Lymph Node Dissection in Thymoma: Is it worth it?

OBJECTIVES

Lymph node dissection (LND) and nodal metastases in thymomas remain controversial and understudied. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of nodal metastasis and the short term outcomes of systematic LND in thymomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From December 2017 to September 2020, we performed 54 LND conducted according to the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) lymph node map. This group was compared to a historical control group of 55 patients who underwent surgery in our center from January 2015 to November 2017.

RESULTS

LND was performed in 72 % and in 5 % of the cases in the study cohort group and historical control group, respectively. The number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly higher in the study cohort group (3.89 per patient vs. 1.62, p = 0.0021). In the whole population studied, nodal metastases were found in 3 patients (2.8 % of all patients) with 5.6 % in the cohort study group vs. 0 % in the control group (p = 0.12). Patients with nodal metastasis had larger tumors (> 7 cm), and a higher histology grade (B2 and B3). There was a trend towards higher risk of laryngeal nerve palsy in the cohort study group (9.3 % vs. 1.8 %, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Systematic LND increases the number of lymph node harvested and detects more lymph node metastases, which remains infrequent in thymomas. The impact of LND and the true prognostic significance of lymph node metastases remains controversial. Given the potential complications, LND or sampling should not be perfomed in small, encapsulated and low grade thymomas.

RADIORYTHMIC: Phase III, Opened, Randomized Study of Postoperative Radiotherapy Versus Surveillance in Stage IIb/III of Masaoka Koga Thymoma after Complete Surgical Resection

INTRODUCTION

Thymomas are rare intrathoracic malignancies that may be aggressive and difficult to treat. Knowledge and level of evidence for treatment strategies are mainly based on retrospective studies or expert opinion. Currently there is no strong evidence that postoperative radiotherapy after complete resection of localized thymoma is associated with survival benefit in patients. RADIORYTHMIC is a phase III, randomized trial aiming at comparing postoperative radiotherapy versus surveillance after complete resection of Masaoka-Koga stage IIb/III thymoma. Systematic central pathologic review will be performed before patient enrollment as per the RYTHMIC network pathway.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred fourteen patients will be included; randomization 1:1 will attribute either postoperative radiotherapy (50-54 Gy to the mediastinum using intensity-modulated radiation therapy or proton beam therapy) or surveillance. Stratification criteria include histologic grading (thymoma type A, AB, B1 vs B2, B3), stage, and delivery of preoperative chemotherapy. Patient recruitment will be mainly made through the French RYTHMIC network of 15 expert centers participating in a nationwide multidisciplinary tumor board. Follow-up will last 7 years. The primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival. Secondary objectives include overall survival, assessment of acute and late toxicities, and analysis of prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

The first patient will be enrolled in January 2021, with results expected in 2028.

Treatment strategies for thymic carcinoma in a real-life setting: Insights from the rythmic network

9072

Background: Thymic carcinomas are an aggressive and difficult to treat subset of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) that represent a heterogeneous group of rare intrathoracic malignancies. Most of the current knowledge and guidelines tumors rely on surgically-oriented databases focusing on early-stage disease, and small prospective, single-arm trials conducted in metastatic thymic carcinomas, mostly in a refractory, late-line setting. “Réseau tumeurs THYMiques et Cancer” (RYTHMIC) is the nationwide network for TETs in France. The management of any patient has to be systematically discussed on a real-time basis at a national multidisciplinary tumor board; a database is hosted by the French Thoracic Cancer Intergroup (IFCT). Methods: We took advantage of the RYTHMIC prospective database to describe baseline characteristics, analyze treatment strategies, and provide landmark outcomes in a cohort of consecutive patients with thymic carcinoma. The inclusion period was January 2012 to April 2017. Results: A total of 213 patients were analyzed. Overall, 60 (28%) patients were considered as surgical candidates upfront, 91 (43%) received primary chemotherapy, and 62 (29%) received exclusive chemotherapy. Median OS was 49.2 months (IC95%: 34.8-63.6); OS was significantly longer in patients with a lower stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001), who were operated on upfront, as opposed to patients who received primary or exclusive chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Surgery, conducted upfront or after primary chemotherapy, was significantly associated with more prolonged OS (p < 0.001); complete resection and postoperative radiotherapy were also predictors of better outcome (p = 0.018 and p = 0.081, respectively). Exclusive chemotherapy was delivered to 62 patients with advanced disease, who all received platinum-based regimen as first-line treatment; PAC regimen was delivered to 66% of patients. Best objective response to first-line chemotherapy was partial response in 33 (53%) patients. Median PFS was 8.0 months (IC95%: 5.0-11.1). Median OS was 32.9 months (IC95%: 20.6-45.1). Response to first-line chemotherapy and squamous histology were the only significant predictors of OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.040, respectively). Conclusions: Our cohort is the first to analyze in depth outcomes and treatment strategies in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with thymic carcinoma. While we confirm the major prognostic impact of surgery, our data highlight the need for optimized multidisciplinary management and innovative therapies as the survival of patients remains limited.

[Short-term results of video-assisted lung cancer surgery in octogenarians]

INTRODUCTION

Due to an increase in life expectancy, onco-pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons are more frequently faced with octogenarian patients with lung cancer. In this age group, treatment modalities may need to be revised because of the increasing presence of comorbidities. Surgery remains the reference treatment for early stage disease, but mortality rates and postoperative complications are higher in this group of patients. One of the solutions to reduce the operative risk would be to develop videoassisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of this form of lung cancer surgery in octogenarians.

METHODS

All patients 80 years old or more who underwent videoassisted lung cancer surgery from 2014 to 2018 at Lyon University Hospital were included. Wedge resections and diagnostic procedures were excluded.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (13 men, 6 women) were included. The median age was 82 years old. All patients had undergone videoassisted lobectomy. Three patients required conversion to thoracotomy (15.8%). All patients underwent complete resection (R0). One patient had N1 lymph node involvement, all others were N0. The postoperative complication rate was 68.4%, the majority of which were grade II of the Clavien classification. Perioperative mortality was 5.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Videoassisted lung cancer resection in a selected population of octogenarians is associated with satisfactory short-term results. It is reasonable to favour minimally invasive techniques in this population, even if the proof of their superiority has not yet been firmly established.

P1255Comparative safety and effectiveness of standard doses of apixaban versus dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKAs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in France: the NAXOS study

Background

Real-world data comparing all available oral anticoagulants (OAC) on a nationwide scale (i.e. in France: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and vitamin K antagonists – VKAs) are lacking. In everyday practice, oral anticoagulants are often underdosed, which may render comparisons between agents difficult.

Purpose and methods

NAXOS is a French real-world study comparing the safety (major bleeding), effectiveness (stroke, systemic thromboembolic events (STE)) and all-cause mortality for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKAs, in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating a given OAC between 2014 and 2016. The French national health insurance data (SNIIRAM) were used. Analyses were performed with adjustment on propensity scores. To avoid bias potentially related to underdosing, the present analysis included only patients receiving standard doses of apixaban (5mg bid), rivaroxaban (20mg od), and dabigatran (150 mg bid), or VKAs. Only OAC naïve patients were included.

Results

In the OAC-naive cohorts treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, 54,575 (62.3%), 65,208 (65.2%), and 9,000 (42.4%), respectively, had the standard dose at the index dispensation, and 112,628 patients received VKAs. After adjustment on propensity scores, apixaban 5 mg was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, compared to VKAs (Hazard Ratio: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.43–0.51) and rivaroxaban 20mg (HR: 0.64; 0.59–0.71), but not to dabigatran 150 mg (HR: 0.97; 0.79–1.18). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and STE, compared to VKAs (HR: 0.62; 0.56–0.69) but not to rivaroxaban (HR: 1.03; 0.92–1.16), and dabigatran (HR: 0.96; 0.76–1.21). Apixaban showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to VKAs (HR: 0.44; 0.41–0.47) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.87; 0.81–0.94) but not to dabigatran (HR: 1.10; 0.92–1.32).

Figure 1. Forest plot presenting the results of the standard dose analysis (PS adjusted).

Conclusions

The NAXOS population-based country-wide observational study shows that 42% to 65% of patients were treated with standard doses of OACs. Analyses of standard doses confirmed the superiority of apixaban compared with VKAs for the three studied outcomes and suggests better safety profile of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban but similar to dabigatran.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The Alliance Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer

Impact of comorbidities and delay in diagnosis in elderly patients with pulmonary hypertension

Patient age at diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension is steadily increasing. The present study sought to analyse clinical characteristics, time to diagnosis and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension in elderly and very elderly patients.

A study was conducted in a French regional referral centre for pulmonary hypertension. All consecutive patients diagnosed with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were included and categorised according to age: <65 years (“young”), 65–74 years (“elderly”) and ≥75 years (“very elderly”).

Over a 4-year period, 248 patients were included: 101 (40.7%) were young, 82 (33.1%) were elderly and 65 (26.2%) were very elderly. The median age at diagnosis among the total population was 68 years. Compared with young patients, elderly and very elderly patients had a longer time to diagnosis (7±48, 9±21 and 16±32 months, respectively; p<0.001). Patients ≥75 years also more often had group 4 pulmonary hypertension. The median overall survival was 46±1.4 months, but was only 37±4.9 months in elderly patients and 28±4.7 months in very elderly patients. Survival from the first symptoms and survival adjusted to comorbidity was similar across age groups.

Patient age should be taken into account when diagnosing pulmonary hypertension as it is associated with a specific clinical profile and a worse prognosis. The difference in prognosis is likely to be related to a delay in diagnosis and a greater number of comorbidities.

More than a quarter of patients diagnosed with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension are older than 75 years; they have a poorer prognosis, likely related to a longer delay in diagnosis and a higher burden of comorbiditieshttp://ow.ly/87FQ30m0WM7

Safety of right heart catheterization for pulmonary hypertension in very elderly patients

Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference test in diagnosing pulmonary hypertension (PH). The increasing age of patients at the time of diagnosis raises the issue of the morbidity of this invasive test in elderly individuals. We hypothesized that the morbidity associated with RHC would be increased in elderly patients and highlight differences in hemodynamic characteristics compared to younger patients. A retrospective study was conducted in a regional referral center for PH. Data for all consecutive RHCs performed during the study period were analyzed. Over a five-year period, 1060 RHCs were performed. Of the patients, 228 (21.5%) were aged ≥75 years and 832 (78.5%) were aged <75 years. Duration of the procedure and site of puncture did not differ according to age group (all P > 0.05). Nine procedures (0.9%) led to complications: three (1.3%) in patients aged >75 years and six (0.7%) in younger patients aged (P = 0.5). Eight were local vascular injuries, directly related to a femoral vein puncture (P < 0.001). Pulmonary arterial pressure and cardiac output were lower in patients aged >75 years than in younger patients (P = 0.001). RHC may be performed regardless of patient age. The rate of RHC complications is not increased in individuals aged >75 years. As most complications were related to femoral vein puncture, this route should be avoided whenever possible.

Use of analgesics in France, following dextropropoxyphene withdrawal

Background

In 2009, the European Medicines Agency recommended withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene (DXP); in March 2011 it was withdrawn from the market in France. Up until that time the combination dextropropoxyphene-paracetamol (DXP/PC) was widely used for analgesia. At withdrawal, French regulators recommended that DXP/PC be replaced by other step 2 analgesics, i.e. tramadol, codeine, or opium-containing drugs, or by PC for a weak level of pain. To investigate prescribing behaviours after DXP/PC withdrawal, dispensations of analgesics before and after withdrawal were analysed.

Methods

Aggregated dispensation data of analgesics prescribed between January 2009 and December 2012 in the Rhône-Alpes region were obtained from the general health insurance claims data; changes in analgesic dispensation over time were analysed with the ATC/DDD methodology. Pre (Jan-June 2009) and post-withdrawal (Jan-June 2012) changes of DDDs where computed for each analgesic step.

Results

The dispensations of DXP/PC experienced a two-step decrease until 2011. Over the withdrawal period 2009-2012, there was a 14% decrease in the overall use of analgesic (from 109 to 94 DDDs), while the use of step 2 analgesics declined by 46% (− 22 DDDs, from 47 to 25 DDDs). This latter decline included a cessation of use of DXP/PC (29 DDDs in 2009) that were only in part (+ 7 DDDs, from 18 to 25 DDDs) compensated by increased use of codeine, tramadol and opium, in monotherapy or combined with PC. For step 1 analgesics, use increased with 9%, mostly PC (+ 8 DDDs, from 31 to 39 DDDs). Step 3 analgesics dispensations remained largely unchanged over this period (around 3 DDDs).

Conclusions

In the Rhône-Alpes region, DXP/PC withdrawal was accompanied in part by an increased use of same level analgesics, and in part by an increased use of PC in monotherapy. The extent of DXP/PC use before withdrawal, and the increased use of PC after DXP withdrawal, underline the complexity of pain management.

Costs of perennial allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma increase with severity and poor disease control

BACKGROUND

Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) represents a global and public health problem, due to its prevalence, morbidity, and impact on the quality of life. PAR is frequently associated with allergic asthma (AA). Costs of PAR with or without AA are poorly documented.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to detail medical resource utilization (MRU) and related direct cost for PAR, with or without concomitant AA, in France.

METHODS

Using Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we identified in 2010 two cohorts of PAR patients, based on General Practitioners' diagnoses and prescribing data, with and without concomitant AA. For each patient, the EHRs were linked to corresponding claims data with MRU and costs during years 2011 to 2013. Predefined subgroup analyses were performed according to severity of PAR and level of AA control.

RESULTS

The median annual cost reimbursed by social security system for a patient with PAR, and no AA was 159€ in 2013. This varied from 111€ to 188€ depending on PAR severity. For patients with PAR and concomitant AA, the median annual cost varied between 266€ and 375€, and drug treatment accounted for 42-55% of the costs, depending on asthma control.

CONCLUSION

This study linking diagnoses from EHRs to claims data collected valid information on PAR management, with or without concomitant AA, and on related costs. There was a clear increase in costs with severity of PAR and control of AA.

Anti-osteoporotic treatments in France: initiation, persistence and switches over 6 years of follow-up

Limited information is available on anti-osteoporotic treatment initiation patterns in France. In 2006-2013, the most frequently prescribed first-line treatment class for osteoporosis was represented by bisphosphonates (alendronic acid and risedronic acid), followed by strontium ranelate. Persistence with anti-osteoporotic treatment was low, with high proportions of treatment discontinuations and switches.

INTRODUCTION

This epidemiological, longitudinal study described first-line treatment initiation, persistence, switches to second-line treatment, and medical care consumption in osteoporotic patients in France during the 2007-2013 period.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥50 years, who were recorded in a French claims database and did not die during the observation period, were included if they met ≥1 inclusion criteria for osteoporosis in 2007 (≥1 reimbursement for anti-osteoporotic treatment, hospitalisation for osteoporotic fracture (spine, hip, femur, forearm bones, humerus, wrist), or ≥1 reimbursement for long-term osteoporosis-associated status). We collected data on consumption of anti-osteoporotic treatment (alendronic acid, ibandronic acid, risedronic acid, zoledronic acid, raloxifene, strontium ranelate, teriparatide) and of osteoporosis-related medical care after the date of first reimbursement for anti-osteoporotic treatment.

RESULTS

We obtained 2219 patients with a 6-year follow-up and 1387 who initiated an anti-osteoporotic treatment in 2007 and who can be selected for the treatment regimen analysis. The most frequently used first-line treatments were alendronic acid (32.7 %), risedronic acid (22.4 %), strontium ranelate (19.3 %), ibandronic acid (13.1 %) and raloxifene (12.2 %). Among patients who received these treatments, the highest persistence after 6 years was observed for raloxifene (37.3 %), alendronic acid (35.1 %) and risedronic acid (32.3 %). Treatment discontinuations were reported for 35.5 % (raloxifene) to 53.4 % (strontium ranelate) and treatment switches for 27.4 % (alendronic acid) to 56.6 % (ibandronic acid) of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that persistence with anti-osteoporotic treatment was relatively low in France, with high proportions of treatment discontinuations and switches, and that patients with osteoporosis were insufficiently monitored by bone specialists.

What are the therapeutic alternatives to dextropropoxyphene in France? A prescribers' survey

About a year after dextropropoxyphene (DXP) withdrawal from the French market, we conducted a survey among members of the French Society of Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine (Sfar) and of the French Society of the Study and Treatment of Pain (SFETD) to identify the indications for which this WHO level II analgesic had been prescribed, the prescriber's feedback following withdrawal, and the substitutive analgesics prescribed. DXP had been prescribed by more than 75% of the 430 anaesthesiologists and 230 pain specialists interviewed, mainly for acute and chronic non-cancer pain of moderate intensity. While two thirds of pain specialists were not satisfied with DXP withdrawal, this decision did not affect the majority of anaesthesiologists. In both groups, the main substitutive analgesic was tramadol combined with acetaminophen, while only 24% of prescribers considered acetaminophen alone as a substitute.