Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) trial found similar ambulation and survival at 60 days with spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Trial outcomes evaluating pain, prescription analgesic use, and patient satisfaction have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction after hip fracture surgery with spinal versus general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Preplanned secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02507505).

SETTING

46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

INTERVENTION

Spinal or general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain on postoperative days 1 through 3; 60-, 180-, and 365-day pain and prescription analgesic use; and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

A total of 1600 patients were enrolled. The average age was 78 years, and 77% were women. A total of 73.5% (1050 of 1428) of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery was greater with spinal anesthesia (rated from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]; mean difference, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68]). Pain did not differ across groups at other time points. Prescription analgesic use at 60 days occurred in 25% (141 of 563) and 18.8% (108 of 574) of patients assigned to spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (relative risk, 1.33 [CI, 1.06 to 1.65]). Satisfaction was similar across groups.

LIMITATION

Missing outcome data and multiple outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Severe pain is common after hip fracture. Spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared with general anesthesia.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine

Comparison of two depth of anesthesia indices, qCON (Conox) and PSI (Sedline), during desflurane sedation and their sensitivity to random ketamine boluses in patients undergoing routine surgery. The performance of desflurane and ketamine on both indices was analyzed for 11 patients, and the ketamine sensitivity was compared with another group of 11 patients under sevoflurane and propofol.The MOAA/S was used to determine sedation level and pain. Different boluses of ketamine ranging from 10 to 30 mg where randomly administered in both groups and the effect on the indexes were measured after 4 min.The indices were recorded during the whole surgery, and their correlations with the desflurane concentration and the discrimination between awake and anesthetized states were evaluated with the prediction probability statistic (Pk). The Pk values, mean (se), discriminating between awake and anesthetized states were 0.974(0.016) for the qCON and 0.962(0.0123) for the PSI, while the 1-Pk statistic for the qCON and the PSI with respect to the desflurane concentration were 0.927(0.016) and 0.918(0.018), respectively, with no statistically significant differences.The agreement between both depth of hypnosis parameters was assessed under the Bland-Altman plot and the Spearman correlation, r_s = 0.57(p < 0.001).During the sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia, which served as a control group, both indices experienced a similar behavior with a no significant change of their median values after ketamine. However, during desflurane anesthesia the qCON index did not change significantly after ketamine administration, qCON (before = 33 (4), after = 30 (17); Wilcoxon, p = 0.89), while the PSI experienced a significant increase, PSI (before = 31(6), after = 39(16) Wilcoxon, p = 0.013).This study shows that qCON and PSI have similar performance under desflurane with good discrimination between the awake and anesthetized states. While both indices exhibited similar behavior under ketamine boluses under a sevoflurane-propofol anesthesia, the qCON index had a better performance under ketamine during desflurane anesthesia.