The addition of a leaded arm sleeve to leaded aprons further decreases operator upper outer quadrant chest wall radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided interventions

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer most commonly occurs in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) chest wall (CW). The effectiveness of routine leaded aprons to protect this region of the body in interventionalists during fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs) is unknown. Given the high lifetime attributable risks of prolonged occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the increasing number of practicing female vascular surgeons and interventionalists, we sought to determine if the use of a leaded arm shield would offer additional protection to the lateral CW and axilla in operators compared with routine leaded aprons.

METHODS

Effectiveness of leaded sleeves in attenuating radiation dose to the axilla and UOQ was evaluated in clinical practice and simulated scenarios. In the clinical setting, optically stimulated luminescence nanoDot detectors were placed at the UOQ lateral CW position, both over and under a standard leaded apron vest with and without the addition of an antimony/bismuth Enviro-Lite sleeve on two vascular surgeons performing FGIs. In the simulation, nanoDots were similarly placed on an anthropomorphic phantom positioned to represent a primary operator performing right femoral access. Fluorography was performed on 12-inch-thick acrylic scatter phantom at 80 kVp for an exposure of 3 Gy reference air kerma. Experiments were done with and without the sleeve. Paired Wilcoxon and χ2 tests were performed to identify the statistical significance of radiation attenuation.

RESULTS

Operator UOQ CW dose was measured during 61 FGIs: 33 cases (54%) with and 28 cases (46%) without the sleeve. Median procedure reference air kerma and fluoroscopy time was 180 mGy (interquartile range [IQR], 85-447 mGy) and 21 minutes (IQR, 11-39 minutes) when the sleeve was worn vs 100 mGy (IQR, 67-270 mGy) and 11 minutes (IQR, 6.3-25 minutes) without the sleeve. Radiation dose to the operator's UOQ was reduced by 96% (IQR, 85%-96%) when the sleeve was present and by 62% (IQR, 44%-82%; P < .001) without the sleeve. In the simulated setting, the sleeve reduced the radiation dose to the UOQ compared with the apron alone (96% vs 67%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine leaded aprons do attenuate the majority of UOQ chest wall radiation dose; however, the addition of a lead-equivalent sleeve further significantly reduces this dose. Because this area of the body has a high incidence of cancer formation, additional protection, especially to female interventionalists, seems prudent. Vascular surgeons should consider using a protective sleeve with their personal protective equipment when performing complex fluoroscopically guided procedures.

Impact of routine surveillance duplex ultrasound and subsequent reintervention after superficial femoral artery stenting

OBJECTIVE

Superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting is a common treatment for peripheral artery disease. It is effective in the short term; however, in-stent restenosis (ISR) limits long-term success. Surveillance with duplex ultrasound (DUS) can identify patients who develop ISR leading to early reintervention, but data to support this practice is sparce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether surveillance and subsequent reintervention improves outcomes in patients with SFA stents.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was performed with patients undergoing SFA stenting between 2005 and 2020 who had a follow-up with DUS. Five groups were identified based on the presence of ISR on DUS (ISR vs no ISR [NISR]), recurrence of symptoms (symptomatic [SX] vs asymptomatic [ASX]), and if any reintervention was performed (reintervention [R] vs no reintervention [NR]): (1) ISR+SX+R; (2) ISR+SX+NR; (3) ISR+ASX+R; (4) ISR+ASX+NR; and (5) NISR+NR. The primary endpoint was amputation-free survival, and the secondary endpoint was patency. Predictors of mortality and surveillance were identified by multivariable logistic regressions and Cox multivariate regression models. Survival curves were presented as Kaplan-Meier plots using log-rank test for subgroup comparison.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The indication for intervention was claudication in 28% and chronic limb-threatening ischemia in 72%. A total of 161 patients (63%) underwent reintervention for ISR. Of patients who had restenosis on DUS, those who were symptomatic and did not undergo reintervention (ISR+SX+NR) did the worst, with 50% amputation rate. In contrast, those who were asymptomatic but did undergo reintervention (ISR+ASX+R) had the lowest amputation rate of 13%. Active smoking was a predictor of both loss of patency and amputation (1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-2.98; P = .050; 3.55; 95% CI, 1.53-8.25; P = .003). Post procedure dual antiplatelet therapy had a positive association with limb salvage (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58; P = .001), whereas diabetes (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.21-6.01; P = .019), stent occlusion (HR, 17.0; 95% CI, 5.93-63.1; P < .001), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia presentations (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.86-11.7; P=.002) were negatively associated with limb salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine surveillance DUS and subsequent reintervention on ISR after SFA stenting is associated with improved patency and amputation-free survival. Surveillance DUS should be routine for patients after stenting, with reintervention strongly considered if ISR is identified for both symptomatic and asymptomatic.

Kommerell's Diverticulum in a Right-Sided Aortic Arch With an Aberrant Left Subclavian Artery Hybrid Repair

BACKGROUND

Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) with a right aortic arch (RAA) and aberrant left subclavian artery (aLSCA) is a rare congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. Treatment is not well defined due to its uncommon presentation, with rupture and dissection risk rates of up to 53%.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypertension presented with difficulty breathing during exercise without dysphagia. Follow-up computerized tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed the presence of a RAA and aLSCA arising from the descending thoracic aorta with an adjacent 58 × 41-mm KD and tracheal and esophageal displacement. Due to the size of the KD, risk of rupture, unsuitable anatomy for total endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and high COPD burden, the patient was planned to undergo a hybrid surgical repair. Left common carotid (LCCA) artery to LSCA bypass, full aortic debranching, LSCA embolization and percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) were performed. Successful device position and exclusion of the diverticulum and aneurysmal aorta were observed after completion thoracic aortogram. 18-month follow-up CTA demonstrated patency of the LSCA to LCCA bypass graft and arch vessel branches, as well as stable exclusion of the KD. Persistence of a type II endoleak originated at the right first posterior intercostal artery has been noted and is being followed conservatively since no sac growth has occurred.

CONCLUSION

We highlight the presence of a KD with RAA and aberrant subclavian artery, a rare congenital anatomic variation of the aortic arch with complex anatomy. Surgical planning must be individualized according to comorbidities and anatomical variations identified on imaging and 3D reconstructions.

Acute limb ischemia secondary to bullet embolism following a cardiac gunshot wound in a pediatric patient

Bullet embolism following a gunshot wound to the heart is a very unusual cause of acute limb ischemia. We report the case of a 3-year-old boy who sustained a penetrating cardiac trauma secondary to an accidental self-inflicted gunshot wound with a BB (ball bearing) gun. The BB pellet entered the left ventricle and embolized into the peripheral circulation, lodging at the bifurcation of the left common femoral artery. This resulted in acute left lower extremity ischemia. The patient was successfully treated by open common femoral artery exploration and foreign body removal.

Pooled study-level analysis of randomized controlled trials analyzing the effect of negative pressure wound therapy with irrigation vs traditional negative pressure wound therapy on diabetic foot outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of NPWT-T for the diabetic foot have been established. The addition of regular periodic irrigation with broad-spectrum antiseptic solution has been shown to reduce bioburden and total bacterial colonies; however, debate remains as to the clinical effect on diabetic foot outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the differences between NPWT-T and NPWT-I for treatment of the diabetic foot and the associated clinical outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline/Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published between January 1, 2002, and March 1, 2022. Keywords included "Negative Pressure Wound Therapy" AND "Instillation" OR "Irrigation." Three studies with a total of 421 patients (NPWT-T [n = 223], NPWT-I [n = 198]) were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between NPWT-T and NPWT-I for BWC (OR, 1.049; 95% CI, 0.709-1.552; P =.810), time to wound closure (SMD, -0.039; 95% CI, -0.233-0.154; P =.691), LOS (SMD, 0.065; 95% CI, -0.128-0.259; P =.508), or AEs (OR, 1.092; 95% CI, 0.714-1.670; P =.69).

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that further RCTs are required to assess the role of NPWT-I in the management of DFU and DFI.

Operator Lower Leg Radiation Dose during Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions is Effectively Reduced by Wearing Lead-Equivalent Leg Wraps

BACKGROUND

The intensity of radiation scatter that emanates from the X-ray beam during fluoroscopically guided interventions is greater below the fluoroscopy table than above. Yet interventionalists' lower legs are typically unshielded and table skirts are often positioned incorrectly. We sought to characterize the efficacy of the leg protector wraps (Leg Wraps, Burlington Medical Inc.) in reducing the radiation dose to the operator's lower leg during fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed evaluating the lower leg radiation dose reduction of one vascular surgeon during F/BEVAR using antimony/bismuth Enviro-Lite leg wraps (0.35 mm lead equivalency, 99.7% attenuation at 50 kVp; Burlington Medical, Hampton Roads, Virginia). Optically Stimulated Luminescence nanoDot detectors (microSTARii System, LANDAUER, Inc., Glenwood, Illinois) were placed over and under the left leg wrap at the anterior tibial tuberosity position to compare operator leg dose with and without this additional protection. The table-mounted lead skirt was used consistently in all cases. The nanoDot detectors were cross-calibrated with a survey meter (RaySafe X2 survey sensor, Fluke Biomedical, Cleveland, Ohio) by measuring scattered radiation at a position equivalent to an operator's mid-tibia while performing digital acquisitions of a 25-cm thick, 30 cm × 30 cm acrylic phantom with a Philips FD20 fluoroscope (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with the table skirt removed. The measured radiation doses were converted to a Hp (0.07) skin dose, assuming an RQR6 beam spectrum (IEC-61267). Paired Wilcoxon test was performed to identify significant attenuation of radiation exposure.

RESULTS

Leg dose measurements from 40 F-BEVARs were analyzed. The patients had a median (interquartile range) body mass index of 27 (24-32) kg/m². Median procedure reference air kerma was 1,100 (728-1,601) mGy, kerma-area product was 127 (73-184) Gycm², and fluoroscopy time was 69 (54-86) min. The median skin dose H_p (0.07) over the leg wraps (n = 40) was 54.2 (24-100) μSv and under the leg wraps (n = 40) was 2.7 μSv (1.0-5.8). The leg wraps attenuated the radiation dose by 95% (89-98%) (P < 0.001). The unprotected, H_p (0.07) per kerma-area product was determined to be 0.38 (0.30-0.55) μSv/Gycm².

CONCLUSIONS

The 0.35-mm lead-equivalent leg wraps significantly decreased scattered radiation to the lower leg during F-BEVAR. Protective leg wraps should be recommended to operators performing complex fluoroscopically guided procedures.

Digital Biomarkers of Gait and Balance in Diabetic Foot, Measurable by Wearable Inertial Measurement Units: A Mini Review

People with diabetic foot frequently exhibit gait and balance dysfunction. Recent advances in wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) enable to assess some of the gait and balance dysfunction associated with diabetic foot (i.e., digital biomarkers of gait and balance). However, there is no review to inform digital biomarkers of gait and balance dysfunction related to diabetic foot, measurable by wearable IMUs (e.g., what gait and balance parameters can wearable IMUs collect? Are the measurements repeatable?). Accordingly, we conducted a web-based, mini review using PubMed. Our search was limited to human subjects and English-written papers published in peer-reviewed journals. We identified 20 papers in this mini review. We found preliminary evidence of digital biomarkers of gait and balance dysfunction in people with diabetic foot, such as slow gait speed, large gait variability, unstable gait initiation, and large body sway. However, due to heterogeneities in included papers in terms of study design, movement tasks, and small sample size, more studies are recommended to confirm this preliminary evidence. Additionally, based on our mini review, we recommend establishing appropriate strategies to successfully incorporate wearable-based assessment into clinical practice for diabetic foot care.

Disposable, Lightweight Shield Decreases Operator Eye and Brain Radiation Dose When Attached to Safety Eyewear During Fluoroscopically-Guided-Interventions

OBJECTIVE

Long-term radiation exposure from fluoroscopically-guided-interventions (FGIs) can cause cataracts and brain tumors in the operator. We have previously demonstrated that leaded eyewear does not decrease operator eye dose unless lead shielding is added to the lateral and inferior portions. Therefore, we developed a disposable, lightweight, lead-equivalent shield that can be attached to the operator's eyewear, conforming around the face and adhering to the surgical mask. This study evaluates the efficacy of our new prototype in lowering operator brain and eye dose when added to both leaded and non-leaded eyewear.

METHODS

The attenuating efficacy of leaded eyewear alone, leaded eyewear + prototype and non-leaded eyewear + prototype were compared to no eyewear protection in both a simulated setting and clinical practice. In the simulation, optically stimulated, luminescent nanoDot detectors (Landauer, Glenwood, II) were placed inside the ocular, temporal lobe, and midbrain spaces of a head phantom (ATOM model-701: CIRS, Norfolk, VA). The phantom was positioned to represent a primary operator performing right femoral access. Fluorography was performed on a plastic scatter phantom at 80kVp for an exposure of 3 Gy RAK. In the clinical setting, nanoDots were placed below the operator's eye both inside and outside the prototype during FGIs. Median and interquartile ranges were calculated for the dose at each nanoDot location for both the phantom and clinical study, with average dose reduction also reported.

RESULTS

Wearing standard leaded eyewear alone did not decrease operator ocular or brain dose. In the phantom experiment, the leaded glasses + prototype reduced dose to the lens, temporal lobe and midbrain by 83% (p<0.001), 78% (p<0.001), and 75% (p<0.001), respectively. The non-leaded glasses + prototype also reduced dose to the lens, temporal lobe and midbrain by 85% (p<0.001), 81% (p<0.001), and 71% (p<0.001). In the clinical setting, 15 FGIs were included, with median RAK of 98.4 mGy. Our prototype led to an average operator eye dose reduction of 89% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Attaching our prototype to both leaded and non-leaded glasses significantly decreased eye and brain radiation dose to the operator. This face shield attachment provides meaningful radiation protection and should be considered as either a replacement or adjunct to routine eyewear.

Use of a 2 Dimensional Vessel Navigator Roadmap Decreases Patient Radiation Dose Compared to Standard 3D Mapping for Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

For fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), the implementation of the VesselNavigator (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) to provide a 3-dimensional vessel roadmap has been shown to reduce patient radiation exposure. Unfortunately, FEVAR radiation doses remain substantial despite utilization of this technology. Traditionally, registration of the live fluoroscopy with the pre-operative CTA is performed via the acquisition of a low-dose cone-beam CT scan. However, this registration can also be accomplished with the acquisition of 2D X-rays using the c-arm in 2 different projection angles. We hypothesized that the 2D image acquisition for vessel roadmap development would result in a significant reduction in patient radiation dose in comparison to the 3D CT registration without compromising image quality or increasing procedural length.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included FEVARs performed from January 2015 to May 2019. For patient data, the cumulative reference air kerma (RAK) was presented as geometric mean and standard deviation. A general linear model with log-normal distribution was used to test the difference in patient RAK between 2D X-ray and 3D CT VesselNavigator registration after adjusting for BMI and the number of vessel fenestrations (1 to 2 vs. 3 to 4). Fluoroscopy time was recorded and used as a surrogate for case complexity. All analyses were done in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty four FEVARs were performed on a Philips Allura Xper FD 20 fluoroscopy system equipped with clarity technology. The VesselNavigator registration was completed using 3D CT mapping in 99 cases and 2D X-rays in 65 procedures. On average, utilization of 2D mapping versus 3D mapping for the VesselNavigator resulted in a 20.4% reduction in patient RAK after controlling for BMI and number of vessel fenestrations, P = 0.0135. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the 2 study groups (P= 0.81) suggesting that image quality was not compromised by the use of 2D mapping leading to the need for additional fluoroscopy.

CONCLUSION

Acquisition of 2D films rather than a 3D CT scan for VesselNavigator registration allows for a significant reduction in patient radiation dose during FEVAR without increasing the case complexity or compromising image quality.