial with ACX-362E demonstrated a favorable safety profile, low systemic and high fecal concentrations, and favorable gut microbiome changes compared with vancomycin. These results shows promise for further clinical development to treat C. difficile infections.

Disclosures

Kevin W. Garey, MS, PharmD, Acurx (Grant/Research Support), Martin Kankam, MD, PhD, MPH, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Research Grant or Support), Julie Mercier, BS, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Research Grant or Support), Corinne Seng Yue, BPharm, MSc, PhD, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Grant/Research Support), Murray Ducharme, PharmD, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Grant/Research Support), Anne J. Gonzales-Luna, PharmD, no financial relationships or conflicts of interest, M Jahangir Alam, PhD, No financial relationships or conflicts of interest, Khurshida Begum, PhD, No financial relationships or conflicts of interest, Michael Silverman, MD, Acurx Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Consultant, Employee, Shareholder).

Effects of CYP3A inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of quizartinib, a potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, and its active metabolite

Aims

Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent and selective next‐generation FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor under investigation in patients with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication‐mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. This drug–drug interaction study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizartinib when coadministered with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors.

Methods

In this parallel‐group study, subjects were randomised to receive: (i) quizartinib + ketoconazole; (ii) quizartinib + fluconazole; or (iii) quizartinib alone. On Days 1–28, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg or fluconazole 200 mg twice daily, and on Day 8, all subjects received a single 30‐mg quizartinib dose. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses, steady‐state PK parameters were simulated by superpositioning, and safety was assessed.

Results

Ninety‐three healthy subjects were randomised; 86 completed the study. When administered with ketoconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 117% (105%, 130%) and 194% (169%, 223%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Steady‐state PK simulation demonstrated ~2‐fold increase of both steady–state C_max and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval when quizartinib was administered with ketoconazole due to accumulation of quizartinib at steady state. When administered with fluconazole, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for quizartinib C_max and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 111% (100%, 124%) and 120% (104%, 138%), respectively, vs quizartinib alone. Overall, 5.4% of subjects experienced quizartinib‐related adverse events; no serious adverse events or deaths occurred.

Conclusions

These results suggest reducing the dose of quizartinib when coadministered with a strong CYP3A inhibitor, but not with a moderate or weak CYP3A inhibitor. This dose reduction was implemented in phase 3 evaluation of quizartinib.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Concomitant Multiple Dose Administration of Verinurad (RDEA3170) and Allopurinol in Adult Male Subjects With Gout

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. This phase 1b, multiple‐dose, drug‐drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of verinurad in combination with allopurinol. Adult males with gout were randomized to receive once‐daily oral doses of allopurinol 300 mg or verinurad 10 mg alone for 7 days, allopurinol 300 mg + verinurad 10 mg on days 8 to 14, and the alternative single agent on days 15 to 21. Colchicine 0.6 mg was taken prophylactically for gout flares. Plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad, allopurinol, oxypurinol (allopurinol active metabolite), colchicine (plasma only), and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Verinurad plasma exposure was unaffected by allopurinol. Verinurad increased the maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) for allopurinol by 33%; the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) was unaffected. Oxypurinol C_max and AUC were reduced 32% and 38%, respectively, by verinurad. Colchicine plasma exposure was unaltered by verinurad. The maximum decrease in serum urate was greater with verinurad + allopurinol (65%) than with verinurad (51%) or allopurinol (43%) alone. Compared with the baseline rate, the maximum rate of uric acid excreted in urine was +56% with verinurad, −46% with allopurinol, and unchanged with verinurad + allopurinol. No serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were noted. Despite decreased systemic exposure of allopurinol and oxypurinol in the presence of verinurad, the combination resulted in greater serum urate reduction compared with either drug alone and was well tolerated at the studied doses.