Influence sur les résultats des rebonds du PSA après curiethérapie de prostate: étude de 295 cas avec trois ans de suivi

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency of the PSA "bouncing" phenomenon after a significant follow-up in a series of patients treated by permanent implant brachytherapy for a prostate cancer. To look for the clinical and dosimetric parameters possibly linked to this transitory secondary PSA increase. To evaluate in which percentage of cases this bouncing could have mimicked a biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1999, to December 2001, 295 patients were treated by a permanent prostate implantation (real-time technique, with free (125)I seeds- Isoseed Bebig-) by the Institut Curie-Hôpital Cochin-Hôpital Necker Paris group. The mean follow-up is 40.3 months (9-66 months). The PSA level was regularly checked, at least every 6 months. We defined as a "bouncing" all increase in PSA, starting at 0.1 ng/ml, subsequently followed by a spontaneous (without any treatment) decrease, with return to the previous level or lower. We particularly focused on the patients fulfilling the criteria for a biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus (Three successive increases in PSA). A multivariate analysis tried to identify independent factors among the usual clinical and dosimetric parameters.

RESULTS

In our series, 161 patients (55%) showed a transitory PSA increase (bouncing) of at least 0.1 ng/ml; 145 patients (49%) a bouncing of 0.2 ng/ml, 93 patients (32%) a bouncing of 0.4 ng/ml and 43 patients (15%) a bouncing of at least 1 ng/ml. Mean PSA bounce was 0.8 ng/ml (0.1-4.1), and mean time to bounce was 19 months. Thirty-two patients (11% of the total number) presented three successive PSA increases with a significant (3 months) interval between the dosages, and therefore were to be considered as being in biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus criteria. Actually, among those 32 patients, 18 (56%) subsequently showed a complete normalization of their PSA, without any treatment. Ten patients went on increasing their PSA, and were considered to be really in biochemical relapse. For the last 4 patients, the situation still remains ambiguous. In multivariate analysis, age<70 years (P<0.00001) and D90>200 Gy (P<0.003) were identified as independent factors for a PSA bouncing of at least 0.4 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed rate of 32% of patients showing a PSA bouncing of at least 0.4 ng/ml in our series is in good agreement with what has been previously reported in the literature. Age<70 years and D90>200 Gy were found to be independent factors predicting for such a secondary transitory increase in PSA. Interestingly, among 32 patients fulfilling the classical criteria of the ASTRO for a biochemical relapse, 18 (56%) subsequently showed a spontaneous PSA decrease, demonstrating that the ASTRO consensus is not well adapted to the biochemical follow-up of our patients undergoing permanent implant prostate Brachytherapy.

[Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: old concept, new techniques]

Whereas it has been proposed almost one century ago, brachytherapy for prostate cancer has only recently emerged, especially thanks to endorectal echography, allowing to visualize seed implantation, to the development of seeds for permanent delivery and of micro-sources for high-dose rate delivery, and also to the development of three-dimension dosimetry programs allowing real-time implantations. For selected patients with localized prostate cancer (PSA < 10, Gleason < 7, no extracapsular extension, volume < 50-60 g), prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants (iodine 125 or, less frequently, palladium 103) gives results which appear at 10-15 years comparable to those of surgery. Incontinence and impotence rates appear lower than those of classical surgery. However, the first post-implant months are usually accompanied by urinary toxicity that should not be minimized. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) could find its indications, in combination with conformal radiotherapy, in the treatment of more advanced forms, presenting an intermediate risk. It could also be an alternative to brachytherapy with permanent implants for the low-risk forms mentioned above, especially in developing countries where the cost of radioactive seeds slows down the use of this technique. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer should, therefore, find more and more indications, because of the increased incidence of prostate cancer, due to population ageing, of the increased proportion of localized forms, due to better detection, of the patient's request for less toxicity, and of the expecting lowering of the costs, which are now equivalent to those of surgery and should further lower.

PSA bounce after permanent implant prostate brachytherapy may mimic a biochemical failure: A study of 295 patients with a minimum 3-year followup

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency and features of the PSA bounce phenomenon in a series of patients treated with permanent implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer, and to evaluate the percentage of cases in which this bounce could have mimicked a biochemical relapse according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus criteria.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1999 to December 2001, 295 patients were treated with a permanent prostate implantation (real-time technique, with free (125)I seeds) by the Paris Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin/Hospital Necker Paris group. Duration of followup is 40.3 months (9-66 months). PSA level was reported at intervals not exceeding 6 months. Bounce was defined by temporary elevation in PSA level, followed by a spontaneous decrease.

RESULTS

In our series, 161 patients (55%) showed a transitory PSA increase (bounce) of at least 0.1 ng/mL; 145 patients (49%) a bounce of 0.2 ng/mL; 93 patients (32%) a bounce of 0.4 ng/mL; and 43 patients (15%) a bounce of at least 1 ng/mL. Mean PSA bounce was 0.8 ng/mL (0.1-4.1), and mean time to bounce was 19 months. Thirty-two patients (11% of total) presented three successive PSA increases, and therefore were to be considered as experiencing a biochemical relapse according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria. Among those 32 patients, 18 (56%) subsequently showed, without any treatment, a complete normalization of their PSA. In multivariate analysis, age <70 (p<0.0001) and D90>200Gy (p<0.003) were identified as independent factors for a PSA bounce of at least 0.4 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed rate of 32% of patients showing a PSA bounce of at least 0.4 ng/mL in our series is in good agreement with what has been previously reported in the literature. Among 32 patients fulfilling the classical ASTRO criteria for a biochemical relapse, 18 (56%) subsequently showed a spontaneous PSA decrease, questioning the ASTRO consensus for the biochemical followup of patients undergoing permanent implant prostate brachytherapy.