Abstract TP75: Waking Up To A New Wake-Up Stroke Protocol Is Feasible And Safe

Introduction: Up to 25% of strokes are recognized upon awakening. Recent studies have demonstrated that a “tissue clock” rather than a time clock can be used to identify patients who may benefit from intravenous thrombolytics (IVT) beyond 4.5 hours from last known well (LKW). Consistent access to hyperacute MRI limits many centers from treating wake-up stroke patients. We created a formal protocol of clinical and imaging criteria to standardize evaluation and management of wake-up strokes.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study reviewed consecutive patients admitted to our Comprehensive Stroke Center who qualified for the wake-up protocol between February 2022 and June 2022. The implemented protocol, based on clinical trials’ inclusion criteria, is comprised of the following: 1) arrival within 12 hours from LKW and within 4.5 hours from symptom discovery; 2) high suspicion for acute ischemic stroke; 3) no contraindication to MRI; 4) NIHSS of at least 4; 5) baseline mRS 0-3; 6) no absolute contraindications to IVT. For patients meeting above inclusion criteria, emergent MRI with perfusion was performed. Diffusion-FLAIR mismatch (signal intensity ratio) and diffusion-perfusion mismatch were reviewed to determine thrombolysis eligibility by a trained neuroradiologist or vascular neurologist.

Results: Ten patients qualified for the wake-up protocol in the first five months of protocol implementation. Median NIHSS was 7, median LKW to arrival time was 8 hours, and median door to MRI time was 72.5 minutes. A final diagnosis of ischemic stroke was made in 80% of these cases. Overall, 50% were eligible for IVT based on our criteria, and 30% received thrombolysis. Median door to needle time was 92 minutes (range 75-117). There were no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. All patients treated with IVT were discharged home with no to minimal residual deficits with mRS 0-1 and median NIHSS at discharge of 2 (range 0-4).

Conclusion: A formal protocol for wake-up stroke management allowed a streamlined approach to expand the number of IVT-eligible cases. Continued efforts are needed to improve door to needle times in such cases and to follow clinical courses of treated patients.

Adult age differences in the use of story structure in delayed free recall

Thirty-six young adults (M age = 24.3 years) and 36 old adults (M age = 71.8 years) listened to four double-episode stories having either standard, interleaved, or scrambled structure. Two days later they were asked to recall the stories. Analysis of the mean number of nodes recalled revealed no age differences in the recall of standard and scrambled stories with both groups recalling the standard stories equally well and the scrambled stories equally poorly. However, for interleaved stories, young adults followed their pattern of recall for standard stories while old adults followed their pattern for scrambled stories. Also, the age groups differed in their pattern of additions and distortions, with old adults giving more for standard stories and young adults giving more for scrambled stories. Results appear to support models of age-related differences in memory processes and/or strategies when material must be reorganized or hierarchized. Possible metacognitive differences were also discussed; i.e., old adults may aim to tell the story interestingly, while young adults aim to tell it accurately.