Comparison between local and three validated triage systems in an emergency department for 2126 children under 3 months

AIM

Triage of patients less than 3 months old was not already studied. The aim was to evaluate Paediatric Emergency Department triage in patients less than 3 months old and newborns using a local system in comparison with three validated paediatric triage systems (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, Manchester Triage System and Emergency Severity Index) and to determine inter-system agreement.

METHODS

All admissions of patients less than 3 months old admitted to the Emergency Department of the Saint Vincent University Hospital between April 2018 and December 2019 were included. The local triage system level was determined prospectively for comparison with retrospectively calculated triage levels of the validated systems. Hospitalisation rates were compared and inter-system agreements determined.

RESULTS

Among emergency admissions, 2126 were included (55% males, mean age 45 days). Hospitalisation rate increased with priority severity as determined by all triage systems studied. Cohen's kappa showed slight agreement between the local triage system and the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System (weighted kappa = 0.133, 0.185 and 0.157 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Whether prospective or retrospective triage used, the systems studied exhibited good association with hospitalisation rate for patients aged less than 3 months and newborn infants.

Consensus survey on the management of children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and at low risk of severe infection

Our aim was to identify national consensus criteria for the management of children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), for evidence-based step-down treatment approaches for patients classified at low risk of severe infection. In 2018, a five-section, 38-item survey was e-mailed to all pediatric hematology and oncology units in France (n = 30). The five sections contained statements on possible consensus criteria for the (i) definition of FN, (ii) initial management of children with FN, (iii) conditions required for initiating step-down therapy in low-risk patients, (iv) management strategy for low-risk patients, and (v) antibiotic treatment on discharge. Consensus was defined by respondents' combined answers (somewhat agree and strongly agree) at 75% or more. Sixty-five physicians (participation rate: 58%), all specialists in pediatric onco-hematology, from 18 centers completed the questionnaire. A consensus was reached on 22 of the 38 statements, including the definition of FN, the criteria for step-down therapy in low-risk children, and the initial care of these patients. There was no consensus on the type and duration of antibiotic therapy on discharge. In conclusion, a consensus has been reached on the criteria for initiating evidence-based step-down treatment of children with FN and a low risk of severe infection but not for the step-down antimicrobial regimen.

Decision-tree derivation and external validation of a new clinical decision rule (DISCERN-FN) to predict the risk of severe infection during febrile neutropenia in children treated for cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2017, international guidelines proposed new management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer, adapted to the risk of severe infection by clinical decision rules (CDRs). Until now, none of the proposed CDRs has performed well enough in high-income countries for use in clinical practice. Our study aimed to build and validate a new CDR (DISCERN-FN) to predict the risk of severe infection in children with febrile neutropenia.

METHODS

We did two prospective studies. First, a prospective derivation study included all episodes of febrile neutropenia in children (aged <18 years) with a cancer diagnosis and receiving treatment for it who were admitted for an episode of febrile neutropenia, excluding patients already treated with antibiotics for this episode, febrile neutropenia not induced by chemotherapy, those receiving palliative care, and those with a stem cell allograft for less than 1 year, from April 1, 2007, to Dec 31, 2011 from two paediatric cancer centres in France. We collected the children's medical history, and clinical and laboratory data, and analysed their associations with severe infection. Sipina software was used to derive the CDR as a decision tree. Second, a prospective, national, external validation study was done in 23 centres from Jan 1, 2012, to May 31, 2016. The primary outcome was severe infection, defined by bacteraemia, a positive bacterial culture from a usually sterile site, a local infection with a high potential for extension, or an invasive fungal infection. The CDR was applied a posteriori to all episodes to evaluate its sensitivity, specificity, and negative likelihood ratio.

FINDINGS

The derivation set included 539 febrile neutropenia episodes (270 episodes in patients with blood cancer [median age 7·5 years, IQR 3·7-11·2; 158 (59 %) boys and 112 (41%) girls] and 269 in patients with solid tumours [median age 6·6 years, IQR 2·9-14·2; 140 (52 %) boys and 129 (48%) girls]). Significant variables introduced into the decision tree were cancer type (solid tumour vs blood cancer), age, high-risk chemotherapy, level of fever, C-reactive protein concentration (at 24-48 h after admission), and leucocyte and platelet counts and procalcitonin (at admission and at 24-48 h after admission). For the derivation set, the CDR sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 93-100), its specificity 56% (51-61), and the negative likelihood ratio 0·04 (0·01-0·15). 1806 febrile neutropenia episodes were analysed in the validation set (mean age 8·1 years [SD 4·8], 1014 (56%) boys and 792 (44%) girls), of which 332 (18%, 95% CI 17-20) were linked with severe infection. For the validation set, the CDR had a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 91-97), a specificity of 38% (36-41), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0·13 (0·08-0·21). Our CDR reduced the risk of severe infection to a post-test probability of 0·8% (95% CI 0·2-2·9) in the derivation set and 2·4% (1·5-3·9) in the validation set. The validation study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03434795.

INTERPRETATION

The use of our CDR substantially reduced the risk of severe infection after testing in both the derivation and validation groups, which suggests that this CDR would improve clinical practice enough to be introduced in appropriate settings.

FUNDING

Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Histological Gastric Biopsy Aspects According to the Updated Sydney System in Children

OBJECTIVES

A descriptive and comparative study of gastric histological aspects according to the updated Sydney classification (USC), obtained from Helicobacter pylori-positive versus H pylori-negative children referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

The Prisma method was used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. Selection criteria were based on following key words USC, H pylori, children, endoscopy, or biopsy. Publication biases were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a meta-regression analysis was done. The study was registered on the PROSPERO platform.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2017, 1238 references were found; 97 studies were retained for the systematic review with a total number of 25,867 children; 75 studies were selected for the meta-analysis concerning 5990 H pylori-infected and 17,782 uninfected children.H pylori-positive versus H pylori-negative children, according to the USC, showed significantly higher relative risk for gastric antral and corpus chronic inflammation, presence of neutrophils, and of lymphoid follicles, and gastric mucosa atrophy, whereas, intestinal metaplasia showed a significantly higher RR only in antral biopsies. The meta-regression analysis showed that H pylori-positive versus H pylori-negative children had significantly higher risk only for corpus activity according to age, recurrent abdominal pain, and geographical area of low H pylori prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori infection in children was associated with higher relative risk for gastric antral and corpus chronic inflammation, presence of neutrophils, lymphoid follicles, and rare gastric mucosa atrophy, whereas, rare intestinal metaplasia was only significantly higher in the antral area.

Clinical course and cost assessment of infants with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis presenting to the emergency department: Data from the GUERANDE clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization for infants but its economic burden is not well documented. Our objective was to describe the clinical evolution and to assess the 1-month cost of a first episode of acute bronchiolitis presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Our study was an epidemiologic analysis and a cost study of the cohort drawn from the clinical trial GUERANDE, conducted in 24 French pediatric EDs. Infants of 6 weeks to 12 months of age presenting at pediatric EDs with a first episode of bronchiolitis were eligible. The costs considered were collected from a societal viewpoint, according to the recommendations of the French National Health Authority.

RESULTS

A total of 777 infants were included with a median age of 4 months. A total of 57% were hospitalized during the month following the first consultation in the ED, including 28 (3.6%) in an intensive care unit. The mean length of stay was 4.2 days (SD = 3.7). The average time to relief of all symptoms was 13 days (SD = 7). Average total cost per patient was €1919 (95% confidence interval: 1756-2138) from a societal perspective, mostly due to hospitalization cost. The estimated annual cost of bronchiolitis in infants was evaluated to be between €160 and €273 million in France.

DISCUSSION

Bronchiolitis represent a high cost for the health care system and broadly for society, with hospitalizations costs being the main cost driver. Thus significant investments should be made to develop innovative therapies, to reduce the number of hospitalizations and length of stay.

Differential risk of severe infection in febrile neutropenia among children with blood cancer or solid tumor

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyze the differences between infections in children with febrile neutropenia (FN) treated for solid tumor or blood cancer.

METHODS

A prospective study included all episodes of FN in children from April 2007 to April 2016 in 2-pediatric cancer centers in France. Medical history, clinical and laboratory data available at admission and final microbiological data were collected. The proportion of FN, severe infection, categories of microorganisms and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The presumed gateway of the infection was a posteriori considered and evaluated.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1197 FN episodes (mean age: 8 years). 66% of the FN episodes occurred in children with blood cancer. Severe infections were identified in 23.4% of episodes overall. The rate of severe infection (28.4% vs. 10.4%), types of microorganisms and the need for a management in intensive care unit (2.6% vs. 0.5%) was significantly different between children with blood cancer and solid tumor. Digestive or respiratory presumed gateway of the infections was less frequent for patients with solid tumor.

CONCLUSION

Given these important microbiological and clinical differences, it may be appropriate to consider differently the risk of severe infection in these two populations and therefore the management of FN.

Effect of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Treatment in Emergency Departments on the Hospitalization Rate for Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Acute bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants. Previous studies, underpowered to examine hospital admission, have found a limited benefit of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) treatment in the pediatric emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether HS nebulization treatment would decrease the hospital admission rate among infants with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (GUERANDE) study was a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial on 2 parallel groups conducted during 2 bronchiolitis seasons (October through March) from October 15, 2012, through April 15, 2014, at 24 French pediatric EDs. Among the 2445 infants (6 weeks to 12 months of age) assessed for inclusion, 777 with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis with respiratory distress and no chronic medical condition were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Two 20-minute nebulization treatments of 4 mL of HS, 3%, or 4 mL of normal saline (NS), 0.9%, given 20 minutes apart.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospital admission rate in the 24 hours after enrollment.

RESULTS

Of the 777 infants included in the study (median age, 3 months; interquartile range, 2-5 months; 468 [60.2%] male), 385 (49.5%) were randomized to the HS group and 387 (49.8%) to the NS group (5 patients did not receive treatment). By 24 hours, 185 of 385 infants (48.1%) in the HS group were admitted compared with 202 of 387 infants (52.2%) in the NS group. The risk difference for hospitalizations was not significant according to the mixed-effects regression model (adjusted risk difference, -3.2%; 95% CI, -8.7% to 2.2%; P = .25). The mean (SD) Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score improvement was greater in the HS group (-3.1 [3.2]) than in the NS group (-2.4 [3.3]) (adjusted difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2; P = .006) and similarly for the Respiratory Assessment Change Score. Mild adverse events, such as worsening of cough, occurred more frequently among children in the HS group (35 of 392 [8.9%]) than among those in the NS group (15 of 384 [3.9%]) (risk difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 1.6%-8.4%; P = .005), with no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Nebulized HS treatment did not significantly reduce the rate of hospital admissions among infants with a first episode of acute moderate to severe bronchiolitis who were admitted to the pediatric ED relative to NS, but mild adverse events were more frequent in the HS group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01777347.

Risk-stratification management of febrile neutropenia in pediatric hematology-oncology patients: Results of a French nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

In 2012, new international guidelines for children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) were issued, recommending reduced-intensity management strategy based on stratification of infectious risks. Some studies have highlighted practice disparities in different countries and within the same country. Our aim was to assess the current management strategies for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced FN in children in France.

PROCEDURE

This survey of all French pediatric oncology-hematology reference centers (n = 30) in late 2012 and early 2013 sent a standardized questionnaire to each center inquiring about their definition of an FN episode, its initial empiric treatment and ongoing management, use of management stratified by risk, and any criteria used for the risk assessment. Each center's management protocol was also analyzed.

RESULTS

All French reference centers participated in this survey, completing 88% of the questionnaire items. Definitions of both fever and neutropenia varied between centers. Ten centers used a risk-stratification strategy for initial management. In all, 42 probabilistic first-line antibiotic treatments were identified. After 48 hr of apyrexia, 17 units applied different forms of step-down therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most French centers already offered some form of reduced-intensity or step-down therapy, although they differed substantially in their management of FN episodes. Risk stratification with validated tools is essential to facilitate the implementation of the international recommendations, which would ultimately help to standardize practices in France.

[Is self-confidence a factor for successful breastfeeding?]

CONTEXT

Maternal self-confidence and self-efficacy in breastfeeding are recognized as factors positively associated with the initiation and duration of breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the importance of this association using the Breast Feeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES).

METHOD

This prospective study was conducted in 2012 in the Jeanne-de-Flandre maternity department in the Lille University Hospital (France). During their time in the maternity department, breastfeeding mothers who participated in the study completed the BSES, a brief self-assessment of their feelings of self-efficacy relating to breastfeeding. They then received follow-up telephone interviews at 1 and 3 months postpartum.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine mothers were included in the study. Breastfeeding rates were 86.5% at 1 month and 60% at 3 months. The BSES score of mothers who continued to breastfeed at 1 and 3 months was significantly higher than the score of mothers who had already weaned their children, with an AUROC of 0.72 at 3 months. This confirmed the reliability of the BSES for predicting adherence to breastfeeding. The BSES score of mothers who had previously breastfed was significantly higher than for those breastfeeding for the first time. The threshold score for the BSES was determined as 116/165.

CONCLUSION

It is important that mothers who lack confidence in their ability to breastfeed be identified early, whether on the maternity ward or even before this point. The value of BSES-based breastfeeding support intervention needs to be evaluated through randomized trials.

Which decision rules meet methodological standards in children with febrile neutropenia? Results of a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision rules (CDRs) have sought to identify the few children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) really at risk of severe infection to reduce the invasive procedures and costs for those at low risk. Several reports have shown that most rules do not perform well enough to be clinically useful. Our objective was to analyze the derivation methods and validation procedures of these CDRs.

PROCEDURE

A systematic review using Medline, Ovid, Refdoc, and the Cochrane Library through December 2012 searched for all CDRs predicting the risk of severe infection and/or complications in children with chemotherapy-induced FN. Their methodological quality was analyzed by 17 criteria for deriving and validating a CDR identified in the literature. The criteria published by the Evidence Based Medicine Working Group were applied to the published validations of each CDR to assess their level of evidence.

RESULTS

The systematic research identified 612 articles and retained 12 that derived CDRs. Overall, the CDRs met a median of 65% of the methodological criteria. The criteria met least often were that the rule made clinical sense, or described the course of action, or that the variables and the CDR were reproducible. Only one CDR, developed in South America, met all methodological criteria and provided the highest level of evidence; unfortunately it was not reproducible in Europe.

CONCLUSION

Only one CDR developed for children with FN met all methodological standards and reached the highest level of evidence.

Predicting the risk of severe bacterial infection in children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of febrile neutropenia (FN) in childhood cancer has been considerably improved by the intensification of treatment, including systematic hospitalization and broad-spectrum antibiotics. As only few children present with a severe bacterial infection (SBI), clinical decision rules have been developed to distinguish those at risk for SBI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of six clinical decision rules proposed in the literature and to compare their performance.

METHODS

This retrospective two-center cohort study included all episodes of chemotherapy-induced FN in children admitted between January 2005 and December 2006. Each rule was applied to our patients. Their sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were calculated and compared with the authors' results, to assess reproducibility. The most predictive rule was defined in advance as that yielding 100% Se, the highest Sp, and the greatest simplicity for bedside application.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-seven episodes of FN in 167 patients were collected; 64 episodes were associated with SBI, including 36 with bacteremia. Four of the six rules were reproducible, but none were able to be validated. The most predictive rule for bacteremia had 96% Se (95% confidence interval (CI): 79-99%) and 25% Sp (95% CI: 19-33%), and the most predictive rule for SBI had 95% Se (95% CI: 87-98%), but no power of discrimination (Sp = 5%, 95% CI: 3-8%).

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the difficulty in identifying standardized decision rules in the management of a condition with numerous clinical variables like FN.