1
|
Ali R, Connolly ID, Tang OY, Mirza FN, Johnston B, Abdulrazeq HF, Lim RK, Galamaga PF, Libby TJ, Sodha NR, Groff MW, Gokaslan ZL, Telfeian AE, Shin JH, Asaad WF, Zou J, Doberstein CE. Author Correction: Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:93. [PMID: 38609435 PMCID: PMC11015017 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01099-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rohaid Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Ian D Connolly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oliver Y Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fatima N Mirza
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Benjamin Johnston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hael F Abdulrazeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rachel K Lim
- Department of Surgery & Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Tiffany J Libby
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Neel R Sodha
- Department of Surgery & Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Albert E Telfeian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wael F Asaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - James Zou
- Departments of Electrical Engineering, Biomedical Data Science, and Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Curtis E Doberstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali R, Connolly ID, Tang OY, Mirza FN, Johnston B, Abdulrazeq HF, Lim RK, Galamaga PF, Libby TJ, Sodha NR, Groff MW, Gokaslan ZL, Telfeian AE, Shin JH, Asaad WF, Zou J, Doberstein CE. Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:63. [PMID: 38459205 PMCID: PMC10923794 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the importance of informed consent in healthcare, the readability and specificity of consent forms often impede patients' comprehension. This study investigates the use of GPT-4 to simplify surgical consent forms and introduces an AI-human expert collaborative approach to validate content appropriateness. Consent forms from multiple institutions were assessed for readability and simplified using GPT-4, with pre- and post-simplification readability metrics compared using nonparametric tests. Independent reviews by medical authors and a malpractice defense attorney were conducted. Finally, GPT-4's potential for generating de novo procedure-specific consent forms was assessed, with forms evaluated using a validated 8-item rubric and expert subspecialty surgeon review. Analysis of 15 academic medical centers' consent forms revealed significant reductions in average reading time, word rarity, and passive sentence frequency (all P < 0.05) following GPT-4-faciliated simplification. Readability improved from an average college freshman to an 8th-grade level (P = 0.004), matching the average American's reading level. Medical and legal sufficiency consistency was confirmed. GPT-4 generated procedure-specific consent forms for five varied surgical procedures at an average 6th-grade reading level. These forms received perfect scores on a standardized consent form rubric and withstood scrutiny upon expert subspeciality surgeon review. This study demonstrates the first AI-human expert collaboration to enhance surgical consent forms, significantly improving readability without sacrificing clinical detail. Our framework could be extended to other patient communication materials, emphasizing clear communication and mitigating disparities related to health literacy barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohaid Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Ian D Connolly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oliver Y Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Fatima N Mirza
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Benjamin Johnston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hael F Abdulrazeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rachel K Lim
- Department of Surgery & Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Tiffany J Libby
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Neel R Sodha
- Department of Surgery & Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Albert E Telfeian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wael F Asaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - James Zou
- Departments of Electrical Engineering, Biomedical Data Science, and Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Curtis E Doberstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ali R, Tang OY, Connolly ID, Abdulrazeq HF, Mirza FN, Lim RK, Johnston BR, Groff MW, Williamson T, Svokos K, Libby TJ, Shin JH, Gokaslan ZL, Doberstein CE, Zou J, Asaad WF. Demographic Representation in 3 Leading Artificial Intelligence Text-to-Image Generators. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:87-95. [PMID: 37966807 PMCID: PMC10782243 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Importance The progression of artificial intelligence (AI) text-to-image generators raises concerns of perpetuating societal biases, including profession-based stereotypes. Objective To gauge the demographic accuracy of surgeon representation by 3 prominent AI text-to-image models compared to real-world attending surgeons and trainees. Design, Setting, and Participants The study used a cross-sectional design, assessing the latest release of 3 leading publicly available AI text-to-image generators. Seven independent reviewers categorized AI-produced images. A total of 2400 images were analyzed, generated across 8 surgical specialties within each model. An additional 1200 images were evaluated based on geographic prompts for 3 countries. The study was conducted in May 2023. The 3 AI text-to-image generators were chosen due to their popularity at the time of this study. The measure of demographic characteristics was provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges subspecialty report, which references the American Medical Association master file for physician demographic characteristics across 50 states. Given changing demographic characteristics in trainees compared to attending surgeons, the decision was made to look into both groups separately. Race (non-White, defined as any race other than non-Hispanic White, and White) and gender (female and male) were assessed to evaluate known societal biases. Exposures Images were generated using a prompt template, "a photo of the face of a [blank]", with the blank replaced by a surgical specialty. Geographic-based prompting was evaluated by specifying the most populous countries on 3 continents (the US, Nigeria, and China). Main Outcomes and Measures The study compared representation of female and non-White surgeons in each model with real demographic data using χ2, Fisher exact, and proportion tests. Results There was a significantly higher mean representation of female (35.8% vs 14.7%; P < .001) and non-White (37.4% vs 22.8%; P < .001) surgeons among trainees than attending surgeons. DALL-E 2 reflected attending surgeons' true demographic data for female surgeons (15.9% vs 14.7%; P = .39) and non-White surgeons (22.6% vs 22.8%; P = .92) but underestimated trainees' representation for both female (15.9% vs 35.8%; P < .001) and non-White (22.6% vs 37.4%; P < .001) surgeons. In contrast, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion had significantly lower representation of images of female (0% and 1.8%, respectively; P < .001) and non-White (0.5% and 0.6%, respectively; P < .001) surgeons than DALL-E 2 or true demographic data. Geographic-based prompting increased non-White surgeon representation but did not alter female representation for all models in prompts specifying Nigeria and China. Conclusion and Relevance In this study, 2 leading publicly available text-to-image generators amplified societal biases, depicting over 98% surgeons as White and male. While 1 of the models depicted comparable demographic characteristics to real attending surgeons, all 3 models underestimated trainee representation. The study suggests the need for guardrails and robust feedback systems to minimize AI text-to-image generators magnifying stereotypes in professions such as surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohaid Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Oliver Y. Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ian D. Connolly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Hael F. Abdulrazeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Fatima N. Mirza
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rachel K. Lim
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Michael W. Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Konstantina Svokos
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Tiffany J. Libby
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - John H. Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ziya L. Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Curtis E. Doberstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - James Zou
- Department of Biomedical Data Science and, by courtesy, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Wael F. Asaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Neuroscience, Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaidi SE, Venkatraman V, Sykes DAW, Albanese J, Erickson MM, Crutcher CL, Goodwin CR, Groff MW, Grossi P, Than KD, Haglund MM, Abd-El-Barr MM. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers. World Neurosurg 2023; 180:e514-e522. [PMID: 37774788 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is among the most common spine procedures. Adjacent segment disease (ASD), characterized by degenerative disease at an adjacent spinal level to a prior fusion, is a well-recognized and significant sequela following ACDF. Adjacent segment ACDF may be considered after the failure of non-surgical options for patients with symptomatic ASD. This study aimed to assess the incidence of dysphagia and other complications as well as radiographic outcomes in adult patients who have undergone ACDF with an integrated interbody spacer device for symptomatic ASD. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD with commercially available integrated interbody spacers by three spine surgeons at an academic institution from March 2018 to April 2022. Demographic, radiographic, and postoperative data were collected, including dysphagia, device-related complications, and the need for revision surgery. RESULTS There were 48 patients (26 male, 22 female) who met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.7 years, mean body mass index 19.5 kg/m2) who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD (1one-level, n = 44; 2-level, n = 4). Overall, 12 patients (25%) experienced dysphagia postoperatively before the first follow-up appointment. Nine of 44 (20.4%) of 1-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia, and 3 of 4 (75%) of 2-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia. Three patients had severe dysphagia which prompted an otolaryngology referral. Two of those patients remained symptomatic at 6 weeks postoperatively. Of 43 patients with prior plate cage systems, none required hardware removal at the time of surgery. Preoperative global and segmental lordosis were 9.07° ± 8.36° (P = 0.22) and 3.58° ± 4.57° (P = 0.14), respectively. At 6 weeks postoperatively, global and segmental lordosis were 11.44° ± 9.06° (P = 0.54) and 5.11° ± 4.44° (P = 0.44), respectively. This constitutes a change of +2.37° and +1.53° in global and segmental lordosis, respectively. The mean anterior disc height change between preoperative and immediate postoperative time points was 6.3 ± 3.1 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 6-week postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -1.5 ± 2.7 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 3-month postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -3.7 ± 5.0 mm. The posterior disc height changes at the same time points were 2.5 ± 1.7 mm, -0.4 ± 1.8. and -0.5 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. This fusion rate was 50% and 70% at 6 months and 1 year post-surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ACDF with integrated spacer is a viable alternative to traditional plate-cage systems for symptomatic ASD. An advantage over traditional plate-cage systems is that the removal of prior instrumentation is not needed in order to place implants. Based on a review of the literature, these standalone systems allowed for a shorter operative time and had less incidence of dysphagia than plate-cage systems for ASD after ACDF. The different standalone and plate-cage systems used in treating ASD after ACDF surgeries should be compared in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif E Zaidi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; School of Medicine, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Vishal Venkatraman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David A W Sykes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica Albanese
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa M Erickson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Clifford L Crutcher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Grossi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Khoi D Than
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael M Haglund
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oren RL, Grasfield RH, Friese MB, Chibnik LB, Chi JH, Groff MW, Kang JD, Xie Z, Culley DJ, Crosby G. Geriatric Surgery Produces a Hypoactive Molecular Phenotype in the Monocyte Immune Gene Transcriptome. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6271. [PMID: 37834915 PMCID: PMC10573997 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery is a major challenge for the immune system, but little is known about the immune response of geriatric patients to surgery. We therefore investigated the impact of surgery on the molecular signature of circulating CD14+ monocytes, cells implicated in clinical recovery from surgery, in older patients. We enrolled older patients having elective joint replacement (N = 19) or spine (N = 16) surgery and investigated pre- to postoperative expression changes in 784 immune-related genes in monocytes. Joint replacement altered the expression of 489 genes (adjusted p < 0.05), of which 38 had a |logFC| > 1. Spine surgery changed the expression of 209 genes (adjusted p < 0.05), of which 27 had a |logFC| > 1. In both, the majority of genes with a |logFC| > 1 change were downregulated. In the combined group (N = 35), 471 transcripts were differentially expressed (adjusted p < 0.05) after surgery; 29 had a |logFC| > 1 and 72% of these were downregulated. Notably, 21 transcripts were common across procedures. Thus, elective surgery in older patients produces myriad changes in the immune gene transcriptome of monocytes, with many suggesting development of an immunocompromised/hypoactive phenotype. Because monocytes are strongly implicated in the quality of surgical recovery, this signature provides insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the immune response to surgery and warrants further study as a potential biomarker for predicting poor outcomes in older surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L. Oren
- Cognitive Outcomes of Geriatric Surgery Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (R.L.O.); (R.H.G.)
| | - Rachel H. Grasfield
- Cognitive Outcomes of Geriatric Surgery Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (R.L.O.); (R.H.G.)
| | - Matthew B. Friese
- Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;
| | - Lori B. Chibnik
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - John H. Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (J.H.C.); (M.W.G.)
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (J.H.C.); (M.W.G.)
| | - James D. Kang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Zhongcong Xie
- Geriatric Anesthesia Research Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA;
| | - Deborah J. Culley
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Gregory Crosby
- Cognitive Outcomes of Geriatric Surgery Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu FY, Rowe KA, O'Mara LM, Bulger A, Bleday R, Groff MW, Cooper Z, Bernacki RE. Evaluation of interdisciplinary care pathway implementation in older elective surgery patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:1310-1322. [PMID: 36705068 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program outlines best practices for surgical care in older adults. These recommendations have guided institutions to create workflows to better support needs specific to older surgical patients. This qualitative study explored clinician experiences to understand influences on implementation of frailty screening and an interdisciplinary care pathway in older elective colorectal surgery and neurosurgery patients. STUDY DESIGN Semi-structured in-person and video-based interviews were conducted from July 2021 to March 2022 with clinicians caring for patients ≥70 years on the colorectal surgery and neurosurgery services. Interviews addressed familiarity with and beliefs about the intervention, intervention alignment with routine workflow and workflow adaptations, and barriers and facilitators to performing the intervention. Interviews were analyzed using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to find themes related to ongoing implementation. RESULTS Thirty-two clinicians participated (56.3% female, 58.8% White). Fifteen relevant CFIR constructs were identified. Key themes to implementation success included strong participant belief in effectiveness of the intervention and its advantage over standard care; the importance of training, reference materials, and champions; and the need for institution-level investment in resources to amplify the impact of the intervention on patients and expand the capacity to address their needs. CONCLUSION Systematic evaluation found implementation of frailty screening and an interdisciplinary care pathway in elective colorectal surgery and neurosurgery patients to be supported by participating clinicians, yet sustainability of the intervention and further adoption across surgical services to better meet the needs of older patients would necessitate organizational resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Y Hu
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine A Rowe
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lynne M O'Mara
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Bulger
- Department of Nursing, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ronald Bleday
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rachelle E Bernacki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang AY, Sharma V, Bi WL, Curry WT, Florman JE, Groff MW, Heilman CB, Hong J, Kryzanski J, Lollis SS, McGillicuddy GT, Moliterno J, Ogilvy CS, Oh DS, Oyelese AA, Proctor MR, Shear PA, Wakefield AE, Whitmore RG, Riesenburger RI. The New England Neurosurgical Society: growth and evolution over 70 years. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:261-269. [PMID: 35523259 DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.jns212777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The New England Neurosurgical Society (NENS) was founded in 1951 under the leadership of its first President (Dr. William Beecher Scoville) and Secretary-Treasurer (Dr. Henry Thomas Ballantine). The purpose of creating the NENS was to unite local neurosurgeons in the New England area; it was one of the first regional neurosurgical societies in America. Although regional neurosurgical societies are important supplements to national organizations, they have often been overshadowed in the available literature. Now in its 70th year, the NENS continues to serve as a platform to represent the needs of New England neurosurgeons, foster connections and networks with colleagues, and provide research and educational opportunities for trainees. Additionally, regional societies enable discussion of issues uniquely relevant to the region, improve referral patterns, and allow for easier attendance with geographic proximity. In this paper, the authors describe the history of the NENS and provide a roadmap for its future. The first section portrays the founders who led the first meetings and establishment of the NENS. The second section describes the early years of the NENS and profiles key leaders. The third section discusses subsequent neurosurgeons who steered the NENS and partnerships with other societies. In the fourth section, the modern era of the NENS and its current activities are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Y Wang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vaishnavi Sharma
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Curry
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Michael W Groff
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carl B Heilman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Hong
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - James Kryzanski
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - S Scott Lollis
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Gerald T McGillicuddy
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Moliterno
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christopher S Ogilvy
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dennis S Oh
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Baystate Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mark R Proctor
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Perry A Shear
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Park Avenue Medical Center, Trumbull, Connecticut
| | - Andrew E Wakefield
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut; and
| | - Robert G Whitmore
- 15Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Ron I Riesenburger
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coric D, Nassr A, Kim PK, Welch WC, Robbins S, DeLuca S, Whiting D, Chahlavi A, Pirris SM, Groff MW, Chi JH, Huang JH, Kent R, Whitmore RG, Meyer SA, Arnold PM, Patel AI, Orr RD, Krishnaney A, Boltes P, Anekstein Y, Steinmetz MP. Prospective, randomized controlled multicenter study of posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:115-125. [PMID: 36152329 DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.spine22536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a posterior facet replacement device, the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) System, for the treatment of one-level symptomatic lumbar stenosis with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Posterior lumbar arthroplasty with facet replacement is a motion-preserving alternative to lumbar decompression and fusion. The authors report the preliminary results from the TOPS FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) trial. METHODS The study was a prospective, randomized controlled FDA IDE trial comparing the investigational TOPS device with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and pedicle screw fixation. The minimum follow-up duration was 24 months. Validated patient-reported outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. The primary outcome was a composite measure of clinical success: 1) no reoperations, 2) no device breakage, 3) ODI reduction of ≥ 15 points, and 4) no new or worsening neurological deficit. Patients were considered a clinical success only if they met all four measures. Radiographic assessments were made by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS A total of 249 patients were evaluated (n = 170 in the TOPS group and n = 79 in the TLIF group). There were no statistically significant differences between implanted levels (L4-5: TOPS, 95% and TLIF, 95%) or blood loss. The overall composite measure for clinical success was statistically significantly higher in the TOPS group (85%) compared with the TLIF group (64%) (p = 0.0138). The percentage of patients reporting a minimum 15-point improvement in ODI showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.037) favoring TOPS (93%) over TLIF (81%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients reporting a minimum 20-point improvement on VAS back pain (TOPS, 87%; TLIF, 64%) and leg pain (TOPS, 90%; TLIF, 88%) scores. The rate of surgical reintervention for facet replacement in the TOPS group (5.9%) was lower than the TLIF group (8.8%). The TOPS cohort demonstrated maintenance of flexion/extension range of motion from preoperatively (3.85°) to 24 months (3.86°). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that posterior lumbar decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device is safe and efficacious in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Additionally, decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device maintains segmental motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domagoj Coric
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Ahmad Nassr
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul K Kim
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - William C Welch
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Steven DeLuca
- 6Orthopedic Institute of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Donald Whiting
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali Chahlavi
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Ascension St. Vincent, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Stephen M Pirris
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Ascension St. Vincent, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Michael W Groff
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John H Chi
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason H Huang
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas
| | | | - Robert G Whitmore
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Scott A Meyer
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Altair Health Spine, Morristown, New Jersey
| | | | | | - R Douglas Orr
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Ajit Krishnaney
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Peggy Boltes
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Yoram Anekstein
- 17Department of Orthopaedics, Sackler School of Medical of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Javeed S, Pugazenthi S, Huguenard AL, Haid RW, Groff MW, Limbrick DD, Zipfel GJ. Impact of Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation awards on subsequent grant funding and career outcomes of neurosurgeon-scientists. J Neurosurg 2022:1-11. [PMID: 36585865 DOI: 10.3171/2022.11.jns221391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation (NREF) provides diverse funding opportunities for in-training and early-career neurosurgeon-scientists. The authors analyzed the impact of NREF funding on the subsequent career success of neurosurgeons in obtaining research funding and academic achievements. METHODS The NREF database was queried to identify NREF winners from 2000 to 2015. The award recipients were surveyed to obtain information about their demographic characteristics, academic career, and research funding. Only subsequent research support with an annual funding amount of $50,000 or greater was included. The primary outcome was the NREF impact ratio, defined as the ratio between NREF award research dollars and subsequent grant funding dollars. The secondary outcomes were time to subsequent grant funding as principal investigator (PI), clinical practice settings, and final academic position achieved. RESULTS From 2000 to 2015, 158 neurosurgeons received 164 NREF awards totaling $8.3 million (M), with $1.7 M awarded to 46 Young Clinician Investigators (YCIs), $1.5 M to 18 Van Wagenen Fellows (VWFs), and $5.1 M to 100 resident Research Fellowship Grant (RFG) awardees. Of all awardees, 73% have current academic appointments, and the mean ± SD number of publications and H-index were 71 ± 82 and 20 ± 15, respectively. The overall response rate to our survey was 70%, and these respondents became the cohort for our analysis. In total, respondents cumulatively obtained $776 M in post-NREF award grant funding, with the most common sources of funding including the National Institutes of Health ($327 M) and foundational awards ($306 M). The NREF impact ratios for awardees were $1:$381 for YCI, $1:$113 for VWF, and $1:$41 for resident RFG. Awardees with NREF projects in functional neurosurgery, pediatric neurosurgery, and neuro-oncology had the highest NREF impact ratios of $1:$194, $1:$185, and $1:$162, respectively. Of respondents, 9% became department chairs, 26% became full professors, 82% received at least 1 subsequent research grant, and 66% served as PI on a subsequent research grant after receiving their NREF awards. CONCLUSIONS In-training and early-career neurosurgeons who were awarded NREF funding had significant success in acquiring subsequent grant support, research productivity, and achievements of academic rank. NREF grants provide a tremendous return on investment across various career stages and subspecialities. They also appeared to have a broader impact on trajectory of research and innovation within the field of neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Javeed
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sangami Pugazenthi
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna L Huguenard
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Regis W Haid
- 2Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | - Michael W Groff
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David D Limbrick
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gregory J Zipfel
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anderson DE, Groff MW, Flood TF, Allaire BT, Davis RB, Stadelmann MA, Zysset PK, Alkalay RN. Evaluation of Load-To-Strength Ratios in Metastatic Vertebrae and Comparison With Age- and Sex-Matched Healthy Individuals. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:866970. [PMID: 35992350 PMCID: PMC9388746 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.866970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Vertebrae containing osteolytic and osteosclerotic bone metastases undergo pathologic vertebral fracture (PVF) when the lesioned vertebrae fail to carry daily loads. We hypothesize that task-specific spinal loading patterns amplify the risk of PVF, with a higher degree of risk in osteolytic than in osteosclerotic vertebrae. To test this hypothesis, we obtained clinical CT images of 11 cadaveric spines with bone metastases, estimated the individual vertebral strength from the CT data, and created spine-specific musculoskeletal models from the CT data. We established a musculoskeletal model for each spine to compute vertebral loading for natural standing, natural standing + weights, forward flexion + weights, and lateral bending + weights and derived the individual vertebral load-to-strength ratio (LSR). For each activity, we compared the metastatic spines' predicted LSRs with the normative LSRs generated from a population-based sample of 250 men and women of comparable ages. Bone metastases classification significantly affected the CT-estimated vertebral strength (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.0001). Post-test analysis showed that the estimated vertebral strength of osteosclerotic and mixed metastases vertebrae was significantly higher than that of osteolytic vertebrae (p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0003) or vertebrae without radiographic evidence of bone metastasis (p = 0.0010 and p = 0.0003). Compared with the median (50%) LSRs of the normative dataset, osteolytic vertebrae had higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p = 0.0375), natural standing + weights (p = 0.0118), and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0111). Surprisingly, vertebrae showing minimal radiographic evidence of bone metastasis presented significantly higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p < 0.0001) and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0009) than the normative dataset. Osteosclerotic vertebrae had lower median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p < 0.0001), natural standing + weights (p = 0.0005), forward flexion + weights (p < 0.0001), and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0002), a trend shared by vertebrae with mixed lesions. This study is the first to apply musculoskeletal modeling to estimate individual vertebral loading in pathologic spines and highlights the role of task-specific loading in augmenting PVF risk associated with specific bone metastatic types. Our finding of high LSRs in vertebrae without radiologically observed bone metastasis highlights that patients with metastatic spine disease could be at an increased risk of vertebral fractures even at levels where lesions have not been identified radiologically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis E. Anderson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thomas F. Flood
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brett T. Allaire
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Roger B. Davis
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marc A. Stadelmann
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philippe K. Zysset
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ron N. Alkalay
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hauser BM, McNulty J, Zaki MM, Gupta S, Cote DJ, Bernstock JD, Lu Y, Chi JH, Groff MW, Khawaja AM, Smith TR, Zaidi HA. Predictors of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in patients with TBI: A nationwide analysis. Injury 2022; 53:1087-1093. [PMID: 34625238 PMCID: PMC8863622 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical spine injury screening is common practice for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. However, risk factors for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma remain unknown. We characterized epidemiology and clinical risk for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma in TBI. METHODS We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort analysis of TBI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011-2014 using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Out of 768,718 TBIs, 46,654 (6.1%) and 42,810 (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, respectively. Only 11% of thoracic and 7% of lumbar spine fracture patients had an accompanying spinal cord injury at any level. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (67% of thoracic and 71% and lumbar fractures). Predictors for both thoracic and lumbar fractures included moderate (thoracic: OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.21-1.31; lumbar: OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.08-1.18) and severe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.67-1.75; OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.13-1.20) compared to mild; epidural hematoma (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.28-1.44; OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.04-1.19); lower extremity injury (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.35-1.41; OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.45-2.55); upper extremity injury (OR 2.19, 95%CI 2.14-2.23; OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.13-1.18); smoking (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.12; OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.09-1.15); and obesity (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.34-1.45; OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.24-1.35). Thoracic injuries (OR 4.45; 95% CI 4.35-4.55) predicted lumbar fractures, while abdominal injuries (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.97-2.07) predicted thoracic fractures. CONCLUSIONS We identified GCS, smoking, upper and lower extremity injuries, and obesity as common risk factors for thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake M. Hauser
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John McNulty
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark M. Zaki
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Saksham Gupta
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David J. Cote
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua D. Bernstock
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Yi Lu
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John H. Chi
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ayaz M. Khawaja
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Hasan A. Zaidi
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goedmakers CMW, Lak AM, Duey AH, Senko AW, Arnaout O, Groff MW, Smith TR, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA, Zaidi HA, Rana A, Boaro A. Deep Learning for Adjacent Segment Disease at Preoperative MRI for Cervical Radiculopathy. Radiology 2021; 301:E446. [PMID: 34807775 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021219023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
13
|
Driver J, Groff MW. Editorial. Navigation in spine surgery: an innovation here to stay. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-3. [PMID: 34624836 DOI: 10.3171/2021.4.spine21207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Driver
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael W Groff
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goedmakers CMW, Lak AM, Duey AH, Senko AW, Arnaout O, Groff MW, Smith TR, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA, Zaidi HA, Rana A, Boaro A. Deep Learning for Adjacent Segment Disease at Preoperative MRI for Cervical Radiculopathy. Radiology 2021; 301:664-671. [PMID: 34546126 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients who undergo surgery for cervical radiculopathy are at risk for developing adjacent segment disease (ASD). Identifying patients who will develop ASD remains challenging for clinicians. Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning algorithm capable of predicting ASD by using only preoperative cervical MRI in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Materials and Methods In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, retrospective chart review was performed for 1244 patients undergoing single-level ACDF in two tertiary care centers. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 344 patients were included, of whom 60% (n = 208) were used for training and 40% for validation (n = 43) and testing (n = 93). A deep learning-based prediction model with 48 convolutional layers was designed and trained by using preoperative T2-sagittal cervical MRI. To validate model performance, a neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon independently provided ASD predictions for the test set. Validation metrics included accuracy, areas under the curve, and F1 scores. The difference in proportion of wrongful predictions between the model and clinician was statistically tested by using the McNemar test. Results A total of 344 patients (median age, 48 years; interquartile range, 41-58 years; 182 women) were evaluated. The model predicted ASD on the 93 test images with an accuracy of 88 of 93 (95%; 95% CI: 90, 99), sensitivity of 12 of 15 (80%; 95% CI: 60, 100), and specificity of 76 of 78 (97%; 95% CI: 94, 100). The neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon provided predictions with lower accuracy (54 of 93; 58%; 95% CI: 48, 68), sensitivity (nine of 15; 60%; 95% CI: 35, 85), and specificity (45 of 78; 58%; 95% CI: 56, 77) compared with the algorithm. The McNemar test on the contingency table demonstrated that the proportion of wrongful predictions was significantly lower by the model (test statistic, 2.000; P < .001). Conclusion A deep learning algorithm that used only preoperative cervical T2-weighted MRI outperformed clinical experts at predicting adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy. © RSNA, 2021 An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on September 22, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M W Goedmakers
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Asad M Lak
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Akiro H Duey
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Alexander W Senko
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Omar Arnaout
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Michael W Groff
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Timothy R Smith
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Hasan A Zaidi
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Aakanksha Rana
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| | - Alessandro Boaro
- From the Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 (C.M.W.G., A.M.L., A.H.D., A.W.S., O.A., M.W.G., T.R.S., H.A.Z., A.R., A.B.); and Spine Research Department, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (C.M.W.G., C.L.A.V.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alkalay RN, Groff MW, Stadelmann MA, Buck FM, Hoppe S, Theumann N, Mektar U, Davis RB, Hackney DB. Improved estimates of strength and stiffness in pathologic vertebrae with bone metastases using CT-derived bone density compared with radiographic bone lesion quality classification. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36:113-124. [PMID: 34479191 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.spine202027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the ability of 1) CT-derived bone lesion quality (classification of vertebral bone metastases [BM]) and 2) computed CT-measured volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) for evaluating the strength and stiffness of cadaver vertebrae from donors with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS Forty-five thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from cadaver spines of 11 donors with breast, esophageal, kidney, lung, or prostate cancer. Each vertebra was imaged using microCT (21.4 μm), vBMD, and bone volume to total volume were computed, and compressive strength and stiffness experimentally measured. The microCT images were reconstructed at 1-mm voxel size to simulate axial and sagittal clinical CT images. Five expert clinicians blindly classified the images according to bone lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed, or healthy). Fleiss' kappa test was used to test agreement among 5 clinical raters for classifying bone lesion quality. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to test the difference in vertebral strength and stiffness based on bone lesion quality. Multivariable regression analysis was used to test the independent contribution of bone lesion quality, computed vBMD, age, gender, and race for predicting vertebral strength and stiffness. RESULTS A low interrater agreement was found for bone lesion quality (κ = 0.19). Although the osteoblastic vertebrae showed significantly higher strength than osteolytic vertebrae (p = 0.0148), the multivariable analysis showed that bone lesion quality explained 19% of the variability in vertebral strength and 13% in vertebral stiffness. The computed vBMD explained 75% of vertebral strength (p < 0.0001) and 48% of stiffness (p < 0.0001) variability. The type of BM affected vBMD-based estimates of vertebral strength, explaining 75% of strength variability in osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.75, p < 0.0001) but only 41% in vertebrae with mixed bone metastasis (R2 = 0.41, p = 0.0168), and 39% in osteolytic vertebrae (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.0381). For vertebral stiffness, vBMD was only associated with that of osteoblastic vertebrae (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.0024). Age and race inconsistently affected the model's strength and stiffness predictions. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic vertebral fracture occurs when the metastatic lesion degrades vertebral strength, rendering it unable to carry daily loads. This study demonstrated the limitation of qualitative clinical classification of bone lesion quality for predicting pathologic vertebral strength and stiffness. Computed CT-derived vBMD more reliably estimated vertebral strength and stiffness. Replacing the qualitative clinical classification with computed vBMD estimates may improve the prediction of vertebral fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron N Alkalay
- 1Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
| | - Michael W Groff
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marc A Stadelmann
- 3ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern
| | | | - Sven Hoppe
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern; and
| | - Nicolas Theumann
- 6Clinique Bois-Cerf, Radiology Department, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - David B Hackney
- 9Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boaro A, Leung J, Reeder HT, Siddi F, Mezzalira E, Liu G, Mekary RA, Lu Y, Groff MW, Onnela JP, Smith TR. Smartphone GPS signatures of patients undergoing spine surgery correlate with mobility and current gold standard outcome measures. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 35:796-806. [PMID: 34450590 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.spine202181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are currently the gold standard to evaluate patient physical performance and ability to recover after spine surgery. However, PROMs have significant limitations due to the qualitative and subjective nature of the information reported as well as the impossibility of using this method in a continuous manner. The smartphone global positioning system (GPS) can be used to provide continuous, quantitative, and objective information on patient mobility. The aim of this study was to use daily mobility features derived from the smartphone GPS to characterize the perioperative period of patients undergoing spine surgery and to compare these objective measurements to PROMs, the current gold standard. METHODS Eight daily mobility features were derived from smartphone GPS data in a population of 39 patients undergoing spine surgery for a period of 2 months starting 3weeks before surgery. In parallel, three different PROMs for pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and functional status (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) were serially measured. Segmented linear regression analysis was used to assess trends before and after surgery. The Student paired t-test was used to compare pre- and postoperative PROM scores. Pearson's correlation was calculated between the daily average of each GPS-based mobility feature and the daily average of each PROM score during the recovery period. RESULTS Smartphone GPS features provided data documenting a reduction in mobility during the immediate postoperative period, followed by a progressive and steady increase with a return to baseline mobility values 1 month after surgery. PROMs measuring pain, physical performance, and disability were significantly different 1 month after surgery compared to the 2 immediate preoperative weeks. The GPS-based features presented moderate to strong linear correlation with pain VAS and PROMIS physical score during the recovery period (Pearson r > 0.7), whereas the ODI and PROMIS mental scores presented a weak correlation (Pearson r approximately 0.4). CONCLUSIONS Smartphone-derived GPS features were shown to accurately characterize perioperative mobility trends in patients undergoing surgery for spine-related diseases. Features related to time (rather than distance) were better at describing patient physical and performance status. Smartphone GPS has the potential to be used for the development of accurate, noninvasive and personalized tools for patient mobility monitoring after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Boaro
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.,4Institute of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy; and
| | - Jeffrey Leung
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Harrison T Reeder
- 2Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Francesca Siddi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Elisabetta Mezzalira
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Gang Liu
- 2Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Rania A Mekary
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.,3School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yi Lu
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael W Groff
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Timothy R Smith
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.,5Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hauser BM, Gupta S, Hoffman SE, Zaki MM, Roffler AA, Cote DJ, Lu Y, Chi JH, Groff MW, Khawaja AM, Smith TR, Zaidi HA. Adult sports-related traumatic spinal injuries: do different activities predispose to certain injuries? J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-7. [PMID: 35354117 PMCID: PMC9751847 DOI: 10.3171/2021.1.spine201860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sports injuries are known to present a high risk of spinal trauma. The authors hypothesized that different sports predispose participants to different injuries and injury severities. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients who experienced a sports-related traumatic spinal injury (TSI), including spinal fractures and spinal cord injuries (SCIs), encoded within the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 through 2014. Multiple imputation was used for missing data, and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were estimated. RESULTS The authors included 12,031 cases of TSI, which represented 15% of all sports-related trauma. The majority of patients with TSI were male (82%), and the median age was 48 years (interquartile range 32-57 years). The most frequent mechanisms of injury in this database were cycling injuries (81%), skiing and snowboarding accidents (12%), aquatic sports injuries (3%), and contact sports (3%). Spinal surgery was required during initial hospitalization for 9.1% of patients with TSI. Compared to non-TSI sports-related trauma, TSIs were associated with an average 2.3-day increase in length of stay (95% CI 2.1-2.4; p < 0.001) and discharge to or with rehabilitative services (adjusted OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.7; p < 0.001). Among sports injuries, TSIs were the cause of discharge to or with rehabilitative services in 32% of cases. SCI was present in 15% of cases with TSI. Within sports-related TSIs, the rate of SCI was 13% for cycling injuries compared to 41% and 49% for contact sports and aquatic sports injuries, respectively. Patients experiencing SCI had a longer length of stay (7.0 days longer; 95% CI 6.7-7.3) and a higher likelihood of adverse discharge disposition (adjusted OR 9.69, 95% CI 8.72-10.77) compared to patients with TSI but without SCI. CONCLUSIONS Of patients with sports-related trauma discharged to rehabilitation, one-third had TSIs. Cycling injuries were the most common cause, suggesting that policies to make cycling safer may reduce TSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake M Hauser
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Saksham Gupta
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Samantha E Hoffman
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Mark M Zaki
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Anne A Roffler
- 3Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Cote
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Yi Lu
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - John H Chi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Michael W Groff
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Ayaz M Khawaja
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- 2Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; and
| | - Timothy R Smith
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Hasan A Zaidi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith LGF, Chiocca EA, Zipfel GJ, Smith AGF, Groff MW, Haid RW, Lonser RR. Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation funding conversion to National Institutes of Health funding. J Neurosurg 2021; 136:287-294. [PMID: 34116507 DOI: 10.3171/2020.11.jns203871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation (NREF) provides research support for in-training and early career neurosurgeon-scientists. To define the impact of this funding, the authors assessed the success of NREF awardees in obtaining subsequent National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. METHODS NREF in-training (Research Fellowship [RF] for residents) and early career awards/awardees (Van Wagenen Fellowship [VW] and Young Clinician Investigator [YCI] award for neurosurgery faculty) were analyzed. NIH funding was defined by individual awardees using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting tool (1985-2014). RESULTS Between 1985 and 2014, 207 unique awardees were supported by 218 NREF awards ($9.84 million [M] in funding), including 117 RF ($6.02 M), 32 VW ($1.68 M), and 69 YCI ($2.65 M) awards. Subspecialty funding included neuro-oncology (79 awards; 36% of RF, VW, and YCI awards), functional (53 awards; 24%), vascular (37 awards; 17%), spine (22 awards; 10%), pediatrics (18 awards; 8%), trauma/critical care (5 awards; 2%), and peripheral nerve (4 awards; 2%). These awardees went on to receive $353.90 M in NIH funding that resulted in an overall NREF/NIH funding ratio of 36.0:1 (in dollars). YCI awardees most frequently obtained later NIH funding (65%; $287.27 M), followed by VW (56%; $41.10 M) and RF (31%; $106.59 M) awardees. YCI awardees had the highest NREF/NIH funding ratio (108.6:1), followed by VW (24.4:1) and RF (17.7:1) awardees. Subspecialty awardees who went on to obtain NIH funding included vascular (19 awardees; 51% of vascular NREF awards), neuro-oncology (40 awardees; 51%), pediatrics (9 awardees; 50%), functional (25 awardees; 47%), peripheral nerve (1 awardees; 25%), trauma/critical care (2 awardees; 20%), and spine (2 awardees; 9%) awardees. Subspecialty NREF/NIH funding ratios were 56.2:1 for vascular, 53.0:1 for neuro-oncology, 47.6:1 for pediatrics, 34.1:1 for functional, 22.2:1 for trauma/critical care, 9.5:1 for peripheral nerve, and 0.4:1 for spine. Individuals with 2 NREF awards achieved a higher NREF/NIH funding ratio (83.3:1) compared to those with 1 award (29.1:1). CONCLUSIONS In-training and early career NREF grant awardees are an excellent investment, as a significant portion of these awardees go on to obtain NIH funding. Moreover, there is a potent multiplicative impact of NREF funding converted to NIH funding that is related to award type and subspecialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke G F Smith
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory J Zipfel
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | - Adam G F Smith
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Michael W Groff
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Russell R Lonser
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Calvachi-Prieto P, McAvoy MB, Cerecedo-Lopez CD, Lu Y, Chi JH, Aglio LS, Smith TR, Gormley WB, Groff MW, Mekary RA, Zaidi HA. Expandable Versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2021; 151:e607-e614. [PMID: 33940268 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expandable cages for interbody fusion allow for in situ expansion optimizing fit while mitigating endplate damage. Studies comparing outcomes after using expandable or static cages have been conflicting. METHODS This was a meta-analysis A systematic search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines identifying studies reporting outcomes among patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LIF). RESULTS Fourteen articles with 1129 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with MIS-LIFs performed with static cages, those with expandable cages had a significantly lower incidence of graft subsidence (expandable: incidence 0.03, I2 22.50%; static: incidence 0.27, I2 51.03%, P interaction <0.001), length of hospital stay (expandable: mean difference [MD] 3.55 days, I2 97%; static: MD 7.1 days, I2 97%, P interaction <0.01), and a greater increase in disc height (expandable: MD -4.41 mm, I2 99.56%; static: MD -0.79 mm, I2 99.17%, P interaction = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference among Oswestry Disability Index (expandable: MD -22.75, I2 98.17%; static: MD -17.11, I2 95.26%, P interaction = 0.15), fusion rate (expandable: incidence 0.94, I2 0%; static incidence 0.92, I2 0%, P interaction = 0.44), overall change in lumbar lordosis (expandable: MD 3.48 degrees, I2 59.29%; static: MD 3.67 degrees, I2 0.00%, P interaction 0.88), blood loss (expandable: MD 228.9 mL, I2 100%; static: MD 261.1 mL, I2 94%, P interaction = 0.69) and operative time (expandable: MD 184 minutes, I2 95.32%; static: MD 150.4 minutes, I2 91%, P interaction = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS Expandable interbody cages in MIS-LIF were associated with a decrease in subsidence rate, operative time and greater in increase in disc height.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Calvachi-Prieto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Malia B McAvoy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Christian D Cerecedo-Lopez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John H Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Linda S Aglio
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William B Gormley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hasan A Zaidi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gabr MA, Touko E, Yadav AP, Karikari I, Goodwin CR, Groff MW, Ramirez L, Abd-El-Barr MM. Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2020; 10:1057-1065. [PMID: 32875838 PMCID: PMC7645096 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219895266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes between stand-alone anchored spacers and traditional cages with plate fixation for dysphagia and pseudoarthrosis using data from clinical trials. METHODS Our search protocol was added to PROSPERO register and systematic review using PRISMA method was performed. Then, we systematically searched for studies addressing stand-alone anchored spacers in patients who underwent ACDF. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI), dysphagia incidence % (Dinc%), and Swallowing-Quality of Life (SQOL) scores during preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits were extracted. Chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for statistical comparisons (P ≤ .05). RESULTS The initial search generated 506 articles in CENTRAL and 40 articles in MEDLINE. Finally, 14 articles were included. Total number of patients was 1173 (583 anchored stand-alone and 590 plate). Dinc% scores were statistically significantly lower in the stand-alone anchored spacer compared to the plate-screw construct (P ≤ .05). ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference in the comparisons of SQOL. On the other hand, NDI scores were statistically significantly lower in baseline of stand-alone anchored spacer and the plate-screw construct compared with both immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS Our study results revealed that the stand-alone anchored spacers were associated with less dysphagia in the immediate and last follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael W. Groff
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr, Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, DUMC 3807, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ghogawala Z, Dunbar M, Kanter AS, Albert T, Bisson EF, Wang MC, Resnick DK, Mummaneni PV, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Bydon M, Fehlings MG, Tumialan LM, Falavigna A, Kawaguchi Y, Ahmed E, Hartl R, Coric D, Magge SN, Harrop JS, Knightly JJ, Assaker R, Groff MW, Holly LT, Wang MY, Rajshekhar V. Spine Expert Panel Review for Medical Decision Making. Neurosurgery 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa447_694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
22
|
Agarwal N, Luy DD, Bonaminio JM, Philips CA, Dattomo KA, Heary RF, Branch CL, Robertson JH, Groff MW, Haid RW. Chronicling the philanthropic arm of neurological surgery: a review of the growth and development of the Neurosurgery Research & Education Foundation. J Neurosurg 2020; 133:1905-1912. [PMID: 32764183 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.jns201474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Neurosurgery Research & Education Foundation (NREF), previously known as the Research Foundation of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), was established in 1980 to encourage and facilitate innovation through financial support to young neurosurgeons in the process of honing their competencies in neurosciences and neurological surgery. This article provides a historical overview of NREF, its mission, and charitable contributions and the ever-expanding avenues for neurosurgeons, neurosurgical residents and fellows, and medical students to supplement clinical training and to further neurosurgical research advances. METHODS Data were collected from the historical archives of the AANS and NREF website. Available data included tabulated revenue, geographic and institutional records of funding, changes in funding for fellowships and awards, advertising methods, and sources of funding. RESULTS Since 1984, NREF has invested more than $23 million into the future of neurosurgery. To date, NREF has provided more than 500 fellowship opportunities which have funded neurosurgeons' education and research efforts at all stages of training and practice. CONCLUSIONS NREF is designed to serve as the vehicle through which the neurosurgical community fosters the continued excellence in the care of patients with neurosurgical diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Agarwal
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Diego D Luy
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Chris A Philips
- 3American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Rolling Meadows, Illinois
| | | | - Robert F Heary
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Charles L Branch
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jon H Robertson
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michael W Groff
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Boaro A, Wells M, Chi J, Lu Y, Smith TR, Groff MW, Zaidi H. A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of Postoperative Major and Minor Complications in Patients with Spinal Metastatic Disease. World Neurosurg 2020; 140:e203-e211. [PMID: 32389869 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major complications after spine metastasis surgery are prioritized in the literature with little consideration of the more frequent minor events such as pneumonia or urinary tract infection. We analyzed incidence and risk factors of postsurgical complications in patients with spinal metastasis extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We also developed a useful predictive model to estimate the probability of occurrence of complications. METHODS A total of 1176 patients diagnosed with spinal metastasis were extracted from NSQIP. Variables screened included age, sex, tumor location, patient's functional status, comorbidities, laboratory values, and case urgency. Two multivariate logistic regression models were designed to evaluate risk factors and likelihood of event occurrence. RESULTS Minor events occurred twice as frequently compared with major complications (36% vs. 18% of patients). The most common major event was death (10%); the most frequent minor event was need for postoperative transfusion (29.4%). In the multivariate analysis, elderly age, emergency case, preoperative leukocytosis, and smoking status retained significance for major complications; American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 4-5, low hematocrit levels, and intradural extramedullary location of the tumor retained significance for minor complications. The predictive models designed explained 72% of the variability in major complications occurrence and 67% for minor events. CONCLUSIONS Smoking status and emergent surgery were found to be the strongest independent predictors of major complications, whereas higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class showed a greater association with minor events. The predictive models produced can be a useful aid for surgeons to identify those patients who are at greater risk of developing postoperative adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Boaro
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Michael Wells
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hasan Zaidi
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES Superiority claims for medical devices are commonly derived from noninferiority trials, but interpretation of such claims can be challenging. This study aimed to (a) establish the prevalence of noninferiority and superiority designs among spinal device trials, (b) assess the frequency of post hoc superiority claims from noninferiority studies, and (c) critically evaluate the risk of bias in claims that could translate to misleading conclusions. METHODS Study bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The risk of bias for the superiority claim was established based on post hoc hypothesis specification, analysis of the intention-to-treat population, post hoc modification of a priori primary outcomes, and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Forty-one studies were identified from 1895 records. Nineteen (46%) were noninferiority trials. Fifteen more (37%) were noninferiority trials with a secondary superiority hypothesis specified a priori. Seven (17%) were superiority trials. Of the 34 noninferiority trials, 14 (41%) made superiority claims. A medium or high risk of bias was related to the superiority claim in 9 of those trials (64%), which was due to the analyzed population, lacking sensitivity analyses, claims not being robust during sensitivity analyses, post hoc hypotheses, or modified endpoints. Only 4 of the 14 (29%) noninferiority studies provided low bias in the superiority claim, compared with 3 of the 5 (60%) superiority trials. CONCLUSIONS Health care decision makers should carefully evaluate the risk of bias in each superiority claim and weigh their conclusions appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jason A. Inzana
- Telos Partners, LLC, Denver, CO, USA,Jason A. Inzana, Telos Partners, LLC, Lafayette, CO
80026, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghogawala Z, Kurpad S, Falavigna A, Groff MW, Sciubba DM, Wu JC, Park P, Berven S, Hoh DJ, Bisson EF, Steinmetz MP, Wang MC, Chou D, Sansur CA, Smith JS, Tumialán LM. Editorial. COVID-19 and spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:1-3. [PMID: 32302989 PMCID: PMC7164398 DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.spine20468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zoher Ghogawala
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Alan L. and Jacqueline B. Stuart Spine Research Center, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Shekar Kurpad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Asdrubal Falavigna
- Department of Neurosurgery, Caxias do Sul University, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel M. Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jau-Ching Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sigurd Berven
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel J. Hoh
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Erica F. Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Michael P. Steinmetz
- Center for Spine Health, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Marjorie C. Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Charles A. Sansur
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Justin S. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; and
| | - Luis M. Tumialán
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lak AM, Rahimi A, Abunimer AM, Tafel I, Devi S, Premkumar A, Ida F, Lu Y, Chi JH, Tanguturi S, Groff MW, Zaidi HA. Quantifying the impact of surgical decompression on quality of life and identification of factors associated with outcomes in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:237-244. [PMID: 32244218 DOI: 10.3171/2020.1.spine191326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) imposes significant impairment on patient quality of life and often requires immediate surgical intervention. In this study the authors sought to estimate the impact of surgical intervention on patient quality of life in the form of mean quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained and identify factors associated with positive outcomes. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective chart review and collected data for patients who had neurological symptoms resulting from radiologically and histologically confirmed MSCC and were treated with surgical decompression during the last 12 years. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were included in this study (mean age 60.4 years, 57.6% males). The 5 most common metastatic tumor types were lung, multiple myeloma, renal, breast, and prostate cancer. The majority of patients had radioresistant tumors (82.7%) and had an active primary site at presentation (67.5%). The median time from tumor diagnosis to cord compression was 12 months and the median time from identification of cord compression to death was 4 months. Preoperative presenting symptoms included motor weakness (70.8%), pain (70.1%), sensory disturbances (47.6%), and bowel or bladder disturbance (31.1%). The median estimated blood loss was 500 mL and the average length of hospital stay was 10.3 days. About 18% of patients had postoperative complications and the mean follow-up was 7 months. The mean pre- and postoperative ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status grades were 3.2 and 2.4, respectively. At follow-up, 58.3% of patients had improved status, 31.5% had no improvement, and 10.0% had worsening of functional status. The mean QALY gained per year in the entire cohort was 0.55. The mean QALY gained in the first 6 months was 0.1 and in the first year was 0.4. For patients who lived 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, or 4-5 years, the mean QALY gained were 0.8, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.3, respectively. Preoperative motor weakness, bowel dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class were identified as independent predictors inversely associated with good outcome. CONCLUSIONS The mean QALY gained from surgical decompression in the first 6 months and first year equals 1.2 months and 5 months of life in perfect health, respectively. These findings suggest that surgery might also be beneficial to patients with life expectancy < 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asad M Lak
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amina Rahimi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abdullah M Abunimer
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ian Tafel
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sharmila Devi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- 2Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Akash Premkumar
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fidelia Ida
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- 3Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Science, Boston; and
| | - Yi Lu
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John H Chi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shyam Tanguturi
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael W Groff
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hasan A Zaidi
- 1Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huang KT, Silva MA, See AP, Wu KC, Gallerani T, Zaidi HA, Lu Y, Chi JH, Groff MW, Arnaout OM. A computer vision approach to identifying the manufacturer and model of anterior cervical spinal hardware. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 31:844-850. [PMID: 31491759 DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.spine19463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent advances in computer vision have revolutionized many aspects of society but have yet to find significant penetrance in neurosurgery. One proposed use for this technology is to aid in the identification of implanted spinal hardware. In revision operations, knowing the manufacturer and model of previously implanted fusion systems upfront can facilitate a faster and safer procedure, but this information is frequently unavailable or incomplete. The authors present one approach for the automated, high-accuracy classification of anterior cervical hardware fusion systems using computer vision. METHODS Patient records were searched for those who underwent anterior-posterior (AP) cervical radiography following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at the authors' institution over a 10-year period (2008-2018). These images were then cropped and windowed to include just the cervical plating system. Images were then labeled with the appropriate manufacturer and system according to the operative record. A computer vision classifier was then constructed using the bag-of-visual-words technique and KAZE feature detection. Accuracy and validity were tested using an 80%/20% training/testing pseudorandom split over 100 iterations. RESULTS A total of 321 total images were isolated containing 9 different ACDF systems from 5 different companies. The correct system was identified as the top choice in 91.5% ± 3.8% of the cases and one of the top 2 or 3 choices in 97.1% ± 2.0% and 98.4 ± 13% of the cases, respectively. Performance persisted despite the inclusion of variable sizes of hardware (i.e., 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level plates). Stratification by the size of hardware did not improve performance. CONCLUSIONS A computer vision algorithm was trained to classify at least 9 different types of anterior cervical fusion systems using relatively sparse data sets and was demonstrated to perform with high accuracy. This represents one of many potential clinical applications of machine learning and computer vision in neurosurgical practice.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hauser BM, Gupta S, Cote DJ, Zaki MM, Xu E, Khawaja AM, Lu Y, Groff MW, Smith TR, Zaidi HA. Traumatic Spinal Injuries Cause Disproportionate Morbidity in Sports-Related Pediatric Trauma. Neurosurgery 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz310_346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
29
|
Aglio LS, Abd-El-Barr MM, Orhurhu V, Kim GY, Zhou J, Gugino LD, Crossley LJ, Gosnell JL, Chi JH, Groff MW. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in thoracolumbosacral spine operations: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 29:647-653. [PMID: 30215593 DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.spine171380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEPreemptive administration of analgesic medication is more effective than medication given after the onset of the painful stimulus. The efficacy of preoperative or preemptive pain relief after thoracolumbosacral spine surgery has not been well studied. The present study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of preemptive analgesia with a single-shot epidural injection in adult patients undergoing spine surgery.METHODSNinety-nine adult patients undergoing thoracolumbosacral operations via a posterior approach were randomized to receive a single shot of either epidural placebo (group 1), hydromorphone alone (group 2), or bupivacaine with hydromorphone (group 3) before surgery at the preoperative holding area. The primary outcome was the presence of opioid sparing and rescue time-defined as the time interval from when a patient was extubated to the time pain medication was first demanded during the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes include length of stay at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), pain score at the PACU, opioid dose, and hospital length of stay.RESULTSOf the 99 patients, 32 were randomized to the epidural placebo group, 33 to the hydromorphone-alone group, and 34 to the bupivacaine with hydromorphone group. No significant difference was seen across the demographics and surgical complexities for all 3 groups. Compared to the control group, opioid sparing was significantly higher in group 2 (57.6% vs 15.6%, p = 0.0007) and group 3 (52.9% vs 15.6%, p = 0.0045) in the first demand of intravenous hydromorphone as a supplemental analgesic medication. Compared to placebo, the rescue time was significantly higher in group 2 (187 minutes vs 51.5 minutes, p = 0.0014) and group 3 (204.5 minutes vs 51. minutes, p = 0.0045). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.CONCLUSIONSThe authors' study demonstrated that preemptive analgesia in thoracolumbosacral surgeries can significantly reduce analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period as evidenced by reduced request for opioid medication in both analgesia study groups who received a preoperative analgesic epidural. Nonetheless, the lack of differences in pain score and opioid dose at the PACU brings into question the role of preemptive epidural opioids in spine surgery patients. Further work is necessary to investigate the long-term effectiveness of preemptive epidural opioids and their role in pain reduction and patient satisfaction.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02968862 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda S Aglio
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Vwaire Orhurhu
- 4Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Grace Y Kim
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - Jie Zhou
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - Laverne D Gugino
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - Lisa J Crossley
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - James L Gosnell
- Departments of1Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and
| | - John H Chi
- 3Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael W Groff
- 3Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ammerman J, Watters WC, Inzana JA, Carragee G, Groff MW. Closing the Treatment Gap for Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Large Annular Defects: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes in this High-risk Population. Cureus 2019; 11:e4613. [PMID: 31312540 PMCID: PMC6615588 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common spinal pathologies and can be associated with debilitating pain and neurological dysfunction. Discectomy is the primary surgical intervention for LDH and is typically successful. Yet, some patients experience recurrent LDH (RLDH) after discectomy, which is associated with worse clinical outcomes and greater socioeconomic burden. Large defects in the annulus fibrosis are a significant risk factor for RLDH and present a critical treatment challenge. It is essential to identify reliable and cost-effective treatments for this at-risk population. A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies describing the treatment of LDH patients with large annular defects. The incidence of large annular defects, measurement technique, RLDH rate, and reoperation rate were compiled and stratified by surgical technique. The risk of bias was scored for each study and for the identification of RLDH and reoperation. Study heterogeneity and pooled estimates were calculated from the included articles. Fifteen unique studies describing 2,768 subjects were included. The pooled incidence of patients with a large annular defect was 44%. The pooled incidence of RLDH and reoperation following conventional limited discectomy in this population was 10.6% and 6.0%, respectively. A more aggressive technique, subtotal discectomy, tended to have lower rates of RLDH (5.8%) and reoperation (3.8%). However, patients treated with subtotal discectomy reported greater back and leg pain associated with disc degeneration. The quality of evidence was low for subtotal discectomy as an alternative to limited discectomy. Each report had a high risk of bias and treatments were never randomized. A recent randomized controlled trial with 550 subjects examined an annular closure device (ACD) and observed significant reductions in RLDH and reoperation rates (>50% reduction). Based on the available evidence, current discectomy techniques are inadequate for patients with large annular defects, leaving a treatment gap for this high-risk population. Currently, the strongest evidence indicates that augmenting limited discectomy with an ACD can reduce RLDH and revision rates in patients with large annular defects, with a low risk of device complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William C Watters
- Clinical Orthopedic Surgery, Institute of Academic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | | | - Gene Carragee
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
DeCarvalho SA, Abd-El-Barr MM, Groff MW. Vascular Complications in Cervical Spine Surgery (Anterior and Posterior Approach). Complications in Neurosurgery 2019:314-319. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-50961-9.00053-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the lumbar spine, end plate preparation for the interbody fusion cages may critically affect the cage's long-term performance. This study investigated the effect of the interbody cage design on the compliance and cage subsidence of instrumented spines under cyclic compression. PURPOSE We aimed to quantify the role of cage geometry and bone density on the stability of the spinal construct in response to cyclic compressive loads. STUDY DESIGN Changes in the cage-bone interface and the effect of bone density on these changes were evaluated in a human cadaveric model for three intervertebral cage designs. METHODS The intervertebral space of 27 functional cadaveric spinal units was instrumented with bilateral linear cages, single anterior conformal cages, or single unilateral oblique cages. Once augmented with a pedicle screw fixation system, the instrumented spine unit was tested under cyclic compression loads (400-1,200 N) to 20,000 cycles at a rate of 2 Hz. Compliance of the cage-bone interface and cage subsidence was computed. Two-way repeated multivariate analysis of variance was used to test the effects of cage design and bone density on the compliance and subsidence of the cages. RESULTS The anterior conformal shaped cage showed reduced interface stiffness (p<.01) and higher hysteresis (p<.01) and subsidence rate (10%-30%) than the bilateral linear and unilateral oblique-shaped cages. Bone density was not associated with the initial compliance of the cage-bone interface or the rate of cage subsidence. Higher bone density did decrease the rate of reduction in cage-bone interface stiffness under higher cyclic loads for the anterior conformal shaped and unilateral oblique cages. CONCLUSIONS Cage design and position significantly affected the degradation of the cage-bone interface under cyclic loading. Comparisons of subsidence rate between the different cage designs suggest the peripheral location of the cages, using the stronger peripheral subchondral bone of the apophyseal ring, to be advantageous in preventing the subsidence and failure of the cage-bone interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron N Alkalay
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Department of Orthopaedics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Robert Adamson
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Department of Orthopaedics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Department of Orthopaedics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang AJ, Huang KT, Smith TR, Lu Y, Chi JH, Groff MW, Zaidi HA. Cervical Spine Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Instrumented Fusion in the Modern Era. World Neurosurg 2018; 120:e562-e572. [PMID: 30165226 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For cases of cervical osteomyelitis that require surgery, concern has continued regarding instrumentation owing to the potential for bacterial seeding of the hardware. We performed a systematic review of the current data. METHODS A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Ovid for articles using the keywords "cervical osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis" and "fusion" or "instrumentation" reported from 1980 to 2017. Prospective or retrospective studies describing ≥2 patients with cervical osteomyelitis were included in the analysis; non-English reports were excluded. Individual patients were excluded from the final analysis if they had previously undergone spinal instrumentation. RESULTS A total of 239 patients from 24 studies met our criteria. Surgical approaches were classified as anterior-only, combined anteroposterior, and posterior-only for 64.8%, 31.9%, and 3.3% of the patients respectively. Of the patients treated using an anterior-only approach, 76.5% had received anterior plating and 85.3%, a cage or spacer implants. Of the patients who had undergone combined approaches, 85.1% underwent circumferential fixation and 14.9%, anterior debridement with posterior instrumentation. The follow-up period ranged from 6 weeks to 11 years (mean, 31.0 months). All the studies reporting the fusion rates, except for 1, reported a 100% fusion rate. The reported rates of pain improvement and neurologic recovery were favorable. The incidence of hardware failure and wound complications was 4.6% and 4.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Despite placing instrumentation during active infection, the rates of hardware failure and wound complications were comparable to those of elective cervical spine procedures. These results suggest that surgical intervention with instrumentation is a safe treatment option for patients with cervical spine osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin T Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John H Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael W Groff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hasan A Zaidi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Klassen PD, Hsu WK, Martens F, Inzana JA, van den Brink WA, Groff MW, Thomé C. Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 10:349-357. [PMID: 29983583 PMCID: PMC6027694 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s164129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lumbar discectomy patients with large annular defects are at a high risk for reherniation and reoperation, which could be mitigated through the use of an annular closure device (ACD). To identify the most effective treatment pathways for this high-risk population, it is critical to understand the clinical outcomes and socioeconomic costs among reoperated patients as well as the utility of ACD for minimizing reoperation risk. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of an ACD. All 550 patients (both ACD treated and control) from the RCT with follow-up data through 2 years were included in this analysis (69 reoperated and 481 non-reoperated). Reoperations were defined as any revision surgery of the index level, regardless of indication. Equivalent U.S. Medicare expenditures for reoperations were estimated through cost multipliers derived from the commercially available PearlDiver database. Results A significantly greater number of control patients (45/278; 16%) compared to ACD patients (24/272; 9%) underwent a revision surgery at the index level within 2 years of followup (p=0.01). At 2 years of follow-up, the reoperated patients had significantly worse Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual analog scale for leg and back pain scores compared to their non-reoperated counterparts (p<0.0001). The total estimated direct medical costs for reoperation were US $952,348 ($13,802 per reoperated patient), with control patients accounting for the majority of this cost burden ($565,188; 59%). Conclusion Post-discectomy reoperation is associated with significantly increased patient morbidity, missed work, and direct treatment costs in a population at high risk for reherniation. Annular closure helped minimize this clinical and socioeconomic burden by reducing the incidence of reoperation by nearly 50% (16% control vs 9% ACD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wellington K Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael W Groff
- Neurosurgical Spine Service, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Review and technical report. OBJECTIVE Intraoperative ultrasound has been used by spine surgeons since the early 1980s. Since that time, more advanced modes of intraoperative imaging and navigation have become widely available. Although the use of ultrasound during spine surgery has fallen out of favor, it remains the only true real-time imaging modality that allows surgeons to visualize soft tissue anatomy instantly and continuously while operating. It is our objective to demonstrate that for this reason, ultrasound is a useful adjunctive technique for spine surgeons, especially when approaching intradural lesions or when addressing pathology in the ventral spinal canal via a posterior approach. METHODS Using PubMed, the existing literature regarding the use of intraoperative ultrasound during spinal surgery was evaluated. Also, surgical case logs were reviewed to identify spinal operations during which intraoperative ultrasound was used. Illustrative cases were selected and reviewed in detail. RESULTS This article provides a brief review of the history of intraoperative ultrasound in spine surgery and describes certain surgical scenarios during which this technique might be useful. Several illustrative cases are provided from our own experience. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should consider the use of intraoperative ultrasound when approaching intradural lesions or when addressing pathology ventral to the thecal sac via a posterior approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viren S. Vasudeva
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Viren S. Vasudeva, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street AB-136, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | - Yuri A. Pompeu
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Karhade
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yi Lu
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vertebral hemangiomas are common tumors that are benign and generally asymptomatic. Occasionally these lesions can exhibit aggressive features such as bony expansion and erosion into the epidural space resulting in neurological symptoms. Surgery is often recommended in these cases, especially if symptoms are severe or rapidly progressive. Some surgeons perform decompression alone, others perform gross-total resection, while others perform en bloc resection. Radiation, embolization, vertebroplasty, and ethanol injection have also been used in combination with surgery. Despite the variety of available treatment options, the optimal management strategy is unclear because aggressive vertebral hemangiomas are uncommon lesions, making it difficult to perform large trials. For this reason, the authors chose instead to report their institutional experience along with a comprehensive review of the literature. METHODS A departmental database was searched for patients with a pathological diagnosis of "hemangioma" between 2008 and 2015. Medical records were reviewed to identify patients with aggressive vertebral hemangiomas, and these cases were reviewed in detail. RESULTS Five patients were identified who underwent surgery for treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas during the specified time period. There were 2 lumbar and 3 thoracic lesions. One patient underwent en bloc spondylectomy, 2 patients had piecemeal gross-total resection, and the remaining 2 had subtotal tumor resection. Intraoperative vertebroplasty was used in 3 cases to augment the anterior column or to obliterate residual tumor. Adjuvant radiation was used in 1 case where there was residual tumor as well. The patient who underwent en bloc spondylectomy experienced several postoperative complications requiring additional medical care and reoperation. At an average follow-up of 31 months (range 3-65 months), no patient had any recurrence of disease and all were clinically asymptomatic, except the patient who underwent en bloc resection who continued to have back pain. CONCLUSIONS Gross-total resection or subtotal resection in combination with vertebroplasty or adjuvant radiation therapy to treat residual tumor seems sufficient in the treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas. En bloc resection appears to provide a similar oncological benefit, but it carries higher morbidity to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John H Chi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael W Groff
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vasudeva VS, Abd-El-Barr MM, Lu Y, Groff MW. Positioning and Safety. Lateral Access Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery 2017:61-66. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28320-3_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
38
|
Karhade AV, Vasudeva VS, Dasenbrock HH, Lu Y, Gormley WB, Groff MW, Chi JH, Smith TR. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2016; 41:E5. [DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.focus16168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to use a large national registry to evaluate the 30-day cumulative incidence and predictors of adverse events, readmissions, and reoperations after surgery for primary and secondary spinal tumors.
METHODS
Data from adult patients who underwent surgery for spinal tumors (2011–2014) were extracted from the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of reoperation, readmission, and major complications (death, neurological, cardiopulmonary, venous thromboembolism [VTE], surgical site infection [SSI], and sepsis). Variables screened included patient age, sex, tumor location, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification, preoperative functional status, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, case urgency, and operative time. Additional variables that were evaluated when analyzing readmission included complications during the surgical hospitalization, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition.
RESULTS
Among the 2207 patients evaluated, 51.4% had extradural tumors, 36.4% had intradural extramedullary tumors, and 12.3% had intramedullary tumors. By spinal level, 20.7% were cervical lesions, 47.4% were thoracic lesions, 29.1% were lumbar lesions, and 2.8% were sacral lesions. Readmission occurred in 10.2% of patients at a median of 18 days (interquartile range [IQR] 12–23 days); the most common reasons for readmission were SSIs (23.7%), systemic infections (17.8%), VTE (12.7%), and CNS complications (11.9%). Predictors of readmission were comorbidities (dyspnea, hypertension, and anemia), disseminated cancer, preoperative steroid use, and an extended hospitalization. Reoperation occurred in 5.3% of patients at a median of 13 days (IQR 8–20 days) postoperatively and was associated with preoperative steroid use and ASA Class 4–5 designation. Major complications occurred in 14.4% of patients: the most common complications and their median time to occurrence were VTE (4.5%) at 9 days (IQR 4–19 days) postoperatively, SSIs (3.6%) at 18 days (IQR 14–25 days), and sepsis (2.9%) at 13 days (IQR 7–21 days). Predictors of major complications included dependent functional status, emergency case status, male sex, comorbidities (dyspnea, bleeding disorders, preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, preoperative leukocytosis), and ASA Class 3–5 designation (p < 0.05). The median hospital LOS was 5 days (IQR 3–9 days), the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3%, and the median time to death was 20 days (IQR 12.5–26 days).
CONCLUSIONS
In this NSQIP analysis, 10.2% of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors were readmitted within 30 days, 5.3% underwent a reoperation, and 14.4% experienced a major complication. The most common complications were SSIs, systemic infections, and VTE, which often occurred late (after discharge from the surgical hospitalization). Patients were primarily readmitted for new complications that developed following discharge rather than exacerbation of complications from the surgical hospital stay. The strongest predictors of adverse events were comorbidities, preoperative steroid use, and higher ASA classification. These models can be used by surgeons to risk-stratify patients preoperatively and identify those who may benefit from increased surveillance following hospital discharge.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECT Large administrative databases have assumed a major role in population-based studies examining health care delivery. Lumbar fusion surgeries specifically have been scrutinized for rising rates coupled with ill-defined indications for fusion such as stenosis and spondylosis. Administrative databases classify cases with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The ICD-9-CM discharge codes are not designated by surgeons, but rather are assigned by trained hospital medical coders. It is unclear how accurately they capture the surgeon's indication for fusion. The authors first sought to compare the ICD-9-CM code(s) assigned by the medical coder according to the surgeon's indication based on a review of the medical chart, and then to elucidate barriers to data fidelity. METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken of all lumbar fusions performed in the Department of Neurosurgery at the authors' institution between August 1, 2011, and August 31, 2013. Based on this review, the indication for fusion in each case was categorized as follows: spondylolisthesis, deformity, tumor, infection, nonpathological fracture, pseudarthrosis, adjacent-level degeneration, stenosis, degenerative disc disease, or disc herniation. These surgeon diagnoses were compared with the primary ICD-9-CM codes that were generated by the medical coders and submitted to administrative databases. A follow-up interview with the hospital's coders and coding manager was undertaken to review causes of error and suggestions for future improvement in data fidelity. RESULTS There were 178 lumbar fusion operations performed in the course of 170 hospital admissions. There were 44 hospitalizations in which fusion was performed for tumor, infection, or nonpathological fracture. Of these, the primary diagnosis matched the surgical indication for fusion in 98% of cases. The remaining 126 hospitalizations were for degenerative diseases, and of these, the primary ICD-9-CM diagnosis matched the surgeon's diagnosis in only 61 (48%) of 126 cases of degenerative disease. When both the primary and all secondary ICD-9-CM diagnoses were considered, the indication for fusion was identified in 100 (79%) of 126 cases. Still, in 21% of hospitalizations, the coder did not identify the surgical diagnosis, which was in fact present in the chart. There are many different causes of coding inaccuracy and data corruption. They include factors related to the quality of documentation by the physicians, coder training and experience, and ICD code ambiguity. CONCLUSIONS Researchers, policymakers, payers, and physicians should note these limitations when reviewing studies in which hospital claims data are used. Advanced domain-specific coder training, increased attention to detail and utilization of ICD-9-CM diagnoses by the surgeon, and improved direction from the surgeon to the coder may augment data fidelity and minimize coding errors. By understanding sources of error, users of these large databases can evaluate their limitations and make more useful decisions based on them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakov Gologorsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abd-El-Barr MM, Bi WL, Bahluyen B, Rodriguez ST, Groff MW, Chi JH. Extensive spinal epidural abscess treated with "apical laminectomies" and irrigation of the epidural space: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 22:318-23. [PMID: 25555055 DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.spine131166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but often devastating infection of the epidural space around the spinal cord. When an SEA is widespread, extensive decompression with laminectomy is often impossible, as it may subject the patient to very long operative times, extensive blood loss, and mechanical instability. A technique called "skip laminectomy" has been described in the literature, in which laminectomies are performed at the rostral and caudal ends of an abscess that spans 3-5 levels and a Fogarty catheter is used to mechanically drain the abscess, much like in an embolectomy. In this report of 2 patients, the authors present a modification of this technique, which they call "apical laminectomies" to allow for irrigation and drainage of an extensive SEA spanning the entire length of the vertebral column (C1-2 to L5-S1). Two patients presented with cervico-thoraco-lumbar SEA. Laminectomies were performed at the natural apices of the spine, namely, at the midcervical, midthoracic, and midlumbar spine levels. Next, a pediatric feeding tube was inserted in the epidural space from the thoracic laminectomies up toward the cervical laminectomy site and down toward the lumbar laminectomy site, and saline antibiotics were used to irrigate the SEA. Both patients underwent this procedure with no adverse effects. Their SEAs resolved both clinically and radiologically. Neither patient suffered from mechanical instability at 1 year after treatment. For patients who present with extensive SEAs, apical laminectomies seem to allow for surgical cure of the infectious burden and do not subject the patient to extended operating room time, an increased risk of blood loss, and the risk of mechanical instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
| | - Biji Bahluyen
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
| | - Samuel T. Rodriguez
- 2Department of Anesthesia, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - John H. Chi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gologorsky Y, Knightly JJ, Chi JH, Groff MW. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:984-93. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.spine131113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
The rates of lumbar spinal fusion operations have increased dramatically over the past 2 decades, and several studies based on administrative databases such as the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) have suggested that the greatest rise is in the general categories of degenerative disc disease and disc herniation, neither of which is a well-accepted indication for lumbar fusion. The administrative databases classify cases with the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The ICD-9-CM discharge codes are not generated by surgeons but rather are assigned by trained hospital medical coders. It is unclear how accurately they capture the surgeon's indication for fusion. The authors sought to compare the ICD-9-CM code(s) assigned by the medical coder to the surgeon's indication based on a review of the medical chart.
Methods
A retrospective review was undertaken of all lumbar fusions performed at our institution by the department of neurosurgery between 8/1/2011 and 8/31/2013. Based on the authors' review, the indication for fusion for each case was categorized as spondylolisthesis, deformity, tumor, infection, nonpathological fracture, pseudarthrosis, adjacent-level degeneration, stenosis, degenerative disc pathology, or disc herniation. These surgeon diagnoses were compared with the primary ICD-9-CM codes that were submitted to administrative databases.
Results
There were 178 lumbar fusion operations performed for 170 hospital admissions. There were 44 hospitalizations in which fusion was performed for tumor, infection, or nonpathological fracture; the remaining 126 were for degenerative diagnoses. For these degenerative cases, the primary ICD-9-CM diagnosis matched the surgeon's diagnosis in only 61 of 126 degenerative cases (48.4%). When both the primary and all secondary ICD-9-CM diagnoses were considered, the indication for fusion was identified in 100 of 126 cases (79.4%).
Conclusions
Characterizing indications for fusion based solely on primary ICD-9-CM codes extracted from large administrative databases does not accurately reflect the surgeon's indication. While these databases may accurately describe national rates of lumbar fusion surgery, the lack of fidelity in the source codes limits their role in accurately identifying indications for surgery. Studying relationships among indications, complications, and outcomes stratified solely by ICD-9-CM codes is not well founded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakov Gologorsky
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - John J. Knightly
- 2Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute, Morristown, New Jersey
| | - John H. Chi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - Michael W. Groff
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abd-El-Barr MM, Strong CI, Groff MW. Chiari malformations: diagnosis, treatments and failures. J Neurosurg Sci 2014; 58:215-221. [PMID: 25418275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Chiari malformations refer to abnormalities of the hindbrain originally described by the Austrian pathologist Hans Chiari in the early 1890s. These malformations range from herniation of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum to complete agenesis of the cerebellum. In this review, we review the different classification schemes of Chiari malformations. We discuss the different signs and symptoms that the two most common malformations present with and diagnostic criteria. We next discuss current treatment paradigms, including the new measure of possible in utero surgery to help decrease the incidence of Chiari type II malformations. There is also a small discussion of treatment failures and salvage procedures in these difficult cases. Chiari malformations are a difficult clinical entity to treat. As more is learned about the genetic and environmental factors relating to their characteristics, it will be interesting if we are able to predict which treatments are better suited for different patients. Similarly, with the evolution of in utero techniques especially for Chiari II malformations, it will be interesting to see if the incidence and practice of treating these difficult patients will change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Abd-El-Barr
- Department of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA -
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dhall SS, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Groff MW, Ghogawala Z, Watters WC, Dailey AT, Resnick DK, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Wang JC, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: correlation between radiographic outcome and function. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:31-6. [PMID: 24980582 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
In an effort to diminish pain or progressive instability, due to either the pathological process or as a result of surgical decompression, one of the primary goals of a fusion procedure is to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Assuming that pain and disability result from lost mechanical integrity of the spine, the objective of a fusion across an unstable segment is to eliminate pathological motion and improve clinical outcome. However, conclusive evidence of this correlation, between successful fusion and clinical outcome, remains elusive, and thus the necessity of documenting successful arthrodesis through radiographic analysis remains debatable. Although a definitive cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, there is moderate evidence that demonstrates a positive association between radiographic presence of fusion and improved clinical outcome. Due to this growing body of literature, it is recommended that strategies intended to enhance the potential for radiographic fusion are considered when performing a lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spine disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay S Dhall
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ghogawala Z, Resnick DK, Watters WC, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Sharan A, Groff MW, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:7-13. [PMID: 24980579 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoher Ghogawala
- Alan and Jacqueline Stuart Spine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ghogawala Z, Whitmore RG, Watters WC, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Groff MW, Wang JC, Resnick DK, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:14-22. [PMID: 24980580 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
A comprehensive economic analysis generally involves the calculation of indirect and direct health costs from a societal perspective as opposed to simply reporting costs from a hospital or payer perspective. Hospital charges for a surgical procedure must be converted to cost data when performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. Once cost data has been calculated, quality-adjusted life year data from a surgical treatment are calculated by using a preference-based health-related quality-of-life instrument such as the EQ-5D. A recent cost-utility analysis from a single study has demonstrated the long-term (over an 8-year time period) benefits of circumferential fusions over stand-alone posterolateral fusions. In addition, economic analysis from a single study has found that lumbar fusion for selected patients with low-back pain can be recommended from an economic perspective. Recent economic analysis, from a single study, finds that femoral ring allograft might be more cost-effective compared with a specific titanium cage when performing an anterior lumbar interbody fusion plus posterolateral fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoher Ghogawala
- Alan and Jacqueline Stuart Spine Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kaiser MG, Eck JC, Groff MW, Watters WC, Dailey AT, Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Sharan A, Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Dhall SS, Ghogawala Z. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:2-6. [PMID: 24980578 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Fusion procedures are an accepted and successful management strategy to alleviate pain and/or neurological symptoms associated with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. In 2005, the first version of the "Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine" was published in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. In an effort to incorporate evidence obtained since the original publication of these guidelines, an expert panel of neurosurgical and orthopedic spine specialists was convened in 2009. Topics reviewed were essentially identical to the original publication. Selected manuscripts from the first iteration of these guidelines as well as relevant publications between 2005 through 2011 were reviewed. Several modifications to the methodology of guideline development were adopted for the current update. In contrast to the 2005 guidelines, a 5-tiered level of evidence strategy was employed, primarily allowing a distinction between lower levels of evidence. The qualitative descriptors (standards/guidelines/options) used in the 2005 recommendations were abandoned and replaced with grades to reflect the strength of medical evidence supporting the recommendation. Recommendations that conflicted with the original publication, if present, were highlighted at the beginning of each chapter. As with the original guideline publication, the intent of this update is to provide a foundation from which an appropriate treatment strategy can be formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sharan A, Groff MW, Dailey AT, Ghogawala Z, Resnick DK, Watters WC, Mummaneni PV, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:102-5. [PMID: 24980592 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is commonly used during lumbar fusion surgery for the prevention of nerve root injury. Justification for its use stems from the belief that IOM can prevent nerve root injury during the placement of pedicle screws. A thorough literature review was conducted to determine if the use of IOM could prevent nerve root injury during the placement of instrumentation in lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. There is no evidence to date that IOM can prevent injury to the nerve roots. There is limited evidence that a threshold below 5 mA from direct stimulation of the screw can indicate a medial pedicle breach by the screw. Unfortunately, once a nerve root injury has taken place, changing the direction of the screw does not alter the outcome. The recommendations formulated in the original guideline effort are neither supported nor refuted with the evidence obtained with the current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alok Sharan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kaiser MG, Groff MW, Watters WC, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Sharan A, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Resnick DK. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:106-32. [PMID: 24980593 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
In an attempt to enhance the potential to achieve a solid arthrodesis and avoid the morbidity of harvesting autologous iliac crest bone (AICB) for a lumbar fusion, numerous alternatives have been investigated. The use of these fusion adjuncts has become routine despite a lack of convincing evidence demonstrating a benefit to justify added costs or potential harm. Potential alternatives to AICB include locally harvested autograft, calcium-phosphate salts, demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and the family of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). In particular, no option has created greater controversy than the BMPs. A significant increase in the number of publications, particularly with respect to the BMPs, has taken place since the release of the original guidelines. Both DBM and the calciumphosphate salts have demonstrated efficacy as a graft extender or as a substitute for AICB when combined with local autograft. The use of recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) as a substitute for AICB, when performing an interbody lumbar fusion, is considered an option since similar outcomes have been observed; however, the potential for heterotopic bone formation is a concern. The use of rhBMP-2, when combined with calcium phosphates, as a substitute for AICB, or as an extender, when used with local autograft or AICB, is also considered an option as similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes have been observed. Surgeons electing to use BMPs should be aware of a growing body of literature demonstrating unique complications associated with the use of BMPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Resnick DK, Watters WC, Sharan A, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Wang JC, Choudhri TF, Eck J, Ghogawala Z, Groff MW, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:54-61. [PMID: 24980586 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Patients presenting with stenosis associated with a spondylolisthesis will often describe signs and symptoms consistent with neurogenic claudication, radiculopathy, and/or low-back pain. The primary objective of surgery, when deemed appropriate, is to decompress the neural elements. As a result of the decompression, the inherent instability associated with the spondylolisthesis may progress and lead to further misalignment that results in pain or recurrence of neurological complaints. Under these circumstances, lumbar fusion is considered appropriate to stabilize the spine and prevent delayed deterioration. Since publication of the original guidelines there have been a significant number of studies published that continue to support the utility of lumbar fusion for patients presenting with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Several recently published trials, including the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, are among the largest prospective randomized investigations of this issue. Despite limitations of study design or execution, these trials have consistently demonstrated superior outcomes when patients undergo surgery, with the majority undergoing some type of lumbar fusion procedure. There is insufficient evidence, however, to recommend a standard approach to achieve a solid arthrodesis. When formulating the most appropriate surgical strategy, it is recommended that an individualized approach be adopted, one that takes into consideration the patient's unique anatomical constraints and desires, as well as surgeon's experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Resnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wang JC, Dailey AT, Mummaneni PV, Ghogawala Z, Resnick DK, Watters WC, Groff MW, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, Sharan A, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21:48-53. [PMID: 24980585 DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.spine14271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Patients suffering from a lumbar herniated disc will typically present with signs and symptoms consistent with radiculopathy. They may also have low-back pain, however, and the source of this pain is less certain, as it may be from the degenerative process that led to the herniation. The surgical alternative of choice remains a lumbar discectomy, but fusions have been performed for both primary and recurrent disc herniations. In the original guidelines, the inclusion of a fusion for routine discectomies was not recommended. This recommendation continues to be supported by more recent evidence. Based on low-level evidence, the incorporation of a lumbar fusion may be considered an option when a herniation is associated with evidence of spinal instability, chronic low-back pain, and/or severe degenerative changes, or if the patient participates in heavy manual labor. For recurrent disc herniations, there is low-level evidence to support the inclusion of lumbar fusion for patients with evidence of instability or chronic low-back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|